Group wants development limited in area near Pacific Union College
By DAVID RYAN
Register Staff Writer
A slow-growth Angwin group wants to burst the so-called Angwin urban bubble, a decades-old zoning area at the center of a controversy over the future of Angwin.
Save Rural Angwin, an opposition group to Pacific Union College’s proposal to develop 391 housing units in what it calls its Eco-Village to provide money for an endowment, wants the county to carve up the bubble into planning zones designed to protect agricultural land, limiting acreage the college can develop to less than 200 affordable units.
The group made the proposal on June 15 as a comment on the county’s draft general plan update.
Under the Save Rural Angwin Plan, much of the old Angwin urban bubble would be placed under an “institutional” designation, with chunks to the north, east, northwest, and southwest designated for agriculture. The Angwin market area would be dubbed commercial, while a peninsula of land to the north and a parcel of land at the southern end of PUC would be zoned “rural residential” to provide land for faculty and staff housing.
“This is a very positive proposal,” said group spokesman Allen Spence in a statement. “We value the college as a major community asset, and we want to see it succeed. From the first day of our organization, we have declared that we will support PUC’s need for faculty and staff housing. This proposal makes that possible.”
PUC officials disagree, stressing that the urban bubble is key to the Seventh Day Adventist college’s future in Napa County. Without the endowment, they have said there will be a dire future for the college.
“SRA’s efforts could result in depriving thousands of faculty, students, staff and their families of a vibrant, healthy institution on which they depend,” PUC President Dick Osborn said in a statement. “If we are unable to grow our endowment in response to trends that threaten our financial future, our long-term ability to function is jeopardized by SRA’s plan. This plan condemns PUC and Angwin to slow, agonizing and inevitable decline.”
PUC officials point out it takes a certain number of market rate housing to subsidize affordable units. In the college’s current plan, about 15 percent of the housing would be so-called affordable and 20 percent would be “workforce”, less expensive than market rate homes but more expensive than affordable homes.
Spence said Save Rural Angwin’s zoning plan would avoid major traffic problems he believes PUC’s development proposal would cause.
“The negative impacts of a development such as envisioned by (PUC-hired developer) Triad (Communities) would significantly increase the population of Angwin,” Spence said. It would create a heavy and dangerous traffic load on Howell Mountain Road and Deer Park Road leading the Valley. It would convert land that has been in agricultural use for nearly 100 years into residential, commercial and industrial use in the heart of Angwin.”
In April, Triad Communities executive Curt Johansen said Jay Smith, owner of St. Helena’s upscale Sunshine Foods supermarket, is interested in opening a 15,000-square-foot organic food supermarket in Angwin. PUC officials reasoned the supermarket would cut traffic along Howell Mountain Road traveling to St. Helena because the market would offer a variety of goods and services.
In the meantime, PUC officials will oppose any changes to the Angwin urban bubble.
Hillary Gitelman, director of county planning, said the Save Rural Angwin proposal will be considered “just like all the other comments” received concerning the new draft general plan. Gitelman said public comments will go online sometime this week, while county public officials will receive hard copies next month.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Hard to believe wrote on Jun 26, 2007 1:27 PM:
confused in Angwin wrote on Jun 26, 2007 3:42 PM:
to confused wrote on Jun 26, 2007 4:28 PM:
Farm Out wrote on Jun 26, 2007 6:31 PM:
Kudos wrote on Jun 26, 2007 7:18 PM:
To: to confused wrote on Jun 27, 2007 7:50 AM:
Farm Out and More wrote on Jun 27, 2007 8:10 AM:
Econut wrote on Jun 27, 2007 8:58 AM:
Cone on wrote on Jun 27, 2007 9:46 AM:
Econut wrote on Jun 27, 2007 10:11 AM:
Support PUC's Plan wrote on Jun 27, 2007 11:40 AM:
Angwin forest fire concerns wrote on Jun 28, 2007 10:21 AM:
The Big Lie wrote on Jun 28, 2007 10:25 PM:
To Angwin forest fire concerns wrote on Jun 28, 2007 10:34 PM:
Response to Jun 28, 2007 10:34 PM wrote on Jun 29, 2007 10:47 AM:
a safer community wrote on Jun 29, 2007 7:26 PM:
To: a safer community wrote on Jun 30, 2007 11:55 AM:
Save Rural Angwin wrote on Jul 2, 2007 11:53 AM:
PUC Thins its Forests wrote on Jul 2, 2007 4:01 PM:
To Save Rural Angwin wrote on Jul 2, 2007 11:48 PM:
Econut wrote on Jul 3, 2007 8:23 AM: