City to put found money to cops, sidewalks
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
Christmas is coming early for the city of Napa, with City Manager Mike Parness recommending the restoration of programs and jobs cut last summer when the city’s financial situation was considered more dire than turned out to be the case.
Parness will ask the City Council Tuesday night to approve $1.8 million in new spending, including salaries for two additional police officers and a second full-time code enforcement officer, as well as funds for a stronger graffiti removal program and more sidewalk repair.
Two employees who lost their jobs doing fire education in the schools and telephone repair would have their positions restored.
Because revenues turned out to be much higher than projected and expenses much less, Napa is in the enviable position of having its first fully balanced budget in five or six years, Parness said.
“It’s encouraging. It’s nice to be on the track back,” Parness said Friday.
The city manager’s budget request includes the equivalent of 15 full-time positions, which would help Napa meet the public’s demand for services, he said.
Napa has about half the number of city employees per capita of most California cities, which is why services like code enforcement have been inadequate, Parness said.
Restoration of two patrol officers will allow the Police Department to devote additional resources to gang and traffic enforcement, the city manager said.
Expansion of Code Enforcement from one full-time position to two, plus part-time help, will enable the city to tackle a backlog of citizen complaints, he said.
The city of Napa Fire Department would get two additional administrative support personnel as well as restoration of the public education officer who goes into the schools.
Police will get funding to restore the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program or a D.A.R.E. equivalent approved by the Napa Valley Unified School District, Parness said.
Community Resources would get money to restore Fourth of July fireworks, Music in the Park and teen events.
The city’s financial turnaround has been both breathtaking and embarrassing to top administrators. After advising the council to cut millions last June from the 2007/08 and 2008/09 budgets, Parness reported in September that the city might have $6 million more to spend than had been predicted.
City officials immediately rescinded agreements calling for labor groups to offer contract givebacks totaling $800,000, and told Parness to return in November with his best account of city finances.
The biggest contributor to the city’s financial misestimation, Parness said, was out-of-date financial software that had administrators guessing what recent revenues and expenditures were.
“Operating departments were ‘flying blind,’” Parness said in this week’s budget memo to council. The current year’s budget was put together last spring, relying on spending and revenue reports that were in some cases a year old, he said.
Napa is in the process of installing more than $1 million worth of new financial software to prevent a recurrence, Parness said. By putting in considerable manual labor, the city knows its current financial status, he said.
When revenues for 2006/07 were tallied this fall, hotel tax and property tax were each more than $1 million greater than projected.
The city is taking several million dollars in new revenue and spending savings to refill reserve accounts that had been drained during the city’s hard years, Parness said.
The city anticipates spending $62.6 million in 2007/08, which is $2.9 million more than the original budget.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Bebee's Human wrote on Nov 19, 2007 5:54 AM:
notpc wrote on Nov 19, 2007 7:39 AM:
Napanee wrote on Nov 19, 2007 7:47 AM:
petebo wrote on Nov 19, 2007 10:06 AM:
napagirl1960 wrote on Nov 19, 2007 10:15 AM:
spectator wrote on Nov 19, 2007 10:32 AM:
mominapa wrote on Nov 19, 2007 10:47 AM:
Rob C wrote on Nov 19, 2007 11:17 AM:
napawineo wrote on Nov 19, 2007 12:37 PM:
Ken wrote on Nov 19, 2007 3:18 PM:
local1 wrote on Nov 19, 2007 4:40 PM:
petebo wrote on Nov 19, 2007 5:16 PM:
freedom wrote on Nov 19, 2007 7:30 PM:
cathyodom wrote on Nov 20, 2007 3:13 PM: