NVR Logo
Land use interest groups weighing stances on growth initiative
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Save and Share Share
The Responsible Growth Initiative is getting a great deal of attention in local political and land use circles, but there’s another land-use measure coming soon — it is not clear how soon — to a ballot box near you.

Traditional environmental and agricultural land use advocates are circulating petitions to extend the powers of Measure J far into the future. The law, which forces any proposed zoning change in the county’s Agricultural Preserve to the ballot and which itself was passed by voter initiative in 1990, is scheduled to sunset in 2020. The new proposal would extend it for several more decades.
With signature-gathering still ongoing, it appears that the earliest a Measure J renewal would appear on the ballot is November of 2008.

Meanwhile, the Responsible Growth Initiative, which gives voters the sole authority to make exceptions to the county’s 1 percent cap on residential growth every year, is headed for the June 3 ballot.
Where do such groups as the Farm Bureau stand on the Responsible Growth Initiative? They are still studying.

Representatives of the Napa Chapter of the Sierra Club, the Napa County Farm Bureau and the Napa Valley Vintners have committed to scheduling time for both proponents and opponents of the Responsible Growth Initiative to come and talk to them.
Proponents say it will save Napa County from unregulated growth. Opponents say it will take a meat-cleaver approach to public planning that will ultimately hurt the county.

The initiative would decimate the existing proposal for 3,200 townhomes, some in seven-story buildings, at the former Napa Pipe property just south of the city of Napa.

The Sierra Club has already heard from Napa attorney James Marshall, one of the prime backers of the initiative. The group intends to hear a presentation from opponents Keep Napa Napa soon.

“We haven't decided yet, but we are taking a presentation from all sides,” Elisabeth Frater, chairwoman of the Napa County Sierra Club.

Rex Stults, industry relations director for Napa Valley Vintners, said his group plans to hear both sides as well, but didn’t know if the group would take a formal position.

Sandy Elles, executive director of the Napa County Farm Bureau, wrote in an e-mail the group plans on getting presentations.

“Citizens in Napa County are voicing strong concerns about growth and the recent large development plans in Angwin, Napa Pipe and the Ghisletta annexation,” she wrote.

“With the update of the county’s General Plan, there’s a historic opportunity to manage and minimize our growth for the next 30 years. ... If the Board of Supervisors and cities can work cooperatively and proactively to minimize growth, frustrated citizens will not have to resort to the initiative process. NCFB will meet with the Responsible Growth Initiative proponents and opponents next month, but we do not currently have a position on the initiative.”
3 comment(s)

musikluvr wrote on Feb 24, 2008 7:37 AM:

" Why do our County School administrators appear to be silent in this growth issue? They want us to pay for more schools that these developers ignore (American Canyon). Well it won't happen again. The taxpayers refuse to pay for services and schools to bring more people here. If they want to build more houses, developers will have to provide all of the infrastructure necessities including schools. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Feb 24, 2008 5:43 PM:

" I don't always agree with musikluvr, but he's right on the mark here. "

jenny99 wrote on Feb 24, 2008 10:08 PM:

" Maybe the reporter didn't call the schools to ask what they think of all this?

And I thought developers weren't required to provide schools when they build houses. Isn't that what Mello Roos charges are for? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy