NVR Logo
Study: County has nearly 7,000 farmworkers
Monday, May 07, 2007
Save and Share Share
Most Napa Valley farmworkers are residents of Napa County, and many have never heard of the county's three farmworker centers, according to a new report on farmworker housing demand from a rural think tank.

The Davis-based California Institute for Rural Studies plans to outline the findings in its study to the newly created Napa County Housing Authority on Tuesday.
The study found that there were 6,790 farmworkers in Napa Valley in 2005, and that 64 percent lived permanently in Napa County. Most of those -- 86 percent -- in an apartment or a garage, according to the study.

About 21 percent of farmworkers said they had never heard of the valley's farmworker centers.
About 40 percent of farmworkers were accompanied by a spouse, with 32 percent of farmworker households reporting children under the age of 18. About 35 percent of farmworkers lived in adjacent counties or in the Central Valley.

The institute will make several recommendations for managing farmworker housing, principally to keep housing center costs competitive with the economic demands of migrant workers. Many migrants are single men who have obligations to send money home to Mexico. The institute estimated that about $250 per month in housing costs were consistent with that need. The institute also recommended finding some way to advertise the centers, something the current operators are doing now with flyers and radio spots. The institute also recommended creating more affordable housing for families in Napa County.
"More and more we're seeing farm labor shortages, so it has become more and more important for agricultural areas to attract a quality workforce," said Ron Strochlic, executive director of the institute.

The study is the first of its kind for Napa County for at least the last several years, according to Howard Siegel, Napa County's community partnership manager. The study is the result of legal pressure from groups that sued the county over a lack of affordable housing in years past.

"This basically grew out of a lawsuit," Strochlic said. "Hopefully something good will come out of this."

The study paints a picture of farmworker life at a time when the county is due to take control of farmworker centers in the valley in the wake of wake of financial mismanagement by the previous agency, the Napa Valley Housing Authority.

The county took over administration of the farmworker centers from the Napa Valley Housing Authority in April, after former director Peter Dreier used $1.4 million in the city of Napa's housing reserves without authorization to cover construction cost overruns at the Mondavi and Calistoga farmworker centers last year.

Dreier retired under pressure in December. Local lawmakers are still in negotiations over how to cover the cost overruns. Meanwhile, the new Napa County Housing Authority passed a $1.2 million budget last week for the current year, estimating at least $971,000 in costs to run the farmworker camps.

Pam Kindig, county auditor-controller, said a draft audit of the Napa Valley Housing Authority's actions is due to be presented to the county on May 15.

Siegel said the county has little idea of what occupancy rates will be at the two newly-renovated farmworker centers, which have had vacancy problems before new construction. But Siegel estimates the county will be up to speed on how to run the centers within six months of a July takeover date.

The county is negotiating with the California Human Development Corporation, the current contractors hired to run the centers.

"Hopefully we will have the benefit of the same operations firm that has been managing these camps," he said. "Hopefully we will be doing what has been done. ... We won't be reinventing the wheel."

Siegel said the farmworker centers, which have 180 spots available, are targeted toward a small population of farmworkers who might otherwise not find housing during peak grape production times.

"It clearly is the focus for the folks that are here less than twelve months out of the year," he said.
10 comment(s)

Sandra wrote on May 7, 2007 8:36 AM:

" What is the time frame of "peak grape production times."? "

To Sandra wrote on May 7, 2007 3:05 PM:

" I think the "peak grape production time" mentioned in this article refers to harvest in the fall. "

You're kidding! wrote on May 7, 2007 3:06 PM:

" Quote - Many migrants are single men who have obligations to send money home to Mexico. The institute estimated that about $250 per month in housing costs were consistent with that need - End Quote. What nonsense! We all have obligations to make money for our families. Why should we create housing that is limited to $250 per month, which includes three meals a day, just for farmworkers? Why not for every working man and woman in Napa County? Call it what it is - rent control. And if we can do that for farmworkers from Mexico we should damn well do it for our own citizens!!! "

checkyoursix wrote on May 7, 2007 3:45 PM:

" I like the title of the pictures next to this article, "Pride on Parade". It goes onto to show mexicans carrying mexican flags in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Why can't we have white people having a parade and showing pride? Is pride only for certain ethnic groups? "

chuck wrote on May 7, 2007 4:09 PM:

" Another worthless government study. Another layer of government employees to further mismanage tax dollars. Another program for the sole benefit of illegal aliens Why not let the market decide if there are enough farm workers? Just like the market decides if there are enough realtors, computer programmers and doctors. Wake up California, the days of the five year plans are over; even in Communist China. "

Paul wrote on May 7, 2007 4:54 PM:

" "64% live permanently in Napa County"... I know many who have lived here 20 years or so and still refuse to learn English. "Es mas dificil!!" Additionally, many have imported their non-English speaking families into our schools. Interesting feature in the NR last week about the Queen and Princesses of "cinco de mayo"; were there there no anglo candidates? I found it intesting to see the "queen" article directly opposite an article quoting teachers moaning about all the money, effort and time going into ESL classes. You should have an ongoing feature about assimilation into the US by the high tide of current immigrants. "

No room at the inn wrote on May 7, 2007 7:35 PM:

" Not a single house built to house any of the workers that the County and the Farm Bureau attract! "

Kevin G wrote on May 7, 2007 9:51 PM:

" Some "odd" numbers ... in terms of money and in terms of numbers of people. Being one of the "thousands" of Mare Island workers that were forced to leave the area , (yes , min. wage jobs were offered to some of us) I can only again , wonder WHY, when we were being closed , more halfway liveable wage jobs were not found . I was born and raised there in Napa and have since retired(in Wash, state).... never to return to my home . You people running the show down there have made it like "Northern Oakland! ....class of 68 "

Rural scholar wrote on May 8, 2007 11:51 AM:

" This is a wonderful piece of research! CIRS is to be commended on a rigorous and relevant study. Hopefully this research will help all people of Napa County learn to appreciate each other's struggles and to create a more welcoming environmental for all. "

like I said wrote on May 8, 2007 4:06 PM:

" for some strange reason my comments are not getting posted, I'm beginning to think that the majority of the comments are being posted by the registers workers. In regards to all the farmworkers housing, they deserve it for working so hard to accomplish they work american citizens are not able...or not willing to do. They get paid less than min. wage to do the dirty jobs. To Kevin G- you are probably one of the employees at the register otherwise you wouldn't have know about the min. wage comment I tried to post, but was not posted and to Rural Scholar I have to agree with you there, people need to appreciate all the hardworking people,not just themselves, this is a great nation of Freedom and different cultures.Please stop the wars, the racism, the hate. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy