Outsourcing in the dark
By HAROLD MEYERSON
WASHINGTON -- You don't trifle with Robin Smith when it comes to keeping America safe. Smith is a former airman first class who won a Sharpshooter badge and was one of 125 women selected by the Air Force for a test combat training program.
She comes from a family that was almost a stranger to civilian life; until her brother retired from service in the mid-'90s, she says, "there was a member of my family on active military duty for over 100 consecutive years."
Since she left the service, Smith has worked for several private security contractors, which is how she came to be stationed at the Department of Homeland Security headquarters in the employ of Wackenhut Services, the company that provides security at a multitude of nuclear, defense and other sensitive federal facilities. For a time she was stationed where Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff worked, and she saw him every day he was at the office. "He trusted us to do everything to protect his site,'' she says.
That trust was misplaced. In September 2005, another Wackenhut employee opened an envelope filled with an unidentified white powder, which poured out over her. Two Wackenhut officers rushed to the scene, which they failed to isolate. Appalled, Smith asked if she should notify the Federal Protective Service and was told she shouldn't. She asked if any of the officers had training in hazardous materials and was told they didn't. She recommended they isolate the envelope and the employee and evacuate the building.
Instead, Wackenhut officers took the envelope outside and told the employee to go wash off the powder, which she did, passing directly in front of Chertoff's office. Finally, they called the Federal Protective Service, which evacuated the building.
The following year Wackenhut's contract at DHS headquarters was terminated, though the company retains an array of contracts at other sensitive facilities. Earlier this month, a House subcommittee held a hearing on Wackenhut and more generally on how well the federal government monitors the performance of its contractors. Smith was among the witnesses.
Over the past six years, the Bush administration has contracted out government whenever possible. The government spent $219 billion on private contracts in 2000; for the past two years, its annual spending on private contractors has topped $400 billion. Much of that is going to the contractors providing services to our forces in Iraq, but the privatization extends well beyond the war. The Energy Department has 15,000 federal employees and pays for roughly 100,000 contract employees. Homeland Security contracts rose from $3.4 billion to $15.8 billion in a single year.
The federal government has no central database to assess the record of prospective contractors. If the companies have been indicted or involved in civil action over their performance, contract officers are, like the rest of us, reliant on Google to discover what's out there.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., has introduced legislation to create a central database that would enable officials at one department to know when a contractor has screwed up at another. Maloney's bill, if enacted, would be only a small step toward bringing accountability to our newly privatized government, but it would at least keep procurement officers from flying blind.
(Meyerson is editor-at-large of American Prospect and the L.A. Weekly. This essay originally appeared in the Washington Post.)
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Mark wrote on Jul 30, 2007 11:39 AM:
Avoiding unions wrote on Jul 30, 2007 11:47 AM: