NVR Logo
A mindless media, an uninformed public
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Save and Share Share
In keeping with one of Mark Twain’s famous quotes, “If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed. If you do read the newspaper you are misinformed,” I opine as follows.

We assume that the media should tell us, “what when, where, how and why.” It’s the how and the why that I feel is sadly lacking. In many cases, one has to dig deep to find out what’s really going on in the world — not just the usual stories of crashes, murders, riots and corruption, but what is behind the stories that are shaping local, national and world events.
A case in point: I heard there was going to be a debate among Republication presidential candidates, but I couldn’t tell where or when. I had to call Direct TV programming in New York to find out. (It was not even in the San Francisco Chronicle’s weekly program guide and certainly not mentioned in the Register.) Was this an assumption that few, if any, care about who our next president might be? On Jay Leno’s “Tonight Show,” he asked the audience if they had seen either a Democratic or Republican debate, and not a single person raised their hand! I asked at least two dozen friends if they had seen the debates and no one knew they were happening! To me, that is pitiful! Yes, they had seen the critiques afterward.

As a further illustration, I read an article about how uninformed we are when it comes to voting. The accompanying cartoon showed a box with a large number of human brains parked in it on the way to a voting booth. Therefore, prejudice and emotion take over and logic disappears. For example, can anyone remember that Thomas Dewey presumably lost his bid for the presidency in 1944 because he had a mustache? (In those days, TV villains generally had a mustache.) Do we know or care about Darfur, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Somalia, Nigeria and Gaza, to name a few places where conflicts are taking place, not to mention problems in North Korea, Iraq and Iran? Who are the good guys and the bad guys in these places? I’ll bet few readers even know the current leaders in Britain, France and Italy.
My point is simply that we hear about world and national events which are of great importance, but we know or care little about what is really happening. The media has determined what they think we want rather than what we should have.

The world is shrinking, and events anywhere can have a profound effect on our society. Perhaps, we are just too busy working or with our daily chores to read print media anymore, and we take the easy way out for often twisted information from TV and the Internet.
(Schaaf lives in Napa.)
5 comment(s)

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 31, 2007 7:57 AM:

" This is why so many folks are moving on to the internet. I read english language news from around the world. Canadian, UK, Asian english language versions of their media do things quite a bit better than US media operations. One the news is really 'fresher' as in one or two days ahead of the US media and they don't try to put a pro-US government spin on their reporting. And, sorry as I am to say it, if the European press reports something, and the US media report differently, the US media is most often wrong. So don't limit your horizon to just the pap that the US media pushes. Getting the truth out of US media is just plain... Ruff "

bdoyle wrote on Jul 31, 2007 1:27 PM:

" Ruff makes some interesting remarks comparing "US media" to international media sources. One thing that has surely weakened the performance of "US media" has been the grotesque, un-deniable LIBERAL bias they inject in to most news stories. It's funny to hear about the failings of major t.v., newspaper and radio "news" sources that have been so infested with LIBERALS who care little about accuracy and objectivity in their "reporting". Newspaper subscriptions have plumeted in many markets and t.v. and radio ratings have fallen to historical LOWS because of the ranting LIBERALS who haunt those institutions. They are losing bad but remain quite hillarious in their denial. I know a lot of foreign "media" share some of this liberal bias, but things have gone completely out of control here in the U.S. "

br wrote on Jul 31, 2007 4:02 PM:

" That's probably because one of the most widely watched news services in the US is Faux News, that widely known liberal news organization, Hannity and Holmes, O'Really et. al. Fair and Balanced, bah. The "liberal bias" argument is really worn out, wasn't true in the first place. For a long time the majority of people have believed that Hussein was primarily involved in 9-11, wasn't true then isn't true now and that did not come from the liberal media. I believe that nuber of believers is dropping but slowly and only after way too many people have died over the original lies. The success of the conservative movement in this country as in most is the fact that the people don't want the truth, it's too hard to understand. They want predigested pap as you call it, shortened so as not to conflict with s-Survivor and American Idol and other preposterous entertainment for the masses. You have to read to find the truth. If you believe what highly paid talking heads who all work for the same six companies you will not get truth. Eighty five per cent of the WORLD'S media is owned by six companies. Go Ruff... Thanks "

Russ wrote on Jul 31, 2007 6:55 PM:

" br, It would be helpful for you to understand the difference between News and Opinion. Air America, O'Reilly and Hannity & Colmes are Opinion, not news. Brian Williams, NBC, and Charlie Gibson, ABC are "news" not Opinion. Your Talking Points pap is not fact. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 31, 2007 11:17 PM:

" Yep, everybody knows just how much the LIBRULZ run FAUX NOISE channel, the W.all S.treet J.ugheads, A.ll-B.ull-C.orn, C.orporate-B.ull-S.keit and N.othing-B.ut-C.rap TV. Those darn LIBRULZ won't cover all those schools being painted in Iraq. Those darn LIBRULZ won't cover all those folks in New Orleans who have had their homes rebuilt. Yep, "bdoyle" grotesque is a word I would use, but I doubt we have the same reasons for saying it. Getting the truth out of the Bush-enablers is, well... Ruff "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy