NVR Logo
What flood projects should be completed first?
Friday, November 30, 2007
Save and Share Share
Should the Napa Creek residents be at the top of the Napa Flood Control repair list?

What about the Oxbow district?
What about other major projects?

Give your thoughts here.
6 comment(s)

Concerned Citizen wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:31 AM:

" Behrens St. Bridge area, Old Town District between Main Street and Jefferson, Eggleston St., Vallejo St., Napa and Yount Streets and original downtown. Forget the Oxbow area for now; this is a new development which serves a very small % of Napa's population or need. Take care of those properties which have been established the longest, which have an extensive role in Napa's history and which have supplied the coffers of the City with plenty of tax revenue as a result of gentrification in the area which resulted in higher; much higher, home values. "

JimClark wrote on Dec 1, 2007 5:23 PM:

" Until and when there is a realistic flood control plan, insure the Army Corps of Engineers dredges the river each and every year until the river is deeper or wider. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 3, 2007 9:35 AM:

" No way, they should do it in the order that makes sense from a financial and engineering standpoint, as originally planned. I feel for those who live in Napa Creek's flood zone, but I feel for those who live in the rest of the flood zone as well. No one knows for sure whether they got flooded worse the last few times due to development as they claim, or due to where the rain fell and other uncontrollable factors. Or actually if it is even true that they got flooded worse. In any case, the way you build a flood project has to be done in logical steps or you cause more flooding along the way for some people. Also, costs are a huge factor, and if they jump ahead and do Napa Creek out of order that will run the cost up considerably in a project that is already extremely expensive and underfunded. "

stormwatcher wrote on Dec 3, 2007 10:05 PM:

" Fortunately, the Army Corp of Engineers studied the effects of moving Napa Creek out of sequence and determined there are NO hydraulic (engineering) reasons not to do so as all necessary downstream work on the River has been completed. The Corp and Flood District have never stated that working on the Creek out of sequence will increase the cost of the Flood Project. The 413 residences and 125 businesses affected by Napa Creek flooding have never claimed that their flooding in 2005 was worse than the River flooding. They only argue that the Creek floods nearly every other year while the River floods every 7 to 10 years. The City is burdened with financially recovering from Creek floods nearly ever other year. That is why the City Council and Flood Board agreed to move Napa Creek up in the schedule(River work will continue until at least 2013, then Napa Creek will begin). Prior to 1986, floods on Napa Creek were few. It is a well established fact that development in any watershed increases the amount of storm water reaching the creek. This is known by City, County, State and Federal govts and is why the State now requires that most new development detain this additional storm water and release it slowly to match predevelopment levels. But these regulations were not implemented by the City until a few years ago after the majority of development in the Napa Creek watershed had been completed. That is why flooding has increased in frequency on the Creek and on many other waterways in Napa. We've always wanted a win-win situation that is equitable to all. We have written supporting letters for grants that would fund Napa Creek independently of the Project and lobbied DC for funds. "

GXNapaSteve wrote on Dec 5, 2007 12:51 AM:

" yes I am a river rat{live on the river} I am always in my boat in the wharf or downtown. There is a lot of debris that needs to be cleaned up to make that river flow smoother. for instance the other day in the oxbow I hit a tree that was stretched across the whole river{ a big tree probably 10 feet at least}. I havent seen a dredger up there for a while? "

jwk wrote on Dec 14, 2007 5:23 AM:

" Obviously The Napa Creek / Behrens St. project should be first and foremost above any further work ANYWHERE else. The Veteran's park, Hatt Building Flood wall, Oxbow Market and The Copia areas (All for the Almighty Tourists) should NEVER have been given precedence over the Residents and Business's in the Napa Creek/Downtown area. Of course all the New Hotels,(New & Pending) Restaurants and wine shops are in no danger of flooding. Let's see how much higher the water comes in our Buildinss this next time with all the New Raised Obstructions approved and built. Last flood was the worst in The Napa Creek area since 1986.... Coincidence?? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy