NVR Logo
D.A.R.E falls victim to city budget cuts
Program elimination saves city $45,000
Monday, August 13, 2007
Save and Share Share
For the first time in 19 years, local schools will open this month without police D.A.R.E. officers in elementary classrooms.

Supporters are mourning the loss of a program that reached nearly 1,000 students in public and private schools each year. Eliminating D.A.R.E. will save the city $45,000 next year.
D.A.R.E., a nationwide program that teaches children how to avoid drugs and violence, is a casualty of city efforts to reprioritize its finances and end years of deficit spending. Police are brainstorming ways to restart the program in 2008.

“I understand why it’s happening, but I hate to see it happening,” said Chuck Stornetta, a retired police officer who has taught fifth- and sixth-graders since the program’s inception in 1988.
“Children will no longer have a positive image of the police at that early age,” said former Police Chief Dan Monez, who embraces D.A.R.E. for more than its anti-drug education.

“It changed the culture of the Napa Police Department. It changed the relationship that we had with the kids in Napa,” Monez said.
D.A.R.E. graduates were “flagging the officers down on the street and wanting to hug them,” Monez said. “That connection is as valuable as anything it might have done for understanding drug use.”

Police Cmdr. Steve Potter, a former D.A.R.E. officer, said the department faced some tough budget choices this spring. “We had to cut D.A.R.E. so we could continue to provide emergency services out on the street,” he said.

“It’s very painful,” Potter said. “You love the connections in the schools with youth.”

Along with the elimination of D.A.R.E., police pulled the plug on the Junior Traffic Patrol that has provided student crossing guards at Napa schools since 1955. Since sixth-graders moved to the middle schools earlier in this decade, the program had shrunk to five elementary schools, police said.

Police will still provide resource officers to Napa’s three middle schools and two high schools, with anti-gang education continuing in the middle schools, Potter said.

The Police Department’s suspension of D.A.R.E. does not affect programs in elementary schools in the county and in American Canyon served by Sheriff’s Department deputies.

Law enforcement is a big supporter of D.A.R.E. although officers concede there is little hard evidence that it works. “It’s hard to come up with statistics to prove the effectiveness of this program,” Potter said.

Ron Hess, a retired Napa police sergeant who got his D.A.R.E. layoff notice this summer, puts it this way: “There is no evidence that D.A.R.E. works, but there is no evidence that it doesn’t work.”

What is certain is that D.A.R.E. gave him the opportunity to befriend hundreds of children and their families. That has to count for something, Hess said.

The positives of D.A.R.E. benefit the officers as much as the kids, Potter said. An officer working patrol runs into one problem after another, which can create an adversarial attitude toward the public, he said.

Teaching enthusiastic elementary students about how to say no to temptation is a whole different deal. “It’s one of the most positive things a police officer can experience in a career,” he said. “The kids love you. The teachers love you.”

The D.A.R.E. program had been shrinking prior to the city’s decision to eliminate funding. Several schools had dropped out because the demands of today’s more structured academic curriculum didn’t leave enough time in a student’s week, said Sgt. Terry Gonsalves, head of youth services and crime prevention.

St. Helena no longer offers D.A.R.E., while Calistoga police suspended the program last year after the D.A.R.E. officer was promoted to sergeant, police spokesmen said.

Napa police has tried to save D.A.R.E. by cobbling together new funding, but there has not been enough time to pull things together, Potter said.

Under one scenario, the city would have contributed $15,000 if the Napa Valley Unified School District and the Napa Safe Schools Foundation had come up with matching amounts.

School Superintendent John Glaser said talks were just starting on ways of restoring D.A.R.E. for at least part of 2007-08 school year. “I think the discussions are in a really positive place right now,” he said.

The Napa Valley Unified School District already partners with police to sponsor resource officers at the secondary schools and fund a youth diversion program, Glaser said.

Some schools are pressed to meet academic goals, but “we want to make sure all the kids who need (D.A.R.E.) get it,” he said.

Several parent-teacher groups have asked about helping to fund D.A.R.E. as have members of the community, Potter said. This creates a “chicken or the egg” issue, he said.

Do police do vigorous fundraising for D.A.R.E. if they cannot be sure the program will continue, or do they first try to restructure the program to be more affordable, Potter said.

Chief Rich Melton wants to study the feasibility of continuing D.A.R.E. with more regular duty officers, rather than depending on retirees. This would lower costs since officers are already on the payroll, but would have an unknown impact on emergency services, Potter said.

More officers would have to be sent away to two weeks of D.A.R.E. training, which would impact patrol services, he said.

D.A.R.E. might be restarted at some schools in 2008, but it could take up to 18 months to fully restore the program, Potter said.

“We really want to get D.A.R.E. back,” said Potter, citing the impact of an officer like Chuck Stornetta, a local D.A.R.E. legend, on kids.

“Chuck is absolutely the nicest man you’d ever want to meet in your life. Unfortunately, a lot of children won’t experience that,” he said.
23 comment(s)

Dirty Napkin wrote on Aug 13, 2007 5:42 AM:

" You have got to be kidding me! Build another parking garage.! "

Will's Mom wrote on Aug 13, 2007 9:16 AM:

" Although I am sure that DARE did well for some, my son, who was chosen to read his DARE essay to his DARE graduating class, is on probation. The drugs gave him the courage to do things that he normally wouldn't do. I can't tell you how many of his friends that were also "A" students,loved by their peers, teachers, and other members of our society have chosen drugs as a means of something to do in this town. How sad! I say that when, if ever, there is money for another program, find another way to use it that is in the best interest of our children. Substance abuse due to boredom has been an issue as long as I can recall and I know that it will never change as long as the tourists and the wealthy are our main focus in this community. Isn't it a shame that us natives are sorry that we couldn't bring our children up in this town without all of the issues that have always surrounded it. "

Pablo wrote on Aug 13, 2007 9:54 AM:

" This is just another example of this city's mis-management of its funds. "

Puzzled wrote on Aug 13, 2007 10:22 AM:

" The cost to put a criminal through the justice system is expensive. So why do we eliminate a program (costing a small $45,000) that will save us money later? What a big mistake. "

CDArroyo wrote on Aug 13, 2007 10:24 AM:

" What a disappointment. I'm disgusted with the City's priorities. I see the notes about what it will "save" the city dollar-wise per year.. but what will it "cost" ultimately. What a shame! We need to audit the City's spending habits. "

Interesting.... wrote on Aug 13, 2007 10:45 AM:

" I am always intersted to read the comments from conservatives who will take money way from single monthers trying to feed their children and provide daycare, yet when it comes to crime and drugs no amount of funding is too much to spend of taxpayer dollars. Same goes for war effort support. This is a no-brainer: Ron Hess, who worked with kids and D.A.R.E says: “There is no evidence that D.A.R.E. works, but there is no evidence that it doesn’t work.” The program has been around for many years. If there is no evidence it works by now... folks that IS the evidence that it doesn't work. Yeah, hugs from kids are great. Creating better law enforcement relationships with children is valuable and effective in crime reduction. What will really help reduce crime in Napa is increased funding to our police department. And, since no one wants to pay more taxes (myself included) we need to increase revenues. To do that, we need more businesses, which need more patrons, which requires more hotels and parking. So yes, build another parking garage. In fact - build two! We need the tax revenues and the sooner the better. "

B. Watch wrote on Aug 13, 2007 11:20 AM:

" Unfortunately, DARE hasn't been shown to have much of an effect on kids, as great of an idea as it is. I *do* like the idea of exposing kids to police in a non-threatening manner - the more ways the police can interact with people in an unaggressive way without triggering "fight or flight", the better. In fact, I believe many adults could use that same kind of environment. It'd be good for the police and the people both - perhaps bridging that divide would encourage greater understanding on both sides of the badge of what the law is and what it's for - beyond traffic tickets and fines, beyond "gotcha!" at every corner and beyond election campaigns touting meaningless arrest numbers, I mean. "

Stephanie wrote on Aug 13, 2007 11:26 AM:

" With all the money in this valley, isn't there a way to raise the measly $45,000 needed? I had 2 children go through the DARE program and another that would have, and believe it is better to be educated than not! I am so disappointed and if I had the extra $45,000, I would make sure the program continued. "

What? wrote on Aug 13, 2007 11:43 AM:

" 45,000 That is not very much. I don't know about anyone else. D.A.R.E worked for me. I think it is very important for kids growing up. Especially now with the increase of crimes in Napa. Most of the crimes committed is by people on drugs. "

finally wrote on Aug 13, 2007 12:02 PM:

" DARE was always a joke to the kids. It never worked, and was a waste of money. Put the funds to use somwhere else. "

napacharley wrote on Aug 13, 2007 12:03 PM:

" Its impossible to count what you prevent. The positive interaction between police and kids at this age is priceless. Whats 45K in relation to the whole budget? Lets keep running those empty busses though... "

Effective? wrote on Aug 13, 2007 12:29 PM:

" Does the DARE program work? I have read that it costs a lot of money and isn't effective. I know other cities have eliminated the program not because of a lack of funding, but because of poor results. "Will's Mom", I think, makes exactly this point. Her son was chosen to read his DARE essay, and is on probation today. My understanding is that this result is not at all unusual. "

angrymom wrote on Aug 13, 2007 1:08 PM:

" I am so upset about this...The city of Napa is not willing to contribute to the D.A.R.E program that provides such valuable and important information to our children. Why is it that Napa does not care about our kids unless they're hanging out downtown bothering the tourists!! What do you expect them to do? Our kids need this positive influence that D.A.R.E. gives them...Napa definately have their priorities backwards! Our kids are our future...REMEMBER?? "

Organize a volunteer effort... wrote on Aug 13, 2007 1:38 PM:

" Maybe a few retired police officers and a few parents can organize an effort to visit the schools and continue the message. Wouldn't be the same certainly but maybe a small step in the right direction. "

mike wrote on Aug 13, 2007 2:27 PM:

" It is possible to count what you prevent. As reported in the Register a short while back, an evalutaion of the DARE program found it had no statistically significant long term effect of detering illicit drug use. It also found no significant difference between DARE and non-DARE students' attitudes toward drug use. DARE is a great concept, and if it can be perpetuated through volunteer efforts, great. But just because it's a well known program among parents doesn't mean its effective or deserving of public funds. "

Gee whiz, wrote on Aug 13, 2007 3:10 PM:

" Why? Why axe this sweet, touchy-feely "looks good on paper so it MUST be good" program? Maybe because there is no evidence that it works? Contrary to Officer Hess' statement, there is ample evidence that it does not work. (Search the US Dept of Justice website.) It does not work, ergo, it is a waste of money. Some of that is my money, yours too, and wasting it is a bad idea. "

Retired Sgt Steve LaVoy wrote on Aug 13, 2007 5:14 PM:

" I taught DARE for 20 years until I retired from the Police Dept. I stayed with it because throughout the years I would meet in the community former students who told me that my short time with them in 5th or 6th grade empowered them to make better choices when it came to drugs and other trouble kids face as they went through middle and high school. No, not every student made the right choices, but many did by utilizing the coping skills taught to them in DARE. I am sad to see it go because my experience with my students shows that DARE DOES have a positive influence in empowering our youth to make good decisions. The cutting back on Youth Services in the Napa Police Dept is a big mistake when one views the Police role in crime prevention. The Dept. will go back to the early days of my career at the PD when we were more reactive than preventative in our mission. It is time for those silent adults in our community who benefited from the decision making skills taught in DARE to speak up and rally the City Council to support Youth Services at the Napa PD. "

To Lavoy wrote on Aug 13, 2007 5:51 PM:

" You were my D.A.R.E teacher and I agree. I have always thought about what you taught me in D.A.R.E. It does work for some. I think the kids it worked for is well worth the 45000 a year it cost the city. Thank you for what you and others have done. I came across many situations in life and D.A.R.E really did help. Now as an adult with kids I am sad this program is now not available. Once again thank you Mr. LaVoy. "

ProDARE wrote on Aug 13, 2007 8:19 PM:

" Are all these "nay-sayers" drug users themselves? Do they even have children they would like to keep from drugs? To me, DARE is that extra insurance. "

It Begins and Ends At Home wrote on Aug 13, 2007 10:31 PM:

" DARE is just like any other program that is part of the public school system. Some work, and some don't. Some kids are touched by it, some kids forget what they heard the minute they walk out of the room. Just like history and algebra. It depends on the child, the home life, the atmosphere in the classroom, and whether it is honored by teachers, parents, and peers. $45,000 sounds like a substantial amount, but let's remember that some folks will shell out more than that for a bottle of wine at the NV wine auction every year. No program can reach every child one hundred percent of the time. If the child has a good start and support at home, DARE would not be necessary. It wasn't when I was in school and that wasn't too long ago. For all of you blaming the City, at least they have championed this program for almost 20 years! It was a tough decision. Perhaps some of you who want to volunteer your own time -- get it together and teach it yourself. Show a little motivation and quit relying on government to do everything! Education isn't that expensive. "

JP wrote on Aug 14, 2007 6:50 PM:

" This is truely a shame. I am also a DARE graduate and remember looking forward to spending time with trustworthy, admirable police officers. What a wonderful program this is and what a loss for the kids. "

Suze wrote on Aug 15, 2007 10:32 PM:

" I truly see the point made by some police officers that this is the first and main positive contact they have with many of our youth. Educating kids about drug abuse and the pitfalls therein could maybe be included in other classes. Perhaps having more officers 'walking a beat' is a good way to get to know the local kids and keep an eye out for drug and gang related crimes on our streets. Plodding the streets and getting to know an urban area intimately has always been good crime prevention and a means to getting to know the local community. Maybe I am just out of step with modern times, but it worked in the past. Nowadays, officers would have to be in pairs, but I think it would still be good policing. I guess we will finally be able to measure the effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. programme in a few years. If there is a huge increase in drug use amoung our youth, we will know it was an effective programme. Right now, I am not sure. "

Birdseye View wrote on Aug 18, 2007 7:17 AM:

" After reading this article it seems to me that the program is being taught by retired officers who I presume to be receiving a great retirement check. If they care so much about the program then how about "donating" your time. As for the materials you need to distribute why not approach the local nonprofits to cover them? This is what community support and local partnerships are suppose to do. It's called "giving back" why not try it? "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy