Did Saddam pay for Mike Thompson's 2002 Iraq trip?
By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein’s intelligence agency secretly financed a trip to Iraq for three U.S. lawmakers during the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.
The three anti-war Democrats made the trip in October 2002, while the Bush administration was trying to persuade Congress to authorize military action against Iraq. While traveling, they called for a diplomatic solution.
Prosecutors say that trip was arranged by Muthanna Al-Hanooti, a Michigan charity official, who was charged Wednesday with setting up the junket at the behest of Saddam’s regime. Iraqi intelligence officials allegedly paid for the trip through an intermediary and rewarded Al-Hanooti with 2 million barrels of Iraqi oil.
The lawmakers are not named in the indictment but the dates correspond to a trip by Democratic Reps. Mike Thompson of St. Helena, Jim McDermott of Washington state and David Bonior of Michigan. None was charged and Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said investigators “have no information whatsoever” any of them knew the trip was underwritten by Saddam.
Thompson released a statement Wednesday saying the trip was approved by the State Department.
“Obviously, had there been any question at all regarding the sponsor of the trip or the funding, I would not have participated,” he said.
In an interview Wednesday afternoon, Thompson said prosecutors have not suggested improper conduct by the members of Congress. The charity was investigated two years ago and was cleared to continue its work.
“The charity that paid for the trip, they didn’t do anything wrong,” said Thompson. “It was somebody involved with them that is alleged to have taken money inappropriately.”
As for his trip, Thompson said this week’s action do nothing to change what he witnessed.
“The people I saw in Baghdad, the people I talked to and the input I got from them certainly were not influenced by this charity or the donors to this charity,” he said.
“Obviously, we didn’t know it at the time,” McDermott spokesman Michael DeCesare said Wednesday. “The trip was to see the plight of the Iraqi children. That’s the only reason we went.”
Both McDermott and Thompson are popular among liberal voters in their reliably Democratic districts for their anti-war views. Bonior is no longer in Congress.
During the trip, the lawmakers expressed skepticism about the Bush administration’s claims that Saddam was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. Though such weapons ultimately were never found, the lawmakers drew criticism for their trip at the time.
Oklahoma Sen. Don Nickles, then the second-ranking Senate Republican, said the Democrats “sound somewhat like spokespersons for the Iraqi government.”
Seattle-area conservatives dubbed McDermott “Baghdad Jim” for the Iraq trip.
Al-Hanooti was arrested Tuesday night while returning to the U.S. from the Middle East, where he was looking for a job, his attorney, James Thomas, said. Al-Hanooti pleaded not guilty Wednesday to charges of conspiracy to act as an unregistered agent of a foreign government, illegally purchasing Iraqi oil and lying to authorities. He was being held on $100,000 bail.
Between 1999 and 2006, he worked on and off as a public relations coordinator for Life for Relief and Development, a charity formed after the first Gulf War to fund humanitarian work in Iraq. FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Force agents raided the charity’s headquarters in 2006 but charged nobody and allowed the agency to continue operating.
McDermott identified that charity as the group financing the Iraq trip. In House disclosure forms, he put the cost at $5,510. Thompson also understood the charity to be financing the trip, spokeswoman Anne Warden said.
Prosecutors said Al-Hanooti was responsible for monitoring Congress for the Iraqi Intelligence Service. From 1999 to 2002, he allegedly provided Saddam’s government with a list of U.S. lawmakers he believed favored lifting economic sanctions against Iraq.
Thomas said Al-Hanooti would “vigorously defend” himself against the charges but he could not discuss the specifics of the case since he had seen none of the evidence.
Register staff contributed to this report.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:09 AM:
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:10 AM:
" Why would a legislator allow him/herself to make a junket on anyone other than the government? It seems a breach of protocol if not ethics to engage in such a visit to a clearly political problem. This is a new reportage and I would prefer to wait and see this matter unfold before making a solid statement in it’s regard. "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:11 AM:
" While I'm sure Mike's oft-chattering critics will go conspiratorily bezerk this morning- the obvious fact is that the Justice Dept. realizes that no one had any idea if Saddam was involved in this trip, and that any wrong doing is on the part of this charity.
What is a much more salient issue on the 5th anniversary of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and the loss of the 4,000th G.I. in this conflict, is just how prescient Mike was in consistently opposing it, and how silent the invasions' media supporters circa 2003 are today. "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:12 AM:
" Are you asking me or informing me?
I would speculate that most democrats would have done whatever it takes to undermine Bush's efforts, especially back in 2001/2002.
Remember? We had just had a TERRORIST ATTACK that took more than 3,000 lives...and three of our DEM (as in democrat though) liberal congressmen, who are against any war, are "invited" by Sadam Hussein to go to Iraq to say "hello"?
Please enlight me because I don't get it. "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:12 AM:
" This incident needs to be reviewed further. Sounds like it "might" be another Hilary, "I just made a mistake" ordeal. "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:13 AM:
" OUR own congresscritter cavorting with a murderous dictator and his sadistic sons? Not a democrat! No, no, no, no! Obviously a planted story from the vast right wing conspiracy Hillary has warned us about all these years since she ducked sniperfire in Bosnia! I can't wait for the local area democrats to defend Thompson on this one... Go ahead; I have my popcorn and soda all ready for THAT comic movie... "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:13 AM:
" Sometimes I have to wonder what side our government is really on. No matter if its democrats or republicans, they all leave a bad taste in my mouth. Mr.Thompson you are a hypocrite and it's time for you to step down, lets put together a ballot and get this guy out of here. I DO NOT want this person representing me or my state. What an embarrassment. "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:15 AM:
" Oh look...Mike Thompson was on a paid vacation to Iraq, compliments of Saddam Hussein. I would expect a Congressman to be a little more selective about where his money comes from. As a veteran, I'm highly offended. "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:15 AM:
" I don't know what is worse, the fact that "Baghdad Mike" went to Iraq and verbally bashed US policy from there or the fact that he DIDN'T KNOW THAT SADDAM WAS PAYING HIM TO DO IT! Either way, he is a pathetic embarrassment for Napa County... "
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:23 AM:
"Actually what is worse is that our vaunted inteligence agencies could not protect us from this type of incident. Another example of the failed administration of Baghdad Bush."
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:24 AM:
"Two million barrels of oil is quite a finders fee for an anti-American junket.
The way this was set up, was apparently nothing less then money laundering to hide the source. That of course, gives the anti-war Saddam guests plausible deny ability."
"
NVR Moderator wrote on Mar 27, 2008 11:26 AM:
Sandra wrote on Mar 27, 2008 1:25 PM:
mrscrappalucci wrote on Mar 27, 2008 2:27 PM:
workerbee wrote on Mar 27, 2008 4:44 PM:
russ wrote on Mar 27, 2008 5:33 PM:
glenroy wrote on Mar 27, 2008 10:32 PM:
Can you imagine the consequences of a Republican taking such a trip? In this day and age only a Democrat could walk away from this with his political backside still attached.
Mike Thompson is one of the few in either House that has survived full contact combat duty...as opposed to Murtha or Kerry claiming ‘Great War Heroism,’ with relatively little, if any actual combat...Thompson is just the real deal. He did not emigrate to Canada nor he did not protest in Moscow to avoid the Vietnam War..he served his country. He has not, it probably wouldn’t help in this district anyway, use his military duty to seek or gain political advantage...there are precious few in his party that are his equal. Much of what he supports I word argue is counterproductive to his objective, but you have to hand it him, he stands on his record and I’ve never once seen him while confronted hide behind the naming calling nor derogatory statements we get from the a Murtha, Kerry, Gore or Obama.
Give Thompson credit, he said it was wrong, in fact he distanced himself from the other two amigos when he realized while on this ‘fact finding trip’ it was less about facts, than about Saddam portraying disunity among Americans, to Iraqis, and to the Arab world where it continues to be broadcasted or referenced in some fashion daily. In many minds it damaged our cause, it was used by al qaeda for recruitment purposes, but the situation, comparatively speaking, is less damaging than Pelosi or Murtha declaring the Iraq War lost, the surge had failed even before it was implemented, along with all the rest of Democrat digested bull food they screech for partisan gain while ignoring national security.
"