NVR Logo
Ogle accused of ogling videotaping teen girls
Saturday, September 01, 2007
Save and Share Share
A Vallejo man arrested by Napa police for more than 30 counts of child pornography has been held to answer to four felonies and a laundry list of misdemeanors.

On Friday morning, Napa County Superior Court Judge Diane Price ended a preliminary hearing by saying Jeffrey Brice Ogle must face trial on several charges related to teens in Napa.
Price held Ogle, 34, to answer to three felony counts of possession of child pornography and one count of felony eavesdropping. Ogle also faces several misdemeanor charges, including one count of prowling, 13 counts of disorderly conduct and three counts of peeking, all of which are misdemeanors.

Ogle is charged for incedents that occurred over the past few months in north Napa, involving at least nine victims ranging in age from 16 to 18.
Ogle is accused of videotaping the teens in various stages of undress, some nude, in their bedrooms or bathrooms. Ogle trespassed onto the girls’ property through a fenced yard and videotaped them through the windows, without their knowledge of his presence, according to prosecutors.

Police believe that on one occasion Ogle climbed on a roof to videotape a girl through her bathroom window, according to the court records.
Ogle, who has no prior felony criminal record, was arrested on June 28, after a teen saw a man outside her window in the 3900 block of Lassen Street with a video recorder, according to the police report. The girl told her father, who scared the intruder off.

Police searched the area and found a pickup not far from the house where the prowler was reported. The pickup was backing up without its lights on. The officer made a traffic stop and questioned Ogle, who was driving, police said. The police said Ogle did not give them any legitimate reason for being in the area.

When officers searched the pickup, they found a video camera camouflaged with black electrical tape, a pair of gloves and a notebook containing several Benicia and Vallejo addresses.

The camera contained footage of several teen girls in various stages of undress, the police report said. One girl had been videotaped five times.

Conflict over arrest

That night Ogle was arrested for prowling, issued a citation and released on his own recognizance with a promise to appear on the citation on Aug. 6. However police continued to investigate Ogle while attempting to identify the other girls on the videotape.

After his June 28, arrest, Ogle, knowing police were investigating him, voluntarily went to see Napa defense attorneys Kelly Boyd and Theresa Harrington.

“Upon my suggestion, (Ogle) immediately enrolled in sex offender therapy. He paid for it on his own,” Boyd told the Register on Friday after Ogle’s court appearance.

Boyd said that on Aug. 6, she appeared in court for Ogle on the prowling citation. “At that time no criminal complaint had been filed by the district attorney,” Boyd said.

Boyd said she asked the court to put it into the record that if a complaint was filed to let her know, “I told them I would bring him in. I sent a letter to the DA telling them I was representing Mr. Ogle and informing them of my request to bring my client into court if they filed a complaint,” she said. “I got no response.”

While out on his own recognizance, Boyd said Ogle cooperated with investigators allowing them to search a storage unit.

On the night of Aug. 20, Boyd said Ogle’s family members called her to say there were about 12 police officers with dogs at the house where Ogle lives with his 85-year-old grandmother in Vallejo.

The officers had a $500,000 warrant for Ogle’s arrest. They were not able to locate Ogle at the residence.

The next day Ogle called Boyd and she accompanied him when he surrendered himself at the county jail. He was booked and held on $500,000 bail.

Boyd said she was disappointed the communication broke down and police were sent to arrest Ogle at his home. “All I needed was the word an arrest warrant was issued, and my client was ready to turn himself in,” she said. “I thought I would walk him into court. We tried very hard to make it work that way.”

Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein said the prosecution “is not bound by any agreement (defense) might have to bring someone  in, particularly when we investigated the case, and the basis of the investigation was that there were more charges — more serious charges — than we had anticipated,” he said. “Our office, the police and judge felt by issuing the (arrest) warrant it was the appropriate way to have Mr. Ogle brought in, and that’s the way it happened.”

Boyd admits the charges against Ogle are serious. “But he’s not a monster. He’s trying to do what he can to get help with his problem,” she said.

Ogle is scheduled to be arraigned on Sept. 10.
18 comment(s)

to attorney boyd wrote on Aug 31, 2007 4:37 PM:

" He's not a monster? 31 counts of child pornography and he's not a monster? "

Disgusted wrote on Aug 31, 2007 8:25 PM:

" Have some class. They are dealing with serious sexual offenses and all the Napa Register can think of is making a catchy and trashy title? Once again... good going. "

Dumb caption wrote on Aug 31, 2007 8:59 PM:

" Predictably, there it is. Another dumb Register story caption. Who comes up with these? "

M.G. wrote on Aug 31, 2007 9:49 PM:

" Seriously! It seems like this is a recent phenomenon, the whole inappropriate story title thing. Not cool. "

bad slant wrote on Aug 31, 2007 10:12 PM:

" You know, this guy has some serious problems and the way this story is written makes HIM look like a victim. He is NOT the victim, he is the problem. You should have waited for more info, or atleast not slanted the story towards his favor or his lawyers. Way to show support to these girls! "

where's your manners wrote on Aug 31, 2007 10:25 PM:

" Come on people, I know you want a "catchy story" but be appropriate! "

D.K. wrote on Aug 31, 2007 10:27 PM:

" This caption title is absurd. I personally know a family that was victimized by this man. They are struggling to put their lives back together and have a daughter who is having difficulty not "looking over her shoulder" wondering.....This is not a minor offense. Lives have been shaken up and changed forever. Napa Register should have a little more class with their titles. Let's support these girls by increasing the penalties for these kinds of offenses. Do you realize that this guy could post bail and be out on the streets again? This is ridiculous! "

bad slant wrote on Aug 31, 2007 10:40 PM:

" What a bad way to support these girls! This story makes this guy look like HE is the victim, when in fact he is NOT. The register should have taken the time to get more information instead of writing a story that makes him and his lawyer look pitied upon. Your next story should support these girls and give the town awareness about the seriousness of this issue! "

Napppa wrote on Aug 31, 2007 10:56 PM:

" Kelly Boyd is a tough lawyer. The DA better have everything wired tight or there's gonna be some crying. And you law and order wimps will be wining about what happened, "

supernova8610 wrote on Aug 31, 2007 11:07 PM:

" Why the funny title to go along with a story that is decidedly NOT funny? What's the Register playing at? Are they aiming to become comedians, rather than people who report the news? "

Knew it was coming wrote on Aug 31, 2007 11:10 PM:

" I knew this was coming. I even predicted it in a blog (which the Register didn't print) after reading the lame "Vintage pool opens with a splash" article title. Time and again the titles are a sophomoric play on words, or biased, or not accurately reflective of the story. Come on Register, we want you to do a better job at this. "

Journalistic integrity wrote on Aug 31, 2007 11:31 PM:

" I agree with M.G. and the rest. Who is watching the store? What ever happened to journalistic integrity? "

Shocked wrote on Aug 31, 2007 11:44 PM:

" I used to know this man and the man that I knew was not a monster BUT clearly he has changed. I would have never imagined he was capable of this. I am in complete shock of his actions and am truly sorry for the children and families that he put through this, including his own. It just goes to show you really do not know people! "

Two Cents wrote on Sep 1, 2007 9:58 AM:

" I dont know how these defense attorney sleep at night? Not a monster.... huh? Think about the damage this kind of humiliating privacy invasion does to a young girl. How paranoid it makes them and self conscious, which many of them will carry for life? Anyone who does this is most certainly deserving of the title "monster", and much worse. If that was the defense attorney's daughter, I wonder if she'd feel the same compassion for this sicko. "

Mike wrote on Sep 1, 2007 10:06 AM:

" Let's get real this guy has a big problem and needs help. Someone should get the idea that little girl's do not like getting peeped at. He is not the victim the DA I would only hope will make every effort to STOP his offenceive patterns. It sounds to me like his enrollment in sex offenders training is only a cover up to get off with as little as possable. As for his lawyer well now I know why being a lawyer defending something like this would be my last choice of jobs. It is the law's duty to protect the girls and I can only hope that they do it well. as for the other take off's on the register's story. That is the editor's choice and they should call it as they see it. Now that is a job I could enjoy having. "

janr707 wrote on Sep 1, 2007 9:05 PM:

" Bad form NVR this is no joke. "

Colfaxian wrote on Sep 5, 2007 2:02 AM:

" If Ms. Boyd does not have a daughter or sister, she must have at least one female cousin. I wonder what she would say if any of her female relatives were on those videotapes? Lassen St is in my 18-yr-old granddaughter's neighborhood and my wife and I are glad this creep's off the streets! "

jomar wrote on Sep 27, 2007 8:48 AM:

" I happen to know a victim, and I'm upset that the NVR doesn't show support for these girls in this article. I'm begining to lose faith in the NVR "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy