Whole Foods fails county health inspection
By JENNIFER HUFFMAN
Register Business Writer
Napa’s new Whole Foods received an F grade in its first county food facility inspection.
The market’s sheer size and diversity of offerings may have contributed towards the failing grade, which Whole Foods took steps to fix “immediately,” said store manager David Cosper.
The report, dated Jan. 31, details 16 inspection categories that were out of compliance, including three major violations.
The major violations, which must be corrected immediately, included improper hand washing and use of gloves at a hot counter area, improper hot and cold holding temperatures in several food areas and lack of availability of hot or cold water at two sinks. Other violations included improper handling of food and food storage, uncovered containers and missing sneeze guards.
“Surprised” when he heard of the market’s failing grade, Cosper said the store has taken steps to fix the failures.
“Eighty percent of everything on this list we either corrected on the spot or within 24 hours of the inspection,” he said. “The other 20 percent are construction issues or structural issues,” which are being addressed.
Since the first inspection, “we added hourly sanitation walks through the store by our leadership team. We replaced and recalibrated all temperature gauges in the store. We’ve re-inspected all refrigeration and heating equipment.”
New team members are being trained to understand “strict sanitation standards and operating procedures.”
Shopping or eating at Whole Foods does not present an immediate health and safety issue, said Steve Lederer, director of the Napa County Department of Environmental Management.
“Any immediate issues of health and safety to the public were immediately resolved,” said Lederer, for example, discarding food held at improper temperatures.
The market stocks 25,000 to 30,000 items and offers a number of prepared food stations and demonstration areas.
With “10 times more things going on than a standard restaurant,” Whole Foods may be the most challenging facility they review, said Lederer.
The more areas to inspect, the more likely a loss of one and two points can add up to a failing grade, said County Environmental Management Coordinator Ruben Oropeza. “It may not be representative about what’s going on completely.”
Fifty-two points were deducted on the inspection report, with some of the biggest markdowns accumulating from improper hot and cold holding temperatures, missing sneeze guards, and improper separation between stored and cooked foods.
According to Lederer, a food facility losing one to nine points in an inspection report receives an A grade. A B grade is given when 10 to 19 points are lost, a C for 20 to 29 points lost, and an F if 30 or more points are deducted.
Cosper said after the inspection he realized the store should have applied for multiple permits within the market.
“Had we done the correct permitting we probably wouldn’t have gotten the score we got,” said Cosper. Separate permits would have applied violatons to each of the permitted areas, instead of adding together for an overall deduction.
Each food facility annual operating permit costs $945 a year, Lederer said. A store with a bakery, cafe or sushi bar can apply for a permit for each.
In Whole Foods’ case, applying for separate permits “certainly would have helped them,” said Lederer, however, “The issues are still real.”
“(Whole Foods) had a number of things they need to work on. ... They are genuinely concerned and interested in resolving the issues,” said Lederer.
“We think they can get their arms around what they need to do, and certainly improve from that last inspection,” said Lederer. “We will keep an eye on them until they do.”
Any facility receiving a C grade or worse is automatically re-inspected within 30 to 60 days. Whole Foods will be re-inspected within the next two to three weeks, said Lederer.
A failing grade in a food facility inspection is uncommon. The county reviews every food facility in the county annually, said Lederer. Of the 700 food facilities reviewed last year, more than 96 percent received A or B grades, said Lederer. Less than 1 percent received an F grade.
Food facility inspection reports are available online at www.co.napa.ca.us/emd-pub/consumer/search.aspx, however to date, the site has yet to upload Whole Foods’ inspection report.
Whole Foods is known for its all-natural and organic foods free of artificial preservatives, colors, flavors, sweeteners and hydrogenated oils. The Bel Aire Plaza store opened on Jan. 16 to intense local anticipation.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
napan79 wrote on Feb 16, 2008 1:40 AM:
valligirl wrote on Feb 16, 2008 6:39 AM:
hudds5 wrote on Feb 16, 2008 6:54 AM:
tfytmp wrote on Feb 16, 2008 7:17 AM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Feb 16, 2008 8:05 AM:
BILly wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:10 AM:
naparian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:35 AM:
momtoo wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:04 AM:
napamomma wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:20 AM:
slow down - take a breath wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:00 AM:
One thing I would like to say to the general public. Whole Food's hot food self serve area, is NOT your private picnic grazing area for tasting, using any container you find, to "sample" the food. Especially when you have NO intention of buying that food. In Berkeley's Whole Foods, I've watched the homeless try to feed themselves by the sample method. But what I've witnessed in Napa certainly wasn't the homeless...by the way these munchies were dressed, they could well afford to buy many containers. I've seen people snacking from one bin to the other with the same cup and tapping the serving spoon on the previously used container ! PLEASE stop it !! I don't want your germs in my food ! I wish the health dept. would hang around and TICKET these freebie fools. "
NVR Moderator wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:20 AM:
The Register did a large February 2005 series on Napa County restaurant inspection reports and what the individual business ratings were. Thanks for the comment. "
naparian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:33 AM:
tfytmp wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:46 AM:
Dwayne wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:49 AM:
biLly wrote on Feb 16, 2008 12:11 PM:
biLly wrote on Feb 16, 2008 12:18 PM:
I read the local rag everyday and this is the first I have seen of a full blown article with such negative comments regarding a new business and it's first health inspection after opening.The reason for these inspections is to remedy the violations ASAP...not punish the business with some huge "paranoia" article intent on slamming the company. Napa is so negative and it has a lot to do with this paper. Whether it is the DUI publishings that are there the whole month or some BS article slamming a new business in town..what a joke "
JMB wrote on Feb 16, 2008 12:23 PM:
napacook wrote on Feb 16, 2008 1:37 PM:
Wine Country Folk wrote on Feb 16, 2008 1:37 PM:
comment wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:24 PM:
Not all of the blame can be placed on the food handlers at Whole Foods. With sneeze guards missing and sinks with no running water, it sounds like the people at Whole Foods opened the doors before it was time. They have to have at least one person certified in food safety in that store, with a store like that I would guess they have a few. Where were they? "
healthymom wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:47 PM:
healthymom wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:53 PM:
citizen wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:05 PM:
hawaiibarby wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:29 PM:
pernodboi wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:49 PM:
Could you imagine a grocery store with 5 or 10 report cards at the door? The consumers would know immediately if the store was taking advantage of the multiple permit rule. "
Selim wrote on Feb 16, 2008 5:08 PM:
First of all, it seems strange that it took this long for the NVR to report this. I knew about the failing grade weeks ago (and I don't work for either WF or the health department). And it ain't all just missing sneeze guards here, folks, you're not getting the whole story. I know a number of people who witnessed gross (pun intended) violations there.
Second, this isn't a "get a life, Napa" issue. This should be a real wake-up call showing how WF is running their operation. They are making a boatload of cash and (apparently) have this corporate formula that makes WF what it is...and they apparently still can't remember the sneeze guards, tell workers to wash hands, or buy a new mop. If Whole Foods can't open a new store without passing a health inspection, then I guess they shouldn't be opening any more stores.
The health department is just doing its job, and I know for a fact that this inspection was triggered in part by complaints from customers over perceived violations that apparently have turned out to be true. Don't slam the health department...place the blame where it belongs. "
easkylar@sbcglobal.net wrote on Feb 16, 2008 7:50 PM:
healthymom wrote on Feb 16, 2008 8:39 PM:
redredwine wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:32 PM:
skeptic wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:52 PM:
Sandra wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:43 AM:
Mr. Burns wrote on Feb 17, 2008 4:05 PM:
suze wrote on Feb 17, 2008 8:37 PM:
jpcrash wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:26 PM:
mikeb wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:40 AM:
biLly wrote on Feb 18, 2008 9:28 AM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:04 PM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:10 PM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:14 PM:
By CHRIS TRIBBEY
Register City Editor
Sunday, June 12, 2005
That's not an Etch-a-Sketch health inspectors are bringing into Napa County restaurants. It's a new health report.
To provide public access to health reports online, and to make sure even the worst handwriting can be read by everyone, the county Environmental Management Department is looking to replace its current paper-only reports with inspections done on portable, tablet-sized computers.
"This will help kick inspections up a bit," said Jill Pahl, assistant director of the department.
The department has purchased three of the Tablet PCs, for less than $10,000 total, using grant money from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and is looking to purchase more, Pahl said. The tablets are just like laptop computers, except they can recognize words written on to them and automatically turn handwritten notes into typed sentences.
The tablets will be essential to the department as it works to put county health inspections online as part of a larger revamp of the department's inspection process. Earlier this year the department was directed by the Board of Supervisors to update its inspection system and to get health reports online after a Register investigation found restaurants throughout the county were ignoring state laws concerning public notification of health inspection results.
The tablets will be used by Environmental Management for other inspections, including those of wastewater plants and other health-related facilities. The tablets have wireless capability and hard copies will be kept on file at the department's office. A printout will be given to a food facility following an inspection.
"
Yvonne wrote on Feb 19, 2008 3:12 PM:
Suze wrote on Feb 19, 2008 8:36 PM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Feb 20, 2008 7:00 AM:
areyouserious wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:24 AM:
and NVR moderator... 2005 article? may as well have been 1985? Did you include Alfredo's in that report? "
cathyodom wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:55 AM:
steph wrote on Feb 20, 2008 9:29 AM:
jeepracer10 wrote on Feb 20, 2008 12:40 PM:
napaao wrote on Feb 21, 2008 10:28 AM:
st.hell.comnative wrote on Feb 21, 2008 3:29 PM:
Food facility inspection reports are available online at www.co.napa.ca.us/emd-pub/consumer/search.aspx, however to date, the site has yet to upload Whole Foods’ inspection report.
Glad none of you are health inspectors! "
Reader wrote on Feb 21, 2008 9:21 PM:
cathyodom wrote on Feb 22, 2008 7:55 AM:
MyInput wrote on Feb 22, 2008 8:34 PM:
Sandra wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:25 AM:
y2kcbr wrote on Feb 25, 2008 2:26 PM:
“The other 20 percent are construction issues or structural issues,”
Does this mean that Env. Mgmt allowed this store to open, knowing that 20% of the store was going to have issues?
My kids' school went there last week on a school outing. The store looked immaculate and food was delicious. I'm certain that they had to post (IN VISIBLE SIGHT) their failing grade to the public. Looks like they have acted on the problems and are working on the issues. Sorry to say the F rating hit WF's, but they can only do better next rating period. I would hope htat with an F rating, the staff at Env. Mgmt would go out in the very near future for a follow-up visit. "