NVR Logo
Blog Comments
Monday, July 09, 2007
Save and Share Share
On Redwood

dress code ruling
"Rise up, students! You won, this round anyway. But why it took a kid wearing Tigger socks to win your battle, I can't imagine."

"What are we showing our kids? The school district is teaching that it's OK to break the law, make up stories to justify what you've done (stopping gang violence), then bully the people that try to stop you."
"The only thing these kids learn is that they're entitled to wear whatever they want ... and if they get in trouble, go get a lawyer because 'the Man' is trying to take away your 'civil liberties.'"

"The school had no case -- no evidence that the dress code stops gangs or other violence. It is a petty, nannyish code. But this case would not have happened and the school could have kept its inane code if only the school had obeyed the law and allowed the protesting parents to opt out -- as every other school in California must allow by state law."
"The best part about this whole thing is that the school now has to abide by the law. Yes people, there is a law that states schools may adopt a policy, but if it above and beyond gang affiliation, tobacco or alcohol, then an opt-out policy must be in force for those parents that wish to have their children wear other clothing that is not disruptive."

"Isn't the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution wonderful? I'm happy for the students and their parents, who did a public service by offering Napans a lesson in civics. I hope more Napans will support the ACLU in its efforts to protect our civil rights."

"The main reason this dress code was implemented was for gang prevention purposes and not to stifle individual liberties. I have seen gang activity in Napa dramatically decrease in the past 10 years. I just hope this potential change does not have a negative affect on the community at large. We pick and choose our battles. Mine remains to continue to prevent gang activity."

"Tigger does not a gang make."

On missing

Napa PD gun

"This is the second time in months that this has happened. What's up? This is not like losing you keys or wallet. It is a ... gun."

"Yes, it is serious when a police officer loses his or her weapon, but I'm sure no one feels worse about it than the officer. Hopefully, the weapon will be recovered without incident and all you perfect people can move on to judge the next imperfect human."

"Could the officer have kept a better eye on it? Sure. But this is no different than your wallet or your purse being stolen. ... Give this officer a break. He/she has chosen to protect and risk their life for you!"

"While I suppose anyone could lose, forget, misplace or have their gun stolen (if they have one), law enforcement officials should be held to a higher standard. I'm sure their training is more thorough than that of the average lay person. When dealing with something as potentially dangerous as a gun, police should know better and be better trained than any one else."
3 comment(s)

JimClark wrote on Jul 9, 2007 5:34 AM:

" Where, in The Constitution, is a public education bureacracy listed as a "right"? The ACLU interprets the Law of our land? "

Jimbo wrote on Jul 9, 2007 3:41 PM:

" The judge interprets the law, and in this case the judge determined - by interpreting the law - that the NVUSD is operating outside of the law. Apparently the ACLU had a case. By the way, the question before the judge in this case was not determining whether or not 'a public education bureacracy' is a right. "

JimClark wrote on Jul 9, 2007 5:52 PM:

" Well, not to burst your bubble. who appointed the "Judge"? Justice is NOT a political process. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy