NVR Logo
Summit meeting on gang problem
Leaders from county, two cities prepare plan to slow gang activity
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Save and Share Share
In the wake of two recent gang-related killings, Napa County political and law enforcement leaders are calling for a task force to better curtail gang activities in Napa County.

The gang issue was a primary topic for a rare joint meeting of the Napa County Board of Supervisors, Napa and American Canyon city councils on Tuesday.
The officials met the same day a Napa County Superior Court judge ordered 15-year-old Edgar Aguilar tried as an adult for the October murder of a rival gang member in American Canyon. The gang-related slaying in Napa in December remains unsolved.

“The gang kids don’t know city boundaries,” said Napa County Board of Supervisors Chairman Brad Wagenknecht.
According to statistics distributed at the meeting, close to 680 gang members live in Napa County.

Napa Chief of Police Rich Melton, who noted school resource officers have worked on the issue for years, proposed two new task forces to boost current gang suppression and prevention efforts, which include weekly and monthly meetings of law enforcement, probation and District Attorney personnel.
One of the two new groups would be composed of community members. The other would include police officers and other law enforcement personnel assigned fulltime to an anti-gang task force.

Community organizations that could be involved include On The Move, a group that tries to prevent group violence; the Sheriff’s Activity League; The Wolfe Center, a treatment center for teens with substance abuse problems; the Boys and Girls Clubs of Napa Valley; and the Napa Police diversion program for youths.

Melton emphasized that the community needs to rely on more than police action. “If all we do is on the suppression side, we will be back in a few years,” he said.

Napa City Councilwoman Juliana Inman suggested that teachers who know which students are involved in gang activities and can intervene be included in the community-based task force.

Napa County Sheriff Doug Koford said the law-enforcement task force would be similar to the Napa Special Investigation Bureau, the countywide anti-drug unit in place for years. The new task force, he said after the meeting, would include two Napa police officers, one sheriff’s deputy, an American Canyon police officer, a probation officer and a district attorney investigator, he said. They would gather intelligence on gang activity, gain expertise on the problem and build a rapport with the community, including families of known gang members.

Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein said that school children are routinely at risk of joining gangs.

“The kids deal with these pressure every day,” Lieberstein said.

There is no public database of adult gang members on probation, he said.

The Napa Police Department has two dedicated anti-gang staff positions, according to a report distributed to the supervisors and city officials.

The American Canyon police officer who attends gang-related meetings has additional duties, according to American Canyon Police Chief Brian Banducci.

The Napa Valley Unified School District reports a 4 percent suspension rate increase for identified gang crimes on campus, a 1 percent increase over a year ago, according to the report to the Board of Supervisors and the city councils.

Out of the 228 students enrolled last year in the Napa County Office Education’s alternative programs, 139 are involved in gangs. The students averaged 42 discipline referrals for gang fights, weapon violations, drug sales and other crimes.

American Canyon Mayor Leon Garcia, a former Napa resident who worked with Wagenknecht in the late 1990s to get at-risk youths involved in basketball and other activities, voiced support for a community-based task force.

American Canyon City Councilman Ed West, who works as a correctional officer at the Napa County jail, said he liked the community-based approach to the issue which will send the statement to the gang members to “go somewhere else,” he said.

Wagenknecht said a proposal could come before each jurisdiction in March that would detail how the task forces could be set up.
8 comment(s)

JimClark wrote on Jan 31, 2008 4:08 AM:

" We have all these statistics about the number of individuals in gang activity, which indicates this matter has a history in Napa County. Many of us have been aware of this and have written or spoke of it. This is an example of proactive versus reactive. Gang violence has a history wherever it is allowed to exist. It always involves violence, arrested adolescent behavior and the willingness of elected individuals to look the other way until it becomes a problem where citizens become victims. Then, of course, raising taxes to create a task force that did not need to exist had the problem been addressed rather than denied can only solve the problem. This issue is indicative of how government at all levels is afraid to act on an issue until it becomes critical. A vendetta killing or testosterone charged turf war has no place in America. Yet it is part of an evolution of denial and negligence. Those we elect give their oath that they will protect and serve the citizenry. When? After a stray bullet hits an innocent bystander? When a predictable threat is ignored until it become politically correct to address it rather than anticipating it? Cowardice is the word that comes to mind.
As we witness the current election cycle, there is that typical avoidance of taking an honest stand. These spoken words are salvific and dangerous due to the intent. How many times have we heard a politician retort, “That’s not exactly what I said”? Politicus is a very small part of the human experience. Ethics, morals and pathos seem to have been ignored for quite some time. Most people don’t understand the meaning of those words; how could they? Take comfort, they know how to hug a tree. "

Straight Talk wrote on Jan 31, 2008 7:20 AM:

" JimClark - I've stayed out of responding to your rants for a while as they seem to offer little value. I am growing tired of your lack of action suggestions. You snipe at elected officials, yet, do you run for office to make the changes you say are so needed? Do you offer solutions? Writing "Take comfort, they [politicians] know how to hug a tree," is absolutely meaningless. All it shows is that you have some sort of anger towards... what?... environmentalists? How does that related to gangs? And who said anything about raising taxes? I understand your frustration about ganes here in Napa. I'm not happy about that either. Just do us all a favor and quit your moaning. You seem to know exactly what "pathos" is. Offer some postitive steps and less rhetoric. "

hudds5 wrote on Jan 31, 2008 7:49 AM:

" Finaaly Napa admits to having a growing Gang problem. Instead of having a "summit" invovling the same people who have not resolved this problem, maybe the Sheriff should request information and assistance from outside resources. Napa is surrounded by cities and couties that have far worse gang problems than they do. At one time, they were just like Napa when the problems started to grow. It would be vital to hear what they have to say about Napa's concerns regarding Gang violence.
If they (gangs)were just killing each other, than most people would be fine with that. However, when gangs are allowed to exist, they cause harm to everyone! "

steph wrote on Jan 31, 2008 8:24 AM:

" We need more vocational education in schools, and smaller, safer schools. We need more education of young girls and women to make sure that they pick good fathers for their babies--fathers are necessary in children's lives, not gang-bangers, men in jail, men who already have children with other girls, etc. Unfortunately, no task force can take the place of a parent, but we must make sure we have good male role models in our boys' lives. "

ubeu wrote on Jan 31, 2008 1:08 PM:

" Listen what napa needs are people whom have lived the gang life and have made something of them selfs, by showing eithers that there is life after you grow up.Also gangs are around because there is nothing elsa offered either in the home or community! To live in napa and be a single parent you need to make 46,000.00 a year 2 family income you nedd over 65,000.00 and even than one still can't afford to live her and what does napa have to offer its young folks not a lot not even those between the ages of 18 to 21.I have known gang life I'm from Stockton, ca and a former gang member trust me I know what I am saying and even in 300 words I still could not explain it all to.Stop the summits and ask those that have live the life and know about drive bys what Napa can do to help its ypuths!!!!!!!!!! "

Chunk wrote on Jan 31, 2008 2:16 PM:

" There's not a gang problem in Napa. If there were then we'd see more people getting blasted in the streets of Napa. "

hudds5 wrote on Jan 31, 2008 6:29 PM:

" Gang drop outs are not the answer but they can provide Law Enforcement with some vital information regarding specific gangs. Current gang members do NOT have enough respect to listen to drop outs. Police needs to keep a current data base of local gang members and judges must be willing to serve restraining orders on juvenile gang members to stay away from our schools. Gang member do not have the right to attend our schools unless they are willing to give up the gang life. Mentors, role models, afterschool activities are all fine but the root of the problem is the fact that these punks breed. They made a choice to get involved in criminal activities and they do not have the courage to walk away. "

napamusings wrote on Jan 31, 2008 11:03 PM:

" Steph, I love your idea of working with kids when they are little to fend off the gang culture. Currently, I volunteer with a little boy at my kids' elementary school who is so on the verge of "going bad" it kills me. I would work with this kid everyday if I could.

I wish his parents cared about him, and his education, as much as I do. And I guess that's the problem. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy