NVR Logo
Big change may come to small school
Howell Mountain School teacher Shannon Beglin works with students, from left, Holly Staid, Meribel Beringer and Stefanie Otterbeck as August Tam, center, and Brook Holister, right, wait their turns. Howell Mountain School could get crowded if Pacific Union College’s “Eco-Village” development brings new students to the area. Lianne Milton/Register | Buy photos
Angwin development would prompt expansion at Howell Mountain School
Friday, April 20, 2007
Save and Share Share
Howell Mountain School, the only campus in the smallest public school district in Napa County, could become a lot larger under a plan proposed by Pacific Union College.

The school serves 84 students, kindergarten through eighth grade. If PUC’s “Eco-Village” plan to create 391 new residents goes forward, the tiny school would see its population rise.
How much it would grow depends on who you talk to.

Thomas Stubbs, superintendent of the Howell Mountain Elementary School District, said a typical formula for growth is that you can expect one new student for every two households. That would suggest the district would gain 195 new students, more than twice as many as are accommodated now.
Angwin resident Duane Cronk, an opponent of the PUC plan and member of the group Save Rural Angwin, estimated that the housing units would bring in about 242 new elementary-aged students and 78 high school students. Angwin teens who attend public school go to St. Helena High School.

Then again, Angwin already has about 2,000 residents today and only 84 students are enrolled at Howell Mountain School.
Stubbs said that because the PUC plan is still a work in progress,  it is hard to know what the school needs to do to prepare.

“We have (attended community meetings) not as supporters of either side, but participating just to get the information,” Stubbs said. “I want as much information as I can possibly get so we can make calculated, accurate decision as to how this project might impact our school district.”

Because the new homes would produce tax funds that would go directly to the school district, not all impacts on the school would be negative, said Peter Bartelme, consultant to Triad Communities, which is PUC’s partner in the proposed Eco-Village.

“Conservative estimates show that an abundance of funds will more than cover costs incurred by the schools from additional students. With a surplus available for school improvements, students are the winners here,” he said.

Because Howell Mountain Elementary School District is a basic aid district, it relies on a portion of the county’s property tax revenue to fund the school. A preliminary study by Triad Communities estimates that more than $2 million in operational funding is likely to go to the district, and capital funding would create another $1 million. Capital funding — money that could be used to build new facilities — would come from the property taxes. Money to run the school would come from the developer fees.

Still, opponents say growth in Angwin is not good for the school.

“We think it would be a disaster because the school as it exists now cannot accommodate that large an enrollment and it would mean having to find another site for a school. I don’t know where they would find that,” Cronk said.

Others, however, have noted that the new housing units may attract Seventh-day Adventists, who established PUC and still form a large part of the population in Angwin, and that students may attend private Seventh-day Adventists schools in the area. Of the 391 new homes PUC is proposing, about half are on campus and are designed to support college students and staff.

Said Cronk, “A few (new residents) may find their way to the Adventist school in Angwin, but not many because only a fraction of the newcomers would be PUC faculty and staff.”

For Stubbs, though, right now it’s a waiting game.

“We’ve just been carefully gathering information. I’m not paying to do any studies yet because we want to wait until they finalize what this thing is going to look like,” he said.

Number crunch

Thomas Stubbs, superintendent of the Howell Mountain Elementary School District, said typically you can expect one new student for every two households. That would suggest the district would gain 195 new students, more than twice as many as are accommodated now.
9 comment(s)

*sigh* wrote on Apr 20, 2007 8:46 AM:

" Once again we see arbitrary numbers pulled out of the air by the Save Rural Angwin people. The formula of .5 students per household for elementary students and .2 students per household for high school is a tried and true state formula. SRA's numbers are nothing but arbitrary numbers intended to scare people. It's really too bad the register didn't verify the formula. Duane was even told specifically by the Howell Mountain School project manager to expect an increase of 66 to 189 students; an opinion independent of triad or PUC. When are we going to learn to deal with facts rather than fantasy simply to try and prove a point. "

Justin wrote on Apr 20, 2007 9:54 AM:

" The headline should have been, "At this time, nobody really has any idea what school impacts will be." Obviously, it needs more study by experts. "

NoGrowthAtAll wrote on Apr 20, 2007 2:08 PM:

" There are some sexy vinters in Pope Valley that might make you guys look good. Why don't you move down there? Why are you so desparate to do business with the PUC folks? Does anyone even have any money? To all the underprivileged people, I got an email from a school I attended that just raised $174.5 million in donations and I still had to take out $120k to attend this school (nobody helped me), and I don't feel to bad about it. Why is everyone trying to rip PUC off with less than $300 million for it's only lasting asset? Why don't you guys pick on someone better proportioned to deal with the stuff you try to feed them? How much of the consulting fees are coming out of the PUC account. This is how it all starts! "

Spining our School wrote on Apr 20, 2007 9:53 PM:

" Here is the spin. Here are the lies. Here are the happy, chirpy comments that come out of the Triad control room.....Napa County is not fooled......if it was all this easy to have a developer build houses and make every single problem go away, we would be a sea of houses....does any one believe the followning Traid comment?“Conservative estimates show that an abundance of funds will more than cover costs incurred by the schools from additional students. With a surplus available for school improvements, students are the winners here,” he said. Who are these people? And why have they become experts on our small village? "

NoGrowthAtAll wrote on Apr 21, 2007 9:48 PM:

" Typical, to PUC, Foothills, Howell Mtn. and the pathetic people who run those schools and who attend... "I want to go to school, but I don't want to pay anything. I'm going to see if I can get a free ride, so the school I attend isn't able to keep up with inflation. Then I'm going to send my children to the same school and thus create a race of co-dependent people who take a school and town into bankruptcy." To the comment below. Unless, you've grown up in Angwin, I probably know a bit more about the place than you'd ever want to know. "

Am I Missing Something? wrote on Apr 23, 2007 6:04 PM:

" Some of you commenting here may not have been in Angwin for long, because enrollment in all schools was formerly much higher than it is now. Also, in case you were unaware, the SDA schools in Angwin and Deer Park have a high percentage of non-SDA students from homes in Angwin and Deer Park. If there are 1200 homes in Angwin with only 84 students at HME, I seriously doubt a 33% increase in the number of homes would result in the 288% growth in students at HME predicted by Mr. Cronk. "

NoGrowthAtAll wrote on Apr 24, 2007 4:30 PM:

" I'm not here to play number games with you, and yes you are probably missing something. "

Am I Missing Something? wrote on Apr 26, 2007 11:48 AM:

" 1200 homes = rural = paradise. 1600 homes = city = environmental disaster. "

Econut wrote on Apr 26, 2007 7:06 PM:

" NoGrowthAtAll, I'm totally with you. Please, no more growth! However, it ain't gonna happen anytime soon for two reasons: (1) immigration > emigration and (2) births > deaths. Only about 20% of the growth in California is due to immigration. Rather than denying people space to live (I happen to like the eco-village concept), education and economic incentives are the keys to reducing population growth. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy