NVR Logo
Leave Angwin bubble as it is
Friday, September 07, 2007
Save and Share Share
Dear editor, I am writing to urge the Napa County Planning Commission to maintain the current zoning in Angwin (the “urban bubble").

I understand that some Angwin residents wish to keep Angwin just as it is — no development, period. And to me, that means no progress in the long run. As an employee of Pacific Union College and 14-year Angwin resident, I sincerely hope that the Napa County Planning Commission will keep the zoning areas as they were planned nearly 30 years ago.
I fear for an Angwin that looks exactly the same 25 years from now. I was excited to hear about a carefully thought-out plan of increasing PUC’s endowment and giving Angwin a much-needed face lift.

Regardless of the specifics of the eco-village, PUC should be able to make long-term plans based on what the county has previously determined as appropriate (through various zoning areas for agriculture, development, etc.).
Please don’t allow a portion of Angwin residents to determine the fate of Pacific Union College and the future of Angwin.

Thank you for your time and your careful consideration.
Michelle Rai / Angwin
4 comment(s)

PUC Prof wrote on Sep 7, 2007 8:49 AM:

" PUC's mission is to SERVE the community at large, which it has been doing for more than a century. It's long-term survival is at stake and it needs to keep its options open. Reducing its options will reduce its ability to serve the community. Has anybody else in Angwin offered free rent on their property to the fire department or ambulance service? Or allowed the public to freely roam on their unfenced property? Or developed an award-winning child daycare center to the valley's residents? If PUC sells out--and there are residents in Angwin who could easily afford all of PUC's land assets--what do you suppose the new owners do with the property? Do you think it would remain unfenced and open to the public? Dictating that PUC's land be used for agriculture is the equivalent of dictating that a vintner use his land to build a school. Is it morally right to do that? "

Serve Angwin wrote on Sep 7, 2007 9:33 AM:

" Ms. Rai is correct. Have you driven around Angwin lately? Yes there is natural beauty everywhere. However, there is also dilapidation from a bygone era. When friends come to visit, I am very proud of its natural beauty (which will remain for years to come), but somewhat ashamed of certain unplanned development, with some that has gone by the wayside. I welcome the idea of good planning which includes a new town center and a few new homes. 380 is a very small number. What makes it even better is that an Eco Village built within zoning that has been approved for years seems like the most viable solution. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 7, 2007 10:36 AM:

" If you fear an Angwin that looks exactly as it does now in 25 years, consider the possibility that it might resemble the existing Angwin Brookside Apartment complex times five. Would someone please comment on WHO will be responsible for maintaining the proposed townhouses? Has anyone performed an internet search on Triad or "Pinnacle Realty Management" to see how they manage their real estate empire? Let's know who we're dealing with. "

puc prof wrote on Sep 7, 2007 3:28 PM:

" What's wrong with Brookside Apartments? The lawns are neatly cut. The buildings are attractive. Storage space is limited so some residents store their belongings outside. The apartments are more attractive than some homes in Angwin. Presumably in a new eco-village there would be a home owner association with rules against abandoning cars, leaving certain items outdoors, etc. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy