NVR Logo
AmCan banking on road tax to ease traffic woes
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Save and Share Share
Saying south county traffic troubles are a regional concern, American Canyon leaders want the extension of a key north-south route to be paid for by a future countywide transportation sales tax increase.

The $57 million extension of Newell Road to South Kelly Road, which would include a $20 million interchange, would be a frontage road along Highway 29, according to the plan discussed by the American Canyon City Council Thursday.
“In all probability there will be a (transportation sales tax),” said Mayor Leon Garcia, who also chairs the Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency. Measure H, a countywide transportation sales tax on the ballot in June of 2006, failed to pass.

Garcia said a group that includes Supervisor Bill Dodd is having “very preliminary” discussions on the formulation of a new countywide transportation sales tax measure in 2008. Dodd on Friday called the discussions “way, way preliminary.”
The mayor spoke as the American Canyon City Council discussed the possible formation of a 17-member group headed by City Councilwoman Cindy Coffey to educate the public on the need to direct the sales tax revenues to build the Newell Road extension.

City Councilmen Don Callison and Ed West, who said they want to ease tensions between the city and Napa County, questioned the need for such a committee, saying the city needs instead to work with the other jurisdictions.
This will make the city look like “cowboys,” West said.

“I just don’t see how this committee is going to lead us to the dance,” said West, who plans to discuss the matter with Dodd.

City Manager Rich Ramirez said Friday that the City Council will discuss the scope of work for the committee on Tuesday.

In addition to building Newell Road, the city still plans to widen Highway 29 from four to six lanes, a project estimated at $67 million, and to extend Devlin Road on the west side of Highway 29 to the north.

The Devlin Road connection would require the construction of a bridge over Fagan Creek, Ramirez said. The bridge — and who will pay for it — is part of ongoing discussions between the city and county officials as they hammer out an agreement on where the city’s future northern boundaries will be, he said Friday.

Transportation mitigation fees charged to new developments will pay for widening Highway 29, according to Omni Means, the city’s traffic consultant.

Under the best scenario, the extension of Newell Road would not be complete until four or five years after the passage of a transportation sales tax, Ramirez said.

Any widening of Highway 29 from four to six lanes would not take place for 15 years, he said. As of Friday, the city has about $20,000 in transportation mitigation fees available for the project, Ramirez said.

The city, which now charges transportation-related fees of $3,954 for every new home, could increase the transportation mitigation fee to $4,331 early next year, Ramirez said.

Omni Means President H. Ross Ainsworth estimates traffic on Highway 29 will increase by 67 percent over the next 30 years. Up to 70 percent of the trips will be regional traffic, he said. An estimated 55,000 cars travel through town daily, according to Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency.

The agency, which studies traffic and transportation issues in Napa County, has led a series of community workshops since early fall to evaluate Napa County’s transportation needs for the next 30 years. The first  public meeting was in September in American Canyon.

So far, NCTPA’s board has not had formal discussions on a new sales tax, stressed Jim Leddy, NCTPA’s executive director. Other groups in the community have had discussions for the past 18 months, he said.

On Thursday, Michele Castagnola, the longtime American Canyon Planning Commission chairwoman, said her daily commute to Napa takes 55 minutes one way.

“We need to do something.”
8 comment(s)

mytwocents wrote on Dec 15, 2007 11:45 PM:

" Yes you do need to do something. There was a time i could get to work in Vallejo from napa in 20 minutes, believe me those days are gone.Please do not even think about cramming one more stop light in AC as most of us are just trying to pass through. "

Lane wrote on Dec 16, 2007 3:48 AM:

" I would be happy to pay a tax to ease American Canyon traffic woes if I could be assured that it will not lead to additional traffic in the rest of Napa. I doubt this assurance can be made. Experience has shown that widening streets leads to more traffic, and within a frightening short period of time the traffic problems are back, but at a higher level. The only solution is one that gets people out of their cars and onto mass transit. Given our population, innovative solutions are going to be needed to make that work. Until that happens, I will vote to fix our roads, but not to widen them. "

robertdba wrote on Dec 16, 2007 11:57 AM:

" It's been proven over and over that the traffic is from Vallejo and Napa. there is not enough people in Amcan to casue the problem. Napa needs to help pass this bill and pay there part to fix it. "

NapaCitizen wrote on Dec 16, 2007 12:56 PM:

" If y'all would have required the Environmental impact for the tract home cancer in AmCyn -- here's a thought, perhaps the developers and the WalMart folks should have been required to ante up for infrastructure contributions. Tax Tax Tax....I guess I've just avoid driving through your grungy little "gateway" --Hmmm... There's a thought. "

Freshair wrote on Dec 16, 2007 6:01 PM:

" To Napacitzen, Thought you should know that Wal-Mart and the Napa Junction project was the first to pay into this regional transportation measure. Pretty generous considering 85% of the traffic is generate by people driving through town to their jobs in Napa and St. Helena first "

napablogger wrote on Dec 16, 2007 9:31 PM:

" Wait, you are not telling me that you build a town on a freeway then complain that most of the cars coming through are just passing through? What do you expect? "

Bike To Work wrote on Dec 16, 2007 10:03 PM:

" How is 6 lanes going to help 15 years from now? There is no solution unless there is a reduction in automobile trips. Express buses will work but only if they are faster and as reliable as cars and if there is an increase in the price of gas. Make the extra lane a car pool and bus lane and people will take the bus. A pedestrian bridge is a worthy use of sales tax measure funds, extra traffic lanes without a new vision of our transportation future is a waste of money. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 16, 2007 11:02 PM:

" I have to say, it is a little ridiculous that AmCan complains about traffic being drive through and not local. Did you ever notice that you happened to build a city along a major freeway? What did you expect? "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy