Ugly anti-immigrant uproar
By Michael Haley
October 28th, 2009
September 23rd, 2009
August 31st, 2009
August 20th, 2009
Did you catch the blood bath in the comments section after the Napa Fair announced that there would be a Mexican theme to the Fair this year, complete with Mexican music and food? Not that we all aren’t eating Mexican food a lot anyway. It was long and it was ugly.
People, it is just a theme for a fair. It has nothing to do with illegal immigration, or any immigration. The only effect it had is to slam local Hispanics personally. It doesn’t solve any immigration problems. It ends up as race-based bashing, and nativism, rather than what it is, simply a theme for a fair.
I don’t think that most of the people who are upset about the Mexican based theme are racists, or that they really dislike Mexicans. Not most of them, anyway.
But if not, then what are they? They are clearly frustrated and angry people. Having said that what they did was wrong and unfair, I also have to defend them and say that there is something legitimate things they are angry about, they are just taking it out in the wrong place in the wrong way.
To understand, we have to back up a bit. Psychologist Abraham Maslow identified in the 1960s the needs of human beings, arranging them in a hierarchy based on which needs are strongest and must be met first before you go on to other, what he called higher needs. The most basic needs were for safety and security, i.e. food, shelter, and the very next one is the need to belong.
The need to belong is one of the most basic needs that we have, we cannot survive without a sense of belonging to others and it drives a huge amount of our behavior. And it was driving the immigrant bashing behavior that day on the Fiesta de Napa thread.
When you grow up in a town, you experience that town the way it is for you as a kid and you develop a strong attachment to it and the way it is. It is "my town". When the world changes as much and as rapidly as ours has, it creates a lot of anxiety for people, they lose their place in their own world, they can feel like strangers in their own town.
This is a big part of the underlying psychology behind immigrant bashing. So many new people coming in, of any stripe, and those who get their sense of value and belonging there find that source of comfort has been stolen, and they get mad about it. And well they should. It is not bad to feel that way.
The fact that the world has gone through so many rapid changes has disrupted our basic sense of identity, and is behind a lot of the confusion and alienation we see around us, politically and socially. The old values that brought us all together have been disrupted, you see this strongly in issues like gay marriage and immigration.
We need new values that incorporate something we can all feel a part of to feel connected. That is what the idea of multiculturalism could have been, but unfortunately that got hijacked by partisans and turned into something else that actually divides us, not brings us together.
This is the legitimate message of the Fair bashers, they feel isolated in their own community, with huge changes that they don’t like and don’t feel like they can control or have any impact over. This leads to huge frustration and anger.
What is wrong is to blame the newcomers, whoever they may be. They are not the problem. Government policy and the lack of enforcement is the problem.
I can’t solve this problem in one short column, or even detail it out much. But I suggest two things.
One is that we all be aware that we need community, we need to find shared values that we can all be a part of, no matter what part of the world or nation or race we may be from. Indeed, this is one of the biggest challenges of our age on every level. We need alliances at home as much as we need alliances in the world.
And we need to support the Fiesta de Napa. Let‚s make this year’s Fair the biggest and best yet.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
musikluvr wrote on Mar 6, 2008 2:28 PM:
Bill wrote on Mar 6, 2008 2:29 PM:
Many of the posters to that blog may be confused by change but many harbor out right hate for anything and anyone who is different or even hints a t being different from the imagined norm. Some hide that hatred behind the idea that culture does not change or that we live in the same circumstances today that existed 30 years ago. The physical world may not change substantially but the human situation does change and many times dramatically.
I have lived in this valley a long time and I have seen special tributes to different groups that contribute to our society and culture under varying circumstances, across the total span of my life I have witnessed first hand racial hatred and bigotry from people who might be considered to be reasonable and educated as well as those without a clue. However I have never observed such outright hatred as can be found on the web. The Register has done an excellent job cleaning up much of the posts other wise I am certain you would have much more to add to your column.
I am sure we will argue over the issue of immigration in the future. Becareful or some one will mistake you for a Liberal.
"
napablogger wrote on Mar 6, 2008 5:25 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 6, 2008 5:31 PM:
kevin wrote on Mar 6, 2008 6:03 PM:
Bill wrote on Mar 6, 2008 9:16 PM:
musikluvr wrote on Mar 6, 2008 9:18 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 6, 2008 10:27 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 6, 2008 10:29 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 6, 2008 10:34 PM:
Sandra wrote on Mar 7, 2008 8:23 AM:
winemd wrote on Mar 7, 2008 8:57 AM:
Bill wrote on Mar 7, 2008 4:43 PM:
I find the theme to be a justifiable marketing tool. No different than targeting any other sector of the population. It is Capitalism at work and working well. I think those that object to it do so for many reasons chief among them is the stated goal of attracting more Latinos to alleviate a flat line attendance and they are offended because they see it as honoring or recognizing one specific community over another. They may also be offended because it is smart business.
If there were another singularly community that could be so readily identified with such a propensity to spend as the Latino community there would be a marketing effort to attract them also.
The uproar over culture is rather misdirected in this instance we should just enjoy and celebrate as in viva Italia or ST. Patrick’s day and maybe promote an Oktoberfest. My Sociology is not as good as yours so if some professor could kindly correct my belief that a description or definition of culture would be inclusive and one of society as being exclusive?
Lets party.
"
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 7, 2008 11:50 PM:
I think this is an interesting theory...it rings true in some ways...I do picture myself at the fair feeling out of place in my own city, not speaking the primary language of the fair, overcrowding, unsupervised little kids, gang fights, etc. For the same reason I don't go to WalMart on the 1st of the month, I will not be attending the fair this year. I think that the issue of separation and not fitting in possibly stems most from the immigrants’ (illegal or otherwise) apparent lack of commitment to integrate themselves into this community, country and culture. Refusal to learn the language and embracement of the Mexican ‘vs’ the American Flag are just 2 examples that really set people off. How do we mesh these cultures when these ultra high barriers refuse to come down? Now it feels as though the pendulum has swung to far the opposite direction. You won’t come to us, so we’ll come to you! I'm going to need a translator to tell me what the show is about at the fair??? It was exploitative, irresponsible and culturally insensitive to choose this theme to begin with.
"
Sandra wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:50 AM:
I agree this decision was made to bring a larger attendance to the fair. It is a marketing tool. But time will tell if was a smart marketing tool. And the fair board should also consider that exclusion is just wrong. Some things should not just be about more money. This is a county fair. The county has many cultures. Napa has a sizable portugeuse population, italians, asians, greeks, germans, etc. All American citizens, and this is their fair, also. Again, the fair board should be looking at ways to bring all of napa to the fair, not one segment. "
napablogger wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:05 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:09 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:19 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:45 AM:
winemd wrote on Mar 8, 2008 12:19 PM:
My experience with the Hispanic people I have met is that they want to learn English and ask for my help by asking for words and corrections. It seems that many people believe that most Hispanics are not like that. Many of the parents I come in contact with are glad when someone in authority can speak in thier language (like teachers) so that they can communicate clearly about their concerns. English is a very hard language to learn; just about every "rule" is broken sometimes. It is tiring to be surrounded by another language all the time, and of course when they are talking to each other it is easier to speak Spanish. All of the ones iknow make an effort, though, and I try to facilitate their communication, even though my Spanish reaches about kindergarten level. Just to be clear, I believe that people who come here should do so legally, and that they will have an easier time finding the American dream by learning English (which takes some time).
Most of the people who oppose the theme (at least those whose comments were approved) are not racist, but frustrated because they see it as dissing the American culture. Most of the people in favor see it as adding something to our community, not subtracting from it. We are not all going to agree, and that should be fine.
It seems to me that there are better places to express frustration with these issues than the fair theme, which could be a lot of fun. "
winemd wrote on Mar 8, 2008 12:26 PM:
It could be worse-in Canada the minority culture has a much bigger sway ;-) and the griping is unbelievable! "
Sandra wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:32 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:38 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:41 PM:
Suze wrote on Mar 8, 2008 6:41 PM:
sickothis wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:32 PM:
kdbk wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:56 PM:
Go ahead and ignore the dozens of people claiming hispanic origin who've written in on this issue...and who've stated their disgust with this pathetic fair theme. It only makes it all the more obvious that your argument is without logic, fact or common sense to support it.
As our nation becomes more and more like the third-world, influenced by the most down-trodden people from south of our border, things will increasingly get worse for our overall standard of living. Do you think that you and your ilk will somehow be immune to the negative consequences that will surely develop? Don't be so irresponsible. It's not "just a fair theme".
"
Concerned Citizen wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:00 AM:
What is it about "entering the U.S. illegally" are people missing? Again, just because Mexico shares a contiguous border w/the U.S. does not give Mexican carte blanche to enter this country w/out documentation as all other nationalities (except those escaping political persecution) MUST do.
Stop apologizing. And, also, btw; just how does one explain the expoential and rapid growth of "latinos" in Napa, California, and ALL border states? Birth rates? All legal residents? I doubt it, and anyone who denies this is either blatantly deceitful, horribly terrified of being labeled xenophobic, natavist, or worse, or blindly ignorant...all of which are not acceptable.
There IS a problem w/illegal immigration. Even the head of this article says "...ugly anti immigration," not "...ugly anti ILLEGAL immigration.
Until the media, politicians and other power players step up, admit this problem exists and act in behalf of American taxpayers, the foment and anger WILL NOT disipate.
Now, psycho babble this. "
Sandra wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:26 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 9, 2008 11:14 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 9, 2008 11:25 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 9, 2008 11:41 AM:
steph wrote on Mar 9, 2008 12:19 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 9, 2008 12:36 PM:
I take some issue with the fact that you do not seem to differentiate between immigrant and illegal immigrant. Also I think it is silly to say that it is our “fault” for allowing them in. We didn’t “allow them” in by failing to keep them out. That is a slippery slope argument. It’s like saying that if you leave your keys in the car it’s your fault when the thief steals it. While you may carry a minimal moral responsibility, the criminal is always at fault legally. I agree with that ALL people just want to raise their families and do the best that they can. I think that if I were from the corrupt country of Mexico, I would run, jump, swim and hop over whatever I had to get to America, especially since there seem to be no consequences for this criminal act. American agencies fight for the rights of illegal Mexican’s more than Mexico does. Ahh – you’re thinking hypocrite!
So here is what makes the difference…I would be so incredibly thankful to the country that is essentially offering me “asylum” that I would do everything I can to integrate myself into the community that “rescued” me. I would learn English, fly and American Flag, try to become a citizen, refrain from reproducing until I am established legally and refrain from exhausting government programs. To do anything else is to stand on a pedestal (now called Fiesta de Napa) laughing and pointing at the Americans, that put food on your plate and a roof over your head, while chanting “Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, you can’t catch me” in Spanish as you flip the bird.
"
JimClark wrote on Mar 9, 2008 12:55 PM:
Fairs have always been an American event and singling out one culture smacks of prejudice. "
lebertm wrote on Mar 9, 2008 2:32 PM:
misfit wrote on Mar 9, 2008 2:59 PM:
Give your minds a rest and let it be. It might be fun. You create your own reality with all of this negativity and anger and hatred. Are those American values? So...what then would an Americana theme be celebrating? "
glenroy wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:51 PM:
"
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 9, 2008 5:41 PM:
For the same reason that nobody complains about Copia themes, NV Museum themes, new movie release themes or the Happy Meal toy themes at McDonalds.
Because these are not county events! Because they have no community impact! The “County” fair is held to a higher standard by the people it is suppose to serve.
I have yet to read a post that is angry, negative or hateful on this blog. People are frustrated and I think that discussing it with each other is constructive; why should anyone stop. I say...Keep it up!
Often this subject is so Taboo that people do not say what they feel because of the responses that you just gave. How are people going to change their perspective if they just stop talking about it?
"
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 9, 2008 5:51 PM:
You say: “…the Mexican people are a hard working and contributing people but we cannot simply rest our thoughts and actions on that fact. Our (Hispanic?) society is a unique one in that we have always welcomed and prospered with the 'come one, come all' attitude. "."
but above
You say: “…at this point the Hispanics want the remaining blacks out; this can be referenced in the media with stories of violence against blacks with the specific stated purpose of an ethnic cleansing…”
Wow! Didn’t Hitler try that….didn’t work out too well for him did it?
I can’t imagine a example of a double standard!
The good people of CA will never allow what you are suggesting. Which is (I think, correct me if I am wrong) that eventually all of CA will be back in the hands of Mexicans and we should just get used to it.
"
napablogger wrote on Mar 9, 2008 7:14 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 9, 2008 7:31 PM:
irishman wrote on Mar 9, 2008 9:53 PM:
jt wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:26 PM:
Rocco wrote on Mar 10, 2008 6:56 AM:
JimClark wrote on Mar 10, 2008 1:36 PM:
kdbk wrote on Mar 10, 2008 7:28 PM:
So, napablogger, let's try again. I never implied a single thing regarding the quality of the actual fair production under the theme Fiesta de Napa. I simply (oh-so simply) commented on how adopting themes, attitudes and values from the third world could result in our society becoming more like the third world...and how that might not be a good thing. But it's o.k. if you want to deliberately avoid what is said as well as the context in which it's said. There are plenty, PLENTY of people in Napa, and all over the country, of all races and ethnicities, who will ultimately solve the problems related to the third-world innundation of our Southern and Western states. You don't have to do a thing to help. You don't even have to acknowledge the problem. "
mikeb wrote on Mar 10, 2008 9:00 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Mar 11, 2008 6:57 AM:
Bill wrote on Mar 11, 2008 9:53 AM:
A fiesta theme whose marketing aim is attracting the Latino (Mexican) sector of society is discriminatory. (Declarative sentence)
Because the fair theme excludes all other sectors from its marketing aim it is discriminatory. Therefore the fair should consider only themes that include all sectors of society.
Proper theme examples: rainbow theme, multi-cultural celebration, world appreciation and universal recognition or the diversity fair.
Absolutely no race, culture or ethnic specific content is to be permitted. No language other than English will be used in the title or any subsequent part of the fair as this excludes those who understand only English and is therefore also discriminatory.
It is further asserted that all fair content i.e. programming, vendors, service groups and organizations adhere to these guidelines. This will be deemed to include any specific foreign language or national reference, other than the United States of America.
All fair activities must conform to this dictum.
This is actually a valid logical statement. Now imagine its strict application as a non-discriminatory doctrine. There may be flaws in the argument, if so pick it apart. Take a look at what is called conservative and liberal and see where it fits these concepts. Ask yourselves, is this the society you in vision or is there a greater mix to the view of America?
"
napablogger wrote on Mar 11, 2008 10:52 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 11, 2008 11:28 AM:
However, the issue of *immigration* (and I agree with Napablogger that ANY immigration, legal or not is a problem), continues to emerge in these discussions. I think people's frustration is causing the pot to overflow every which way and in some respects, we need to productively channel it.
First of all, when we behave as though a certain people or culture is the problem, people become defensive, cry discrimination and so on. We ride a treadmill which takes us nowhere.
I've said this before and I think it's important to say again. The population of people (of any color or culture) are like bacteria in a petri dish. If you add sugar (the U.S. is sugar) and you have two petri dishes, one with more sugar than the other, population will move from one dish to the other and expand exponentially; even to the point of becoming over populated in both dishes.
Back when Europeans invaded this continent, they discovered corn and how to grow it. The population of Europe expanded so much as a result of this new food source that it made people uncomfortable to the point of leaving the European continent and colonizing America. Yes it's true that people came here as a result of religious persecution, but over population creates chaos and people have a tendency to harass others when resources are limited.
"
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 11, 2008 12:01 PM:
That said, the problem is not skin color or culture. Those are simply targets in our attempt to deal with over crowding. The bottom line is crowding. We do not want to live in a place where it takes an hour to drive 15 miles; where the beauty of green rolling hills are replaced by wall to wall housing; where we we inhale fossil fuels when we take a breath; where our dumps are filled to capacity and some people begin to litter because they don't want to pay for disposal of their own trash.
We must stop "crowding" and we shouldn't attach culture or color to it. And we should limit the growth of those who are legal citizens by penalizing those who have the most children - take away tax and welfare benefits beyond replacement level of two children. "
lunareyeschick wrote on Mar 11, 2008 12:28 PM:
Latinos are nothing new to Napa County. And I went to school with other Latinos, with Portuguese, with Italians, with those of Irish & English descent. With Australians and Indians and Native Americans. And we've always celebrated every culture, for that is the fabric of this dream called America. I've celebrated with green beer and Irish drinking songs for St. Patricks Day; I've sung old English Christmas Carols; I've eaten traditional Porteguese foods at Easter. Since when is it un-American to celebrate our differences and diversity? Is this backlash against Latinos in the valley new? No. Those of us who have been here as long as other "Native" Napans know that this sentiment has always lurked in the background, marring our educational and life experiences. Maybe this outlandish reaction to the proposed fair theme was a good thing. Maybe in it's ridiculousness, it will get us all talking. Once all of the name calling and hatred gets out of the way.
Chill out Napa, have a glass of wine (the grapes for which have probably passed through the hands of some of the people I know and love), and realize that like it or not the world is changing. And hey, this may be news to you, but California was once Mexico... and once upon a time Spanish people ruled over this land. And a fiesta is nothing more than a good old fashioned party. Nothing new to California, either. ;) Why not enjoy it? We will be. "
Bill wrote on Mar 11, 2008 3:48 PM:
As far as I am concerned about the faire we agree, about culture we may not. I see America and culture as inclusive and not exclusive. As Americans we have as much Mexican or Latin, Asian African, etc culture within us as we do any European subset. It is a part of who we are as a nation and a people. We can celebrate them together or individually it is utterly unimportant and without meaning.
Save secure borders and immigration as separate issues they have nothing to do with the faire. The anxiety expressed is merely the nausea of life.
"
kdbk wrote on Mar 11, 2008 5:44 PM:
The controversy over the fair theme is obviously a reflection of the way that many people feel about the changes we've all seen in our communities over the past couple decades...how many of those changes are not positive for U.S. citizens nor those who migrate here legally or not. We're talking about a system of laws, economic systems, a system of government etc. that have proven to be the best in the world, for people of all races and ethnicities. Hint: that's why everyone wants to come here...why lots of people die trying to in many instances. We are talking about the preservation of what is clearly an imperfect, yet nonetheless the best method of running a country the world has ever seen. We need to build, strengthen and preserve this nation and it's basic elements. Go ahead, call the fair theme "no big deal". Then please tell us again who the narrowed- minded thinkers are. "
Winfield Scott wrote on Mar 12, 2008 6:38 AM:
napagirl76 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 9:48 AM:
on another note, i've heard that the fair and the board have lost a lot of bussiness support over this. Maybe Joe well think a little bit more of NAPA as a whole next time he gets a "theme" idea. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:24 AM:
I would like to leave this country intact for my children and I'm sure you all feel the same way. Stay focused on the real issue and do not allow yourselves to color this argument with culture etc. It really sets us back, making it more difficult to move forward with the real issue of overcrowding. "
winemd wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:27 AM:
I enjoy other cultures, but I don't want to go to Ireland to celebrate St. Patrick's Day, or a Latin country to celebrate a fiesta (which is generic). I know there are those who think that we celebrate Hispanic cultures at other times and that the fair is not the place or time. Again, I respect your opinion, but I don't agree that it dismisses America to have a fiesta theme at the fair.
Most Mexicans I know do not expect the US to become like Mexico. They speak Spanish amongst themselves, but make an effort to learn English. It is intimidating at first. They want to have a good life here and are trying hard. They are happy to celebrate Fourth of July. They did not ask for this theme, so remember that your "beef" is with the fair board, who is using the theme to get them out to the fair in larger numbers. If I was Hispanic and I read the comments, I think I would be afraid to come to the fair at this point. "
winemd wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:47 PM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:28 PM:
Winfield Scott wrote on Mar 13, 2008 6:25 AM:
Bill wrote on Mar 13, 2008 7:58 AM:
freeport56 wrote on Mar 13, 2008 8:14 AM:
"Exclusion, Mexican only"...etc are the bloggers online responding to the two articles about the Fair.
As I have stated previously, I have an issue with "ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION". I do not consider my self a racist, nor was I raised that way. I spent a good part of my youth surfing and playing in Mexico. We were always treated well by the locals and knew where and where not to go to stay out of trouble. The "Fiesta de Napa Theme" is to create a party atmosphere, nothing more. if you are that upset about the theme, stay home. the Fair has always been and will always be for ALL of Napa.
To add to musikluvr's history lesson. Mexico only had control of California for 25 years. It was never really part of Mexican history in a significant way. It was only after French rule of Mexico ended that California was the grand prize. it was the Spanish who had set up California's towns and cities. father Serra was the largest part of that process. "
Econut wrote on Mar 13, 2008 9:01 AM:
Winfield Scott wrote on Mar 13, 2008 11:54 AM:
5th generation napan wrote on Mar 13, 2008 12:43 PM:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Powerful words written by a bunch of illegal immigrants.
Bottom line, until people learn how to embrace the good in people and not accept the bad behavior we will never see peace. A family has no boarders. "
Sandra wrote on Mar 13, 2008 1:42 PM:
14obama wrote on Mar 13, 2008 4:38 PM:
And musikluver said something truthful for a change,something about "White Americans". Seems to me we are now doing the same thing all around the world. Iraq maybe ? Iran next,huh ? Remember ! Don't,EVER,allow these kind into office again ! "
14obama wrote on Mar 13, 2008 4:48 PM:
I,too,am a gringo and love the Mexican culture.
The people who complain are without any knowledge of who we are,God's Children. He thinks he's the only one around,I guess. Mexican music says alot about the love and caring these people have for one another. Start loving before you miss out on all the beauty around you ! "
CaptnLee01 wrote on Mar 13, 2008 4:51 PM:
14obama wrote on Mar 13, 2008 4:57 PM:
Let's get our boards and head on down to Todos Santos ! "
109823 wrote on Mar 13, 2008 7:55 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 13, 2008 11:43 PM:
Picture a group of people sitting around a table. The discussion is…How to make the Napa County Fair more money and boost attendance. They decide that the solution of this problem is to “go after” (the previously untapped) population of Mexicans in Napa. Then they decide that the best way to appeal to this culture is to advertise a “fiesta”. How insulting is that. If we advertise a party then the Mexicans will come! To assume that the only way to appeal to any culture is to entice them with “a big party” is insulting the intelligence and dignity of that culture. Let me ask you this. If the theme was “Party in Napa” everyone would say…”huh…seems silly to me”.
But you boys put it in Spanish and hire a few “Latin” Entertainers, yeah that’ll fool them Mexicans into thinking the fair is all about them and that they will be attending a “real” Mexican Fiesta. Then maybe they’ll finally come to the fair and spend some money so you can all get a bigger slice of the corporate pie, who cares what the community ramifications will be, right?!?
This whole thing is “exploitative” and reeks of insensitivity. The fair is a family event, not a big “party”. This is a total misrepresentation of what ALL THE PEOPLE of Napa want for their County Fair.
"
jasper wrote on Mar 14, 2008 12:34 AM:
JimClark wrote on Mar 14, 2008 5:46 AM:
The theme of a Fair should bring a gathering. To make one grouping of people to the fore-front? That simply creates problems. I'm a Scot and I know that the clans had more problems when they attempted to separate themselves from one another in spite of occupying the same lands. As s the world grew larger, they seemed to continue their territorial animosity; in some respects, they continue to today. That may be a lesson to learn today. "
mikeya wrote on Mar 14, 2008 7:41 AM:
kevin eggers wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:45 AM:
southnapareader wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:59 AM:
I think we can all celebrate Napa and build our community with each other whatever the language the fair name is in. Without a doubt, spanish-speaking residents are already a part of our community.
Being okay with the fair's theme doesn't mean that you support illegal immigration. I think it is ridiculous that people are upset that the community is doing something in Spanish or upset that we do things sometimes for and with the latino community. We all deserve to be included in this community, and the fair's theme can help be inclusive. Again, this is just the theme of the fair! I am asking my fellow Napans to find contructive and community building (not destructive and divisive) ways to work through their frustrations.
When things are in Italian (think wineries) or other languages (french for New Orleans?), it rarely gets this backlash. As a lifelong Napa resident, I want Napa to be a community that is famous for its fine wine and a place where hospitality isn't just for the tourists, but for all those that live and work here. "
Two Cents wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:18 AM:
I will definitely be checking out that book you mentioned, thanks for the info. "
John Richards wrote on Mar 14, 2008 3:45 PM:
biLly wrote on Mar 15, 2008 8:24 AM:
Mykdgirl54 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 1:12 PM:
I thought community events such as these were about uniting people - glad to see that the committee is trying to achieve this! (sarcastic) Wouldn't a better idea be a theme where you had ALL different cultures, expressed, represented, and celebrated. Where the theme could be something such as "united in Napa" or "community" as a theme. Sounds like thats an idea we might all be able to agree on "
109823 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 3:03 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 15, 2008 3:38 PM:
In nature, whenever there is vacant space, populations will move in to occupy it. If resources become limited or a fear of limited resources exists, those who occupy the space will defend it and those who want it will fight for it. History proves the point much better than I can.
When a population moves in to occupy space which is already highly occupied, this cannot be equated with past generations who occupied less crowded space. Even though people fought over such space, there was a greater level of availability to begin with.
I think people are justifiably upset today because we are presently crowded and there is very little space to take away without building upward or putting so many people in one living unit that the quality of life diminishes. Additionally, people may become even more dependent on government assistance if we do not take measures to control crowding.
I am no longer comfortable paying for families with five children on government assistance or otherwise, when I intentionally limited my numbers to a replacement value of two. Nor am I comfortable with opening the borders of a crowded country and being told to just adapt to it.
Once vacant space becomes occupied, littering, crime/violence, and numerous families crowding into a living unit become signs that we've reached our limit. Do we then begin to take our agricultural lands out of circulation to accommodate the increased housing needs of a new population? Keep in mind that grapes today may be grain tomorrow. Do you see the problem?
"
sweetgrape14 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 8:44 PM:
Paisano wrote on Mar 17, 2008 8:14 AM:
Sandra wrote on Mar 17, 2008 8:37 AM:
Paisano wrote on Mar 17, 2008 9:47 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Mar 17, 2008 10:28 AM:
Paisano wrote on Mar 17, 2008 11:10 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Mar 17, 2008 12:52 PM:
Paisano wrote on Mar 17, 2008 1:05 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Mar 17, 2008 2:14 PM:
Sandra wrote on Mar 18, 2008 9:17 AM:
Paisano wrote on Mar 18, 2008 10:07 AM:
angrytoo wrote on Mar 18, 2008 10:36 AM:
GregN. wrote on Mar 18, 2008 10:40 AM:
hawaiibarby wrote on Mar 18, 2008 5:58 PM:
Suze wrote on Mar 18, 2008 11:02 PM:
Winfield Scott wrote on Mar 19, 2008 7:19 AM:
Sandra wrote on Mar 19, 2008 7:20 AM:
Paisano wrote on Mar 19, 2008 2:43 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 19, 2008 4:02 PM:
Bars are privately owned establishments not county sponsored community events. Surely you do not lack the intelligence to know the difference. You are wishy washy in your position, that is why people do not find your arguments valid. While you may make some good points; your analogies are off based, facetious and make no sense. The fair theme is inappropriate for this specific venue; not inappropriate in and of itself. I’m glad your done arguing this point, unless you find a more solid position to offer, nobody is able to relate to your position.
"
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 19, 2008 4:05 PM:
Winfield Scott (June 13, 1786 – May 29, 1866) was a United States Army general, diplomat, and presidential candidate. Known as "Old Fuss and Feathers" and the "Grand Old Man of the Army", he served on active duty as a general longer than any other man in American history and most historians rate him the ablest American commander of his time. Over the course of his fifty-year career, he commanded forces in the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Black Hawk War, the Second Seminole War, and, briefly, the American Civil War, conceiving the Union strategy known as the Anaconda Plan that would be used to defeat the Confederacy.
A national hero after the Mexican-American War, he served as military governor of Mexico City. Such was his stature that, in 1852, the United States Whig Party passed over its own incumbent President of the United States, Millard Fillmore, to nominate Scott in the United States presidential election. Scott lost to Democrat Franklin Pierce in the general election, but remained a popular national figure, receiving a brevet promotion in 1856 to the rank of lieutenant general, becoming the first American since George Washington to hold that rank.
"
109823 wrote on Mar 19, 2008 5:53 PM:
m8a5r4i7 wrote on Mar 19, 2008 7:14 PM:
Mexicans do not speak MEXICAN they speak Spanish!!!!!!
Stop complaining and just have a good time, plus why do all people hate on mexicans but still eat the food and need of their service... hypocritical people!!!! "
kdbk wrote on Mar 20, 2008 12:05 AM:
paisano: your position is "impossible to relate to". But let me try to help. Use a modicum of logic in your argument. Just relying on emotion, along with your petty dismissal of relevant facts, is not only ineffective, it's irresponsible. "
Sandra wrote on Mar 20, 2008 7:58 AM:
winemd wrote on Mar 20, 2008 8:20 AM:
"
Concerned Citizen wrote on Mar 20, 2008 9:26 AM:
And why, among the apologists and amnesty advocates, do they persist in ignoring statistics? I can't even begin to understand why Americans are so brainwashed, apologetic, cowed, and fearful of the truth about illegal immigration and it's bad bad effects on our culture, our country, politics and the very fabric of society?
What is there to gain by refusing to protect the laws and, therefore, the foundation of our system/ our society? I just don't get it.
This overflow of illegal people entering the U.S. is UNPRECEDENTED in history; and it's negative impact is costly in financial and societal terms. This is so obvious that even the most blinded among us cannot help but notice...so, again, I ask: Why do you defend this blatant "flipping off" of Americans and our government?
"
Paisano wrote on Mar 20, 2008 2:17 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Mar 20, 2008 2:36 PM:
I thought you were done! "This" issue IS about the fair theme. Maybe you should write a (new) letter to the editor about your perceived “hatred of Hispanics” and your newly expressed concerns about the Hispanic tendency to overpopulate a community. Then we can comment appropriately about these issues. Doesn’t it feel better than to just say what you meant all along than to hide your “real” thoughts under the umbrella of your fair theme defense!
"
funnyme wrote on Mar 20, 2008 7:52 PM:
Secondly, IT"S JUST A THEME!!! WHO REALLY CARES!?!?!?!?!?!? I can't believe someone is making such a big deal out of this. If there was a booth supporting illegel aliens, then yes I would have a problem. but since this is supposed to be a FUN FAMILY EVENT don't make such a big deal about it. Most people like Mexican food, and the music is lively and sets the perfect mood for something like this. "
Sandra wrote on Mar 21, 2008 8:27 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Mar 21, 2008 8:29 AM:
Reality Check wrote on Mar 22, 2008 6:23 AM:
JimClark wrote on Mar 22, 2008 9:02 AM:
I love this country!!!!!
And I thank the Register for giving us a place to share our thoughts and beliefs. "
kbf wrote on Mar 24, 2008 6:56 AM:
you summed it all up perfectly. "
007WYNWM wrote on Mar 25, 2008 9:10 PM:
educated wrote on Mar 30, 2008 2:46 PM:
Paddy wrote on Apr 10, 2008 10:31 AM: