Calistoga plans ‘Lights Out’ Saturday
By JOHN WATERS Jr.
Weekly Calistogan
With the annual observations of Earth Day just around the corner, two events are being planned to get Calistoga involved in a push toward planet sustainability.
Today Calistoga will go dark for an hour during “Lights Out Calistoga,” sponsored by the Calistoga Chamber of Commerce. Between 8 and 9 p.m., Calistoga residents will join millions of people worldwide to turn off all non-essential lights for one hour to reduce energy consumption and raise global awareness about the need for action on global warming.
“It’s a fun, simple event, and the restaurants loved the idea of hosting candlelight dinners to make it special,” said Eden Umble, Calistoga Chamber of Commerce special events coordinator.
The candlelight dinners are a simple — and romantic — way to save energy.
The hour-long blackout is called Earth Hour. It’s a global event that started as a local event in Sydney, Australia, last year, and a similar event was conducted in October with “Lights Out San Francisco.”
According to the www.light soutamerica.org Web site, some of the world’s major cities, including Copenhagen, Toronto, Chicago, Melbourne, Brisbane and Tel Aviv will unite and switch off for Earth Hour.
The city of Napa is not among them, but some locals will be participating. In a letter to the Register earlier this week, Silverado Middle School student Niko Baila asked, “Wouldn’t it be amazing if all of Napa just turned all of their lights off? It would even be better if the whole world turned off all their lights. I think it would be terrific if astronauts in outer space were performing an experiment, and when they looked at their earth, it just disappeared right in front of their eyes.”
Earth Day
Organizers are uniting to make this year’s Earth Day observation something special in Calistoga. Tony Albright of Albright Printing, Lydia Ruiz of Resource Green and event coordinator Kate Stanley are organizing an Earth Day Celebration on April 26, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Myrtle Street, opposite the Calistoga Library.
Calistoga’s Earth Day will include tastes of organically grown food, information on green living and energy conservation, children’s activities, music and a trash clean-up, according to Ruiz, who broke the news to the Calistoga City Council on Tuesday.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
common sense wrote on Mar 29, 2008 8:34 AM:
fmmt47 wrote on Mar 29, 2008 9:51 AM:
mofosheee wrote on Mar 29, 2008 10:46 AM:
funnyme wrote on Mar 29, 2008 10:58 AM:
We are with you common sense! "
common sense wrote on Mar 29, 2008 11:15 AM:
common sense wrote on Mar 29, 2008 11:20 AM:
aszmidt wrote on Mar 29, 2008 12:07 PM:
The brown shirt conservatives would have us believe that there is no problem. That man has no effect on the earth. We can not make a difference with individual efforts. To them, I say, “shame on you”. Only man would be so arrogant as to assume that his actions have no effect. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. It was individual efforts and sacrifice by our forefathers, who were uber environmentalists, which helped create this great nation. We do effect our environment. We can make a difference. "
aszmidt wrote on Mar 29, 2008 12:09 PM:
What about the world as a whole? Can you say Chernobyl? "
mofosheee wrote on Mar 29, 2008 2:00 PM:
diehard4ever wrote on Mar 29, 2008 2:39 PM:
common sense wrote on Mar 29, 2008 3:01 PM:
Nuclear power is 8-10 cents/kw-hour, solar is 20 cents/kw-hour...and solar cells are expensive and energy-consuming to produce. A recent study at UC Berkeley(!) found that, economically, there are much better ways to produce energy and help the environment than solar power. In a nutshell, the study said that our current investment in solar is a waste of money, and better results could be had. Despite the huge benefits of nuclear, we're not building any new nuclear plants in California. Meanwhile, liberal France gets ~80% of their power from nuclear. Something doesn't add up.
I certainly don't oppose energy efficiency. I'm all for it. I don't oppose protecting the environment...I'm just demanding that we do it with democracy and capitalism, not socialism and tyranny. There is a negative cost when people's businesses go under in the name of saving the planet, when it really isn't saving anything.
I'm highly opposed to bad science like global warming and the political hype that accompanies it. As I stated before, environmentalism is the new socialism. Global warming is the new guilt and fear tactic.
My lights STAY ON in scientific dissent. Anyone else want to join me? "
aszmidt wrote on Mar 29, 2008 8:18 PM:
By all means, educate me. I really want to understand.
As far as Nuclear power goes, as long as there is the most remote chance that a 30 kilometer area would become unihabitable for many lifetimes or that some 4000 citizens could die from cancer as a result of an 'accident', No thank you. Also, does your cost of production for Nuclear power include the cost of remediating the toxic waste? Currently the DOE recognizes 108 sites across the country where they 'Hope' to clean up or mitigate the waste by 2025. How about the 31 million pounds of nuclear waste in just the Fernald Ohio facility? How many billions of dollars will be needed to complete the cleanup of just that one site? "
common sense wrote on Mar 29, 2008 8:26 PM:
Kevin wrote on Mar 29, 2008 9:02 PM:
matt@newspeak wrote on Mar 29, 2008 9:23 PM:
As for us, I thought it was very cool to see all our neighbor's lights here in Am Can go down at 8:00 and come back up after 9:00. My wife and I lit a bunch a candles and are enjoying our very peaceful and romantic evening to much to start turning the lights back on just yet- and we're knocking a bit off the PG&E bill to boot.
Good idea "Earth Hour"
"
justnana wrote on Mar 30, 2008 12:02 AM:
glenroy wrote on Mar 30, 2008 9:54 AM:
"
glenroy wrote on Mar 30, 2008 11:01 AM:
How is it the US Navy has sailed the worlds seas for decades without a nuclear meltdown, lost ship?
Why would the Navy continue to build nuclear ships that don’t work?
Why is France generating 80+ of their electricity with nuclear power?
Why did China recently hired Babcox and Wilcox to build the worlds largest nuclear plant?
Since 3 Mile Island why has the rest of the world built over 100 nuclear power plants?
How much green house gases does a nuclear power plant release in a year?
It has nothing to do with safety...it’s a political farce...
The fact is...if we had not stopped building nuclear power plants domestically our green house gas release would be 20% less, our dependence on foreign oil would be half what it is, and if Clinton had not threatened to veto the bipartisan ANWAR recovery program in 1996 our dependence would be at least 70% less. Our world would be cleaner and safer....wow. For the ‘lights out’ crowd do the math...if we can cut our dependence of fossil fuel for electrical power 100% we can save...maybe a part per billion, no more than one part per half billion for sure... in the vast atmosphere...boy that will have an impact about like spitting in the SF Bay causing a flood. You’all need to get real...chill...avoid Gore the clueless wonder.
The rest the world uses American technology for nuclear power plants and drilling in environmentally sensitive areas....if we don’t soon we’ll all start looking and smelling the same.
"
jeepracer10 wrote on Apr 5, 2008 3:11 PM:
common sense wrote on Apr 12, 2008 6:45 AM: