Contractor sting nails 18 in AmCan
By KERANA TODOROV
Register Staff Writer
Eighteen people were arrested in American Canyon this week in a sting operation targeting those who to do home repairs without a license.
A total of 175 people were caught Wednesday and Thursday in undercover operations in seven cities throughout the state, the California Contractors State License Board disclosed Friday. American Canyon’s was the only undercover operation in Napa County.
The suspects were arrested after they offered bids on projects valued at more than $500 to undercover agents posing as homeowners.
In American Canyon, people were asked to visit a vacant home in the city. Most of the suspects who kept their appointments had advertised their services in local papers, including the Napa Valley Register and the Times-Herald, according to the board.
Of the 18 men arrested in American Canyon, eight were from Napa, three from American Canyon and five from Vallejo, according to the state investigators. One person came from Fairfield and another from Benicia.
One man who showed up at the door lived down the street, said Doug Ropel, a state investigator. Another came with a laborer carrying marijuana, he also said.
The men were arrested after bidding on jobs that included repairing a fence that fell during a storm, painting the outside walls of the vacant house and in some cases, landscaping the yard, explained Ropel. They received a notice to appear in Napa County Superior Court and were released.
The men face up to six months in jail or a $1,000 fine on suspicion of bidding on contracting jobs worth more than $500 without a license, a misdemeanor, according to the board. Had the men been arrested for the same offense for the second time, they would have been sent to jail for 90 days.
Other suspected unlicensed operators who had been contacted as part of the sting operation did not show up, Ropel also said, avoiding arrest.
Ropel said the sting was set up through the city’s code enforcement division. The other sting operations were in El Dorado, Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, San Diego and Tulare counties.
Dennis Corbett, the city’s chief building official, said the city’s police department assisted the investigators.
Corbett, who has worked with the city for two years, does not believe there are more unlicensed operators in American Canyon than in other cities.
“This occurs statewide,” Corbett said.
There are 310,000 licensed contractors permitted to work in 43 different categories, from fence repairs to painting, according to the Contractors State License Board.
Licensed contractors have to take tests, including one on contractors law, and pass a background check.
Rick Lopes, a spokesman for the board, said homeowners take many risks by hiring unlicensed operators, including getting shoddy work and allowing someone with criminal background inside their homes.
Among those arrested this week in other sting operations were five people with arrest warrants and an unregistered sex offender, he noted.
Corbett said the city cannot enforce the state’s contractors laws because they are outside the city’s jurisdiction.
City staffers can only refer complaints to the board, Corbett said. The staff does not distribute lists of licensed contractors to maintain a sense of independence. However the city does have booklets from the Contractors State License Board on how to select a contractor.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
make napa better wrote on Mar 15, 2008 7:18 AM:
bob2 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 8:21 AM:
NVC wrote on Mar 15, 2008 9:34 AM:
There, you can check by lic.#, company name, or personnel name.
It will also show what company carries their workman's compensation insurance. (unless they haven't any employees)
As a contractor I use the above website to check any sub-contractors I might use, and homeowners should do the same.
Also, requesting proof of liability insurance is also a reasonable and wise request from any contractor.
Hope this helped,
NVC "
mikeb wrote on Mar 15, 2008 9:36 AM:
hudds5 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 9:39 AM:
illbeme wrote on Mar 15, 2008 10:15 AM:
napalocal wrote on Mar 15, 2008 10:38 AM:
109823 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 10:43 AM:
napalocal wrote on Mar 15, 2008 12:05 PM:
aaanapa wrote on Mar 15, 2008 2:55 PM:
Tim wrote on Mar 15, 2008 2:59 PM:
These people, at the very least are unethicel in their business practices,
it is overly trusting people like you that many of these scammers go after.
many of them are unskilled in the trades and use sub-par materials in their "work".
This type of sting operation protects the public....especially the elderly who are preyed upon by these creeps.
But if you want to pay several thousand dollars to someone that is not skilled, does poor quality work, uses inferior and sometimes dangerous materials and many times doesn't even come back to finish the job....Go for it.
But remember, the guy that is painting the fence today is the same guy that is rewiring the electrical in someone's house tomorrow...would you allow your family to sleep in an improperly wired house?
"
napalocal wrote on Mar 15, 2008 4:22 PM:
I disagree with both of you, and I use to work in the construction industry for a licensed union contractor. Our country doesn't procuce anything anymore, we have become a nation of consumers moving away from what made our country great. The worforce is lazy and the unions have raised the labor rates to the point where it makes much more economic sense to go with a non union company. A non union company can be licensed and should be used for jobs that require technical knowledge. The State also doesn't help due to astronomical workers compensation insurance, and the insurance industry... don't get me started. However, the article specifically stated that the jobs were, "repainting the exterior of a house, landscaping a backard, and repairing a fence." I could see the sting operation for someone putting in a bid to "rewire a house", but that was not the case. I am also sure that the unercover officers made sure the "job" was just big enough to exceed the $500 limit so they could prosecute. Quit picking on the inividuals trying to get ahead but putting in some hard work. this is a blatent example of going after, getting additional revenue from, someone who can't afford the fine... just like the sting operation downtown over "driving away from the courthouse". I bet 90% of the cars they towed will be abandoned to the city since the owners can't afford the new added fines. Good job Napa, kick them when they are down....Just my opinion, but I am very smart. "
MarkMiwords wrote on Mar 15, 2008 6:18 PM:
14obama wrote on Mar 17, 2008 8:46 PM:
It just aint right to furnish an avenue for us to vent,then,to choose which ones will be posted here. Where's the old Napa idealism gone ? "