NVR Logo
What's to blame for differing test scores between the sexes?
Brogan McCuen makes a speech about her favorite poem in freshman honors English class at Napa High School. Statistically, girls tend to score better than boys in language arts, resulting in honors English classes that sometimes have a five-to-one ratio of girls to boys. Jorgen Gulliksen/Register | Buy photos
Monday, March 03, 2008
Save and Share Share
In an era of high stakes accountability for schools, educators are placing an ever-greater emphasis on raising test scores in English.

For school districts in Napa County, where Hispanic populations are large, this has meant a heightened focus on the needs of English learners, who typically bring down averages on standardized tests.
But while the ethnic gap dominates most discussions of Napa’s state and federal rankings, there is another set of contrasting scores that crosses all ethnic lines.

It’s the gender gap, and at a time when the state and federal government are pushing for improvement in English scores, boys are falling behind.
Some say the reason is neurological. Others blame the schools. But whatever the case, evidence suggests that boys score lower on standardized English tests than their female classmates.

Last year in Napa Valley Unified School District, 39 percent of 11th-grade boys scored below basic or far below basic on the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) test in English, compared with 27 percent of girls. In the top two categories on the STAR test, 48 percent of 11th-grade girls scored proficient or advanced, as opposed to 37 percent of boys.
Napa High School English teacher Justin Aaron said his honors English classes for ninth-graders usually have a five to one ratio of girls to boys. In his lower level ninth-grade English courses, he said, he usually sees closer to a one to five ratio of girls to boys.

“It starts to balance out by the time they’re seniors,” said Aaron, “but even then it is still predominantly girls” in advanced English classes.

Clinical psychologist Dr. Daniel Peters, who practices in Napa and San Ramon, said the reason for the contrast has to do with brain development. Girls have larger hippocampuses, he said, the part of the brain that aids in learning and, in particular, language arts. Girls also use more cortical areas of the brain for verbal and emotional functioning, said Peters.

Conversely, boys use more cortical areas dedicated to spatial and mechanical functioning, he said. The result is that, neurologically, girls are better wired for language skills than boys, said Peters.

“What are boys and men always known as? Not being able to express their feelings or even themselves,” said Peters. “Writing is just another layered version of being able to express themselves. Boys and men just don’t seem to be as good at that as girls and women.”

But while the neurological differences between boys and girls are generally accepted in the scientific community, many believe that the gender gap in language arts has as least as much to do with the schools as brain development.

Educational consultant Joe Manthey, who led a workshop through the Napa County Office of Education about educating male students, cites the almost nonexistent gender gap for home-schooled students in English as proof that schools are part of the problem.

The reason that home-schooled boys score as well as their female counterparts in English is twofold, said Manthey. First, they are more likely to be given a choice in their reading material. Second, “they’re less likely to fall through the cracks,” he said.

Manthey’s research shows that boys are more inclined to read nonfiction than fiction, and are more likely to relate to subjects related to science, sports and stories that revolve around male characters.

“Then you see boys required to read books like ‘The Joy Luck Club,’” he said, referring to the book by Amy Tan about immigrant mothers and daughters.

It’s no wonder, said Manthey, that boys tune out in English class.

Aaron agrees. “I’m trying to sell ‘The Joy Luck Club’ to a classroom with about 18 boys, and that is definitely a hard sell.” But while the first semester of his class may focus on stories about women, said Aaron, the second semester incorporates texts that are more likely to appeal to a male audience.

“I am definitely aware that there is a gender difference, and you have to be on your toes and hit all the different groups and modes of learning,” he said.

Manthey, however, worries that the system is set up for girls, leaving boys in English class behind.

“I think in the last 20 years or so, schools have focused very heavily on educating girls,” said Napa County Office of Education Superintendent Barbara Nemko. “Because the focus was so much on girls, we have not been focusing on boys.”

Peters said one controversial theory in educational psychology is that boys believe “the classroom game is rigged” and that “it is taught by women and set up for girls.”

And when the state and federal governments base accountability on student subgroups like ethnicity and socioeconomics with no regard for gender, Manthey worries that educators simply don’t care.

Aaron, on the other hand, attributes the gender gap to the culture of students, not educators. It is considered taboo for a boy to walk across campus with a poetry book under his arm, he said.

“As a society I’d say that boys tend to get criticized or ostracized for reading poetry or novels and plays when they’re young teens,” he said, adding, “I don’t know if girls have that same stigma.”

“All the boys in my class are conscious of how literature is a much more emotional class, a girlie class,” said Napa High honors English student Alex Manter. “I can see that affecting people. … Napa High is very good about eliminating that social stigma, but certainly I can see a football player can be less inclined to read a book of Shakespeare’s love sonnets.”

For Manter, though, “I don’t know if it’s so much that a guy won’t be able to learn (English) as there is not a lot of motivation to try to learn,” he said. “Everybody expects girls to do a lot better.”
12 comment(s)

napablogger wrote on Mar 3, 2008 12:33 AM:

" Interesting, this is classic for people--go from one extreme to the other. To solve the problem of discrimination against women and as a part of that girls in school, we turned around and started discriminating against boys. It's pretty obvious, the girls are constantly being pumped up with all this "yes you can" encouragement in ways that the boys are not. Can we be surprised at the results? The lesson of male chauvinism is to value femaleness EQUALLY with maleness, not switch from one prejudice to another. "

Common Sense wrote on Mar 3, 2008 8:14 AM:

" Gee, most of us who have grown up in the 70s and 80s know that the schools tend to be structured for girls. The naive good intentions of the previous generation, attempting to improve things for girls, really did damage to boys. It is an epidemic now. "

Rob C wrote on Mar 3, 2008 9:59 AM:

" Oh boy, this ought to be good.

Peters is on tenuous ground here - recall how Harvard past president Larry Summers was castigated and eventually driven out of his position for merely suggesting that boys do better than girls at science and math b/c of innate differences?

MIT biology professor Nancy Hopkins walked out on Summers' talk, saying later that if she hadn't left, ''I would've either blacked out or thrown up." And she wasn't alone in her extreme reaction.


And if you buy into Manthey's argument, then that's another reason our government monopoly on education needs a thorough shake-up and re-vamp.

Nature vs nurture....let the blogging begin. Can we top the Fiesta Fair comment totals? "

winemd wrote on Mar 3, 2008 10:20 AM:

" The cover story of the March 2 New York Times magazine covers the growing trend in underperforming schools for single sex education. There are advantages and disadvantages to this idea. Ideally, each child should be able to receive an education that is best for them. I don't think that the public school system is equipped to deal with the problems of different learning styles very well. My daughter is a student who does well in school because it fits her learning style, but my son is an active hands-on learner. They are both equally smart, but she naturally does better at testing than he does. I don't have a good answer and it goes beyond just differences between boys and girls, in my opinion. "

hudds5 wrote on Mar 3, 2008 12:51 PM:

" Who's to blame...who cares! So girls are smarted than boys, does this translate to more opportunities for girls? It should, but it doesn't. I have to daughters and I can only hope that they have the same opportunities (or more) than any boy that might get a scholarship based on his athletic abilities. "

musikluvr wrote on Mar 3, 2008 1:32 PM:

" Another waste of taxpayer dollars by our schools! This is old news. Why don't the schools concentrate on teaching the three R's and stop all this waste of time and money. "

musikluvr wrote on Mar 3, 2008 1:35 PM:

" Homeschooled children do better than those in our useless public schools? Yet the NVUSD annual budget is $116,000,000 and home schooled kids do it on a $zero budget. Shows me what an absolute waste of money public education is! "

Rocco wrote on Mar 3, 2008 3:37 PM:

" Musikluvr actually brings up a good point...this time. The amount of money spent on education can never equal the impact on a child's success more than that of the child's family. Strong families make for successful students...of any sex. Everything else is merely shouting at the wind. (P.S. Search high and low, you’ll be hard pressed to find a classier young lady than Brogan McCuen!)

"

MikeK wrote on Mar 3, 2008 7:50 PM:

" musikluvr. . .there's no such thing as a zero dollar budget for homeschooling.

You need to really do some research on your views. "

steph wrote on Mar 3, 2008 10:02 PM:

" Musikluvr speaks from ignorance. I have children in Napa's public schools and I know the schools are doing a terrific job. I suppose we could go third-world and do away with public education, but I prefer the American way. "

musikluvr wrote on Mar 4, 2008 10:37 AM:

" So Barbara Nemko says, "we have not been focusing on boys"? What is this anti-male attitude all about? I think it is a function of the feminization of this country and it starts in the public schools. This is the proof from the person at the top of our county schools that there is purposful sexual discrimination and unfair treatment. There should be an investigation and an indictment of the people perpetrating this outrage on our sons. "

musikluvr wrote on Mar 4, 2008 11:04 AM:

" This is exactly why vouchers should be available for private schools and for home schools. Our tax money is being spent by our schools to sexually discriminate against our sons. Mr. Manthey and Ms. Nemko prove it by their admissions. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy