NVR Logo
We need the arts to thrive in Napa
Friday, February 15, 2008
Save and Share Share
A cold January night and the Napa Valley Opera House theater cafe is overflowing for the final town hall meting on the arts.

They’ve come from all over the county to discuss the arts in this valley, to explore their meaning in our personal lives, their power to lift us to the level of our dreams and, not least, their very important potential for our business community. I cannot escape the feeling that we were present at the dawning of something new and intensely important for Napa Valley, an impression reinforced by the presence of civic leaders, such as Mayor Techel and Supervisor Dodd.
Few of us can forget the disaster of 2005-06 when, as a result of inadequate funding, we not only lost a dozen arts organizations but also were forced to abandon the school arts education program. Other than our own personal interests, how do we calculate the ultimate cost to us as a community in sending our young people into the world without exposure to these kinds of experiences? Who knows for sure? But, if we’re trying to produce citizens who can seize the fullness of our culture and build good lives, you can bet it’s not insignificant.

What has not been appreciated until recently is how huge an engine the arts can be to a prospering long-term economy. For example, in 17 short days, the Carlos Menotti arts festival in Charlestown, S.C. realizes income of $55.1 million. Who is not impressed with Ashland, a city built on the arts? Closer to home, our neighboring communities of Walnut Creek, Petaluma and Sonoma are already earnestly at work in governmental support of their cultural activities.
Napa should not be languishing. We have great venues, a vibrant arts community, enthusiasm and our enviable destination status.

The recent action by our supervisors in allotting $90,000 from county TOT funds was far-sighted and generous. It enabled our arts council to reinstate some school programs, initiate arts advertising, and devise a groundbreaking, comprehensive arts planning program for the county. It was an extraordinary demonstration of how effective timely financial support of the arts can be.
Other important efforts are in play, and the public should be aware of them. The Arts Council has been outstanding in spearheading work, creating a Public Arts Funding Ordinance, and the newly created Arts Commission of Napa Valley will give all citizens throughout the entire valley a vigorous voice for public advocacy of the arts.

These are first steps, but we need to build immediately on these programs by planning, now, for public policies that encourage the arts and provide for some form of reliable public financing. The truth is that to thrive, the arts have always required assistance and it’s clear that contributions, even from generous benefactors, are neither constant enough nor large enough to sustain the cultural community. The need is reciprocal: We need the cultural community and, through a program of public funding, the cultural community needs us.

(Block is a member of the Arts Council of Napa Valley board of directors and lives in Napa. This letter represents his personal opinion, not that of the council or other members of the board.)
2 comment(s)

glenroy wrote on Feb 15, 2008 11:41 AM:

" I wouldn’t think Ashland, Oregon, would be an ‘appealable’ example for the majority of Napa residents...the problem with publicly funded ‘Arts’ is that 9 times out of 10 the ‘Arts’ produced whether film, sculpture or poetry ends up advocating an extreme partisans cause...National Public Radio is but one example of tax payer funded radio that advocates spending more tax payer monies for an agenda neither publicly supported nor to the public benefit of those paying the freight. Instead of public money for more ‘Arts,’ particularly to enhance the limited historical knowledge of current and future generations how about our public schools teaching more civics, social science, history and political science...let the ‘Artists’ do like the rest of us either earn a living by our profession or get a job and spend their money on their hobbies instead of our money on their hobbies which most of us couldn’t care less about.
"

On the other hand wrote on Feb 15, 2008 4:26 PM:

" Re: Glenroy's comment -- First, what happens in Ashland OR would MOST DEFINITELY be welcome in Napa by many, many people-that is, well-educated visitors with disposable income travel there to see great theater, eat, drink and buy stuff. What the heck is wrong with that? Second, people who see the world 24/7 through a lens of political partisanship do not make good judges of the political bias of others. Third, great societies respect, support and nurture their artists, through private philanthropy and public policy. In summation, there's no truth or beauty in being a philistine. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy