Napa school district slams state budget cuts
Sends resolution defending education budget, Proposition 98
By JILLIAN JONES
Napa Valley Register
3 p.m.The Napa Valley Unified school board voted unanimously Thursday night to adopt a resolution urging the state to reject cuts to public education and to protect Proposition 98, the voter-approved law that guarantees minimum funding for California schools.
The resolution comes in response to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposal to cut the state’s estimated $14 billion deficit in part by suspending Proposition 98 and cutting $4.8 billion in education funds in the next year-and-a-half.
“The Napa Valley Unified School District Board of Education calls on the governor and the Legislature to put our students first, reject across-the-board cuts that would damage our public schools, and protect voter-approved, minimum school funding law, Proposition 98,” the resolution reads.
According to the resolution, California ranks 46th in the nation in per-pupil spending, at nearly $1,900 below the national average. Meanwhile, California has some of the largest class sizes in the country and ranks last in the number of counselors, school nurses and librarians per student, it said.
If the Legislature adopts the governor’s proposal, it could mean the largest reduction to education funding in California history, with school district funds cut by an average of $7.6 million per district.
NVUSD’s total yearly budget is $116 million.
“With restricted funds, with how our money works, we simply don’t have that to cut,” said Robb Felder, NVUSD board clerk. “It’s going to directly affect students, directly affect the quality of their education.”
The purpose of the resolution, he said, is “to send the strong message that that is not acceptable.”
“The state budget proposed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is a giant step back for our students that would create chaos in our public schools with cuts of historic proportion that would derail the progress and threaten the education of million of California students,” the resolution said, adding, “California educators, school board members, administrators, superintendents, school employees and others are outraged that in the self-proclaimed ‘year of education,’ the governor’s proposed budget would slash $4.8 billion from out public schools over the next 18 months.”
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell has said he fears that “the ‘year of education’ will become the year of education evisceration.”
“Our students didn’t create this budget crisis,” the resolution said, “and their education shouldn’t be ransomed to solve it with proposals that don’t just mortgage their academic futures, but amount to a foreclosure of hope for generations of families.”
A two-thirds vote is required by the Legislature to suspend Proposition 98. Based on feedback from the Legislature, the governor will issue a revised budget May 14.
NVUSD will host a public meeting Wednesday to address the budget proposal and its impact on Napa schools. The goal of the meeting is to establish a timeline that will take the district through the next few months, and to form a local Napa Valley Coalition to get the community involved in battling the cuts.
The meeting is Wednesday, 7-9 p.m., in the Wappo Room in the NVUSD Education Center, 2425 Jefferson St., Napa.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Dwayne wrote on Feb 9, 2008 3:01 PM:
JimClark wrote on Feb 9, 2008 5:00 PM:
Most of us call that a no-brainer. "
musikluvr wrote on Feb 9, 2008 6:35 PM:
Amelia wrote on Feb 9, 2008 9:18 PM:
averagejane wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:00 PM:
wake up people. our future generations need our support!!! "
pat wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:06 PM:
JimClark wrote on Feb 10, 2008 6:59 AM:
JimClark wrote on Feb 10, 2008 7:14 AM:
School districts should dictate what their students are provided as far as education. Properly educated students will be capable of making their own decisions regarding their future. Global warming? Tree hugging? The only reason those and other politically correct shams are promoted is due to an endless insertion of PC into the classroom where basic education has become politically incorrect. "
petebo wrote on Feb 10, 2008 7:23 AM:
musikluvr wrote on Feb 10, 2008 7:44 AM:
InTheKnow wrote on Feb 10, 2008 8:17 AM:
So yes they do get paid well for working 9 months a year.
I have seen what happens in the schools. The new teachers, who do not have tenure, work like dogs. The tenured teachers, administrators, etc all are gone by 3:00. Forget the "I go home and work" I have seen many shopping at target, starkbucks, etc.
I think we need alternate forms of education. KIPP, etc.
There is more PC training in school rather than the basics.
Also how much does the top brass make in salaries. John, Sharon, Deb, etc.
Remember this is a public agency. Should their salaries be equal to the private sector. NO
If the want the private sector pay go there. I guarantee there is some on who is willing and capable of doing your job for les. "
Napa Walker wrote on Feb 10, 2008 9:13 AM:
napablogger wrote on Feb 10, 2008 10:44 AM:
Dwayne wrote on Feb 10, 2008 11:22 AM:
sickothis wrote on Feb 10, 2008 1:17 PM:
MikeK wrote on Feb 10, 2008 2:13 PM:
matt68 wrote on Feb 10, 2008 4:15 PM:
ubeu wrote on Feb 12, 2008 9:12 AM: