NVR Logo
Ritz-Carlton proposes large Napa hotel site
1:30 p.m.
Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Save and Share Share
The planned Ritz-Carlton resort at First Street and Silverado Trail will be a much grander project than the hotel first approved for the location five years ago.

By acquiring the commercial frontage along First, the new developers have expanded the site from eight to 11 acres, creating room for a more spacious resort with restaurants and a retail “village.”
This will be Napa’s first five-star hotel and the most expensive private development in city history, said Cassandra Walker, the city’s economic development manager.

The developer, River House Land Company, will be spending “upwards of $200 million” to turn a site where garbage trucks were once stored into a world class resort, Mayor Jill Techel said.
Ritz-Carlton is an iconic brand symbolizing luxury the world over. There are currently 66 Ritz Carlton hotels and resorts, with new ones opening in Beijing, Dubai, Jakarta ... and in 2010, potentially downtown Napa’s Oxbow District.

The city’s planning department is beginning to process the Ritz-Carlton application, with the possibility of public hearings in early 2008, said Mike Allen, a city planner.
The River House Land Company is an offshoot of Continental Real Estate Companies of Florida. Efforts to interview the developer this week were unsuccessful.

The developer first acquired the eight acres for which a 351-room Napa Resort and Spa was approved in 2002. Because of the tourism downturn after Sept. 11, 2001, the hotel was never built.

The new developer now owns the adjacent properties along First from Silverado Trail to the Napa River, controlling the entire northwest corner of the intersection.

The project is a blend of old and new elements arranged to take advantage of the additional acreage, Allen said. The riverfront resort will still have 351 rooms and nearly 21,000 square feet of banquet and meeting rooms, but will also have stores along First, Allen said.

The project will have a spa and two pools. Some rooms will be sold as condominiums that made available to the pool of hotel rooms, Walker said.

While many of the earlier project’s environmental assessment remain valid, the applicant is having to do new traffic studies and seek another development clearance from the Napa County Flood Control District, Allen said. A public trail and low flood wall are planned along the hotel’s river frontage.

The original Napa Resort and Spa was approved by the City Council on a 4-1 vote, with the anticipation that it could generate $1 million to $2 million in annual revenue for the city. A Ritz, with its higher priced rooms, would produce more in taxes.

In 2002, neighbors complained about the feared traffic impacts, environmentalists said the project was too massive for the riverfront, while others said the Italianate architecture didn’t fit Napa.

The main entrance to the new project would be off of First, where Juarez Street is now located, Allen said. The architecture is now “Craftsmanesque,” with wood and stone accents that are very Napa Valley, he said.

The hotel buildings are three- and four-story, with the tallest units at the northern end of the property where they would be less visible to traffic, Allen said. Nearly all 479 parking spaces would be underground.

The Ritz-Carlton would have Napa’s largest room for banquets and school proms, accommodating about 600 people, Walker said.

As a luxury brand, the Ritz-Carlton would give Napa a full price spectrum of hotels. Napa has medium priced hotels like the Embassy Suites and the Marriott, but nothing in Ritz-Carlton’s league, she said.

The Ritz would help downtown and the Oxbow District to achieve a “critical mass” of visitors to support restaurants and stores, Walker said.

Copia was the Oxbow District pioneer, opening in 2001 in what had been a rundown area with little public recognition. Two hotels, the 108-room River Terrace Inn and soon the 160-room Westin Verasa, have followed, with the Oxbow Public Market opening later this year.

As a worldwide symbol of high-end tourism, a Ritz-Carlton would validate downtown Napa as a destination of the first order, Techel said. The prospect of a Ritz creates yet more interest in central Napa, she said.

Another 142-room hotel is about to break ground on First Street near City Hall. The Avia, formerly called the Inn at Town Center, is currently removing toxic soil traced to a former gas station.
18 comment(s)

make napa better wrote on Oct 2, 2007 3:59 PM:

" Did you know the Ritz Carlton is owned by the Marriott? "

notpc wrote on Oct 2, 2007 4:55 PM:

" Sounds like a great project which will generate jobs and new business. I really hope the city council realizes that they better get the homeless problem and riff raff walking the streets of downtown under control or those high end tourists are going to make accomodations 20 minutes north. "

NapaNative times five wrote on Oct 2, 2007 5:30 PM:

" Sorry, but give me the days back when..I'd rather see the wooden Indian in front of the long gone Rexall drug store on First Street than this over-sized facility for rich out of towners. "

jeeper16 wrote on Oct 2, 2007 8:28 PM:

" Maybe they can have a "Venice" theme out front like the Venetian hotel in Las Vegas. They'll need it when that part of town is inundated by the Napa River. "

denB wrote on Oct 2, 2007 9:16 PM:

" Has anyone considered that an underground parking structure might flood during a stormy winter??? "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Oct 3, 2007 7:33 AM:

" Oh, gag me with an oversized resort "world class destination" monstrosity. Get over yourselves. Balance your current budget before dreaming of more flowing funds generated from the bastardadazion of Napa. Try growing up instead of growing out...you might actually LEARN something, Napa "leaders." Qootes upon assumptions upon "The Ritz would help downtown and the Oxbow District to achieve a “critical mass” of visitors to support restaurants and stores, Walker said." My question: what came first, the chicken or the egg? So, we need to build a behemoth to support the restaurants and stores which were built to serve the visitors. But, now we need another "draw" to bring in the consumers to support those businesses because, as always, there is NO intelligent planning process in Napa; just continual building with the fantasy that 'this new structure' will be the panacea we've been looking for. Except, it won't..just like Embassy Suites isn't, and all the other hotels/inns/motels in place. NONE of these have fulfilled the gaping hole in logic which seems to be the 'business as usual' approach to EVERYTHING in the planning process of Napa city. GROW UP. "

Common Sense wrote on Oct 3, 2007 8:04 AM:

" Napa has already transitioned from big town to small city. This project seems to be ideal for where we are at right now. Nevertheless, we need to be vigilant in ensuring it is done well and to our liking...this will be a key part of downtown for decades to come. "

skiph wrote on Oct 3, 2007 10:31 AM:

" Wonderful. As if downtown Napa isn't already a neverending construction zone...I'm glad it's full steam ahead with losing the downtown Napa charm and hello tourists taking over on weekends. Is anyone going to do anything to help ease the bumper to bumper traffic flows we already experience before any of these huge projects has started accepting more visitors? Does this mean Silverado Trail on a Friday afternoon is now virtually undrivable once the Ritz opens? Our city is expanding everything but infrastructure in our town. "

jimmie wrote on Oct 3, 2007 1:29 PM:

" Yea, complainers, turn the town over to all the meth heads that thrive in the blight and squalor we have "enjoyed" for 30 years. Your old Napa is gone forever like the rest of the changing world and we are blessed with what we have. Almost any community would embrace the enriched changes coming our way. Alturas and Eureka have some of the slow pace that you so adore. "

Yahoo wrote on Oct 3, 2007 1:33 PM:

" Isn't the new Hotel where Slinsens construction used to be enough. That thing is community in itself. Just what we need anither hotel to hold 5000 more.I wonder how the B&B's feel about this. Aren't we hurting our own here. Napa is growing to fast and it needs to slow down. "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Oct 3, 2007 3:25 PM:

" Jimmie, you said: "turn the town over to all the meth heads that thrive in the blight and squalor we have "enjoyed" for 30 years. Your old Napa is gone forever..." I don't know about everyone else but, my Napa of "old" is not your "meth head" description. What have you been doing and where have you been spending your time that your only memory of Napa past is peopled by "meth heads?" Napa was a great small town complete with local color, local businesses, local interests, sidewalk sales to die for, community interests which were not primarily wine/winery/tourist oriented. It was a great, clean and colorful town which hosted thriving industry and enterprise. Now, as a result of stupid planning of the '70's forward; city planners and officials have spent year after year trying to undo the damage done from that era onward. Shame. Meth heads? Well, maybe. "

Lance wrote on Oct 3, 2007 4:26 PM:

" Concerned Citizen, you're lamenting a Napa that few, if any, remember. The 60's were a LONG time ago... "

mom2 wrote on Oct 3, 2007 4:37 PM:

" If you all follow the city as well as you do, then you would know that there is a strong effort to improve the Soscol corridor infrastructure. This is not soley an effort to improve the area for the Ritz. But more effort to improve drainage in this area when the river does reach a flood stage. Improving this area will help all of the people living in this area and the business owners who are unable to improve their businesses because of the restrictions placed on them by Flood agencies of the state. So if you are going to tell Napa to grow up, well they are trying. As far as budgets and balancing...well services for all the residents are not balanced by revenues. They cut back services and we scream...(they find 2 Million and we scream, too). Everyone wants a different thing, more police, more fire, better roads, good water...all of this has to be paid for by revenue and our property tax barely pays the bills...so what other revenues are there? Sales Tax generated from business, including TOT. That is what pays the bills in your city. So when you shop on the internet or somewhere out of town you are just robbing yourself of services. So, that said, who else is going to generate that revenue that the city needs to service its residents? Well, that would be from the tourists, what better way to collect a 12% tax than on the room at a Ritz Carlton? Those people go downtown and visit those businesses and restaurants and generate a little more tax to add to the revenue of the city. Do I agree with everything they do, No, but I like this project. "

comment wrote on Oct 3, 2007 8:44 PM:

" It seems that none of the money made goes towards improving things in the lower class neighborhoods where these new hotel employees live. Take a drive down Coombs Street, or most places in south Napa. The roads are terrible. When do we get to see some of that new money? At least we got the road repainted today. Whoop de doo! "

mytwocents wrote on Oct 3, 2007 9:20 PM:

" There goes the neighborhood! say hello to massive traffic on Silverado Trail and Soscol. I'm glad I know the short cuts, I need to commute to the bay area to afford living here. "

mytwocents wrote on Oct 3, 2007 9:25 PM:

" ..."Everyone wants a different thing, more police, more fire, better roads, good water" Is that too much to ask? What are we paying taxes for? "

mom2 wrote on Oct 3, 2007 9:45 PM:

" Have you ever done the research to see just how much of your tax money goes back in to your city? Homeowners do not provide as much revenue to the city that you think. Your property tax gets cut up to so many little pieces. Part of it goes to the State, part to your county, part to the city and then there are extra districts that get a portion. So what you provide in revenue to the city is not enough to pay for the fire, police, infrastructure, roads and transportation. Is is too much to ask when you pay taxes? No, but you have to realize that just because you are paying taxes that everything should be fixed because of it. The good majority of the cities revenue is made up from the businesses in the community. The residents support the city by spending money in their town. Napa Valley has an extra 4 million people running through this community. Is it wrong for the City of Napa to want to capture some of the revenue so they can be able to fix some roads and provide more (hopefully someday better) services? "

sammy wrote on Oct 6, 2007 8:29 PM:

" To Concerned Citizen,.... I always enjoy reading your blogs, can you define this statement tho that you made. I'm not picking on you :) I'm just curious what the statement means.... Thanks Here ya go: Napa was a great small town complete with local color, local businesses, local interests, sidewalk sales to die for. What does Local color mean ? Thanks Sam "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy