NVR Logo
Live closer, drive less
Friday, June 01, 2007
Save and Share Share
If Napa wants to get serious about combating global warming, it should be approving higher density developments that mix housing with stores and jobs, a transportation expert recommends.

Compact development reduces the need for roads and vehicle trips, a major contributor to greenhouse gases, said Reid Ewing, a research professor at the National Center for Smart Growth at the University of Maryland.
Ewing addressed more than 30 people at Napa City Hall Wednesday night as part of a speakers series intended to raise public awareness of local transportation problems and solutions.

The Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency is updating its transportation plan, a process that could lead to a second attempt, in November 2008, to pass a transportation sales tax.
Ewing touted the environmental benefits of coordinating transportation and land use projects so that people can walk or reduce the distance they have to drive to meet daily needs.

The city of Napa generally scores points for staying within defined boundaries, Ewing said. Napa has begun approving higher density housing, with plans to combine housing with commercial development in downtown and on nearby Soscol Avenue.
Ewing said he was a contributor to a soon-to-be-released report by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that will tout the benefits of so-called smart growth to curb global warming.

If the U.S. had a strong policy that discouraged urban sprawl, the growth in greenhouse gases from vehicle emissions over the next 50 years could be cut by as much as half, he said.

Ewing conceded that many people do not like higher densities. Changing their opinion will involve "a lot of public education," he said.

Fortunately, there are many examples of neighborhoods made better when higher density development is accompanied by good design, he said.

As the public becomes more concerned about global warming, the politics of growth will change, Ewing said.

"I think that the pressure to develop land differently will rise to the point that elected leaders will say we have no choice," he said.

America will become "a little more European," Ewing said.

Several audience members asked if it made sense to expand south county roadways to handle congestion, much of it from people who can't afford Napa housing but work here.

Wider highways are sometimes needed, but communities generally cannot pave their way out of congestion, Ewing said. As much as 70 percent of new highway capacity will be gobbled up by locals who decide to drive again at peak hours or travel more, he said.

Free-flowing highways also encourage inefficient, sprawling development, Ewing said. "If you can drive faster, you will drive farther," he said.

Ewing encouraged politicians to build more housing that workers, especially those with lower incomes, can afford here. The best way to lower the cost of housing is to allow greater densities, he said.

The next speaker in the NCTPA series will be James Corless, who runs the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's Transportation for Livable Communities and Housing Incentive Program.

Corless will speak on June 20 at 8 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Napa City Hall.
18 comment(s)

Morgan wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:18 AM:

" How perfect is this! The Rogal dream of 3200 units jammed together at Napa Pipe may now be touted as environmentally correct and a hindrance to global warming. Who knew? "

Libertarian wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:08 AM:

" Sounds like another environmental excuse to keep the poor people consolidated in one convenient downtown spot, and out of the upper middle class neighborhoods. "

RobC wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:40 AM:

" Here they come and they want your road-repair tax dollars for their pet social-engineering projects. This is how special interests gin-up "earmarks" attached to transportation bills that have nothing to do with fixing the current infrastructure. And this is how those bills fail and the roads continue to crumble. I implore elected officials to not allow these spurious interests to subvert needed tax bills designed to fix the infrastructure into a mishmash of debatable science and special interest pork. In this case Professor Ewing's traveling carpetbag of "Smart Growth" isn't... "

Naomi wrote on Jun 1, 2007 10:43 AM:

" Please.......this type of development works. Check out Portland, Oregon. "

too bad wrote on Jun 1, 2007 10:57 AM:

" ...Wider highways are sometimes needed, but communities generally cannot pave their way out of congestion, Ewing said. As much as 70 percent of new highway capacity will be gobbled up by locals who decide to drive again at peak hours or travel more, he said... Too bad, I will still commute to work in the bay area because I can earn much more income by leaving this valley to work. "

Steph wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:25 AM:

" What's so bad about sensible forethought? Come on, people! There's something very nice about being able to walk to a grocery store and cafe, or any multitude of shops and services, and mill about with your neighbors. Nobody will force anybody to live there, but properly planned communities are very attractive to potential buyers and tenants. You might find that they become very expensive as a result, actually. Wow, how cynical we've become! Isn't it nice to have choices? "

Libertarian wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:36 AM:

" Get a clue, Naomi...Portland is one of the few places that has a worse homeless problem than Napa! Ya, let's follow their far-left model... "

Planner out to lunch wrote on Jun 1, 2007 1:30 PM:

" Another person trying to plan our lives. I recently visited Irvine, CA a community completely built on a plan...unfortunately there is no gas station in Irvine. We are lucky to live in Napa County. What we need to do is protect it from the "planners". "

Steph wrote on Jun 1, 2007 2:10 PM:

" Oh, yes, No Planning. Now there's a plan. You know why traffic is so bad in Napa? Poor planning. Resistance to planned development that leads to pockets of development, ala Winchester Mystery house. Change happens. Deal with it. Or don't and see what you get. "

RobC wrote on Jun 1, 2007 2:17 PM:

" Yes choices are nice...but not at the expense of our infrastructure. You want to tax and spend to achieve some out-of-state planners vision of pedestrian utopia, great. But fix the roads and the bridges first, then try a social engineering tax on a separate proposition. Good luck. "

To plannner out to lunch wrote on Jun 1, 2007 3:37 PM:

" There are no gas stations in Irvine? I think you are the one who is out to lunch. It is a city of 100,000 people. Of course there are gas stations. Maybe they were just so well designed NOT to look like typical gas stations that you missed them. "

There are no gas stations wrote on Jun 3, 2007 3:02 PM:

" I have been to Irvine twice. there are no gas stations in Irvine. There are also no gun stores, no houses of ill repute and no casinos...places that people need and want. So what happens is like what happens to St. Helenans who have no local service businesses...they shop in towns where the services are located driving long distances using a lot of gas but. So, planning solves nothing. We live in a market capitalistic ecomony that each of us is living off of, why keep trying to ruin it? "

For it wrote on Jun 4, 2007 4:22 PM:

" Thank you Naomi and Steph, people with a brain. Something has to be done, if you look at studies household numbers are going down, but the population continues to rise. Higher density is an answer. And personally I would love to be able to walk to a cafe, grocery store, or post office. I would enjoy a community with those options, which is no where to be found around here. All of you negative people on here just want Napa to continue at its sluggish slow growth pace. I love how you all try to bash Ewing as if he knows nothing, well I can guarantee he is far more educated than most of you who seem to think they know it all. "

to There are no gas stations wrote on Jun 4, 2007 10:52 PM:

" I grew up in Irvine. There are many gas stations (two I can think of that were walking distance from my house). My house was also walking distance (a quarter of a mile) from a six screen movie theater, cafes, boutiques, and a major grocery store. I think the planning worked out very nicely. And are you really suggesting that Napa should plan for casinos and "houses of ill repute"? And this will be better than your flawed concept of the gas-stationless Irvine? These are services that people "need"? I think you plan for Napa needs some work. "

Just Do It wrote on Jun 5, 2007 1:34 PM:

" It is really amazing to me that so many people can have such strong opinions about something when you weren't even there to hear it yourselves. Kevin Courtney, as always, did a great job of capturing the speaker's, Mr. Ewing, points. But of course it is impossible to capture the whole evening into a few short paragraphs. If all of you people care so much about Napa and the Valley why don't you turn off American Idol and Survivor and show up at the next speaker forum and let your voice be heard. Must be nice living your life from the cheap seats. Its all about choices...you can choose to sprawl or densify....you can choose to breathe clean air or polluted.....you can choose to get up and do something or sit there and look like an idiot complaining about those who do care. What's your choice...and no American Idol and Survivor are not options. "

Suburbia wrote on Jun 7, 2007 9:51 AM:

" There is a reason people move to the suburbs, to get away from the congestion of a big city. High density housing developments have their place, and it's not in Napa, or any suburb for that matter. If you want everything within walking distance to your home, then move to the big city - or Europe! I like my space thank you. "

To Libertarian wrote on Jun 7, 2007 10:34 AM:

" Did I miss something....I thought we were talking about transporation and high density development. Please read the article again and post something pertaining to the article. "

regional planner wrote on Jul 27, 2007 10:52 AM:

" there is no real solution, a capitalistic society,requires growth for new jobs and a strong economy. The only problem is (check out costal china) that if grow is uncontrolled and undirected everybody will be affected. Let me restate that, the common person will be effected. It is a good idea to have a dense community with all services with in walking, or biking distance. It serves to increase mom and pop businesses, and increased person to person interaction. It also means living in 2nd and third story condo's over those stores. People aslo seem to like there box stores with the discount prices. Remember prices are always a little higher in those small businesses. People also like pivacy, long drives, butiful views, big houses, and countless other things that suburbia has provided. To make a long story short. There are many compromises to be made if a truely usefull high densty community is to work. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy