NVR Logo
Bush budget $15 million short on Napa flood project
Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Save and Share Share
1 p.m.Citing inadequate federal funding, Napa officials estimate that the Napa flood project will be finished in 2016, not 2015 as was predicted a year ago.

The schedule could slip even further. President Bush’s proposed budget for 2008/09 contains $7.5 million for flood control. This is only a third of the $22.8 million that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wants.
Local officials intend to mount a vigorous lobbying campaign to boost federal funding for next year, said Heather Stanton, local project manager.

It’s unfortunate that the federal government is having budget difficulties at the same time that the corps wants to award its most expensive construction contract since the flood project was approved by voters in 1998, Stanton said.
The corps expects to award a contract in late summer for the construction of two railroad bridges and the eastward shift of Napa Valley Wine Train tracks in the Oxbow District.

Now estimated to cost $48 million, this work had been expected to take two and a half years, Stanton said. But if the federal money isn’t there, construction could end up taking substantially longer, she said.
Napa ask Congress to increase next year’s allocation to something much closer to the $22.8 million that the corps needs, Stanton said.

Congressman Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, said he would be working with California’s two senators to get more for Napa than the president’s $7.5 million, but he didn’t hold out much hope that Napa would get the requested $22.8 million.

“(Bush) has not been generous with flood control funding from day one and we have to recognize that,” Thompson said Wednesday.

The president’s budget for next year would cut billions of dollars from domestic programs, yet still end up with a $410 billion deficit, Thompson said.

At the same time, the corps may have an inflated sense of what it can realistically spend next year in Napa, he said. “I wouldn’t put too much stock in what corps capabilities are,” Thompson said.

Stanton defended the corps’ request for $22.8 million for 2008/09 as realistic. If the federal allocation is less, this will likely delay the start of work on Napa Creek flood defenses, she said.

Under the current timetable, construction of terraces and culverts on Napa Creek would start in late 2010 and take two years. The cost is now estimated at $20 million, $5 million more than previously thought.

Linda Kerr, a leader of a Napa Creek neighborhood group, In Harm’s Way, said she wasn’t surprised that the creek schedule could slip.

Because federal funding has lagged, “we’d predicted it will be built closer to 2013. I still think that’s more realistic,” she said Wednesday.

Every year’s delay exposes residents and businesses in the creek’s flood zone to added risk of water damage, Kerr said.

Kerr said she is hopeful that the city and the flood district could receive state grants to tackle parts of Napa Creek defenses sooner than 2010.

“These are long shots,” Kerr said of the grant applications. “If you could secure all these grants, you could actually do (Napa Creek) without federal funding.”

Currently, a federal contractor is wrapping up construction of a promenade and flood wall on the west side of the river from Napa Mill to First Street and the reconstruction of Veteran’s Memorial Park.

When the railroad contract is awarded later this year, the first piece of work will be the construction of a railroad bridge over the planned flood bypass channel at McKinstry Street, Stanton said.

The second priority is the construction of a replacement railroad bridge over the Napa River when funds become available.

Congress allocated $10.8 million for construction and planning in 2007/08, which was some $3 million more than Bush had proposed.

The company that wins the railroad contract will stay on the job however long it takes for federal allocations to fund the work, Stanton said.

It took a special federal waiver to be able to award a comprehensive contract rather than break the railroad work into pieces, Stanton said.

When local officials travel to Washington in April to lobby Congress, they will argue that Wine Train faces additional years of construction mess unless federal funding is increased, Stanton said.

On Tuesday, the Napa City Council passed a resolution supporting the corps’ request for $22.8 million for next year.

Historically, the city has suffered $26 million in flood damage annually. The New Year’s flood of December 2005 caused $70 million in damage, the council said.
13 comment(s)

Tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Feb 6, 2008 1:18 PM:

" I guess there is plenty of money to help Iraq build bridges and an infrastacture but not enough to help the tax payers of this COUNTRY keep their homes and businesses safe, Thanks a lot Mr. Bush in eight years you and your cabinet single-handley set this country back 20 years. I bet the terrorist were going to attack the napa river flood project "

kevin wrote on Feb 6, 2008 1:31 PM:

" Hey, live up to your name and quit complaining. Besides, with global warming the ocean is going to flood everyone anyway, right? "

Joe wrote on Feb 6, 2008 2:10 PM:

" It's not Bush's fault that people live or have business's too close to the river and creeks. If Bush wansn't so brave and sent troops to go after the terrorist's then we would not even have a country to live in because the terrorist would have taken over already. "

tgrl707 wrote on Feb 6, 2008 2:47 PM:

" "if bush wasn't brave"- are you kidding me? if the men and women that are serving in the war were not brave enough to enlist, THEN we could possibly have more of a problem with terrorists. get a clue........ "

musikluvr wrote on Feb 6, 2008 3:57 PM:

" If we had even average representation in Congress we could have gotten the funds by now. Other congressional districts get $ millions in ridiculous earmarks for pig farms and alfalfa farms - our congressman can't even get us money for our important flood project - and this community is holding up its end by paying with the sales tax increase. Instead of blaming Bush lets get some new vibrant younger congressional representation. "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Feb 6, 2008 4:06 PM:

" Brave my foot! Tell him to go there and be brave. "

comment wrote on Feb 6, 2008 4:26 PM:

" Terrorists would have taken over? Thanks Joe, I needed a laugh. "

entity wrote on Feb 6, 2008 4:35 PM:

" Yeah, pretty brave to depose a small-time dictator who made your daddy upset, then killing tens of thousands of civilians while ignoring the constitution, international treaty, and BASIC HUMAN DECENCY, and driving our nation deeper into debt than it's ever been in the meanwhile. Yep, bravery abounds in the B00sh whitehouse! The only brave ones are the soldiers risking life and limb just for the price of a gallon of gas, at the whim of our errant Commander-in-Chief. "

Demo Cracy wrote on Feb 6, 2008 5:59 PM:

" I know it won't happen, but why the heck do we have to pay for the silly train track moving? How about dumping the whole Wine Train? We paid a pretty penny for it to be rerouted for the Trancas/29 interchange a few years ago and now this! "

getreal wrote on Feb 6, 2008 7:24 PM:

" Does Napa really need two expensive RR bridges so that a tourist train can reach it's shop a 1/4 mile away? It seems that the powers that be would rather accomodate the Wine Train rather than the homeowners on Napa Creek. "

napablogger wrote on Feb 7, 2008 1:26 AM:

" musiklovr, I think you are right, I notice that even other areas of Thompson's district get more than Napa--like Yolo County. Must be taking us for granted. This is another reason for smaller government and local control too. All this money goes to Washington, never to be seen again. "

jwk wrote on Feb 7, 2008 5:34 AM:

" Enity's old and tired rhetoric still doesn't hold water. Only an illinformed and ignorant person would still keep saying that the war was over oil. Get a clue. Hopefully, even though the troops and the presidents decisions give us the right to say idiotic things, let's hope you don't vote. Suppose you also believe that Bush blew up the WTC. "

jeepracer10 wrote on Feb 7, 2008 2:34 PM:

" Can anyone say "Tourist Tax"? "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy