NVR Logo
County mistake: 25 jail inmates released early
All had less than a month to go, two have returned voluntarily
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Save and Share Share
Twenty-five Napa County jail inmates were cut loose early on Wednesday because of a mistake by their jailers.

The inmates were let out before their scheduled release dates because jail officials used an incorrect formula to figure good and work time credits, according to Napa County Department of Corrections Director Julie Hutchin.
None of the 25 inmates released are convicted child molesters or rapists, Hutchin said on Friday evening. She said the inmates include those serving sentences for DUIs, other non-violent crimes and assault. Two of them were convicted of domestic violence.

As of Friday evening, two of the inmates had voluntarily turned themselves in to serve the remainders of their sentences.
“Our priority now is to see those inmates who had more than five days to serve are returned to jail,” Hutchin said.

Hutchin said although the inmates have been convicted, they do not pose a high danger to the community.
“People held in county jail are not the violent offenders who would be sentenced to state prison,” Hutchin said.

Hutchin said on Friday evening that Napa County Superior Court judges were issuing arrest warrants for those inmates who had not voluntarily turned themselves in.

“Once we realized our error, we immediately notified the (inmates’) attorneys, who tried to get in touch with them,” Hutchin said.

Hutchin said that as head of the department of corrections, she assumes the responsibility for the error.

“I made the decision. We believed we may had been holding people too long in the jail because of their credits for good time and work time. I used a formula to calculate the good time and work time days. However I used the probation department’s formula instead of the department of corrections. As a result, 25 inmates were released too early,” Hutchin said.

The inmates were released on Wednesday. On Thursday, the probation department notified the county jail of the error, which set the wheels in motion to round up the 25 inmates who most likely thought Christmas came around again.

Hutchin said all of the inmates had between five days and one month left in jail before their scheduled releases.

“All of these people had already served 84 percent of the time owned to the county,” Hutchin said. “Once again, I want to stress that our priority is to see those who were released with more than five days to serve are returned to the jail. I understand what happened, and I can assure everyone it will not happen again.”

Napa and Madera are the only two among the state’s 58 counties that have correctional officers, not sheriff’s deputies, operating county jails.

Napa County Department of Corrections is a separate entity from the Napa County Sheriff’s Department. Hutchin is the department’s director, while Doug Koford oversees the sheriff’s department.

The jail is staffed by correctional officers who are not sworn peace officers. They do not carry weapons and have no police powers.
19 comment(s)

Dwayne wrote on Jan 11, 2008 8:31 PM:

" I can't wait until these folks are running our new government controlled health care system. Maybe we can get free vasectomy's, by mistake. "

Joe wrote on Jan 11, 2008 9:47 PM:

" None of these inmates should have to go back. The county made the mistake of letting them go, so they should be free. It's not like they're violent offenders, so what's the big deal? "

vernacular wrote on Jan 12, 2008 6:37 AM:

" "...and assault. Two of them were convicted of domestic violence."

Sounds like at least some are violent offenders to me. "

ketama wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:36 AM:

" I agree with Joe. Besides, it's more of our money to locate them. "

skippert wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:17 AM:

" What a joke. How can you just opps like that. You are put in a position (with good pay) and you can't do it right. This is the problem with society, no one takes their jobs serious. "

hudds5 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:32 AM:

" Shocking that the Napa Jail would make such a big mistake regarding an inmate's release date. Maybe the county should think about spending a little more money and turn the jail over to the Sheriff's Dept. At least the jail will be in compliance and these mistakes may be prevented in the future. Also, if the jail is under the Sheriff, maybe there will be some improvements to the facility. Have you seen the Sheriff's building lately? "

NapaValley61 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:04 AM:

" Domestic Violence is a violent offence otherwise it would not contain the word violent. Next we will be reading in the Napa Register, Domestic Violence victim attacked by early release offender. As for more money spent to locate them, just issue a warrant and if they do not turn themselves in, double the time when they do catch them. And for saving money, fire the staff that miscalculated the time and hire someone that can use an adding machine. "

cutiepie wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:31 AM:

" Mistakes are made. It would take more taxpayers monies to locate these people. Hopefully there is a better system in place when the formula is used to release these people. All in all it appears it was a honest mistake, with the people who made the mistake taking responsibility for what their error. "

supernova8610 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:42 AM:

" It's a matter of principle, Joe. "

whowhatwherewhen wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:13 PM:

" NapaValley61: Think about what you just said. Do you know how much money it takes to hire someone, let alone the expenses to have new people trained? It would cost way more money to fire the people. It seems to me that The issue wasnt the people figuring the times instead the issue was the heads of the department telling the staff who do the times to do it a different way. It doesnt seem like the staff are at fault at all. I do agree it is time for the Sheriffs department to take over the jail. "

Joe wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:10 PM:

" It's not fair to the inmates who were let go to have to go back. Some of them probably applied forjobs by now or even started a new job. Some may have gone back to their old jobs. To take them back it makes them look bad to their bosses who may have given them a second chance. "

hudds5 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:59 PM:

" come on Joe...they didn't have jobs to get back to. Most of them went straight to the homeless shelter or to their local drug dealer. unless you have some "inside" information, the problem is the fact that the jail needs to start making changes. "

thatonegirl143 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:21 PM:

" "they didn't have jobs to get back to. Most of them went straight to the homeless shelter or to their local drug dealer."

FYI -- my boyfriend was one of the inmates who got released && called back. he went to work 6 days a week, 6-8 hours a day. he had 3 houses to choose to come home to && has nothing to do with drugs either [not only because he was in jail.] so dont assume things unless you know the facts. you dont need "inside" information. you need to be smart && non-judgmental.

"Sounds like at least some are violent offenders to me."

my boyfriend was in there for assult because he got into a fight ONE night. a fight. he didnt beat me or anyone else. him and another person were drunk && fought. hes not a "violent offender."

ps. the article isnt even the truth of what really happened. 46 people were released because a new law was passed. 2 days late the law was changed && they called everyone back.

pss. thanks joe for being open minded. "

MikezzzYttot wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:25 PM:

" wow, what a great system we have here "

Napaparent wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:49 PM:

" I for one DO NOT agree that anyone should loose their job--I highly doubt the process of making these "calculations" has anything to do w/ a calculator--I'm sure most of the process is steeped in complex Federal, State and county regulations and law. I'm sure it would be like calling "Doing your income taxes--adding and subtracting". I'm more impressed that two agencies in our county actually appeared to work together once the issue was discovered; rather using our odd media here to bash and berate. Also, if most folks who commented here would notice, the Jail Director did accept responsibiliy, corrected the mistake and appears (by the article) to be making some changes to policy and procedures. Good for her. Get real people-mistakes happen--but as long as they're on top of the issues--let it go! "

Maya wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:29 PM:

" Well said, Joe.
I wonder what the penalty is for the person who made this mistake? I hope this at least goes in their personnel file. "

Napaparent wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:42 PM:

" Oh give me a break!! Joe states that the inmate may 'look bad'...gee, wouldn't that have already been the case considering they are/were in JAIL! At some point inmates need to come to grips w/ reality--they have broken the trust of the community; that's a hard thing to regain--and depending on they crime--may never be regained. I'd suggest a portion of their time be spent on figuring out how to give back to the community they dumped on, instead of self serving notions of 'being done wrong'. "

Joe wrote on Jan 13, 2008 1:36 PM:

" Just because somebody was or is an inmate doesn't mean they are a bad person. Many times innocent people are convicted and locked up for crimes they didn't commit. Other times people are locked up for petty crimes that aren't even a big deal. Like defending someone else and being involved in a violent confrentation. It also is not fair to try get these inmates back in jail because some may have traveled far away to start a new life somewhere else. They should not have to pay with their own money to come back and serve more time. "

Napaparent wrote on Jan 13, 2008 7:48 PM:

" There are new Forensic Psychiatric research studies that are showing actually that there are some people "born bad" That's not saying everyone in jail is a bad person and of course-there are some who are wrongfully incarcerated. (few these days though) The fact remains is that if a person cannot (baring a physical or mental problem of course)generally respect our community rules--regardless of "petty", major felony whatever we call it)then there is something wrong w/ that person-end of story... "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy