County closes polling places, pushes vote-by-mail effort
By DAVID RYAN
Register Staff Writer
Napa County Registrar of Voters John Tuteur’s plans are falling into place.
After a November 2006 debacle in which some voters were turned away from congested polling places, Tuteur spent 2007 launching initiatives designed to convert polling place voters into vote-by-mail voters.
The most recent effort was a direct mail campaign Tuteur announced in November. He sent a letter to some 12,000 registered voters in Napa County, informing them that their polling places would be shut down and their precincts had been turned into vote-by-mail areas.
The shift, in 41 precincts, affects nearly 20 percent of the county’s potential voters.
Why did he make the move? Tuteur said he needed to find a way to reduce congestion at the polls. The answer was to latch onto a growing West Coast trend — vote by mail.
By reducing the number of polling places and encouraging voters to mail in ballots, Tuteur expects at the very least that polling booths from deactivated districts can be used at the remaining election-day locations. More booths mean less waiting of the kind that turned people away from the polls in November 2006.
(Tuteur’s explains his reasoning in a Your Turn commentary on page B3.)
Napa County may be one of the heaviest vote-by-mail counties in the state, according to Tuteur. Some 60 percent of the county’s voters vote by mail.
About 19 percent, however, have been forced into it.
A state rule allows registrars of voters to forcibly convert polling place districts into a vote-by-mail districts if all but 250 or fewer voters in the district have volunteered to vote by mail.
Those forced into voting by mail do not pay postage on their ballots and have the option of turning their ballots in — signed and sealed — at any county polling place on election day by 8 p.m.
Napa County has a total of 85 vote by mail precincts, including 41 Tuteur recently decided to shutter.
Tuteur said 29 of those 41 recently closed were in the city of Napa. Four out of five polling places in Calistoga were closed, Yountville closed one, St. Helena closed one and the rest were in the unincorporated part of county. Some vote-by-mail precincts have been carved out of pieces of existing precincts.
Tuteur left one polling place open — for now — at the Veterans Home of California at Yountville because of concerns among the elder veterans that they would not be able to get to a convenient polling place.
“Some of the veterans felt that was easier for them than (voting) by mail,” Tuteur said.
The change is brewing controversy, especially among those who believe removing the polling places disenfranchises voters who would prefer to wait until election day to cast their ballots. Tuteur said he heard from about 30 residents after he notified the 12,000 voters of the shift.
One, Linda Brown, wrote a letter to the Register raising her concerns. “There are often 20 or more ballot initiatives and dozens of candidates on any given ballot,” Brown wrote in a Dec. 19 letter. “Voters should have the right to study these issues and options up to election day. Often some of the most important information does not emerge until the very end of the race.”
While Tuteur disagrees with Brown about disenfranchisement, he said he whole-heartedly agrees when it comes to voting strategy.
“That’s one of the primary concerns I had,” he said. “I don’t want to vote a week in advance. I want to hear all the last-minute arguments and see what’s in the media.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
common sense wrote on Dec 30, 2007 9:06 AM:
bjensen wrote on Dec 30, 2007 10:00 AM:
California State Elections Code, Section 3005, does state:
“Whenever, on the 88th day before the election, there are 250 or less persons registered to vote in any precinct, the elections official may furnish each voter with a vote by mail ballot along with a statement that there will be no polling place for the election. The elections official shall also notify each voter of the location of the two nearest polling places in the event the voter chooses to return the ballot on election day. The voter shall not be required to file an application for the vote by mail ballot and the ballot shall be sent as soon as the ballots are available. No precinct shall be divided in order to conform to this section.”
The article also states “Some vote-by-mail precincts have been carved out of pieces of existing precincts.” This seems to be in direct contravention to the last rule of Section 3005.
Furthermore, Section 3005 seems to require that this determination must be made for every separate election. “John Tuteur’s plans are falling into place” does not indicate that he intends to revisit this issue with every election.
Mr. Tuteur, or the Napa County legal advisor, should explain. "
mikeb wrote on Dec 30, 2007 11:59 AM:
supernova8610 wrote on Dec 30, 2007 12:36 PM:
kbf wrote on Dec 30, 2007 2:55 PM:
Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Dec 30, 2007 5:59 PM:
Skip M. wrote on Dec 30, 2007 7:48 PM:
Skip M. wrote on Dec 30, 2007 8:02 PM:
mytwocents wrote on Dec 30, 2007 8:19 PM: