NVR Logo
Napa councilman proposes youth curfew to stem gang violence
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Save and Share Share
Saying that Napa streets aren’t safe at night for teenagers, a Napa council member is asking the city to investigate adopting a curfew for minors.

“I’ve talked to a lot of parents who think (a curfew) is a great idea,” Councilman Mark van Gorder said. “We have people being shot and killed ... it happens at night.”
Unsupervised youths who are out late at night can too easily become perpetrators and victims of crimes and violence, van Gorder said. “I don’t think the streets are safe at night.”

While a curfew is probably a good idea, van Gorder said he would like to have police and the community weigh in on this topic, which has proven controversial in many cities.
Would Napa be safer with a youth curfew? Add your thoughts by clicking here.

Two decades ago, Napa tried to adopt a daytime curfew, but ran into opposition from parents who home school their kids.
A city ordinance imposes a curfew on people under 18 between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m., but it hasn’t been enforced in years.

Napa’s curfew, which contains exceptions for teens returning home from work and special events, is “unconstitutionally vague,” City Attorney Michael Barrett said.

Curfews have been a “faddish response” to youth crime over the years, said Michael Risher, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union in San Francisco.

Their effectiveness has not been proven, yet they have been in and out of favor depending on the public’s alarm over juvenile crime, Risher said.

A federal district court ruled against San Diego’s curfew in 1997, which caused many cities to back away from restrictions on teen activity at night, Risher said. Others make curfews part of their crime-fighting arsenal of tools, he said.

The U.S. constitution protects rights of free speech and association. As interpreted by the courts, this right can apply to youths who want to be outside their home at night, Risher said.

Should a youth who is acting responsibly have to risk being apprehended by police, then prove that he was not up to mischief? he asked. Jobs, church activities and other events can get out after curfew time, he said.

Dan Monez, Napa’s former police chief, remembers several night sweeps in the early 90s when police tried to get loitering youths off the streets.

Police also advocated a daytime curfew to prevent gang members from hanging out near Napa High School and causing fights, he said.

“We couldn’t figure out how to make it fair,” Monez said of the day curfew idea. Police ended up enforcing a penal code provision against loitering near school campuses and the daytime problem went away, he said.

Faced with a recent increase in gang violence, the city and local law enforcement agencies intend to create two task forces. One will involve law enforcement in a countywide gang suppression unit. The other will bring together community groups to devise a prevention plan.

Police are part of the solution, but parents, schools and community groups have to play a role as well, Napa Police Chief Rich Melton said.

“You can’t just say, ‘Let’s do a curfew,’” Melton said. How much police time would an community-wide curfew require? If officer are picking up kids all night, what other police activities will suffer?

The law does not allow youths who violate curfews to be kept at Juvenile Hall, so where would police put them while waiting for parents to show up? Melton said.

Suppose no parents can be found? Who will supervise the kids until they are found? he said.

Programs that help kids to stay in school need to be part of any community’s response to youth gangs, Melton said.

“You have to build a program before you can magically say, ‘Let’s have a curfew,’” said Mary Butler, the county’s chief probation officer. “The gang issue is so big you need the whole community involved.”

As a practical matter, most jurisdictions don’t have curfews because they have no place to put violators, Butler said.

When juveniles commit crimes, a curfew is typically part of their probation agreement, Butler said. Some 500 juveniles in Napa County are on probation, she said.

“I absolutely think there is a value to giving kids curfews, especially with substance abuse issues,” Butler said.

As a practical matter, police are able to stop and question anyone who appears suspicious late at night, said Police Sgt. Terry Gonsalves, the city’s youth services officer.

These “consensual encounters” constitute a “loose curfew” of sorts, said Gonsalves, who thinks a more rigorous curfew would be a good crime-fighting tool. “If we had a place to take these kids, we’d be way ahead,” he said.

Monez feels the same way. Curfews are “a tool when the gang stuff acts up,” he said.

Sheriff Doug Koford likes the idea of bringing the community into the discussion of curfews and other ways of dealing with at-risk kids.

“I’m in favor of anything that makes the community and kids safer,” Koford said. But when it comes to a curfew and the enforcement issues that it creates, “you have to be careful what you wish for,” he said.

“We have to make sure we’re not penalizing the kids out there doing good,” Koford said. He once had a teenage son who once worked a job that got out late at night, he said.

If parents were more responsible and knew where their kids were, curfews wouldn’t be a subject for debate, van Gorder said.

Growing up in Sebastopol, van Gorder said his mother made him be home by 10 p.m. until he turned 18. Four week prior to his 18th birthday, he stayed out later without telling her.

“She called the police on me,” he said.

30 comment(s)

opiniagirl wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:09 PM:

" "If parents were more responsible and knew where their kids were, curfews wouldn’t be a subject for debate, Van Gorder said" I couldn’t have said it better myself! I love it - let's curfew away! Better yet, let's fine the PARENTS when their kids break curfew. We'll see how fast parents become responsible when it hits their pocketbooks! "

Napanee wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:25 PM:

" Totally in favor. "

asahigo wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:45 PM:

" A curfew is a great idea. No kid should be out past 10pm anyways. "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:51 PM:

" Great idea! It would hold parents sccountable for where their kids are. Thats a smashing idea! "

sam wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:57 PM:

" It is a great idea, for some. But what about when they are at a school dance, or a Friday night football game? what then? "

Skip M. wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:00 PM:

" The article states "A city ordinance imposes a curfew on people under 18 between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m., but it hasn’t been enforced in years." Here's a novel concept ENFORCE THE LAW!
"

Matt wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:22 PM:

" Great idea! And look - we actually have one city council member who wants to do something proactive to help all Napans. "

chunk wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:32 PM:

" The curfew will never work. Why can't teenagers who have their license be allowed to drive around after 10? When 10 rolls around do they have to sleep where they're at? What about the weekends? 10 is when things start happening a lot of the times and events are getting out late such as movies, dances, sporting events. Teens are usually allowed to babysit at the age of 12-15 so the adults can go out until whenever they want. Not fair. Most teens are responsible enough to walk from one place to another without getting into trouble. Napa isn't that dangerous of a place. Enough with the gang problem talk. It's a bunch of wannabe posers who think they're tough. U ever see most of them? Most are short skinny little punks. Who's really afraid? Not me. Curfew not needed. "

Common Sense wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:47 PM:

" I'm not a huge fan of government micromanagement. However, if you are under 18, you are not an adult and the parents should be accountable. I would support a night time curfew. "

Two Cents wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:52 PM:

" Why not just impose the curfew on anyone who has had any type of problem with the law. Let's say I'm a 17 year old senior who has never been in trouble in my life, why should I have to go home at 10pm if the movie is not done yet or the football game is not over? It's not fair to punish all for the actions of some.
It's like at the middle schools.. although the dress code has been lifted, students who have proven affiliated with gangs, are on what's called a "no-red or no-blue contract" and they are not allowed to wear those colors to school. Period.
Why cant we impose the same things on kids in this town? If you have been identified as a gang member/affiliation or have been in any trouble with the law whatsoever, you are subjected to a 10pm curfew.
Leave all the other kids who have proven to be responsible up to this point alone. "

Dwayne wrote on Feb 12, 2008 5:03 PM:

" How is it that professional police officers, used to dealing with the scum of society, are afraid they might round up "innocent' kids? I can spot trouble-making punks a block away. We need real cops, not former rent-a-cops with poor judgment. Common Now, let's have a reality check. "

naparacer wrote on Feb 12, 2008 5:51 PM:

" They tried to enforce the curfew in the mid 90's when the last wave of gang violence came through, and it didn't work then either. The kids who are targeted by the curfew won't be affected because their parents either don't care, or don't have enough control to keep them out of gangs to begin with. "

kevin wrote on Feb 12, 2008 9:28 PM:

" Curfews didn't work when I was a kid and they won't work now. I spent quite a few nights locked up for violating the law by cruising the "J" after 10 PM. Our tax dollars hard at work... "

roni8877 wrote on Feb 12, 2008 10:29 PM:

" Good Grief you had a curfew 50 years ago when I was a kid Now heres a new idea...make the curfew for any minor on probation and if caught out
after curfew throw his parents in jail with him or her. After all its the parents job to know where their kids are. I bet you if their parents spent a few night in lock up they might just deside to get contorl of what, and where their kids are. How about 3 strikes and your deported or given a strong jail sentence. let them go to jail and start cleaning gang scribbeling off buildings and freeway over passes dresses in pink jump suites!!!! Lets face it, these kids do exactley what their parents allow them to get away with! If they are helo responsible really responsible and accountable it will help make the streets a safe place to walk. Think Pink!! If parentd had to scrub that scribbling off a few walls I bet they would make sure their kids never did any scribbleing on walls and over passes. "

Firewater wrote on Feb 13, 2008 6:07 AM:

" I love the Idea, We had curfew when I was young, not in this town and was taken to jail because we were cruising. That was a scary night having my father come down to pick me up. That did it for me, but of course I wasn't a gang banger but we were breaking the law.Our laws are to wish washy
time to take a stand. I agree the curfew on weekends need to extend since there are late activitys. But watch out some parent might call the ACLU!!! "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 13, 2008 6:11 AM:

" Wow chunk, wake up and smell the Caffinos that needs to be moved. We have kids shooting eachother, in a group. That sounds like a gang to me... "

hudds5 wrote on Feb 13, 2008 7:02 AM:

" A curfew is a good idea and it will help prevent some of the problems that have been occurring in Napa lately. However, it will only an impact on those kids who have parents that actually care what their kids are up to. The Gangs will have a different approach, and they should be placed in jail if they do not comply with the law. Gang members do not have rights and they should be treated the way the treat others. "

rocketman wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:02 AM:

" Besides the fact that curfews don't work, who are you going to get to enforce a curfew?? You don't have enough cops now...... "

ubeu wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:07 AM:

" Is this councilman man awake?! Curfews do not work!! Look stuff is going to happen one way or another. What Napa needs is more to offer its teens than the Boys and Girls club not that I do not support them but why not look to having someplace where teens can go do homework and have coffee, dance listen to music, skate board in a safe place. So long as their is this stuff not being offered than their will be gangs. The either thing is you have a lot of single parent homes, and well it is hard to be there for a kid with no one looking out for them so gangs come in and be that family. Reality is we need MORE MENTORS TO HELP STOP GANG VIOLENCE!!! Also not to point fingers but so long as we have Wineries hiring ILLEGAL Workers we will have Gangs because where do you think they come from?! When we stop this from happening we start do work on the rest. All curfews will do is, well lets see if I as a teen can get away with breaking the curfew!!!! "

dmom wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:11 AM:

" It's always sad when the actions of troublemakers make life miserable for the majority. Most teens are not out there creating havoc; they're responsible, caring, busy and involved young people working toward becoming productive citizens. It's easy to determine which responses are posted by people with no knowledge of or experience with today's teenagers and base everything they post on heresay. If a curfew is imposed to protect Napa teens from potential danger I would suggest it be marked for 11:00 p.m. since young drivers already have that restriction. For all the good kids performing in plays, music events, Youth Symphony, attending church youth group activites or school dances, and those working or playing sports, that time of night is more reasonable. If my child were to be finished with an event later than 11:00, I would typically know that in advance and have a prepared, signed and dated curfew pass for my child to carry. It would include my phone number. Gangs would still be on the streets after 11:00, intentionally breaking curfew, but good kids would be at home, safe and sound. Please remember that there are 4 high schools in Napa, over 6,000 teens, of which at most, a few hundred are troublemakers. Let's not ignore the majority. "

my2cents68 wrote on Feb 13, 2008 9:18 AM:

" I've never understood parents that let their kids out past 10pm, especially on a school night. I think it's a little different when the kids are junior's or senior's in high school. It would be a judgement call on the officer's part to see if these kids are up to no good or what the reason is for them being out past the curfew. But what about all of these little teeny boppers out there?? I would NEVER let my 13 year old out that late. Shoot, he's not even allowed out past 6pm! As far as sports events and dances, some schools do not allow the younger kids to leave the event unless a parent is there to pick them up.Should parents be fined if their kid is out past curfew, absolutely. Not only that, make the kids do some manitory community service. In the end though a curfew does no good if it's not enforced, whether it by at home by the parents or in public by an officer. "

JimClark wrote on Feb 13, 2008 9:52 AM:

" Um, if our one time Police Chief denied the problem, it could have been eradicated a long time ago. The discouraging of a problem discourages those who might be the cause of it.
Since that didn't happen, there needs to be extremely strong measures to eliminate it. The ACLU and other whiners be d***ed. I have no doubt that Law Enforcement knows who the majority of these miscreants are.
Maybe it is time to reign them in and watch gang related crime decrease exponentially. "

napadad wrote on Feb 13, 2008 10:01 AM:

" I have a 13 year old boy, he doesnt "hang out" with kids i dont know except at school. He doesnt leave home without a destination, one I can verify. He doesnt go to kids houses unless I have met the parents and know phone numbers and addresses. He doesnt leave one place to go to another without calling me first and getting permission, and I occasionally swing by unannounced to let him know I do the footwork to assure he is where hes supposed to be. He doesnt need a curfew because he has parents that parent. There is no reason for him to hang out in front of mervyns for hours etc. cause there are things to do! bowling hiking riding bikes movies billiards fishing and more. Nothing to do for teens is a weak excuse! Go ask the police they have programs darrens gun exchange has paintball info and there are a variety of sports year around. Im sure there are drama groups and many theatre and art groups also if you wanted to look for them. That being said criminal gang activity is propogated by adults who use and recruit teens. Life sentences for crimes specifically related adults contributing to youth violence adults arrested with minors in the comission of gang activity and supplying weapons and or drugs to minors knowingly would be a better start. "

musikluvr wrote on Feb 13, 2008 11:03 AM:

" We have a curfew law but it isn't enforced? Oh really! Wasn't Mr. Van Gorder elected to uphold the laws and didn't he take an oath to do so? How many other laws do we have on the books that we "don't enforce"? I say start enforcing the laws or resign and let us get someone who is willing and able to run the city. "

Word wrote on Feb 13, 2008 12:15 PM:

" Mr. Van Gorder has a head on his shoulders. But before we pour police resources into curfew enforcement, let's put more effort (parental and governmental) into creating constructive places and activities for youths. We've made a good start, with Cybermill, Boys and Girls Club and City Recreation Programs. We could do more. Congrats to Van Gorder and the Council for pushing ahead with plans for a community-driven master plan for all city park facilities. Teens who are involved with hosting soccer workshops, removing exotic weeds, and building hiking trails, may not have a whole lot of time for troublemaking. "

greyhoundgirl wrote on Feb 13, 2008 1:02 PM:

" All responsible parents give their kids curfews. For those parents that have theirs heads you know where, the law has to do their job for them. I'm for any change in the right direction, and since nothing is being done right now there's no reason not to try this. First good idea this city has come up with in a LONG time. "

pat wrote on Feb 13, 2008 5:11 PM:

" I doubt that a curfew will solve all the problems associated with youth crime, but as mentioned, it is a tool for the police to use. I highly doubt that you need to be concerned if you are a minor and driving home from your job or another appropriate activity. You are not who the police is looking for. But a large group of kids hanging out in front of Mervyns or an apartment complex, they could detain and questioned by the police. Again, just an added tool to help the police do their job. I am happy to see that Mr. Van Gorder is trying to find solutions, and hopefully they won’t stop with a curfew. It should not surprise me that musikluvr and others will criticize, as that is all they are capable of doing. "

wassupnapa wrote on Feb 13, 2008 7:57 PM:

" As debates go, this is a little silly. If there is already a city ordinance, in effect yet not enforced, simply enforce it and do not enact yet another law to sit on top of the existing one. I spent my teen years and early 20's in Napa, and while I don't agree with curfews as a rule, I have to admit, a curfew probably would have kept me out of the trouble I had gotten into several times. How about training the officers in what the current ordinance requires, and allow them to use that or suspicious activities to let them pull over teens who they suspect are up to no good? Frankly, Napa is not socially conducive to young people growing up there - there isn't a whole lot to do in this small town and young ones with nothing to do can get into trouble so easily. Either enforce the current rules, or start forming places for teens and young people to go, and give them something to do, and you'll see juvenile crime drop drastically. This remedy has been proven time and again in many cities, in addition to other small towns such as Napa. "

sickothis wrote on Feb 13, 2008 9:08 PM:

" How are you going to tell who's under 18? Papers please. Papers. "

lordstar wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:11 PM:

" About the only thing enforcing such a silly curfew would do is make Napa’s teen population angry. Last I checked that’s what everyone was so afraid of...angry teens. Here is an idea, don't give teens a reason to be angry. Good luck with that. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy