NVR Logo
Conservative, liberal labels mask the CFR agenda
Monday, September 17, 2007
Save and Share Share
The Sept. 12 guest editorial by William Rusher (“The GOP is set”) listed five Republican candidates that he felt could easily win the nomination for president. What is interesting is that five of the Republican candidates are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and Mr. Rusher picked four of the five. The CFR Republicans are Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Newt Gingrich and Fred Thompson. Mr. Rusher, as well as the rest of the controlled media, has placed the CFR members on center stage. The Democrats are not left out at all. The CFR Democrats are Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson.

Should we worry whether they are CFR members or not? The CFR is on a fast-track course to abolish the sovereign U.S.A. by 2010, literally forcing us to become part of a North American Union. Mexican truckers have already been given authorization to run their long-haul rigs throughout the United States; San Antonio, Texas, is advancing the city’s goal to establish itself as a North American Free Trade Agreement inland port; and a Mexican customs inspection facility is planned for Kansas City, Mo. NASCO (Tri-National Advocacy for Efficient, Secure, Environmentally Conscious Trade & Transportation) has figured out a way to cash in on the Chinese containers passing along the NAFTA superhighway from the Mexican ports of Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas to U.S. and Canadian destinations. The first “North American Union” driver’s license, complete with a hologram of the continent on the reverse, has been created in North Carolina. Note that all this is without congressional approval or oversight.
The powerful U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, along with Mexican and Canadian counterparts, launched the Security and Prosperity Partnership on March 23, 2005, at a meeting in Waco, Texas, with George Bush, Mexico’s President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. The tri-national agreement, hatched below the radar in Washington, contains the recommendations of the Independent Task Force of North America to remove the U.S. borders and establish a North American Union similar to the European Union and replace the dollar with a currency called the amero.

The NAFTA “superhighway” linking Mexico, the U.S. and Canada is already underway. A Texas legislator tried to stop this massive mile-wide structure, but Texas Gov. Rick Perry vetoed the bill. The governor is a Bilderberger with the same CFR viewpoint. The Bush administration has limited the 854 miles of border fencing called for in the Secure Fence Act to just 18 miles as part of the SPP “open border” policy.
Congress is just now starting to wake up by having several bills to stop the forward progress of the NAU. Nineteen states are in the process of passing legislation to stop it, as well. Twenty-two members of the U.S. House of Representatives — 21 Republicans and one Democrat — urged President Bush to back off when he attended the third SPP summit meeting in Montebello, Quebec. The Senate just voted 74-24 to pass an amendment removing funding from the Department of Transportation bill for the Mexican trucking in the U.S.

What is Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, doing? He still has his thumb in his mouth.
The CFR member actions are considered treason under the U.S. Constitution, and if you support a member candidate, then you are a problem as well. Most past presidents came from a pool of CFR members as the present presidential candidates for the 2008 election. Candidates do not advertise their CFR membership to the public. They pose as “liberals” and “conservatives” to control all aspects of the debate. The CFR has really stacked the deck for the 2008 election.

To bolster CFR support, the controlled media blacks out non-CFR candidates. For example, Republican candidate Ron Paul won the Maryland Straw Poll, Alabama Presidential Straw, was victorious in New Hampshire and has won a number of Internet polls including MSNBC, all this without a word from the press. It’s because grassroots America has figured out how to get around this blackout by going to independent news organizations on the Internet and discovering that there is a real candidate supporting our sovereign nation.

Whether you’re on the Internet or not, don’t buy into the media’s portrayal of Fred Thompson as a new Ronald Reagan. As senator, Fred Thompson voted for such things as expanding the welfare state, federal involvement in education, expanding trade with Communist nations and subsidizing abortions. By being a CFR member he supports preemptive war and would place the North American Union as a top priority.

In contrast, Rep. Ron Paul sets himself apart from other Republicans by being decidedly anti-war while supporting American independence and sovereignty. He is referred to as “Dr. No” by his colleagues because of his refusal to support unconstitutional bills. You can quickly find out more by going to http://www. ronpaul2008.com/issues/.

(Snyder lives in Napa.)
7 comment(s)

klr wrote on Sep 17, 2007 11:21 AM:

" Thank you for an excellent article that pretty much covers the state of affairs in this country. Ron Paul is a true patriot, but it is “we the people” that must step forward, take time to research what is happening, and then make our voices heard. Every American must understand that our freedoms are slowly being eroded by both political parties. While their seen hand, the media, is guiding and dividing Americans, the unseen hand is secretly plotting the destruction of our liberties. "

supernova8610 wrote on Sep 17, 2007 2:22 PM:

" Ron Paul is the only candidate I support; I don't like anyone else. If, by the time the elections next year roll around, Ron Paul isn't one of the two final candidates, I don't know if I'll even vote. "

Bill wrote on Sep 17, 2007 2:59 PM:

" This letter is better than the last laundry list. It is unfortunate that alphabet soup serves more to obscure the argument than to clarify the threat of uncontrolled globalization. Repeated arguments such as these serve to alert the populace to imminent problems but when obfuscated with unsupportable accusations serve to cause dismissal of the author’s opinion. The history of conspiracy theorists is painfully evident and distract from reasonable concerns about super organizations beyond public scrutiny. Blanket accusations, such as a worldwide media Cabal or a sinister group of individuals, is a disservice to those who generally believe that we are losing control of our lives through the blatant adulation of global capitalism where faceless corporate structures dictate our existence. "

JimClark wrote on Sep 17, 2007 4:46 PM:

" The Council on Foreign Relations is a "think tank" NOT a policy maker. They may have some observations but, they have stepped over the line. They are no better than moveon.org. "

VANappan wrote on Sep 17, 2007 5:28 PM:

" Good article and on point, but Ron Paul is an light weight and will never be elected anything over a congressman (period). Perhaps we can draft Pat Buchanan or hold our nose and vote for Rudy. "

Normbc9 wrote on Sep 17, 2007 8:10 PM:

" The CFR is a far reaching very welthy international organization and is suopported in the US by th David Rckefeller, The Ford Foundation and others. But the main control still rwests with the rich and powerful of central Europe. Another group to pay attention to is the Tri-Lateral Commission of which Henry Kissinger, Mitt Romney and other welthy political figures from here in the US and others from Russia, South Africa and the far East all have a powerful role in. The CFR has expended more than 6 billion US dollars from it's holdings to back what was first called the North American Cooperative Security Act (SB 853) then with the adverse attention it was remaned the North American Union (NAU) and finally now the SPP. Regardless iof the name the whole issue is supposedly to level the economic playing field for industry regardless of the nation of its base. The real issue is to deny the US its sovereignty, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Education, finance and judical systems and to merge the North American conyinent country military systems inder the control of a CFR Board. They are already laying the ground work for a common monetary system. Every member of the current Administration;'s Cabiet in Washington, DC is a CFR member except for the President. His father and brother are very active members and George senior is on the CFR Board of Directors. "

ojodoctor wrote on Sep 18, 2007 2:30 PM:

" FYI. Mitt Romney is not a member of the CFR. You should check your facts first. He did author an article recently for Foreign Affairs, but he is not a member. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy