NVR Logo
Is Angwin rural, or is it a college town?
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Save and Share Share
The recent debate about Angwin development within the urban bubble has been spearheaded by a group that claims that Angwin is rural and needs to be preserved as such.

I would contend that Angwin is in fact not rural and instead should be considered a “college town” similar to many such towns which have grown up around an educational institution in an agricultural setting.
It is my belief that not a single person who bought a house or land in Angwin failed to realize that there was a college at the center of the town. That being said, I don’t think that anyone moving into an area with such knowledge has reason to complain. Anyone who bought a house next to a zoo, for example, would be considered unreasonable if they were to complain that the smells and sounds from the zoo ruined their lifestyle. They would be considered even more unreasonable if they tried to get the zoning changed to prevent the zoo from building and expanding on its own land as it saw fit.

Early in the debate, I spoke with leaders of the Save Rural Angwin movement and asked them a pointed question about the college at the center of the Urban Bubble in question. I asked, “What if the organization that supports and owns the college chose to expand this campus because of its large land holdings and its central location on the West Coast? Would you have any grounds on which to prevent the college from growing from its current size of about 1,500 students to say, 4,000 to 6,000 students, and all the development which that would require?”
The response was typically silence because the individual realized the audacity of what they were trying to do in preventing a landowner from using his own land to suit his own purposes. (This was only stated for purposes of illustration, as the college has no such plans to my knowledge.)

The flap over the Urban Bubble is just another round in this attempt by one landowner to tell another landowner what to do with his property. In truth, Angwin is unlikely to ever incorporate formally as a town, but that does not make it any less a historic center of population, a college town if you will, which has been recognized for more than a century. And it does not make the urban bubble any less applicable today and into the foreseeable future. If we truly want Angwin to be a rural area, I would suggest a modest proposal for consideration: That all of us who have moved into this area in the last 150 years or so should leave and return the land to its original state. I don’t think that is what the opponents of the Urban Bubble have in mind, but it seems the logical conclusion to such a line of thinking. Where does one stop in determining who should and should not be allowed into our de facto “gated community?”
Around Napa County there are many hidden hilltops and truly rural forested areas from which to choose when purchasing land or a home. To my knowledge, none of these other locations has a college or anything remotely like it nearby. So I would say to those who want to change the Urban Bubble in Angwin, leave it alone (or maybe even expand it to reflect the reality of the Angwin community that is currently in place). The Urban Bubble reflects the reality of the college town that has grown up around the institution over the last 100 years. And may I kindly suggest to anyone who doesn’t like living in a community with a college at its center, you are welcome to move to another truly “rural” location somewhere else in Napa County.

(Miller is a financial aid counselor at PUC and lives in Angwin).
5 comment(s)

Sickothis wrote on Oct 18, 2007 10:35 AM:

" Absolutely right on! "

Serve Angwin wrote on Oct 18, 2007 3:48 PM:

" Good perspective. "

supernova8610 wrote on Oct 18, 2007 9:22 PM:

" While I like Angwin just the way it is, this guy has a really good point. "

PUC Prof wrote on Oct 19, 2007 6:34 PM:

" As supervisor Diane Dillon wryly observed, "Angwin is bigger than just PUC." When you look on a map, the semiurban sprawl of Angwin occupies a much larger area than PUC. Nobody seems to complain about the thousand (or so) students in the compact "smart growth" dormitories of PUC. A small, compact, "smart growth" ecovillage (it is not urban sprawl) with fewer residents than in the PUC dorms would occupy only a tiny portion of Angwin and few Angwin residents would even live within sight of the ecovillage, yet some seem convinced that it would utterly destroy Angwin. I'm scratching my head. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Oct 20, 2007 11:27 AM:

" a hundred years ago, landowners had more flexibility to do whatever they wanted to their land to suit their own purposes. We live in a different world today with different goals and we "choose" to have regulation on land use. A hundred years ago it was acceptable to use private property as a toxic dump site. And yes, we do have land in Angwin (much of it once owned by the college) that was subdivided into smaller parcels. Should we keep on going until this hillside is littered with housing? The proposed development in Angwin is clustered whereas many of the existing homes in Angwin are on half acre lots. Many of these homes have insufficient and failing septic systems because someone turned a blind eye to the unusual growth taking place up here which shouldn't have been tolerated. We cannot reverse the damage already done. Does this mean we should use bad mistakes as a justification for making more? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy