NVR Logo
Teen to be tried as adult for killing Vallejo gang member
American Canyon 15-year-old faces murder charges
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Save and Share Share
4:30 p.m.
Although the defense argued 15-year-old Edgar Aguilar was acting in self-defense when he stabbed a known Vallejo gang member to death, the court disagreed and held the American Canyon teen to answer to murder.

Napa Superior Court Judge Stephen Kroyer ruled this morning there was enough evidence presented during the preliminary hearing to hold Aguilar for the Oct. 1, 2007, murder of Manuel Macias, 24.
Aguilar’s attorney, Greg Galeste, argued Aguilar was attacked by a Macias — who is almost twice his size — and Aguilar was only defending himself when he stabbed Macias to death.

Deputy District Attorney Fred Gutierrez painted a much different picture of Aguilar, calling him a known violent gang member who killed Macias in a street gang fight.
Because of the seriousness of the crimes, the court ordered Aguilar to be tried in adult court. Due to his age, however, he is being housed without bail in juvenile hall.

When should teens be charged as adults? Give your thoughts here
During the hearing, witnesses testified Aguilar and Macias were documented members of rival street gangs.

The day Macias was fatally stabbed, Aguilar, is a member of the Surenos street gang, and his 14-year-old friend were walking on Elliott Drive in American Canyon to the bus stop to go to Napa.

A car containing Macias, a member of the rival Norteno street gang, along with Jesse Perez — the driver — and Jaime Sabater drove by.

Macias yelled gang slurs at Aguilar and his friend. More gang slurs and signs were exchanged. The men in the car stopped and got out. Macias took on Aguilar, while Perez and Sabater fought with his younger friend.

Macias received one fatal stab wound to his heart. Perez, Sabater and Macias left in their car. Perez called 911 and drove to a nearby service station to wait for an ambulance. Macias was taken to Kaiser Hospital in Vallejo, where he was pronounced dead.

During an interview with law enforcement the day of the stabbing, Sabater picked Aguilar out of a photo line up as the person who was fighting with Macias when he was stabbed.

Gary James, gang investigator with the Napa County District Attorney, testified Macias’ death was the “classic confrontation between Sureno and Norteno gang members. The name calling, the flashing of gang signs leads to violent activity, which in this case, ended in a homicide,” James said.

Galeste argued Aguilar was only defending himself.

“What was he suppose to do in this situation? The autopsy showed Manny (Macias) had cocaine and marijuana in his system. Was Edgar to allow a drugged-out, ex-con beat him up?” Galeste asked. “This guy is on felony adult probation for domestic violence.”

Galeste described Macias as being 24 years old, 5-foot-10 and weighing 215 pounds. “Edgar is a 15-year-old kid about 5-foot-5 and weighs 120 pounds. The victim outweighed him by about 80 to 90 pounds,” Galeste said. “You have a super-heavy weight beating up a feather weight. He had a right to defend himself.”

Galeste said Aguilar never showed the knife until he had been punched at least “five or six times in the face, neck and shoulder by the victim. Edgar believed there was sufficient bodily injury to defend himself. He used any means to ward off the intentional and unprovoked attack.”

Gutierrez disagreed.

“If he’s getting beat up, what about the lack of serious injuries? Mr. Aguilar had some scrapes and bruises. He is not some poor innocent guy. He is a known gang member. The fight started with the usual gang interchanges.  He had his knife in his hand, and he wanted to kill someone,” Gutierrez said.

In addition to the murder charge, Kroyer also held Aguilar to answer to assault with a deadly weapon, street terrorism and several special allegations, including gang enhancements, which can add additional years to his prison sentence.

Aguilar faces 25 years to life if found guilty. His arraignment is March 5.

9 comment(s)

flibbertigibbet wrote on Jan 29, 2008 5:20 PM:

" Interesting, they were both gang members, take that out, both male, so the same. One outweighed the other by almost double and was 9 years older and was the one starting and pushing the confrontation. ? I think the little kid is lucky he had a knife that day, obviously made the confrontation equal, and maybe he would be the one 6' under. Get him AND HIS PARENTS for carrying a knife and have him "scared straight" and be done with it. "

Dwayne wrote on Jan 29, 2008 6:50 PM:

" You can't scare straight a gang member. They have a thug mentality. He belongs in criminal graduate school (prison). There, he can learn how to be a professional criminal instead of just a punk with a knife. "

fortethetank wrote on Jan 29, 2008 6:53 PM:

" I agree with flibb... The 15 year old was defending himself. When they say gang members don't they mean wannabe little poser punks. This is Napa not the inner city. If there was truly a gang problem we'd be having more "gang" members die every month or two. This isn't Boys n tha Hood. These guys are wannabes and losers. They look more ridiculous than anything. "

hudds5 wrote on Jan 29, 2008 7:00 PM:

" Tried as an adult for killing a Gang member is a little too much. It might be a case of self defense but there's probably more to this incident then we know at this time. Hopefully, we will get more information as this case develops. "

NapaValley61 wrote on Jan 29, 2008 7:53 PM:

" I agree, we need more information in order to made a fair judgement. The facts are so far that you have a 24 year old ADULT against a 15 year old TEEN and the adult is almost 100 pounds heavier than the teen? Sounds like an unfair fight to me. If some crazed person came at me and I had a knife to protect me... I would use it too. Come on people, get real.... you know you would do what ever it takes to survive. What if you took GANG out of the story and it was told a 15 year old teen was attacked by a 24 year old adult and used a knife to protect him, it would have been self defense. "

notpc wrote on Jan 29, 2008 8:11 PM:

" Amazing, the comments about ignoring the gang factor. I guess the next time someone uses a gun to commit a crime we should ignore that too? I have zero sympathy for these scumbag gangbangers.This community has been very lucky that no innocent people have been killed. "

bettye wrote on Jan 29, 2008 10:35 PM:

" What's " sooooo " stupid is a 25yr.old man in a gang .. I have even been told of a gray haired man with 9 kids in Vallejo that is an active gang member !!What are these people trying to prove ?? It is just plain STUPID . Grow up for Heavens sake !!! "

Mr_Napa wrote on Jan 29, 2008 10:44 PM:

" In terms of deadliness, there is not much of a difference between a hardcore gangmember with a weapon and a wannabe hardcore gangmember with a weapon. Engage parents. That works. "

petebo wrote on Jan 29, 2008 11:40 PM:

" There is no justice in America...does anyone know why? Here's a hint, the federal government has limited jurisdiction. In fact, it is limited to federal territory. Does anyone know where the federal territories are? And do you live in federal territory/ Chances are, unless you are in the military or a park ranger, no one lives in federal territory on the North American continent. Judges and jurors must live in federal territory to be valid...by law. Law is for government, not people. Ask any judge to show you the oath that he or she took...if they can even find it. It was not an Article III oath as required by the US Constitution. The people in those black robes are parading as judges of the Judiciary as per article III when in fact they are merely administrative officers. This is why there can NEVER be justice in America. When the judges are lying to us, who exactly CAN we believe? We are surrounded by lies... "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy