NVR Logo
Most of mistakenly released inmates back in jail
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Save and Share Share
As of Monday afternoon, nearly all of the 25 inmates prematurely released from Napa County jail last week had been contacted, and most were behind bars again.

Authorities have not yet been able to contact three of the offenders.
Of the other 22, 16 had already returned by the end of the weekend. Three were to turn themselves in Monday, according to Napa County Department of Corrections Director Julie Hutchens, while two more were expected to come in today.

Jail authorities don't plan to reach the remaining inmate, presumably because he only had a few days left on his sentence when the inmates were let go.
The 25 were released Wednesday, after jailers used an incorrect formula to figure out the inmates' good behavior and work credits. The calculations from the wrong formula -- which turned out to be the formula used by the probation department -- showed some of the inmates had been held beyond their release date, Hutchens said. As a result, inmates with as little time left as five days and as much time as 44 days to serve were cut loose.

Only three offenders were in on violence-related charges -- one for aggravated assault and two on domestic violence. Another of the inmates released early is a registered sex offender who was serving time for failing to register his address with local authorities.
All four of them are once more behind bars, Hutchens said.

The majority of the remaining inmates were convicted of violations of probation or DUI, Hutchens said.

Of the three inmates jail staff have not been able to contact, one was serving time for violation of probation for being drunk in public: one, who is on parole, was convicted of auto theft; and the other was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon, Hutchens said.

Hutchens said all inmates are given credits for good behavior and work when they are first put behind bars.

"We assume they will obey the rules and work while serving their time. If they don't and become a discipline problem, we can take those credits away," she said. "I was reading California case law and felt the calculations they were using were different from what the jail was using. I became alarmed we were keeping people past their release date. I asked our jail tech staff to change the formula. I approved the release of those I believed were here beyond their actual release date."

Once the error was discovered by the probation department, jail and probation staffers began calling the released inmates. Their attorneys were also contacted.

"Many of the people who turned themselves in called us after they read the article about it in Saturday's (Register)," Hutchens said.

Napa police picked up one, sheriff's deputies got two and one was nabbed by Solano County law enforcement, she said. "The rest voluntarily called us and returned to finish their sentences."

Hutchens said a hearing before Napa County Superior Court Judge Stephen Kroyer is set for Wednesday.

The court will decide whether to issue arrest warrants for any of the inmates who are still at large, she said.

Hutchens takes full responsibility for the mistake.

"I should have conversed with any other county agencies that might have been even remotely involved before making such a decision," she said.

Hutchens has been NCDC director since Sept. 4; she oversees an average daily jail population of about 230 inmates. Capacity is set at 264. Before coming to Napa, she was jail administrator for Siskiyou County in Northern California. That county has a population of 48,000, with an average jail population of about 100, she said.
4 comment(s)

Joe wrote on Jan 15, 2008 12:41 PM:

" Poor inmates. Now they get it worse than they would have if the jail would have done their jobs right. A person really needs to keep their moral up when they are locked up. What helps with this is the thought of being released. It is tough to be caged up and not be able to see outside. Many of these people probably were happy to get out and let there guard down once hey were out. It's just messed up that they had to go back. "

sam wrote on Jan 15, 2008 2:46 PM:

" What do you mean poor inmates. They were put away for a reason. To bad if they had to go back. Whats to bad is how much money we had to spend to find them again "

fortethetank wrote on Jan 15, 2008 3:52 PM:

" I agree with Joe. They should have let them stay free. They served more than 80% of their time anyways according to the previous article. It costs more money to keep them locked up. A lot of them were probably working jobs once they got out only to have to quit and go back to jail. Now their release date is going to be even longer than if they wouldn't have been let out early. What if they had plane tickets scheduled to go on vacation when they got out but now they can't because they don't get out until a later date. That's messed up. "

angelturty wrote on Jan 19, 2008 11:58 AM:

" you know society has been given so many different false outlooks on 'jail'.there were three of those people who should have had to turn themselves in,the violent ones.im pretty sure the remaing ones were petty charges.STOP SPENDING TAX PAYERS MONEY ON THE PETTY OFFENDERS AND FOCUS MORE ON THE VIOLENT ONES.LIKE SEX OFFENDERS AND THE ONES WHO ARE VIOLENT.plus it was the c.o's faults who released the inmates,not the inmates faults!!!!!people do your jobs RIGHT and none of this would have happened.personaly i think it was a very cruel joke! "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy