NVR Logo
A plan to pay for farmworker overruns
To end funding fiasco, cities, county share costs, rely on grants from state, vintners
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Save and Share Share
Months after cost overruns in the renovation of two farmworker camps caused a political stir all over Napa Valley, local government agencies have unveiled a plan to share the burden of what is now estimated to be $2.2 million in unexpected expenses.

St. Helena is set to be the first city to formalize an agreement between Napa County governments to cover overruns at camps in Calistoga and Rutherford. The St. Helena City Council meeting tonight represents the first public airing of the details of the settlement agreement, worked out largely behind closed doors in recent months.
According to the agreement, local governments including the five cities and the county agreed in principle to pay up to $557,711 toward a $2.2 million deficit caused by overruns on renovations of the Mondavi and Calistoga centers.

The agreement estimates the remaining $1.67 million will be taken care of by three grants, two of which are not certain to be awarded yet.
One grant, for $775,000, was agreed to by the state in 2005 and is expected to be awarded in September.

The two uncertain grants account for $896,000 — $691,000 from a state farmworker housing grant that could be awarded by the state before June 30, and a $205,000 grant from the Napa Valley Vintners that could be awarded from Auction Napa Valley proceeds in the fall.
If either or both of those grants fail to materialize, the agreement puts the onus on the city of Napa, its housing authority and the county to come up with a way to pay the difference.

Either way, all three Upvalley cities and American Canyon will each pay $46,475 out of housing trust funds and call it a day.

“The $46,000 closes this chapter for us,” said Bert Johansson, St. Helena city manager.

Johansson said the various governments decided to enter into a settlement agreement to avoid costly lawsuits and an even more protracted process.

“You can point fingers and have attorneys go at it all day long, (but) we’re going to spend more than $46,000 if we go down that road and it’s not the right thing to do,” he said.

The city of Napa and its housing authority will contribute $185,903, the same amount the Napa County Housing Authority will pay. The county is expected to ratify the settlement once all five cities have done so.

The agreement is part of a reorganization of the way farmworker housing is administered in Napa Valley. The county established its housing authority in April to take over administration and operation of the three farmworker centers from the Napa Valley Housing Authority.

The shakeup comes after revelations in November showing former Napa Valley Housing Authority Executive Director Peter Dreier used $1.4 million in the city of Napa’s housing reserves — without authorization — to cover construction cost overruns at the Mondavi and Calistoga farmworker centers.

The overruns stemmed from upgrades fire department inspectors required before work had been completed at the camps, but after the construction contracts for the projects had been approved.

Dreier retired under pressure in December.

An analysis of the system of checks and balances of the former housing authority system revealed Napa city and county housing monies were stored in the same checking account and Dreier oversaw both agencies.

Bonnie Schoch, a St. Helena city council member who was a member of the Napa Valley Housing Authority, said the farmworker centers are better off now.

“I do believe its better off being overseen by the county and I think they’ve done a fantastic job, (Napa County Auditor-Controller) Pam Kindig especially,” she said.

The $2.2 million is the highest government-reported figure for the cost overruns to date. Kindig is due to release a draft audit of the Napa Valley Housing Authority to the county on May 15. The county housing authority is due to discuss demand for farmworker camps this morning.
22 comment(s)

Exasperated wrote on May 8, 2007 7:16 AM:

" Why should the taxpayers contribute even a penny to this mess? The wineries need to step up to the plate and take care of it. It's THEIR workers! "

How's this for a plan? wrote on May 8, 2007 8:16 AM:

" Stop using public monies to pay for farmworker anything. The private businesses who benefit from cheap labor can pay for them. "

Brown Act wrote on May 8, 2007 9:12 AM:

" What?? to avoid litigation they make decisions behind closed doors? AFTER they allow Drier to "retire" with full benefits? And we are expected to swallow all this *@#!^ with a smile???? "

RobC wrote on May 8, 2007 9:13 AM:

" Wineries have donated nearly $70 million dollars to our community, including $4 million specifically for housing. In the past year alone, (apart from their own numerous charitable activities) wineries donated nearly $7 million to local beneficiaries. Find me another "private business" in our community that does so much. Maybe a better plan is to avoid intellectually lazy rants and go after the true problem - bad government policies and procedures, and incompetent public officials. "

Tom wrote on May 8, 2007 9:26 AM:

" Thanks for reasserting my decision to vote against every incumbant in the next local election. Using 100% public monies - that's everyone's tax dollars - to subsidize the business ventures of the very wealthy is beyond absurd, and it is not even close to the kind of leadership I expect from my elected representatives. "

View from Afar wrote on May 8, 2007 10:23 AM:

" This is amazing beyond belief. How can this transpire in the light of day and in the face of city governments claiming bankruptsy and the need to slash budgets/services? The inmates are running the asylum. Can't a thing be done to stop this madness? Where are the priorities of city/county governmental employees (read: elected officials!) Boy, am I glad I left this crazy county. "

Ed wrote on May 8, 2007 11:20 AM:

" Here's a better plan, sell it. It's so underutilized as it is they're having to market it to attract patrons. Any business venture that gets too far into the red gets liquidated to cover it's debt. Sell it off. "

Want to make cuts? wrote on May 8, 2007 11:51 AM:

" I have had the same question for some time. Isn't the Housing Auth and the City of Napa required to have enough housing for CITIZENS of Napa? I highly doubt Mondavi et al need the financial support.I think it needs to be the #1 cut-rather than our Fire/Police Dept's. "

OVER TAXED CITIZEN wrote on May 8, 2007 12:23 PM:

" It had better not come from tax payer money "

Mark M wrote on May 8, 2007 2:47 PM:

" I'll BET Slimy St. Helena wants to "close the chapter" on this book. Typical to they way St. Helena is currently being run, one of it's city council members is up to her neck in this disgusting bit of deceit and fraud! And NOW the price tag's up to 2.2 million? That sure went up from 1.4 quickly. Recall the crooks and fire the managers before they bankrupt the entire county. And, STOP all the shananigans behind "closed doors". "

Don't Let 'Em Get Away With It! wrote on May 8, 2007 2:53 PM:

" The State Attorney General and the Napa County Grand Jury should be investigating this. Make the individuals involved in this accountable. "

$2.2 Million? wrote on May 8, 2007 3:24 PM:

" The last report I saw on this stated the overrun costs totaled $1.4 million. Where did this extra $800,000 come from? Did someone "accidentally" miss counting ot or "forget" to report it? This is incompetence at it's finest, "

Amazed wrote on May 8, 2007 3:39 PM:

" Shouldn't there be an IQ test before people write in here. Never have a seen so many people that have no idea what they are talking about. The contribution of the wine industry to this community is HUGE. The political leaders are trying to do the right thing. Peter Drier and his partner in Crime, Jed Christensen ripped us all off. The rest of the city and county is left to fix it and they are doing a good job. "

Napa Register Don't Let This Issue Die wrote on May 8, 2007 4:22 PM:

" Mr. Ryan, please keep us posted, and don't let this issue die quietly. I missed the names of the housing board members responsible for this. The comment guidelines say we can't use names in this blog, but in this case, we should know who these people are. City Manager Johansson says we shouldn't "point fingers". I disagree. We need to find out who these people are and remove ALL of them from their positions of power. "

To Amazed wrote on May 8, 2007 4:56 PM:

" Since St. Helena City Council is voting on this tonight, it might be nice for folks to know how much the city needs these funds. St Helena is out of compliance with it's affordable housing requirements. It is facing gigantic State penalties for its inadequate wastewater treatment facility. The town is unable to fund its flood project and is considering taking $6 million out of the general fund to build it. (Is that legal??? I don't think it is.) The city's poorly managed water resources has its citizens in Phase III water rationing. Spending $46,000 of badly needed housing trust funds and using Dreier as a "fall guy" certainly is not "doing the right thing". If our politicians really thought they were doing the "right" thing, they wouldn't be having sneaky meetings behind closed doors. You can bet those meetings are about saving their collective butts and focusing attention elsewhere. Rather than requiring an IQ test to share outrage over this situation, how about requiring Ethics courses for our elected officials? "

CLOSE IT wrote on May 8, 2007 10:44 PM:

" Close down one of the farmworker centers. They're not being fully used. Sell the other one. Pay off debts. Is it that hard to do the math, guys??? "

To to Amazed wrote on May 8, 2007 10:48 PM:

" If St. Helena is in trouble with its affordable housing requirments, this will help them. How many farm workers live in this affordable housing, 60 or more? Where can you get credit for 60 affordable housing units for $46,000? Sounds like a deal to me. "

to to Amazed wrote on May 8, 2007 11:46 PM:

" ...Rather than requiring an IQ test to share outrage over this situation, how about requiring Ethics courses for our elected officials? " Ha! right on well put.Let St Helena bail themselves out.We don't have to take this lying down. "

To Amazed wrote on May 9, 2007 7:44 AM:

" Maybe YOU should take the IQ test. Did you know that when vintners make the "hugh" contributions, they can take a tax deduction for it? Also, it is great for publicity: Ever been to the Wine Auction? See for yourself! "

Ed wrote on May 9, 2007 2:18 PM:

" It's just amazing how our local government can divine an extra $2.2 million to subsidize a multi-billion dollar industry yet they can't figure out a way to find the same money to fix our streets or fund our schools. It's just amazing how that works. "

Media attention wrote on May 12, 2007 10:10 PM:

" i urge everyone to contact national news agencys that believe we are catering to the ileagal. Such as Bill Oreilly and let them know what is happening in our community. Napa was built not on the wine industry but from the Military, commuters, and family owned businesses. Wine only became a factor in the last 20 years. our elected official, (mayor?) love to hobnob with the rich and famous is why they cater to the wine industry. I thought Napa was just fine before with its raggity old clock tower and orchards everywhere. My condo would of probably cost 250,000 less then the 445,000 I paid. Napa Native. "

Shawna wrote on May 14, 2007 6:53 AM:

" This is total crap. I wrote a comment the other day in regards to the drive by shooting on Laurel and stated that this is the kind of neighborhood you get for $500,000. That comment was not printed. Why? What was so wrong with what was said. The truth hurts. Don't you people get the fact that if you keep this place quant, that is what makes the people like it here. Why do you think Bodaga Bay is still small? Because that is how is should be. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy