NVR Logo
Thompson Reflects on Middle East
Congressman Mike Thompson met with the media at the Veterans Home of California in Yountvillle on Thursday morning. J.L. Sousa/Register | Buy photos
Congressman discusses ’02 Iraq visit, recent fact-finding mission
Friday, March 28, 2008
Save and Share Share
Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, met the Napa press Thursday, a week after his visit to the Middle East and just one day after allegations surfaced that Saddam Hussein’s regime financed Thompson’s controversial 2002 trip to Iraq.

The press conference, held at the Veterans Home of California in Yountville, coincided with a planned Thompson visit to award a Purple Heart and Bronze Star to a Napa veteran.
But one day earlier, federal prosecutors charged Iraqi-American Muthanna Al-Hanooti, a charity official in Detroit and allegedly an agent for Saddam’s intelligence service, with organizing the 2002 trip to Iraq for Thompson and two other U.S. lawmakers.

Thompson returned from the trip — which took place months before the U.S. authorized military action against Iraq — facing harsh criticism from conservative circles for his anti-war sentiments and his call for a diplomatic solution to Iraqi-U.S. tensions.
Neither Thompson nor the lawmakers who accompanied him have been charged with wrongdoing, nor has anyone suggested they knew about the Saddam regime’s involvement in the trip’s funding.

Thompson said Thursday the trip was approved by the State Department, and that the charity with which Al-Hanooti worked was “well respected” and “operated lawfully and ethically.”
“My staff vetted the charity the best we could,” he said, noting that it “appeared to be on the up and up.”

About two years ago, one of the lawmakers who accompanied him on the trip, Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., suggested that Al-Hanooti was under investigation, he said, but no further details were provided.

When the indictment was released Wednesday, Thompson said he was “interested, not surprised.”

Had he known Saddam was tied to funding for the trip, he would not have gone, Thompson said.

Regardless, Thompson said he is confident visiting Iraq was the right move with the United States on the verge of deploying troops overseas.

“We were about to vote on a war that very few members of Congress knew much about,” he said.

“I knew that this would not be my last vote” on the war, he said, stressing the importance of observing the situation firsthand.

When Thompson returned, he expressed his objection to the war and said U.S. troops would be challenged by unfamiliar insurgent tactics and desert conditions.

“I was right, unfortunately,” added Thompson. “Everything I feared would happen … has come to fruition.”

Thompson said he does not feel as if he was tricked by Saddam’s regime to make the trip.

“The people that were tricked, or the people that were duped, are the people that believe this president,” he said.

From Jordan to Napa Pipe

Last week, Thompson visited the Middle East again as part of a fact-finding trip for his post on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Traveling to Dubai, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, he evaluated America’s intelligence operations overseas.

Commending the “good people over there doing great work,” Thompson emphasized intelligence must be collected without creating additional enemies.

Thompson said one experience during last week’s visit reminded him of his 2002 journey, he said.

Thompson flew into Jordan on his way to Baghdad in 2002, where he said he met a group of Jordanian businessmen worried about the effects an American invasion of Iraq might have on neighboring countries.

Last week, in Jordan once again, he said, “I couldn’t help thinking … ‘All of this has come to fruition.’”

“There are a tremendous number of (Iraqi) refugees” in Jordan who are “taxing their resources,” he said.

Jordanians, said Thompson, refer to refugees as “guests,” suggesting the country’s hope that they will return to Iraq.

“They are not going to be able to go ‘home’ home,” said Thompson. “They may be able to return to Iraq … (but) it is going to be a new day there.”

Thompson also discussed the upcoming presidential election, calling the likelihood of a Democrat occupying the White House in 2009 “not an ‘if’ but a ‘when.’”

Thompson announced in January that he is backing Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., as the Democratic candidate.

But in the California Primary, Thompson’s district showed more support for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

Thompson said he will not change his endorsement. But as a Democratic Party superdelegate, it is unclear whether Thompson will side with the majority of voters or cast his superdelegate vote for Clinton.

“That question is premature,” he said. “Ask me before the convention.”

Thompson notes that the First Congressional District— which includes Napa — is closely divided on the two Democratic candidates. Obama won in the First District with 47.2 percent of the vote, compared with Clinton’s 44.9 percent.

“We have two great candidates,” he said.

Thompson played down the concern over the role superdelegates will play with the tight race for electoral votes.

“I don’t think the superdelegate situation is as big a deal as the Napa Register blog (commentators) think it is. I don’t think superdelegates … are going to go into some back room to decide who the next president is going to be.”

Thompson said there is also a possibility that he will not cast a superdelegate vote at all.

Thompson said he is not taking a position on Napa County’s Measure N or the proposed Napa Pipe project.

As for his upcoming run for re-election, Thompson stressed the importance of seniority in Congress.

“The longer you’re there, the more things you can do for your district,” he said. Thompson faces three challengers, Democrat Mitch Clogg of the Mendocino Coast and Republicans Doug Pharr, a former Napa County prosecutor and Zane Starkewolf of Davis.

“I hope I’ve done a job worthy enough for reelection,” he said. “I have no desire to do anything else.”
43 comment(s)

napanabroad wrote on Mar 28, 2008 6:10 AM:

" Oh My Mr. Thompson, either you are naive, uneducated in Middle Eastern tactics or complicit.

As a ranking member on the Intelligence committee all are unacceptable. Having lived and worked there, EVERYTHING with political implications in the Middle East for the Western audience are scripted. He should know this.

I find it utterly disturbing and inexcusable that Mr. Thompson, in his position, didn't know who Mr. Hanooti was or the fact that Mr. Hanooti was the former Michigan director of CAIR, the largest lobby group of its kind in the US (founded by HAMAS and openly known as having TERRORIST ties and convicted members).

To learn more on this story, see photos and find out who Mr. Hanooti is, google the investigative project by Steve Emerson, who has this as his feature story. "

MarkMathews wrote on Mar 28, 2008 6:42 AM:

" Mr. Thompson, since you were given a kid glove treatment by the Napa press, I presume at least ONE of your staffers will read this question from a consituent. What does the congressman think about his chosen candidates' recent lie/misspeak? Just curious... ;o) "

anotherguyinnapa wrote on Mar 28, 2008 8:10 AM:

" "'That question is premature,' he said. 'Ask me before the convention.'"
So, he's saying he's leaving open the possibility of voting for Obama. A move in the right direction if he wants to get re-elected in this district, where more people voted for Obama.
I'd still like to see an article about what Mitch Clogg, Doug Pharr and Zane Starkewolf are all about.
"The longer you’re there, the more things you can do for your district." Well, how about doing something for his district? A good start would be to get more federal money spent in the district. I have no doubt that more money goes out in the form of taxes than comes back in the form of spending. The Feds get about twice as much revenue from California as they spend in California. Our roads are falling apart, and we've got a flood project that's moving along at government speed. The money to fix both of these problems is chump change for the Feds. We could fix those problems and more if taxes collected from California were spent in California. Sure, a lot of that money is being wasted in Iraq and Thompson has been right on Iraq all along. But there's a lot more that can be spent here in Northern California. And don't spend it on rewarding the people who made bad decisions in the real estate market. The people want *low* housing prices. If you let the bottom drop out of the housing market, home ownership will increase and you will get more votes!
Get to work, Mike! "

kevin wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:01 AM:

" How pathetic. The man carries water for Saddam, bad mouths his own country from foreign shores, doesn't even know he is being duped by Saddam and now doesn't believe it should be any cause for concern. Our troops have persevered and successfully completed all the goals they were assigned under Congress's Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq. Mike may have a different opinion, but I think they have done a great job; there have been no more domestic terrorist attacks, Saddam has been removed from power and Iraq is no longer a threat to the US or the stability of the Middle East. Mike may be correct on one thing; his expertise at bootlicking for the wealthy winery elite may well get him re-elected. So much for the spirit of "change"... "

Common Sense wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:11 AM:

" Thompson's actions are a disgrace. A Congressman needs to check his sources of funding. As a veteran, I'm highly offended that our elected official vacationed on the enemy's dime at a time when we were considering putting our troops lives on the line. "

Jay Jacobson wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:25 AM:

" I see the Bush apologists are alive and well. How was Sen. Thompson supposed to know about Saddam's secret funding of a Detroit charity if the entire Bush administration didn't know about Saddam's military preparedness and the supposed weapons of mass destruction? Or, because it was a visit approved by our state department, could it be that our government was lying to our elected officials the same way it has been lying to the people. "

Hear Ye wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:59 AM:

" Good for Thompson. It's nice to see that at least some people didn't drink the Bush kool-aid. It worries me seeing delusional people speak of Iraq as some huge success. However, once the fear mongering Bush and his minions leave office, we can focus on getting people back in touch with reality. "

101napa4gen wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:14 AM:

" Mike, one thing for sure, you will NOT get 2 votes, mine and the person opposing you !!! You will not even support the voting mojority in your district. Maybe I also supported Hillary but must go with friends and neighbors GO Obama "

jakeass wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:19 AM:

" "Well respected." Like you're "Well respected," Mike. Detroit is a Suni stronghold in the U.S., thanks to Facist forefather Henry Ford. And Detroit is just where they belong. No offense, Detroit, but you are the murder capital of our nation. Maybe we should grant Detroit it's independance, like Kosovo. We could call it: "Kosovo in the Heartland." We could relocate the United Nations building to downtown Detroit. "

xmrs09 wrote on Mar 28, 2008 11:51 AM:

" hey, anotherguyinnapa, here's an idea: why don't you run for congress and, if elected, see how much money you can bring home to "your" district? Mike Thompson is an honorable, hard-working man who reaches across the aisle to work with members of the GOP to get things done. I'm willing to bet that he's done more for this district in his tenure than all the others before him together. He understands the system and knows what it takes to accomplish things. Do some research...real research...and you will see what I mean. I, too, voted for Hilary in the primary but I can understand Thompson's thoughtful reconsideration, given that the next president is one he will have to work with for at least four years. You don't get things done by digging your heels in and sticking by the 'good 'ole boys.' it takes common sense and compromise, something most of the bloggers here seem to lack. "

Oldegold4 wrote on Mar 28, 2008 12:17 PM:

" How pathetic indeed to suggest that Mke Thompson "carried water for Saddam, and bad mouthed the US from foreign soil".

You facts sir, appear right out of Carl Rove's handbook and are about as accurate as your assessment of present conditions in Irag where today all hell has, not unexpectedly, broken out again.

Your words sir, suggest not only that Rep. Thompson is unpatriotic, but also guilty of treasonist actions against his country. I suspect you are actually aware but choose to ignor his long and dedicated service to America which includes combat in Vietnam. You should be ashamed. "

jwk wrote on Mar 28, 2008 12:29 PM:

" Thus Earning the nickname "Bagdad Mike". This congressman would do anything to attack and dis the current administration like most others in his party. He wanted and still wants us to lose the war on terror, so don't think for a minute he didn't know who was supporting and financing his cause.. "

jwk wrote on Mar 28, 2008 12:36 PM:

" Well put Kevin!! Hear ye and Jay Jacobson definitely have the "Bush derangement syndrome"!! Furthermore, Just serving in Vietnam dosen't make you wise or worthy of any elected position on it's own merits. If so, then I guess we should all Vote for "John McCain"?? "

funnyme wrote on Mar 28, 2008 2:33 PM:

" You know when a song gets stuck in your mind and you just can't get it out. Maybe some of you can help me...This word just keeps circling my head:
TREASON, sedition mean disloyalty or treachery to one's country or its government.
TREASON is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's government.
"

Hear Ye wrote on Mar 28, 2008 2:54 PM:

" Funny how if you don't agree with the Bush administration and speak out about it that you're now considered unpatriotic. Hilarious zingers like "Bush Derangement syndrome" are made up terms by the wacky right who are tired of having to search for what Bush says their defense should be to basic truths that are thrown their way. The real derangement is the people who feel the need to defend every little move of the current administration. I'm not a huge fan of Thompson but these comments are blowing the whole thing out of proportion. It's as if some people haven't even read the article or done some back reading of the original trip. sad really. "

JimClark wrote on Mar 28, 2008 3:21 PM:

" Since when did Representative Thompson become a Senator? "

jimtub wrote on Mar 28, 2008 4:50 PM:

" Listen, I can partially excuse Mr. Thompson and his cohorts for being unaware of the charity's ties to Hussein's regime. I'll sort of give them that based on the US having no clue until recently this guy was so connected. What I do NOT excuse is Thompson labelling anyone a dupe for believing President Bush. How do you justify such statements when this investigation revealed Hussein specifically chose these 3 lawmakers due to the high likelihood they would be sympathetic to avoiding war? If he so easily duped Mr. Thompson to actually come over on his dime, should we ignore the possibility he just MIGHT have orchestrated things to look as though there was no need to take military action? Maybe, just maybe, he swept a few things under the sand. Sure, Mr. Thompson foresaw the conditions in Jordan, but that could have been predicted by anyone paying attention to the political/geographic conditions. I also find the Register reporter's lukewarm questions and the piece itself to be nothing but a chance for Mr. Thompson to deflect this issue as well as to muster support for his chosen Democrat candidate. Bad form, Register. For a front page by-line, your reporter looked like a Journalism 101 student. "

Boomer wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:36 PM:

" "funnyme's" characterization of Rep. Thompson's trip to Baghdad as treasonous is outrageous and should be roundly condemned by all who read his words. To accuse anyone of such crime is serious stuff and I believe the "Register" was remiss in printing such a scandalous blog without demanding of the writer some proof that Thompson's trip was undertaken with the intent of doing harm to the United States instead of an opportunity for our Representative to get a better informed sense of what an invasion of Iraq might entail.

Thompson's military background uniquely qualified him to assess what dangers might lie in an invasion of Iraq, and his judgment that it would be a perilous undertaking to be prosecuted only as a last resort has proven prophetic. "

napanabroad wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:47 PM:

" Hear Ye, what part about traveling with a person who is the regional head of a group numerous Repubs and Democrats have stated are linked intimately to TERRORISTS don't you find upsetting.
The Iraq war was not the folly; the folly came in believing we can extend democracy into countries that believe theologically in gender, racial and religious apartheid. Attempt democracy in Saudi tomorrow and see how well it works. Was the confederacy a democracy, would it have been a functioning democracy for African Americans/women?
I wonder what would have happened to America if the antiwar/hate America first crowd had been prevalent when America fought its first terrorist war in 1800 in that part of the world. This spawned Jefferson’s famous "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute".
Would the antiwar crowd have said “give peace a chance” and would Mr. Thompson have gone to Algiers to see the plight of the people (minus the hidden European/American slaves)? (Good historically relevant story every official and American should learn from both politically and militarily).
In all seriousness, this should be a huge eye opener for everyone involved. Instead of arguing about this, we should be questioning how do we stop it and how many more anti-American personnel are in America, what are their objectives and why do they have unfettered access to our top officials? Especially why are the very people who should be in the know getting duped…….unacceptable.
Why not have a federal inquiry into Mr. Hanooti and all the groups he is acquainted with? What will you find? Mr. Thompson, you up to protecting America? Or is this another Bush conspiracy?
"

Doug Pharr wrote on Mar 28, 2008 6:05 PM:

" Mike Thompson allowed himself to be used as a propaganda tool for Saddam Hussein. That showed poor judgment.

Mike Thompson continues to show poor judgment on national security. He is one of the House Democrats that recently placed us all at risk by refusing to authorize continued surveillance of electronic communications entering the U.S. Packages, mail and people can all be searched without a warrant when they cross the border, but Thompson thinks electronic communcations should treated differently. He rejected the bipartisan solution worked out in the Senate. Since mid-February, that surveillance has been turned off by Nancy Pelosi, Mike Thompson and others. The Conservative Blue Dog Democrats asked Nancy Pelosi to accept the Senate version but she refused. Mike Thompson didn't even join in the request. He followed Pelosi's lead the entire way.

Mike Thompson votes Democratic Party Line 96.6% of the time.

Mike Thompson does not reach accross the aisle. He has refused to sign a pledge to do so offered by Divided We Fail.org.

For such a "powerful" Congressman, Mike Thompson has brought relatively very little federal money to this District. Yet he still has a very low rating from Taxpayer for Common Sense.

Mike Thompson may be a nice guy, (I don't know him) but he has done very little for this Congressional District. He claims to be a conservative Democrat here at home, but in DC he consistenly follows the lead of far left liberals. That is exactly how he ended up in Bagdad as propaganda tool for Saddan Hussein.

It is time for somebody new.

Doug Pharr
"

funnyme wrote on Mar 28, 2008 6:49 PM:

" Jim Clark, that is a very clever question.
He hasn't, but what IF Mr. Thompson WOULD LIKE to be a senator; I wonder what would Ms. B. Boxer and Ms. D. Feinstein do once they suspect that Mr. Thompson is after one of their seats...Hmmm...Would they support a fellow Demoncat or would they dig some laundry out to stop him from going after their seats?
"

zanestarkewolf wrote on Mar 28, 2008 7:12 PM:

" Mike Thompson has the nerve to defend his actions. Mr. Thompson has the audacity to claim that a paid trip to spy against America was justified. He shook hands with Saddam Hussein; a man who no one should deny is a mass murderer and a criminal. Regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with the war in Iraq, Mike Thompson’s actions are inexcusable. Mike Thompson owes the people of the 1st Congressional District an apology. "

glenroy wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:23 PM:

"
I think it’s safe to say after reading the posts herein that Mr. Thompson has, as they say in the good old south, ‘more than a little problem’...he still served his country in Vietnam even through many of his supporters found other ways to display their patriotism...like extended stays in Canada or in Bill Clinton’s case going to Moscow and protesting against American aid to South Vietnam.

Mr. Thompson is by no means is our only elected representative who is completely naive to the ways of radical Islamists, you can count on one hand those that are not, but as the saying goes ‘ignorance is no excuse before the law.’

Give him credit for standing up and taking his medicine you can’t say that about any other leading Democrat...Mr. Thompson deserves at least that much credit, however trivial.


"

zanchin wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:51 PM:

" The article states Congressman Thompson's trip was approved by the State Department. Since President Bush's State Department was tasked with approving this trip, and they did, if anyone was duped, it was the executive branch. The executive is capable of outing a covert C.I.A agent, but incapable of determining the source of funding for a trip they approved. No surprise there. "

napanabroad wrote on Mar 29, 2008 3:58 AM:

" Zanchin,

There in lies the problem, this is an issue that is not unique to Mr. Thompson, Mr. Bush, the CIA, FBI, the Pentagon, or a boat load of others in DC.

Washington, as well as our universities HAVE been targeted by foreign governments/groups to propagandize our entire system, our politicians, media, our society. These groups have been here since the 1980's and now have extensive US arms (CAIR has 25 state offices).

These people control who is on the lecture scene, who gets funding and who controls the messages coming from the region.

For anyone willing to scratch the surface, all you have to do is look at the Holy Land trial (Aug 2007), where 300 foreign based groups were named as uninditected conspiritors, including this mans groups.

It is time we stopped pretending and making fantasy based policy. And no, sitting down with Iran et. al isn't the solution. Coming from a strong position with a stern, unwavering and intellectually enlightened approach is what will get results.

Choose to continue on blindly and we find ourselves where France, the UK and the rest of Europe is now, with a loss of freedoms, riots, and constant security threats. You choose. "

funnyme wrote on Mar 29, 2008 8:48 AM:

" Mr. Dough Pharr, thank you. Now I can replace "that" AWFUL word with Propaganda Tool for Saddam Hussein.
Propaganda: The activity of spreading particular ideas, opinions etc., according to an organized plan, by a government.

And I agree with you, it's time for somebody new.
Is it you? If so, let us get to know you more. Thus far, I like what I see.
"

glenroy wrote on Mar 29, 2008 6:03 PM:

" napanabroad...you’re both accurate and way over this head...or her head...way over. Posts like the one you commented on are made by people who are incapable of independent thought, you know memory over and above comprehension... we’ve all worked with them and yet it has nothing to do with intelligence...it’s a complete lack of common sense it what it is. But like you said...it’s coming sooner or later but it’s coming. "

glenroy wrote on Mar 29, 2008 6:05 PM:

" Jim you always asked such difficult questions...of course never...
"

russ wrote on Mar 29, 2008 7:41 PM:

" It is time for Mike Thompson to go. He has piled up too much liberal baggage and owes too many debts to such as Hillary Clinton. He is a Pelosi tag-along demonstrating that his head is in broken Washington DC. I am beginning to notice Doug Pharr. "

109823 wrote on Mar 30, 2008 10:41 AM:

" No way, a politician that's accepting a financed trip from Sadaam for propaganda purposes. The next thing they'll be telling us is the wineries are padding Thompsons wallet to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to the illegal immigrants. This is absurd!! Although he does live in St. Helena..... "

zanchin wrote on Mar 30, 2008 6:54 PM:

" napanabroad
You're right--It is time we stopped pretending and making fantasy based policy. That's a very concise discription of the current administration. Well put. "

napanabroad wrote on Mar 31, 2008 2:43 PM:

" Zanchin,

Fight about taxes, the economy, education, but the safety of the American people and upholding the Constitution of the United States is an absolute and unquestionably a non-partisan issue.

As much as I deplore the current administration's policies with the ME, especially Condi Rice (who is so desperate to leave a positive mark she is willing to help get any deal signed), the Democrats absolutely scare the living daylights out of me. They can't even breathe the word Jihadist, let alone take a tough stance. If you can't name your enemy, how can you ever hope to win?

But, fortunately, some in Congress understand this is an issue as Frank Wolf (R-VA) pointed out in his letter to Georgetown (who teach most of the US Foreign Service) last month questioning the uses of a $20M gift from a Saudi prince. Aptly stating Saudi Arabia only represents 1% of the faith, but funds 90% of the mosques and Madrassas throughout the world (that is where your $4.00 gas goes). This was after giving $20M to Harvard.

Glenroy,

unfortunately it is coming and it isn't the fault of Iraq or the "War on Terror". These countries have been moving backwards since the French and English pulled out in the 60's.

Compare Algiers/Beirut to Paris/London in 1960, compare them today. These societies are rapidly moving backwards in their openness, even though 50% are under 25.

We are not helping the fact either by being paralyzed by the PC/Multiculti virus of the One World Utopia, where everyone is the same and only "differences" exist.

See how allowing in a stream of foreign actors has worked for Lebanon and now Europe. No, it is time to ask hard questions? "

common sense wrote on Mar 31, 2008 6:10 PM:

" Thompson is either a traitor or incompetent. Take your pick...either way, he should not be in office. "

doug pharr wrote on Mar 31, 2008 9:58 PM:

" His trip seemed to have a high cost right here at home, too. His trip was in 2002, right?

Since 2002 federal funding for our flood project has been slashed to 30% of what was requested. I don't know, but it seems like there might be a connection.

I expect a savvy politician would have figured out there was a downside to that trip. So much for our powerful, relatively conservative congress member working with the GOP to help us locally. That fairy tale just won't fly any more.

I may be wrong, but it looks to me like our flood project was derailed when Thompson burned up all his political capitol on a trip that was paid for by Saddam Hussein.

I suppose if Barrack Obama is elected Thompson might do better. Oh, but that's right, he is supporting Hillary Clinton. I think Mike Thompson's "experience" in Washington is more of a liability than an asset to our community.

Doug Pharr "

nightwatchman wrote on Apr 1, 2008 10:54 AM:

" It's not very becoming of a candidate for Congress to not know how to spell the name of the president he'd likely be working with. I'm sure President Obama would give lots of money for the flood project to someone like that. I'd say Thompson's done pretty well getting us what he has considering Bush doesn't like to spend money on anything that doesn't involve killing people. "

Doug Pharr wrote on Apr 1, 2008 5:03 PM:

" No disrespect was intended, but you are correct, I did misspell his name in my post. Actually, it may have been my spell checker that made an out-correction, but I am certainly responsible for it nonetheless. From now on, I will refer to him as Senator Obama.

Your other remarks make fine rhetoric, but they are unsupported by facts and can’t be taken too seriously.

Doug Pharr
"

zanchin wrote on Apr 1, 2008 7:19 PM:

" napanabroad,
your deploring the current administrations policies in the Middle East is quite understandable. As far as taking a tough stance. That's not enough. Part of that equation has to be a smart stance. It helps quite a bit if you’re taking the fight to the right country. Now our country is up to it’s eyeballs in debt. And even less secure with communist China holding more and more of our debt . What has the president asked of the country? Go shopping! Only the military and their loved ones have had to pay a price for this greatest blunder. Oh yeah, and the future generations that are getting the bill for this mess. Say what you will about Congressman Thompson but his assessment of what would happen was quite accurate --and he‘s never outed a covert CIA agent. If your looking for four more years of the policies you deplore your choice is clear. "

napanabroad wrote on Apr 2, 2008 1:51 PM:

" Zanchin,

What would a smart stance exactly entail in your eyes?

The problem with Mr. Thompson's analysis is that he was right for the wrong reasons. He claims he was right because he doubted our soldiers ability to adapt to the desert and to tactics by the enemy. The reality of it is that he was right because we fight not to win.

Our politicians won't allow our soldiers to go after certain people or go into certain areas because of the political ramifications. Look at Sadr, who wants nothing more than Taliban style rule, guess what, he will get it if we don't take a hard stance with these guys and the people who fund them NO MATTER WHO THEY ARE!

We will not be successful because our guys are fighting with two hands tied behind their backs.

Mr. Thompson wasn't right because our men and women don't have the ability to win, he was right because it is politicians like him who fight the wars now against enemys and governments that don't carry his type of baggage. "

napanabroad wrote on Apr 2, 2008 2:21 PM:

" Zanchin,

I assume you are talking about war with China as being the war with the right country.

China is as invested in our prosperity as anyone in the world, because going to war with us either politically, economically or militarily means that mountain of currency they are sitting on takes a dive, and tanks their currency as well.

No, the real enemy is Saudi (the public), Iran, N. Korea and Venezuela. Countries that have an ideology that is the polar opposite to ours and their power is directl[y link to weakness of the US. "

skeptic wrote on Apr 2, 2008 5:32 PM:

" "mike's too conservative , mikes too liberal". this is what you get as criticism when someone is moderate . that's why a majority of us, republicans and democrats, keep voting for him. if the state department o.k.d it how could he have done an even better job vetting the funding than them? if everyone had listened to mike and others who actually cared enough to visit iraq there would be 4000 soldiers alive today . where were all the people who now talk about sadam back when rumsfeld was meeting with him and selling the poison gas to him? did they complain that we took his side in a war with iran? or that we, as usual, sold arms to both sides? i also love the "not enough pork for us yet" comments. isin't it supposed to be state gas taxes that mainly pay for our roads? then let us ask our state elected officials about the atrocious conditions. mike is part of the federal government and any increse in that budget means a loan from japan or china right now.if we had listened to mike we could have repaved every road in the u.s. by now with federal funds saved from the war, even if we had stayed in afghanistan. of course federal funds have a tendency to go more to other states and keeping our money here for roads rather than sending to d.c. first is more efficient. "

steph wrote on Apr 3, 2008 6:21 PM:

" Regarding earmarks, Rep.Thompson is working HARD! He was able to get $211,000 appropriated for olive fruit fly research. That money will be spent in Paris, France. Maybe if you're in the neighborhood you can stop in and say "hello!" "

glenroy wrote on Apr 3, 2008 7:45 PM:

" Napanabroad...you’re right on the money....


"

FerrariGTC wrote on Apr 4, 2008 8:58 AM:

" ~steph

Try $742,764 by Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) for olive fruit fly
research. Part of this money, $211,509, is to be spent in Paris, France. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy