NVR Logo
Supes to scrutinize growth initiative
Saturday, December 22, 2007
Save and Share Share
3:25 p.m.A growth-limiting initiative proposed for the June 2008 will get scrutiny from the Napa County Board of Supervisors in January.

Napa County Registrar of Voters John Tuteur said Friday he is set to certify the signatures on petitions for the Responsible Growth Initiative next week, setting in a motion a process that will fall at the feet of the Board of Supervisors next month.
The inititaive is modeled after 1980’s Measure A, which limited growth to 1 percent per year in the unincorporated county. But this new version also limits future building height to three stories and backers of the initiative have said that the progress of the 3,200-home Napa Pipe proposal spurred them to action.

A vote by the Board of Supervisors — possibly coming as soon as Jan. 8 or Jan. 15 — will decide whether the initiative will become an ordinance straight away, be set before the voters on the June ballot or be scrutinized fiscally and legally under what’s called a 9111 report.
“There's been enough questions about it that it would be great to do an independent analysis of it,” said Supervisor Brad Wagenknecht, adding he hadn’t made a final decision yet.

Supervisor Bill Dodd said a 9111 report could provide voters with unbiased information about the initiative.
“I wouldn't be opposed to doing some fiscal analysis on it,” he said. “We've done that with some other initiatives. I would never consider enacting it (directly) into law under any circumstances.”
3 comment(s)

MarkMiwords wrote on Dec 21, 2007 4:25 PM:

" I received a mailer from a group called "Keep Napa Napa" today saying how bad the "Responsible Growth Initiative" is. I read all three pages of their "information". Way down at the bottom of the last page, it said that "Keep Napa Napa" is a group of concerned citizens with "major funding" provided by Napa Redevelopment Partners. I'll ALWAYS have questions about both sides of this argument. Please do the 9111 study so we can have impartial information. "

NapaCitizen wrote on Dec 21, 2007 7:47 PM:

" We all must examine the motives behind both sides of this measure. Clearly anyone owning land they want to develop and ADD thousands of people onto the overloaded infrastructure we already have would not want any restriction on growth, period. Recall that old line "if we build it, they will come"? Even if we don't build it they keep coming. That doesn't mean they need to stay indefinitely. No one has an entitlement to live anywhere, regardless of where you were raised. Its a free economy and the hospitality and agricultural jobs in the Valley do not compensate enough of their workforce in such a manner they can afford to live anywhere near Napa. That's the reality. Start working on the issues that create the problem. More development is not the answer. As for the mailer. I'm appalled. Careful, let us build 3500 "affordable" highrise condos at Napa Pipe or they're going to crowd them into YOUR neighborhood. Hmm... Thats a minimum of 5000 new vehicles and 20000 more car trips every day. Can you say "Exhaust Fume'"? "

Paddy wrote on Dec 21, 2007 10:39 PM:

" The Responsible Growth Initiative represents the desires of the vast majority of those living in Napa. Measure A opponents have been handed their hats and shown the door in numerous attempts to thwart the desires of those of us who appreciate the open fields, clean air and agricultural nature of our valley. We constantly have to fight back the attempts of those short-sighted, egotistical and greedy few who stand to make a lot of money at the expense of the great majority. Say no to increased taxes to pay for the infrastructure needed for 4,200 new homes!! 10,000 cars!! Sewage treatment, road reconstruction, new schools will be paid for by us. Summers will be filled with smoggy days and first stage alerts and with the bloom off the rose the economy of the valley will suffer tragically. We live in a fragile setting and those trying to smash it down must not be allowed to do so. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy