NVR Logo
Whole Foods fails county health inspection
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Save and Share Share
Napa’s new Whole Foods received an F grade in its first county food facility inspection.

The market’s sheer size and diversity of offerings may have contributed towards the failing grade, which Whole Foods took steps to fix “immediately,” said store manager David Cosper.
The report, dated Jan. 31, details 16 inspection categories that were out of compliance, including three major violations.

The major violations, which must be corrected immediately, included improper hand washing and use of gloves at a hot counter area, improper hot and cold holding temperatures in several food areas and lack of availability of hot or cold water at two sinks. Other violations included improper handling of food and food storage, uncovered containers and missing sneeze guards.
“Surprised” when he heard of the market’s failing grade, Cosper said the store has taken steps to fix the failures.

“Eighty percent of everything on this list we either corrected on the spot or within 24 hours of the inspection,” he said. “The other 20 percent are construction issues or structural issues,” which are being addressed.
Since the first inspection, “we added hourly sanitation walks through the store by our leadership team. We replaced and recalibrated all temperature gauges in the store. We’ve re-inspected all refrigeration and heating equipment.”

New team members are being trained to understand “strict sanitation standards and operating procedures.”

Shopping or eating at Whole Foods does not present an immediate health and safety issue, said Steve Lederer, director of the Napa County Department of Environmental Management.

“Any immediate issues of health and safety to the public were immediately resolved,” said Lederer, for example, discarding food held at improper temperatures.

The market stocks 25,000 to 30,000 items and offers a number of prepared food stations and demonstration areas.

With “10 times more things going on than a standard restaurant,” Whole Foods may be the most challenging facility they review, said Lederer.

The more areas to inspect, the more likely a loss of one and two points can add up to a failing grade, said County Environmental Management Coordinator Ruben Oropeza. “It may not be representative about what’s going on completely.”

Fifty-two points were deducted on the inspection report, with some of the biggest markdowns accumulating from improper hot and cold holding temperatures, missing sneeze guards, and improper separation between stored and cooked foods.

According to Lederer, a food facility losing one to nine points in an inspection report receives an A grade. A B grade is given when 10 to 19 points are lost, a C for 20 to 29 points lost, and an F if 30 or more points are deducted.

Cosper said after the inspection he realized the store should have applied for multiple permits within the market.

“Had we done the correct permitting we probably wouldn’t have gotten the score we got,” said Cosper. Separate permits would have applied violatons to each of the permitted areas, instead of adding together for an overall deduction.

Each food facility annual operating permit costs $945 a year, Lederer said. A store with a bakery, cafe or sushi bar can apply for a permit for each.

In Whole Foods’ case, applying for separate permits “certainly would have helped them,” said Lederer, however, “The issues are still real.”

“(Whole Foods) had a number of things they need to work on. ... They are genuinely concerned and interested in resolving the issues,” said Lederer.

“We think they can get their arms around what they need to do, and certainly improve from that last inspection,” said Lederer. “We will keep an eye on them until they do.”

Any facility receiving a C grade or worse is automatically re-inspected within 30 to 60 days. Whole Foods will be re-inspected within the next two to three weeks, said Lederer.

A failing grade in a food facility inspection is uncommon. The county reviews every food facility in the county annually, said Lederer. Of the 700 food facilities reviewed last year, more than 96 percent received A or B grades, said Lederer. Less than 1 percent received an F grade.

Food facility inspection reports are available online at www.co.napa.ca.us/emd-pub/consumer/search.aspx, however to date, the site has yet to upload Whole Foods’ inspection report.

Whole Foods is known for its all-natural and organic foods free of artificial preservatives, colors, flavors, sweeteners and hydrogenated oils. The Bel Aire Plaza store opened on Jan. 16 to intense local anticipation.
53 comment(s)

napan79 wrote on Feb 16, 2008 1:40 AM:

" Whole Foods being over price should have better health standards. Don't think just because a store has high prices means it is a better place to eat. When a store first opens you would think the managment would make sure everyone is washing their hands and changing their gloves. Shop Vallergas at least they have an A and shop local. "

valligirl wrote on Feb 16, 2008 6:39 AM:

" That's pretty bad - glad I haven't eaten there, not very appetizing is it? "

hudds5 wrote on Feb 16, 2008 6:54 AM:

" I wonder if this might have contributed to the rash of colds that have been reported in Napa? "

tfytmp wrote on Feb 16, 2008 7:17 AM:

" Whole Foods just opened. There is no reason for not getting an A. Part of the problem seems to be a POOR building code inspection, BEFORE THE STORE OPENED. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Feb 16, 2008 8:05 AM:

" I'm still going to shop there. --- The biggest factoids in this story are that Whole Foods should have separately permitted each area, and that they immediately responded to the problems uncovered. --- However, one wonders if there was a pre-opening inspection by the Napa County Department of Environmental Services? If not, WHY NOT? Our government should not be playing "gotcha" games with newly opening businesses, and needlessly embarrassing them without giving them the chance to correct "structural deficiencies" like missing sneeze guards first. And if the permitting process went awry, then the government workers should have clued Whole Foods or any other new business in on potential problems at the time of application. Yes, I want safe food, but I'd like to avoid the high-handed manner in which new businesses are treated in Napa. Unless there is a serious health threat that must be publicized, honest businesses should be allowed a 'shakedown' period that includes a visit before they open to the public. If things are not remedied when the new business opens to the public then hammer them. But this kind of goofy-ness just makes Napa look stupidly and needlessly hostile to business. ~Ruff "

BILly wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:10 AM:

" How many other "F" ratings form the Health Department have you done articles on???? Sounds a little political to me. The good old Register that does not have the guts to publish criticism. "

naparian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:35 AM:

" I'll still be shopping there...love all the healthy choices "

momtoo wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:04 AM:

" This isn't surprising to me. I had to ask a worker to change her gloves once and the floors in the kitchen area are gross! This is the dirtiest WF I've ever been in, and it's brand new! "

napamomma wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:20 AM:

" Eeeewwww! Gross!! What a bummer, especially after all the hype and excitement of the store opening. This totally turns me off to shopping there however I am going to hope that they are and have taken the measures they said they did in this article and shop there....and if get score another F, I will never shop there again!! "

slow down - take a breath wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:00 AM:

" Dear Whole Foods.....welcome to the Napa County Health Department....which I believe to be one of the toughest in the nation.......I would never recommend to anyone that they open anything in this valley that deals with the serving of food.

One thing I would like to say to the general public. Whole Food's hot food self serve area, is NOT your private picnic grazing area for tasting, using any container you find, to "sample" the food. Especially when you have NO intention of buying that food. In Berkeley's Whole Foods, I've watched the homeless try to feed themselves by the sample method. But what I've witnessed in Napa certainly wasn't the homeless...by the way these munchies were dressed, they could well afford to buy many containers. I've seen people snacking from one bin to the other with the same cup and tapping the serving spoon on the previously used container ! PLEASE stop it !! I don't want your germs in my food ! I wish the health dept. would hang around and TICKET these freebie fools. "

NVR Moderator wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:20 AM:

" BilLy:
The Register did a large February 2005 series on Napa County restaurant inspection reports and what the individual business ratings were. Thanks for the comment. "

naparian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:33 AM:

" so....Napa Health folks....you off to visit TJs, Oxbow, Raley's, etc over the next few weeks? Let's see if you do and if the NVR covers that? "

tfytmp wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:46 AM:

" Maybe it is time that Napa does what Sac County does. They have "Food School". Every buisness that applies for a permit and every buisness that receives a grade of C or below needs to attend. "

Dwayne wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:49 AM:

" According to Whole Foods, this was just a technical violation, because they didn't manipulate their permits in order to weight better grades? I'd have more respect for them if they hadn't waffled like that, and simply admitted to the negligent health standards that they were aware of going into business. I won't be shopping there. Thanks for the article, NVR. "

biLly wrote on Feb 16, 2008 12:11 PM:

" 2005???? It is 2008 big guy..way to be on top of it ! "

biLly wrote on Feb 16, 2008 12:18 PM:

" Ruff, you hit the nail on the head.
I read the local rag everyday and this is the first I have seen of a full blown article with such negative comments regarding a new business and it's first health inspection after opening.The reason for these inspections is to remedy the violations ASAP...not punish the business with some huge "paranoia" article intent on slamming the company. Napa is so negative and it has a lot to do with this paper. Whether it is the DUI publishings that are there the whole month or some BS article slamming a new business in town..what a joke "

JMB wrote on Feb 16, 2008 12:23 PM:

" I laughed out loud this morning upon reading this article. Brand new store, corporation owned which means they have set rules in place, claiming to be natural, organic, and healthy, but they failed their first inspection??? FAILED! Who on earth did they hire? My mind just boggles. I wasn't planning on going to Whole Paycheck anyway, but now I just might browse (not buy) to see it. I'm HACCP certified and I'd get a kick out of looking at what's going on (or not!) and their practices. "

napacook wrote on Feb 16, 2008 1:37 PM:

" Shouldn't a large corporation such as Whole Foods know the health regulations set forth by the state and local agencies? Shouldn't they have corporate guidelines/standards that should be followed in addition to statuatory ones? "

Wine Country Folk wrote on Feb 16, 2008 1:37 PM:

" Hmmm, we are taking typhoid pills for an international trip. Glad we are prepared to eat at Whole Foods also! "

comment wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:24 PM:

" There are positives in making it public like this. You can be sure Whole Foods will not let it happen again. The higher ups in the company will be all over this, making sure everything is taken care of.

Not all of the blame can be placed on the food handlers at Whole Foods. With sneeze guards missing and sinks with no running water, it sounds like the people at Whole Foods opened the doors before it was time. They have to have at least one person certified in food safety in that store, with a store like that I would guess they have a few. Where were they? "

healthymom wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:47 PM:

" Napa GET A LIFE! I thought we where better then picking on the new kid in town. Sounds like someone is in somebody’s pocket! Whole Foods have strict quality standards that they truly live up to! I have shopped at Whole Foods EVERY day since they have opened...you can't find better quality any where else! People think that just because they are a big corporation they take away from the local farmers, soooo not true! I can't believe all of the local choices they offer! Have you been into a TJ's lately all of those products that you think are so cheap are products that TJ's got for a discount FOR a reason...farmers who are going bankrupt. TJ's packaging may look nice...but it so bad for the environment! Whole Foods sets standards! I will continue to shop there! Stay Strong Whole Foods! "

healthymom wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:53 PM:

" One more thing! I bet half of you posting comments work or the TJ's or Vallergas...again get a life! :) Again get a life NAPA! "

citizen wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:05 PM:

" You all are rude. Using hypothetical numbers for better clarity; if Whole Foods had taken out 10 permits (as other market do)and gotten a -1 on each, they would have received 10 'A's. Instead, they took out 1 permit, got -10 and received an 'F. Get it? Now relax and go enjoy a meal. "

hawaiibarby wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:29 PM:

" what a hoot! over priced and germy... a plus for Vallergas! Does anyone remember when the grading started a few years ago? this is not NEW for the Health Dept. It's been ongoing and really forces these places to keep it clean! Do you see Lyon's Restaurant operating anymore? Talk about a germy foodery... how many people got ill there before the grading system...who knows? Good for you health dept! keep up the good work! People, look for those who display their A grades proudly on their windows. THAT'S where you want to eat/shop! "

pernodboi wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:49 PM:

" Wow! What an eye opening story. The comments were very entertaining as well - almost as informative as the article. I just got back from LA and was pleased to see the letter grade from the health services posted at every eatery. I think this has been discussed for Napa - but never implemented - maybe it's time to open that topic for discussion, again.

Could you imagine a grocery store with 5 or 10 report cards at the door? The consumers would know immediately if the store was taking advantage of the multiple permit rule. "

Selim wrote on Feb 16, 2008 5:08 PM:

" Two things:

First of all, it seems strange that it took this long for the NVR to report this. I knew about the failing grade weeks ago (and I don't work for either WF or the health department). And it ain't all just missing sneeze guards here, folks, you're not getting the whole story. I know a number of people who witnessed gross (pun intended) violations there.

Second, this isn't a "get a life, Napa" issue. This should be a real wake-up call showing how WF is running their operation. They are making a boatload of cash and (apparently) have this corporate formula that makes WF what it is...and they apparently still can't remember the sneeze guards, tell workers to wash hands, or buy a new mop. If Whole Foods can't open a new store without passing a health inspection, then I guess they shouldn't be opening any more stores.

The health department is just doing its job, and I know for a fact that this inspection was triggered in part by complaints from customers over perceived violations that apparently have turned out to be true. Don't slam the health department...place the blame where it belongs. "

easkylar@sbcglobal.net wrote on Feb 16, 2008 7:50 PM:

" I believe that everyone is better off knowing about the violations and consequently the efforts to correct them. I don't believe we should be choosing sides or assigning blame. Let's hope this works out for the best of everyone, a healthy community, as well as a healthy economy. "

healthymom wrote on Feb 16, 2008 8:39 PM:

" I own a winery in Napa and I have personal been through a Health inspection and let me tell you they are a bunch of glorified "HOUSE WIFES" who took a 8 hour class to become certified! A bunch of power trippers if you ask me! What is "gross" is the way Napa begged and pleaded to have a Whole Foods here and you have given them nothing but a hard time! I don't now if you can "Read Properly" but most of the violations were simple permit violations! I have been shopping at Whole Foods for over 10 years...and I will continue to shop there for as long as I live and guess what it will probably be longer than all of you because I am eating food that is good for you! "

redredwine wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:32 PM:

" oh my goodness, all that hype and all for a stinkin' "F"? I'm shocked!!! NOT GOOD!!! My co-worker and I were just about to go and shop there, NOT ANY MORE!!! Disgusting! "

skeptic wrote on Feb 16, 2008 10:52 PM:

" pernodboi had a great point. it's really legal to pay the county a few thousand dollars and an F turns into an A ? really? will the information on how many permits each restaurant paid for be provided on the same level of transparency as the letter grades? i'd like to know the names of all those who paid to get a better grade. i appreciate the article and anticipate it will help the store improve right away. i'll come on in the next time i go to trader joe's next door and see if they still have the good deal on grapefruit. we all have the freedom to walk in and pick up a few bargains if we can't afford the things not on sale.i hope they stay with one permit. if they get an A they can say it's worth 5 times what some other A's are. "

Sandra wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:43 AM:

" I believe there is/was a problem with Whole Foods. We purchased milk there that spoiled before its date. This shows it was improperly refrigerated at some point. Having had a father that worked in environmental health for 22 years, there are many small things that can add up to cause a failiure. Whole foods was inspected by the county before opening. BUT, the inspector cannot know how the employess will handle food, or store food, before the fact. The inspector cannot know if the store will properly refrigerate, cover containers in the walk in box, or follow other procedures of hygene. If we have one of the toughest County health departments then I say hurrah!. It is for our benefit, and will keep us safer. I am sure most of the violations will be corrected by educating the employess, and the store will be more vigilant in the future. How can this be a bad thing? "

Mr. Burns wrote on Feb 17, 2008 4:05 PM:

" This is inexcusable. 22 points below an F grade. Rather than making excuses I think Cosper should be looking for a new job. Unfortunately accountability no longer exists in corporate America, and I wouldn't expect Whole Foods to behave any differently. "

suze wrote on Feb 17, 2008 8:37 PM:

" Just to give a little perspective on this, on a previous restaurant testing, Taco Bell scored higher than the French Laundry!! A lot of issues being the storing of foodstuffs. Some foods don't taste too good when ice cold from the 'fridge. It gets put out on the counter to 'warm up' before serving, and the health inspector nails you. Sounds to me like they are picking on Whole Foods. I wanted to buy wild mushrooms there, only to be told they had been stopped from selling them - a health hazard. Funny that, I can buy the dried article in any store, what is the difference?!Vallergas sells wild mushrooms, why can't Whole Foods? No store is perfect, this one seems pretty good to me, I like their ethics. "

jpcrash wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:26 PM:

" Amazed. Poor Management for sure. Someone should be fired for this. It is pure lazyness. "

mikeb wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:40 AM:

" Ha! The Whole Foods cheer squad is out in force on this issue trying to defend the inflated prices they're paying for bad food, and Ruff seems to be head cheerleader. Why should a new bussiness be given slack on it's health inspection? If anything, the new busness should be the cleanest in town! Beyond that, you can hardly call Whole Foods a novice in the food service care and handling. On the notion that Whole Foods could have avoided the F grade if they had multiple permits, Ruff, have you even thought about what that "solution" means? It means they can raise their score without correcting a single issue cited in the health inspection report! Multiple permits would simply divide out the laundry list of deficiencies so that the exact same list of problems might result in 7 B's rather than 1 F. Maybe that's how you want your "fresh" food cared for, but I'll pass. "

biLly wrote on Feb 18, 2008 9:28 AM:

" No excuses for Whole Foods ...my issue is how many F grades have their been for other businesses that the Register has not published an article about?? I have a feeling there are plenty ... The public should know about all "F" ratings not just Whole Foods "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:04 PM:

" There is a way to see the grades. Go to the county web site. They shold have it on there. "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:10 PM:

" Viva Trader Joes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:14 PM:

" Health report going digital
By CHRIS TRIBBEY

Register City Editor
Sunday, June 12, 2005


That's not an Etch-a-Sketch health inspectors are bringing into Napa County restaurants. It's a new health report.

To provide public access to health reports online, and to make sure even the worst handwriting can be read by everyone, the county Environmental Management Department is looking to replace its current paper-only reports with inspections done on portable, tablet-sized computers.
"This will help kick inspections up a bit," said Jill Pahl, assistant director of the department.

The department has purchased three of the Tablet PCs, for less than $10,000 total, using grant money from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and is looking to purchase more, Pahl said. The tablets are just like laptop computers, except they can recognize words written on to them and automatically turn handwritten notes into typed sentences.

The tablets will be essential to the department as it works to put county health inspections online as part of a larger revamp of the department's inspection process. Earlier this year the department was directed by the Board of Supervisors to update its inspection system and to get health reports online after a Register investigation found restaurants throughout the county were ignoring state laws concerning public notification of health inspection results.

The tablets will be used by Environmental Management for other inspections, including those of wastewater plants and other health-related facilities. The tablets have wireless capability and hard copies will be kept on file at the department's office. A printout will be given to a food facility following an inspection.

"

Yvonne wrote on Feb 19, 2008 3:12 PM:

" I have worked in both restaurants and stores and so been inspected in both establishments. The things that the Health Dept looks for are very simple and do not change from county to county. A new store opening in Napa would have the same standards as any other area, sneeze guards and hot and cold running water are standard. I am surprized that the health dept didn't catch those issues before they opened, but more surprised that Whole Foods Corp. didn't make sure those items were installed before they open. The problem of food handlers, temperature control and food storage are issues that show poor training and should have been taught by the management team. They are standards that every grocery store, restaurant or commercial kitchen is required to follow, for our safety. These are not new laws or standards and the management team for Whole Foods should be held accountable. Issues of temperature control and food storage, gloves and hot water are very serious. I haven't been to Whole Foods yet, I am sure they will do everything they need to do to get into compliance, and keep on the good side of the Health Dept. "

Suze wrote on Feb 19, 2008 8:36 PM:

" Nice letter Yvonne, informative and balanced, and yup I am sure Whole Foods will quickly get into compliance. No one has been poisoned yet, or we would surely have heard ALL about it! I will continue to patronize them. I prefer to give my money to farms who are trying to make a difference to the planet and livestock producers who treat their animals humanely. Even though it costs a few bucks more, I can cut back somewhere else less important that the food I eat. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Feb 20, 2008 7:00 AM:

" Mikeb, why attack me for wanting the Health Department to view itself in a business-friendly way? Wouldn't it be better for the Health Department to pre-inspect a new business to make sure it is up to snuff before it opens its doors? The 'Usual Suspects' have had a big 'Gotcha' party where the table was set by the Health Department. I see no reason why the Health Department should play 'Gotcha' with any businesses not willfully flouting the law. If sneezeguards were missing, the Health Depart could have told them that they couldn't open the department until they were there. The effect would have been the same, except Napa County would not look like arbitrary, high-handed bullies. I am sorry, but I'll still stand for treating ALL newly opening businesses decently no matter who they are, or what segment of consumers they appeal to. I believe that most decent Napans and decent Americans know that businesses must be able to open and thrive to create jobs in and income for residents and local government. That's how we make Napa a better place to live. The 'Usual Suspects' are all about how the incompetent the government is most times, so why are they cheering when a government department is high-handed and hostile to a newly opened business? Many of the posts have a certain element of sour grapes to them, as if making the good life in Napa even better is a bad thing, while pushing strip malls and big box stores is just ducky. There are many ways to take care of our public health without being nasty and hostile to new businesses. Telling a new business that they have some things to fix and need more training before they open is not coddling, it's just sensible. ~Ruff "

areyouserious wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:24 AM:

" almost all of the infractions were fixed over night. But if you lamos want to keep perpetuating the Joe Vallerga trip go ahead. That means there will be less idiots running the red light and less people in the parking lot. I continue to shop there. Better food, BETTER deals, more local than any other store!

and NVR moderator... 2005 article? may as well have been 1985? Did you include Alfredo's in that report? "

cathyodom wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:55 AM:

" And yet another reason why I shop at Vallerga's and support a locally owned vendor instead of a giant corporation! I get great service at Vallerga's, it's close to my house, they have the food that I want, and great deli meats and butcher service for meat and fish. Why shop anywhere else? OH, and they're a clean store and didn't just get an F! Hmm what happened to Lyon's after their F? And, why did Whole Foods get to stay open when they got their F, and the public didn't find out for 4 weeks? "

steph wrote on Feb 20, 2008 9:29 AM:

" This can NOT be. I'm in full agreement with Ruff again. He's pointing out a big hypocracy. I'm celebrating with some brown rice sushi from WF. Yum! I also agree with "Slow Down Take a Breath's" comment--it's the public you have to be careful of, fouling the utensils at the salad and hot food bar, then dropping the handles back into the food. Yuck. You know how many piggie people don't wash their hands after handling money or using the bathroom, picking their nose, licking their fingers?? It's disgusting. As for Sandra's anecdote about spoiled milk--I've had that happen at other supermarkets, but I didn't blame the market for a one-off incident, because that's not really very fair. I hope you took the milk back for a replacement, as I'm sure WF would have been happy to help you. I AM glad we have health inspectors; as they have pointed out before, in our country we have life-preserving safety and health regulations. Yes, some of the rules and regulations may be arbitrarily and bureaucratically imposed and enforced, but children don't regularly die of diarrhea here in the US. We have rules here. "

jeepracer10 wrote on Feb 20, 2008 12:40 PM:

" I have worked in many of the local restaurants and grocery stores in the past. You would be supprised to see some of the things going on in the places even with good grades. I also worked at one famous upvalley restaurant that seemed to be "tipped off" that the inspection was on a certain day. We always got a good grade because we happened to do a deep cleaning the day before the inspection. The other 364 days a year hosted numerous health and safety problems just like anywhere else. "

napaao wrote on Feb 21, 2008 10:28 AM:

" I guess this store isn't what it was hyped up to be! "

st.hell.comnative wrote on Feb 21, 2008 3:29 PM:

" If you all would pay attention to the article, you would have noticed this little bit of information:
Food facility inspection reports are available online at www.co.napa.ca.us/emd-pub/consumer/search.aspx, however to date, the site has yet to upload Whole Foods’ inspection report.
Glad none of you are health inspectors! "

Reader wrote on Feb 21, 2008 9:21 PM:

" I would bet that the loudest complainers here are still eating beef. "

cathyodom wrote on Feb 22, 2008 7:55 AM:

" Thinking more on this- I think now we should have the letter grades posted in the windows for restaurants and markets serving food. They had that in San Diego, and it was nice to know. Jeepracer- it's scary for the consumer to think about, restaurants being tipped off, and then only being "clean" on that one day! No wonder we get sick with "stomach flu" aka food poisoning!!! "

MyInput wrote on Feb 22, 2008 8:34 PM:

" I'd rather thank the county staff who filed objective health inspection reports than create excuses for the apparently sloppy performance of the new Whole Foods Store. On my initial visit to WF, I was a taken aback by the array of warming trays, especially those containing meats swimming in sauces. I'm not one for monitoring how long they leave trays out or, for that matter, whether people can sneeze into them. The visit just reinforced my preference for small-scale outlets run by local folks, like Vallergas and Brown's Valley Market, whose employees can explain with pride exactly how their items are handled. "

Sandra wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:25 AM:

" Ruff states, among other things, "Wouldn't it be better for the Health Department to pre-inspect a new business to make sure it is up to snuff before it opens its doors?" I have to wonder why you would think the Health Department does not do this? They absolutely inspect before any business is allowed to open and serve the public food. Did it ever occur to Ruff that the agency he accuses of playing "Gotcha" with his beloved Whole Foods preinspected and that with the information they had at the time, saw no reason why the store should not open? Did it ever occur to those claiming the Health deptartment is not business friendly have absolutly no basis in reality to make this claim. I am bothered by people throwing out accusations based on untruths. If you had read the article, you would know that Whole foods failed it's inspection because of "... improper hand washing and use of gloves at a hot counter area, improper hot and cold holding temperatures in several food areas and lack of availability of hot or cold water at two sinks. Other violations included improper handling of food and food storage, uncovered containers and missing sneeze guards." Most of these violations are due to how employess were trained. The other two, hot water at a sink, and sneeze gaurds, could have been noted at the time of preinspection, but the store could of been allowed to open based on the promise of this being taken care of by the time it opens. The Health Dept always does a follow up inspection once a business opens it doors, because it is their job. I am glad they are there to keep food service safe for the public. "

y2kcbr wrote on Feb 25, 2008 2:26 PM:

" I'm in awe about this comment:
“The other 20 percent are construction issues or structural issues,”

Does this mean that Env. Mgmt allowed this store to open, knowing that 20% of the store was going to have issues?

My kids' school went there last week on a school outing. The store looked immaculate and food was delicious. I'm certain that they had to post (IN VISIBLE SIGHT) their failing grade to the public. Looks like they have acted on the problems and are working on the issues. Sorry to say the F rating hit WF's, but they can only do better next rating period. I would hope htat with an F rating, the staff at Env. Mgmt would go out in the very near future for a follow-up visit. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy