NVR Logo
Measure K passes, a boost for Pumpkin Patch
Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Save and Share Share
For the second time in 12 years, the Stanly Lane pumpkin patch has triumphed at the Napa County ballot box.

Based on incomplete returns tallied as of 11 p.m. Tuesday, voters readily approved expansion of Billy Wilcoxson’s Stanley Lane Marketplace on the Highway 12 entry to Napa.
Despite opposition from agricultural and environmental groups, Wilcoxson persuaded voters to allow him to add food preparation and wine tasting to his current operation.

“I guess a lot of people like what I’m doing,” Wilcoxson said. “I give back to my community. My pumpkin patch is something that people really look forward to.”
After the final election night tally of 143 precincts, Measure K was winning 57 percent to 43 percent. There are still some mail-in ballots to be counted, but those are not expected to change the outcome of the vote.

“I would say, ‘Congratulations. The people of Napa have spoken,’” said Supervisor Mark Luce, who signed a ballot argument against expanded commercial uses on a property zoned for agriculture.
County voters have turned down many requests over the years for commercial activity on ag lands, Luce said. But adding more year-round uses to Stanly Lane Marketplace struck most voters as reasonable, he said.

While the Napa County Farm Bureau had opposed Wilcoxson’s plans, it was always about principle, not personality, Sandy Elles, the bureau’s executive director, said Tuesday night.

“He’s a likable businessman. He has a pumpkin patch the community loves,” Elles said. “It wasn’t about Billy the person. It was about land use and protecting agriculture.”

Wilcoxson had estimated he would spend $60,000 to promote Measure K with signs, advertising and legal costs. His opponents fought back mostly with letters to the editor.

“With many other big development issues facing the county, we didn’t put a lot of energy into communicating with voters the danger of cumulative impacts to farmland conversion,” Elles said.

The development potential at Napa Pipe, in Angwin and on Ghisletta lands in south Napa — not to mention the county’s review of its general plan — were all higher Farm Bureau priorities than the pumpkin patch expansion, she said.

Wilcoxson easily won a 1996 vote to place a produce stand on Stanly Lane. He created a pumpkin playland at Halloween and sold trees at Christmas, while eventually opening a store year-round.

“I really try hard,” said Wilcoxson, who said he was hurt by critics who called his business an eyesore. With the positive vote on Tuesday, “it makes me fired up to keep going, that’s for sure.”

Wilcoxson said he would like to have food preparation going by summer, making Stanly Lane Marketplace a convenient place for locals and tourists to get a casual meal.

The possibility of inviting wineries to offer wine tasting will take longer to take shape, he said.

15 comment(s)

valleygal wrote on Feb 6, 2008 6:14 AM:

" Glad it passed. This gentleman has worked for many years to build his business. If it had been a hotel or high end restaurant, there would have been no argument at all.
Congratulations. "

skippert wrote on Feb 6, 2008 6:24 AM:

" YEAH. YEAH. YEAH. "

rocketman wrote on Feb 6, 2008 8:29 AM:

" ........I knew that common sense would prevail. To the naysayers.......we told you so!! "

MP wrote on Feb 6, 2008 8:39 AM:

" I just wish it wasn't such an eyesore..... "

brownsvalleyian wrote on Feb 6, 2008 9:07 AM:

" Congratulations to Billy, his family, and Stanley Lane employees. I am excited to see Napa come together to support this measure. How better to repay the man who supplies the best pumpkins and Christmas trees to our families. I am glad that this measure passed so that he can make an income year-round, and supply tourists and locals alike with good food. "

DBlevins wrote on Feb 6, 2008 9:22 AM:

" Congratulations! What an asset to the community & a beautiful place to go & have a deli sandwich, some fresh produce & a speciality coffee!Ha heck, make it a day & have a picnic, with your family & enjoy the beautiful views & friendly people! WAY TO GO NAPA. Thanks for the votes! "

epicuria wrote on Feb 6, 2008 9:28 AM:

" Break the law then ask to make such illegal actions legal, claiming the Little Guy argument. The Pumpkin Patch sure is an unattractive way to welcome visitors into the valley. Once more poor taste has triumphed over good taste. "

freeport56 wrote on Feb 6, 2008 10:03 AM:

" Yeah. The "Business of America is Business". Besides, what would be there if not the pumpkin patch....a vineyard? "

NapaNanC wrote on Feb 6, 2008 12:46 PM:

" What's funny to me is that Mr. Wilcoxson's pro-K ads said, and I paraphrase, "We are asking only that we be able to make sandwiches on-site rather than bring them in from somewhere else. Simple as that!" Nowhere did the ads state that he'd be barbecuing food or offering winetasting. This was simply deceptive. "

glenroy wrote on Feb 6, 2008 12:50 PM:

"
The problem with the Napa County Farm Bureau’s argument is offering food to existing customers on a portion of a portion of land neither suited for or being used as Ag land in the strictest interpretation of Ag uses doesn’t have any negative impact on Ag Preserve lands. If anything, a little common sense might suggest it just might be somebodies right to use their land. I think once the voters realized that sandwiches were already being sold there where was the logic that making them there instead of just refrigerating them there threatened the Ag preserve...silly-silly. I think the Wilcoxson’s ought to be reimbursed for the $60,000.00 they were forced to spend on such a silly argument against by those who funded the opposition and if not them the county ought to credit his property taxes.... "

glenroy wrote on Feb 6, 2008 12:56 PM:

" The problem with the Napa County Farm Bureau’s argument is offering food to existing customers on a portion of a portion of land neither suited for or being used as Ag land in the strictest interpretation of Ag uses doesn’t have any negative impact on Ag Preserve lands. If anything, a little common sense might suggest it just might be somebodies right to use their land. I think once the voters realized that sandwiches were already being sold there where was the logic that making them there instead of just refrigerating them there threatened the Ag preserve...silly-silly. I think the Wilcoxson’s ought to be reimbursed for the $60,000.00 they were forced to spend on such a silly argument against by those who funded the opposition and if not them the county ought to credit his property taxes.... "

angrytoo wrote on Feb 6, 2008 1:55 PM:

" I think this is a great thing. This will bring more tourists into the marketplace and hopefully increase the local products offered in his store. "

Dwayne wrote on Feb 6, 2008 4:16 PM:

" Entrepreneurial diversity is the life blood of any community. Liberal control freaks are at the heart of the opposition. How sad that they cannot bring themselves to congratulate the hard work that leads to success. "

steph wrote on Feb 6, 2008 6:13 PM:

" I don't think the pumpkin patch is an eyesore. I think the Plumpjack hotel down the road is an eyesore, with its yurts and giant fence... I think the pumpkin patch shows tourists that Napa is community full of real people--it's a sign of good health. How about a big "Thank You, Napa On Measure K" sign? It really was the community rallying behind one of our own to pass the measure. That and the common belief in basic property rights. Mr. Wilcoxson has served his community, and the community gave his services a nod in return. Way to go! Thank YOU, Mr. Wilcoxson! "

vocal-de-local wrote on Feb 6, 2008 8:15 PM:

" What's to stop any landowner, anywhere from doing the same thing? Where does it stop? Do Napans want growth on Agricultural lands or not? So all it takes is a friendly personality combined with perseverance? Every wanna be developer in and outside of Napa County probably has a PR person who can put on a friendly face in return for development favors. Don't you people realize that others will follow because they now think Napans are a bunch of suckers who have no backbone? Unbelievable. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy