Firefighters get a raise
By KEVIN COURTNEY, Register Staff Writer
At a time when high police and fire salaries in Vallejo have that city flirting with bankruptcy, Napa is bestowing 11 percent wage increases on its firefighters.
Firefighters will get raises of up to $10,000 per year, retroactive to July 1. The Napa City Council approved the agreement last week.
A new firefighter now earns $74,460, while a veteran brings in $93,564. A veteran firefighter/paramedic will receive $102,924.
The city is living up to its contract to pay firefighters the average of nine other Bay Area cities, said Assistant City Manager Nancy Weiss. “It’s what they were entitled to under the contract,” she said.
Josh Pero, president of the Napa City Firefighters Association, said the increase was as big as it was because his membership had not taken the raises they were due the past two years.
“We went two years without taking what we should have gotten,” Pero said. “The past two budget cycles the Napa City Firefighters Association has come to the table and helped the city with their budget problems.”
Because the city was facing hard times, his membership voted to cap its 2005 increase at 2 percent and its 2003 increase at 3 percent, Pero said.
Firefighters are now playing catch-up. The 11 percent raise brings Napa firefighters up to the average of nine comparable cities, including Vacaville, Santa Rosa, Fairfield, Hayward, Petaluma and Vallejo, Weiss said.
“A couple of agencies in our survey group had significant increases,” Weiss said. “Vallejo was one of those.”
Vallejo is in a financial crisis, with the Vallejo City Council announcing last week that it might have to file for bankruptcy to get out of its mountain of financial obligations to employees.
According to Vallejo officials, police and fire wages and benefits are eating up 80 percent of general fund revenues. The city could run of money in April. In addition, it has $135 million in unfunded retirement liability for current and retired employees.
City Manager Mike Parness said Napa’s financial picture is a far cry from Vallejo’s. Napa’s revenues are growing, not shrinking, and Napa’s contracts with police and fire are less generous, consuming less than 60 percent of the general fund, he said.
Napa has caps on retirement medical benefits that Vallejo does not have. Also, Napa’s police and fire contribute more money to the state-run retirement system, he said.
Like Vallejo, Napa firefighters contribute 9 percent of their pay to the Public Employees Retirement System, but they also pay another 2 percent, officials said.
Because of this extra 2 percent, Napa firefighters actually earn 2 percent less than the regional average, Pero said.
Vallejo’s situation is an extreme case of the financial strains that most California cities are facing, Parness said. Cities have lost control of their public safety retirement costs, he said. The state allows public safety employees to retire at age 50 with 3 percent pay for every year worked, he said.
A city that does not offer this benefit risks becoming unable to recruit and retain the best employees, Weiss said. “It’s really a statewide issue,” she said.
Napa needs to strike a balance between the needs of employees and the needs of residents for quality city services, Parness said. There are many areas where service levels could be improved if the city had the money, he said.
Solano County cities are generally in worse financial shape than Napa these days, Parness said. They depended more on housing development for revenues and have been hurt by the building downturn, he said.
In a report to council last week, Napa’s Finance Director Carole Wilson said city revenues from the hotel tax and interest on investments were running ahead of expectations.
Napa’s seven-year contract with firefighters expires June 30. Negotiations on a new contract are scheduled to begin next month.
Wages and benefits for Napa’s public safety employees consume nearly 60 percent of the city’s general fund, Parness said. This is close to the California average, he said.
Parness would prefer that Napa have flexibility as to whether it pays the average of surrounding cities. Survey information is helpful, but should it dictate what the city must pay? he asked.
Pero declined to comment on the upcoming negotiations or Vallejo’s situation. “I can’t tell you what our strategy and tactics will be,” he said. Negotiations are best done in private, he said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
musikluvr wrote on Feb 26, 2008 9:04 AM:
Rob C wrote on Feb 26, 2008 9:10 AM:
He is right, though, that using mandatory "averages of similar pay" is nothing more than a self-increasing upward spiral; as some area is always going to be "less in pay" than another - a beautiful union tactic used across the country.
And no, Mr. Pero, sunshine on negotiations is always in the best interest of taxpayers. Lack of transparency has already allowed these absurd pay-escalation metrics and ever-increasing unfunded pension liabilities.
Lets hope the city's upcoming contract negotiations are conducted with reality in mind - not expediency. A positive, cost-saving step would include a shift from defined-benefit public employee retirement plans to one based upon defined contributions - which is on par with nearly all private sector retirement plans today.
Look down the road to Vallejo fellow citizens - we are not as insulated from their plight as we'd like to think.
_________________________________
"As the roads continue to crumble" "
Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 26, 2008 9:48 AM:
petebo wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:10 AM:
hudds5 wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:36 AM:
Hopefully Napa won't put themselves in the same situation as Vallejo. "
BiLly wrote on Feb 26, 2008 11:47 AM:
This is not New York City...how many major fires in Napa last year?
"
chunk wrote on Feb 26, 2008 11:56 AM:
napablogger wrote on Feb 26, 2008 12:27 PM:
averagejane wrote on Feb 26, 2008 1:28 PM:
grant wrote on Feb 26, 2008 1:58 PM:
hoozcryinow wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:37 PM:
mofosheee wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:45 PM:
musikluvr wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:55 PM:
BiLly wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:56 PM:
napablogger wrote on Feb 26, 2008 6:02 PM:
notpc wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:26 PM:
chunk wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:21 PM:
another co. wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:52 PM:
rocketman wrote on Feb 27, 2008 6:53 AM:
rocketman wrote on Feb 27, 2008 6:56 AM:
jeepracer10 wrote on Feb 27, 2008 5:20 PM:
napadad wrote on Feb 28, 2008 12:21 PM:
accordionista wrote on Feb 28, 2008 12:26 PM:
Clever Nickname wrote on Feb 28, 2008 12:34 PM:
chunk wrote on Feb 28, 2008 4:13 PM:
jeepracer10 wrote on Feb 28, 2008 4:52 PM:
notpc wrote on Feb 28, 2008 10:06 PM:
anotherguyinnapa wrote on Mar 2, 2008 10:06 AM:
Endisforever wrote on Mar 2, 2008 12:54 PM:
Napa_Native wrote on Mar 2, 2008 1:25 PM:
To earn their salary they are expected to "work" during normal business hours. This is when business inspections, training, apparatus maintenance, exercise etc. is to occur. Physical fitness is important. But to include exercise during the "work” period is a stretch. After 5pm the work day is done and all they are expected to do is respond to calls. So basically the crews are expected to work 8 hours of the 24-hour shift. (For those who work and 8-hour day that translates to roughly 2 hours and 45 minutes of an 8-hour shift.)
The work schedule averages to 10 days a month, and crews are expected to "work" normal business hours (8), then the top step firefighter earns $102,200 for 80 hours of "work" and 160 hours of stand-by time. The tax payer’s money would be better spent if the fire department used the 12-hour shift schedule. The city would NOT have to hire any more firefighters and the productive hours for each shift would increase 50%!
Firefighters are on duty for 48 hours straight which raises safety concerns. If they have a busy night on the first night of the tour, then we need to ask the question about their ability to perform for the next 24 hours.
The International Association of Fire Chiefs just published a paper on The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Fire Fighters and EMS Responders. This paper presents strong evidence for moving away from 24-hour shift work.
My suggestion does not call for a reduction in their compensation. But it does require a paradigm shift.
"
Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Mar 2, 2008 1:40 PM:
cyclnapa wrote on Mar 3, 2008 8:31 AM:
joe08 wrote on Mar 3, 2008 9:02 PM:
petebo wrote on Mar 4, 2008 6:52 PM:
fyrman75 wrote on Mar 7, 2008 5:15 PM:
misfit wrote on Mar 7, 2008 10:13 PM:
Yes, at times they have to witness horrific things but, like a policeman who never has to draw his gun over an entire career, those events are relatively rare. I would think the CHP is exposed to more of those kinds of things.
Now, I know emergency room technicians who witness a lot of tragic things, nurses in hospitals who must take someone off of life support and then comfort a grieving family, many other examples of difficult jobs that don't command this kind of money and benefits. It is out of whack to be sure. No, I don't want to be the one to pull a child out of a pool but, that's what you signed up for. Was the motive to help humanity or to jump on the gravy train?
Teachers should be livid! "
TheTruth wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:07 AM:
Napa_Native wrote on Mar 10, 2008 6:58 PM:
Paramedic training is a minimum of 1090 hours. In regards to firefighter academies, most are completed in one semester.
"
TheTruth wrote on Mar 11, 2008 5:57 AM: