NVR Logo
Reducing the chemicals from cleaning
Friday, January 25, 2008
Save and Share Share
For two decades you’ve heard that “perc,” the solvent used in dry cleaning, is effective but toxic. Yet consumers searching for a clean alternative won’t find many options.

Perchloroethylene, a nonflammable, colorless liquid with a sharp, sweet odor, has been used for a half-century. It remains the cleaning agent of choice for about 85 percent of 30,000 dry cleaners operating in the United States.
One emerging alternative - silicon-based solvents - is not proven as totally safe.

• Silicon-based solvents. D5 is an odorless, colorless liquid used to dry clean clothes under the name of GreenEarth. D5 contains no organic chemicals, and initial studies showed it to be non-toxic. It is not a skin irritant and, like hydrocarbons, doesn’t fall under any U.S. environmental laws.
It has been used for decades in personal care items such as underarm deodorants, cosmetics, shampoos and creams, said Tim Maxwell, president of GreenEarth, a Kansas City-based company.

A 2003 industry-financed study concluded exposure to D5 raised cancer risks in rats. But Silicones Environmental, Health and Safety Council, an industry trade group based in Virginia, says people likely face no increased risk, due to biological differences between rats and humans. The Environmental Proection agency awaits more information from manufacturers before doing a formal analysis of the compound’s risks.
• Wet cleaning. A 2007 California study calls wet cleaning - more like traditional washing - the greenest alternative to perc. Cleaning agents cost less, equipment lasts longer, electricity use drops, hazardous-waste disposal costs are eliminated, and water use doesn’t significantly change, says the comparision to traditional dry cleaning.

While dry cleaners have long hand-washed some delicate garments, wet cleaning brings that process into the digital age, using computer-controlled washers and dryers and specialized finishing equipment. Currently, only about 80 full-time professional wet cleaners operate across the nation, most in California, where government subsidies are available for cleaners who adopt the process.

Dry cleaners who still use perc say they take steps to eliminate risks to customers and the environment.

“It all depends on the operator,” Pappas says. “All solvents are safe, as long as you know how to use them.”

Toxicity well known

Health experts agree that perchloroethylene is hazardous. Among its reported effects:

• Dizziness.

• Skin, eye and respiratory-tract irritation.

• Damage to central nervous system, liver and kidneys

• Reproductive and childhood-development problems.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies it as a probable cancer-causer in humans. The Environmental Protection Agency calls it a toxic air pollutant. The chemical pollutes outdoor air and ground water as well.

How can a consumer minimize risk?

First, check on how your dry cleaner handles garments. George Pappas, who owns Palo Verde Cleaners in Tucson, Ariz., says he hangs perc-cleaned clothes on a line for 24 hours before giving them to the customer to allow the solvent to evaporate and reduce the chance that customers will be exposed to toxic residues.

If your clothes smell like chemicals when you pick them up, do not accept them until they have been properly dried, the EPA says.

At home, air out clothes again for a time to let chemicals dissipate before hanging clothes in a closet, the EPA recommends.
2 comment(s)

devabob wrote on Jan 28, 2008 2:58 PM:

" As is typical this article state incorrect information and unsubstantiated facts. The author states "Health experts agree". Which health experts? What about opposing views from the industry? Perc does not have the effects stated here. In 1/2 a century with over 30,000 dry cleaners none has developed kidney damage or cancer due to the dry cleaning process or chemicals. Why don't we see that in print? This is just a cheap way to attack small business owners in the dry cleaning industry. "

coigue wrote on Feb 3, 2008 8:20 PM:

" Dear devabob, if you want to know the answers to your questions, google "environmental oncology". Many of the results have data and literature on household cleaners. Also, the "breast cancer cluster mystery" in Marin county was found to be due to chemicals in dry cleaned clothes. Actually, I see the article does cite some sources. If those are not enough, as I said before...Google is your friend "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy