NVR Logo
Napa should slam door on all development
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Save and Share Share
I have written before that problems become crises when ignored. Whether beginning on the local level and working up, or at the international/national level and proceeding down, the longer we ignore them, the more difficult it is to find resolution.

Never before have we had such a convergence of crises that can end life as we know it sitting dead ahead. If you see the American Dream as a pathway of life, small pebbles are growing to the size of insurmountable boulders from which there may be no getting by.
You hear about them in the news: the housing/credit debacle; peak oil, resource depletion and the energy crisis; the runaway debt; the dollar’s collapse; global warming; and a exploding population we can no longer feed or take care of. These crises are not going away nor getting smaller. All of these need drastic action on the national level but I’ve got news for you: Don’t count on it. Short of a violent revolution a la 1776, it’s not going to happen.

We need leaders with forethought, intelligence and the wherewithal to lead us down paths, no matter how uncomfortable, if circumstances demand it. While not easy to influence our state and national leaders, we can begin with our local leaders who have, in most cases, failed miserably.
To be a responsible local leader, you have to look at the overall picture and make decisions based on events that will minimize the crises coming our way.

Here in Napa, Mayor Jill Techel and the city council have continued down a path of growth, even though the end is in sight. The crises mentioned above are threatening America with a severe recession and worse. Techel needs to have the backbone to do what is best for Napa’s long-range future and say no to future growth.
We need to ask: Do our leaders believe Napa can continue business as usual, despite a national economic meltdown? Or are they so in debt with the big money interests/developers, that they can’t think outside the box? I believe it is a combination of the two.

A “growth economy” is known as an economic oxymoron. It hastens the inevitable demise when a draconian contractual economy will take place regardless of what we do. Those who follow this path of growth to the end (the United States, China, India ...) will have the most difficult time adjusting to a bleak future. Those who have contracted will have a better chance to survive. This paradigm shift in thinking needs to begin on the local level. Napa has already maximized its growth and any increase decreases the quality of living. It also creates a deeper hole to dig out of where more income (taxes and growth) is continually needed.

An example of complete bone-headed growth is the Napa Redevelopment Partners’ Napa Pipe proposal. This project will do nothing but add to the intolerable traffic and create an infrastructure Napans will be paying for, for years to come. Who would come out ahead in this scheme? Those in construction, real estate, politics — the usual cast of characters.

We need to bite the bullet and slam the door on all development from this point on. Any development bringing more citizens, whether at Napa Pipe, Foster Road or elsewhere, will decrease the standard of living and make future crises worse. Any elected official not able to see this needs to be thrown out of office, and the sooner, the better.

There are groups out there who have agreed with me on this issue for years, such as those who supported the 1980s Measure A. Now we have an initiative that supports the same goals backed by hired guns with conservative backgrounds. This in itself will be very interesting to see how it plays out, but we may be onto something here. Politics is circular, not linear, and the left and right will always meet.

Another local leader who has to have his feet placed to the coals is Supervisor Bill Dodd. (Dodd, who admits he will not be seen using mass transit, is head of the Bay Area’s Metropolitan Transportation Commission). Dodd is in a position to make Napa County into an example of what needs to be done to survive the future. Napa County should immediately work on bringing back the commuter rail system from the Vallejo Ferry to Calistoga. As Bill Ryan said in an essay, the question is not whether we can afford it, as the reality is that we can’t afford to wait.

0ur local leaders can either position us in a good place for a questionable future or continue down the road to ruin. They need to make drastic decisions quickly, or we need to replace them with leaders with forethought and intelligence.

(Lydecker lives in Napa.)
11 comment(s)

Concerned Citizen wrote on Dec 16, 2007 9:50 AM:

" Mr. Lydecker has written another intelligent, concise, articulate and well written piece. But, of course, GET READY FOR THE ONSLAUGHT OF NAYSAYERS who have no foresight, no vision and who are motivated by greed, name recognition and are the devil's advocate just for the sake of being so. But, Mr. Lydecker, you are, of course, right on target. This is not an infinite planet, not an infinite state and not an infinite county/country. There are limits which will be imposed on growth by nature and space if we don't step up and curb ourselves. This is a fact, it isn't a political ploy, it isn't a scheme and it isn't self serving...is simply FACT. For those of you who cannot see outside the box or outside greed; consider this: Like driving on Hy 29 or 80? Like the gridlock and mass confusion, anger, frustration and road rage? Like the crowding? Like the way in which people treat one another in these situations? Well, guess what? If Napa, California, the U.S., the population continues to grow as it is, our entire lives will be nothing more than an constant battle; constant confrontation and stop and go life. We are not meant to be stopped in our forward movement constantly; this leads to madness but, this is exactly what we have created w/the crowded way in which we have constructed our reality. Mentally, physically and psychologically, this is not a healthy way to live. You have my support 100% Mr Lydecker. And thank you for having the fortitude to speak out knowing you'll get blasted by the ignorant among us. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 16, 2007 11:20 AM:

" No one in Napa wants overgrowth so I agree with your sentiments to some extent. But you have left a very important part out of your equation, the need for the growth. That comes from two things, the fact that the voters have put into place constantly expanding government obligations, this year for example the fireman in Napa got an astounding 11% pay increase, after averaging well over 100K in salaries to begin with. NVC wants over $300 million in construction bonds alone. Public employees have become the new wealthy class with the huge raises they get. Global warming is going to cost a fortune to combat, much of it with tax dollars. Cost of universal health care? Huge. A railroad? Huger. The voters want it both ways, they want no growth and they want the government to spend money like drunken sailors. What do you think is going to pay for all this growth in government that voters demand? Growth in development, that's what. We need to cut government spending or we will never cut development. Even though the developments themselves cost tax money at first, they generate huge sales and property taxes down the road. The other factor is affordable housing. Because voters demand large amounts of it, more development must occur to pay for it. Affordable housing means developers lose money on part of a project and have to make it up by building bigger projects. Projects like Angwin's PUC development are probably doubled in size due to demands for affordable housing. Third is immigration, that is where the demand is coming from for housing. So when you are tossing around blame, don't forget to blame yourself. "

kevin wrote on Dec 16, 2007 2:49 PM:

" Having had this argument with Dodd and Luce it all comes down to ABAG mandating that Napa build its "fair share" of housing. Until we figure out how to exclude ourselves from ABAG's regulations, this discussion is all "hot air"... "

Bill wrote on Dec 16, 2007 3:05 PM:

" Ooops, Napabloger you have a nice laundry list here but the topic is Napa pipe.This project will add significant tax problems and overload to the local economy with out appreciably increasing economic secutity or real economic growth. Start defining economic growth as real jobs and not real estate development. If you want to keep attacking firemen's pay don't light any fires they cant get to from their homes in Solano. "

sickothis wrote on Dec 16, 2007 4:20 PM:

" When I moved here 15 years ago or so there were 20,000 less people in the City of Napa. The City. American Canyon now has around 16,000 people. In 15 years there are expected to be an additional 20,000 people in the City of Napa alone. That's 1.25 x American Canyon sized city's worth of additional people living in Napa. Where, exactly, are you proposing they live? Remember that 15 years ago was the height of the no-growth/slow growth movement. Still they came, and because of the SG/NG head in the sand attitude, there wasn't adequate planning. "

Straight Talk wrote on Dec 16, 2007 6:32 PM:

" Love this commentary. Right on the money! Napablogger has good points. We do have to pay for those things we said we want... even if we didn't know what we were voting for. To Bill... Puh-lease. Don't tell me about the poor firemen who have to live in Solano (If that was your point) they make quite a bit more money than my family and I can afford to live here. Oh, and I won't be getting 90% of my annual salary each year when I retire. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 16, 2007 7:14 PM:

" Bill, 3200 homes generate a lot of property taxes as well as sales taxes to local businesses, much of which goes to local government coffers. Local housing means the firemen don't have to drive from Solano and reduces pressure on salaries. Yes, despite huge developer fees building initially costs government more than it produces, but over the long term it greatly increases local revenue. Mike Parness flatly said that Napa's new development was going to solve the budget problem over time. Why would he say that if development didn't bring in more money? My point is that Napans need to face the fact that development is fueled by government needing to cover costs and getting big taxes out of it. Why do you think Wal Mart got built in American Canyon? They are collecting oodles of sales taxes out of that place. If we are serious about stopping growth then we have to stop the growth of government and government services that depend on it. "

bill wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:41 PM:

" Good Napabloger, Now that you have narrowed the focus and taken a position of pro 3,200 new units on a former industrial property that a train runs through we can start to have an exchange (by the way the Napa development partners don’t own the tracks running through the property which could prove a large problem for any developer). This is the future local battle that will determine not only the future of several local politicians but also the future of the City of Napa and this valley. Your economic philosophy definitely has a simple mass appeal but if you rely on real estate development and vineyards as the sole source of your economic model and don’t add meaningful steady employment possibilities out side of tourism and clerks then you abuse common sense. Both the supervisors mentioned will bang you with work force housing the new mantra instead of affordable housing and not tax base growth as the base reason for their support. You understand an affordable place for those firemen to live, just not in Silverado. Instead let’s build another city and siphon the revenues generated to fix our streets? This place could generate jobs for the local economy and not merely bedrooms fore people who must work elsewhere. Jobs that pay more than a bartender’s wage or maids, after all I’m sure you understand enough about economics to realize that housing is largely a function of income. There will definitely be some mixed use of this site just not the present vision welcome to the future local political war.I'm late sorry but one word I had to change to siphon so hope I am pc now. I look forward to your comentary and find it informative. "

napa noir wrote on Dec 17, 2007 5:19 PM:

" A class action suit is being prepared against ABAG as we speak. (It is being filed in Palo Alto.) The biggest problem with ABAG is that it represents the interests of the building, banking and real estate industry. Their members are nearly all from these fields. Most of their predictions about the Bay Area future border on the insane and ludicrous. "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Dec 19, 2007 11:11 AM:

" Napa Noir and Bill...love your posts and agree with the both of you. Bill, though I don't always agree w/you, in this case; I agree 100%. Excellent points; particularly regarding generating jobs, not housing in the Industrially zoned Napa pipe area. Where once was employment; let there again be employment. "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Dec 19, 2007 11:18 AM:

" Napa noir, if what you say is true; I am celebrating right now w/a toast to those who are challenging the ludicrous and inane "absorb your fair share of Bay Area growth" policy of ABAG. I have FOREVER believed we should seceed from the Nine Bay Area Counties. We are not really a part of the "bay area" and should, therefore, align ourselves with our neighboring counties to the north. I would rather see Napa County pay the fines imposed by ABAG (actually, what gives them the right?!?!?!?) than continue to abide by the ridiculous standards they insist we do which are completely contrary to our agricultural industry/lifestyle and open space preference. We are not or should not be required to grow any way other than that which our own populace wishes to expand. I truly hope that a class action suit is in process. That would make my Christmas!!! "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy