NVR Logo
Schools struggle to pay for No Child
Monday, March 24, 2008
Save and Share Share
8 a.m.Accountability is not free, according to local educators.

In fact, for Napa Valley Unified School District, it costs about $2 million a year.
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, schools and districts can be required to comply with state- and federal-mandated programs that cost up to millions of dollars. But with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed $14.8 billion cut to public education, educators say they’re in a lose-lose situation: accountability on one hand, reality on the other.

Toscano said the district spends “at least” $1.5 million a year on costs related to No Child Left Behind, with realistic estimates probably closer to $2 million. The district’s total budget for this year is $116 million.
Those expenses are related to requirements resulting from NVUSD’s inability to meet federal standards for two consecutive years, thus launching the district into a probationary status called Program Improvement (PI). Sanctions and requirements under PI increase every year that a school or district fails to meet federal standards, and at its worst it could mean takeover by a separate entity.

“What happens,” said Toscano, “is in PI there are some essential program components that a district is required to explore with an external team and implement.”
NVUSD is in the second of five levels of PI. Students must meet minimum federal standards this year to exit PI; otherwise it will enter stage three, subject to even stricter requirements.

Requirements, she said, include after-school programs, training for teachers, developing pacing guides for classrooms, and tracking data against standards.

“There are huge hidden costs,” said NVUSD Superintendent John Glaser, such as parent notification, curriculum changes, monitoring and the cost of alternative governance teams.

Earlier this month, he said, administrators and district officials attended an all-day meeting about PI. “That’s lots and lots of staff time,” said Glaser, adding, “When you start adding up the many, many meetings we’ve had, the curriculum costs, the supervision costs, monitoring curriculum, evaluation costs, it really does add up.”

“This is all good stuff,” said Toscano, “but it means less money that goes to each site.”

“You can only spend that dollar one time,” she said.

“If we were fully funded for what we need to do under No Child Left Behind … we’d have that many more resources to spend,” said Glaser, noting, “The budget takes on different meaning when you’re under sanctions.”

The irony, said Glaser, is that next year the district will have even fewer resources, as the governor’s proposed budget cuts would hit NVUSD with a $7.5 million budget reduction.

On the chopping block are academic coaches, training for teachers, and the district’s current data tracking system — all requirements under NVUSD’s PI plan.

“Unless they figure out a way to give us money to cover what is in our plan,” said Toscano, “we may not be able to continue providing what is in our plan.”

“How can we do it?” she asked. “We can’t do it. It’s like saying, ‘You have to do these things, but we’re taking away the money to provide you the opportunity to do it.’ It leaves you with a sucker’s choice.”

Until the final state budget is released in May — and even then it could take months to get the governor’s signature — NVUSD won’t know how much money will be available for mandates under No Child Left Behind, she said.

In the meantime, Vintage High School Principal Eric Schneider said he’ll do everything he can to make sure programs under PI don’t suffer as a result of budget cuts.

“I don’t see PI mandates as being affected here, frankly,” he said.

“Those mandates are top priorities and we need them to be successful,” he said. “We will use whatever site budgets we have.”

Schneider said there is the possibility that individual schools could be asked to reorganize their budgets “to make sure these initiatives are successful.” He might also have to look at funding PI programs with the individual school’s budget, he said.

“The PI mandates for me, those are site priorities,” said Schneider. “In my site budget that I control, those mandates will get funded first before we do anything else. ... It’s the stuff that falls below PI, like our arts program ... that’s where we have to get really creative.”

Noting the significant improvements in test scores over the past four years, Glaser expressed frustration about the impact cuts could have on the district’s ability to exit PI.

“It feels a lot like you’ve gotten this car up to speed, and you’re really starting to feel like you’re making a difference, and it feels like we’re headed toward a brick wall,” he said. “It’s hard to imaging that our momentum won’t be significantly diminished by the potential funding cuts.”

“It’s a momentum killer,” said Schneider. After so much improvement, he said, “that momentum just falls flat.”
14 comment(s)

Common Sense wrote on Mar 24, 2008 9:01 AM:

" Our schools are grossly inefficient and outdated, and NCLB gets blamed. Too bad the Register won't provide a more objective view of NCLB to help explain why so many people support it. Here are some facts about NCLB from the 2007 Nation's Report Card:

- In reading, scores for 4th graders were the highest on record.
- In math, scores for 4th and 8th graders were the highest on record.
- African-American and Hispanic students are making significant progress, posting all-time highs in a number of categories.
- In 4th grade reading, the achievement gap between white and African-American students is at an all-time low.
- In math, 4th and 8th grade African-American students achieved their highest scores to date.
- In 4th grade reading and in 4th and 8th grade math, Hispanic students set new achievement records.
- In reading, Hispanic 8th graders matched their all-time high. "

Rob C wrote on Mar 24, 2008 9:41 AM:

" Suckers choice? How so? NCLB is a federal program. The pending cuts are due to state budget issues. Totally unrelated sources of revenue. It's the spend side that can't seem to be managed.

Disregarding for the moment how NCLB has been effectively gutted by allowing states to set their very own "hurdle rates" for defining success, if it remains the imperious, onerous yoke that CA educators vilify it for, then don't take Federal money.

But I guess 50% of our state budget still isn't enough to deliver our current results. "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Mar 24, 2008 11:47 AM:

" Common Sense writes "Our schools are grossly inefficient and outdated," then cites statistics indicating how wonderful they're doing. Hmmm. Apparently, NCLB has proven that some groups are doing better on multiple-choice tests in reading and math. What courses or activities are being sacrificed in order to achieve those gains? The above-mentioned, cherry-picked statistics don't tell the whole story. I think NCLB has done more harm than good. "

WHY wrote on Mar 24, 2008 11:53 AM:

" Just a question that maybe someone could answer for me. If the budget is so tight, why is is that we continue with free breakfast and lunch programs. Would this not amount to much? I was raised by a single parent that struggled to keep a roof over two of us. She always found a way to make us a cheese or peanut butter sandwhich. If we continue to give out free stuff people will never take the initiative to do better and inturn setting an example for their children that they to can do better. "

mikeb wrote on Mar 24, 2008 12:08 PM:

" According to the article NCLB costs at the very most $2 million. The entire budget for NVUSD is $116 million. NCLB accounts for 1.7% of the overall budget. I happen to think that is very reasonable for a program that mandates/assures a minum level of basic education for our children. Before seeing these true figures I actually had a little sympathy for the school administrators complaining about the costs of NCLB. But seeing the figures in black and white it is very apparent that the educational budget problems have nothing to do with NCLB and everything to do with missmanagement, from the State level on down. "

Common Sense wrote on Mar 24, 2008 12:16 PM:

" Mad Jay, NCLB has produced good results within an antiquated school system. But, these only apply to reading and math...it needs to happen to history, science, music, etc. NCLB actually put some of these subjects on equal footing with math and reading for the first time, but yet we haven't forced schools to report this info...and we should.

You cite no evidence that the learning is solely due to improved test taking strategy. Don't bother looking, there isn't any...these kids are actually learning.

By your logic (testing only produces kids with better test taking strategies), we shouldn't test at all. Somehow, I don't think that will fly...imagine operating a college that way.

Testing provides accountability to ensure that we are educating as best we can. It is also proven that the recall and application of learned material (like what happens on a test) vastly improves retention.

The valid criticisms of NCLB are that we don't report for all subject areas, and that we use only written exam testing methods...I would like to see oral boards and hands-on projects (or shows/performances for the arts) added.

Contrary to what is normally heard in the mainstream media, NCLB is not the root of all evil in our schools...it is actually the cure.

"

Skip M. wrote on Mar 24, 2008 2:47 PM:

" If a doctor fails to maintain a certain standard of conduct, his or her license to practice is revoked and he or she is out of business. If a lawyer fails to meet a certain standard of conduct, he or she is disbarred and is out of business. But where the education of our children is concerned, we have this continuous dissent from the education community that standards of achievement are somehow the root of all problems. If NVUSD was doing such a wonderful job in the first place, why the sanctions? Perhaps the sanctions are in place because NVUSD was FAILING. I am a product of NVUSD, and I will tell you right now, I was functionally illiterate, and could not even balance a check book by the time I left the school system. After years of struggle teaching myself, I was able to turn all of that around. I get my Bachelor’s in Accounting and Business Management this year (no thanks to NVUSD). I no longer live in Napa. My children attend in a district that is a top performer. There is no whining about standards where my children attend. Keep the school districts feet to the fire. And when they complain about standards, turn up the heat. As for the budget, if I have $116 dollars and I have to pay $2 to ride the bus, I do not complain. Of course, you can keep complaining about NCLB and refuse to comply, and next year you will be in deeper trouble. It really sounds like school administrators are not much more mature than the children in their charge. "

mikek wrote on Mar 24, 2008 3:47 PM:

" Why do people act so powerless?

If the school does poorly, replace the board, who can replace the administrators.

Wouldn't you rather make these decisions locally than have people 3000 miles away do it?

I know, I know. You would need to be vigilant in order to do that. Laziness is the root of so many problems in government. Guess who gets the blame for that? "

Skip M. wrote on Mar 24, 2008 4:17 PM:

" MikeK: Ouch! Hasn’t anyone told you the truth hurts? But this is not only in regard to the board and administration. If your children’s teacher(s) do not see your face at least once a week, you are remiss in your duties as a parent. And for those who do not have children in the school system, you need to be involved at the board level too. To the argument; “My kids are grown and I shouldn’t have to bother.” It is the kids in school now that will be the police, doctors, and nurses that will be caring for you in ten to twenty years (and you are likely to live that long). To those that argue; “I don’t have children.” Or; “My children are not in school yet.” I make the same argument to you. Those kids in school now will be your care givers and employees in just a few years. Like it or not, the entire community has a very big and direct stake in the education of all children in the community. "

Dwayne wrote on Mar 24, 2008 4:45 PM:

" Our daughter attends a grade school in Napa that won a distinguished school of California award last week. Everything about the school, testing, ESL, morale, is very high, yet this school has to suffer the cuts that the district has wrought due to NCLB.

This whole thing is wrong, very very wrong... "

les wrote on Mar 24, 2008 7:24 PM:

" Recently I read an article from the head of education in India where they use a similar concept as NCLB. The scores in math, science and languages have definitely gone up for them and are significantly higher than their US counter parts. How ever, he is not happy with the program because the US counter parts kick their butts in the real world where creative problem solving is more important than solving equations. I found that to be an interesting observation on his part. They are now looking at ways to infuse creativity into their current bland education program to compete with us. We are on the otherhand trying to make our education programs more bland.

I also find it interesting that there are numerous claims about waste and inefficiency in our education system. Which may be true, but no one is putting their finger on the top 3 things that should be done. A Successful company would first do the analysis to see what is working and what is not and then proceed to make measured improvements. Of course a good six sigma guy is going to cost money, but it would be worth it if he/she could make real executable recommendations on how to change and manage that change. "

a teacher wrote on Mar 24, 2008 9:26 PM:

" I dunno Les. Stanford ran a study of the School system that came out last spring. They had a few things to say about what works and what doesn't. I haven't seen anyone jumping on the reform wagon yet. I suspect that the other half of your suggestion is the political will to act. The cynic in me doubts that any action will happen with the current players. Too many apple carts will be upset. "

Dwayne wrote on Mar 24, 2008 10:14 PM:

" One of the real problems is that our schools are already suffering from analysis paralysis.... "

Sickothis wrote on Mar 26, 2008 3:32 PM:

" That $116 mil includes the bonds for infrastructure, not just operations. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy