NVR Logo
New First Street bridge plan gets OK
Downtown span will feature ribbon of illuminated glass
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Save and Share Share
The last of downtown Napa’s new bridges, a replacement span over the Napa River at First Street near Copia, will be the fanciest.

A ribbon of illuminated glass will run the length of the bridge under each sidewalk, casting a glow onto the piers below. There will be four overlooks with benches at the corners, with lights perched atop sleek obelisks.
And per the wishes of neighboring homeowners and the Napa City Council, the railings will be green, not gray as preferred by a larger community group.

The color of the railings was decided Tuesday by the council, which also certified the project’s environmental studies. Those moves set the stage for construction to begin, potentially this summer.
More realistically, construction won’t start until 2008, giving the city more time to negotiate right-of-way acquisitions from adjoining properties, said Graham Wadsworth, a city engineer.

The replacement bridge will be two lanes, like the current one, but with eight-foot shoulders for bicycles and wide 10-foot sidewalks with green metal railings.
The design, by T.Y. Lin International and MacDonald Architects, has elements that echo the existing bridge, a 1908 span on the National Register of Historic Places, but reflects the aesthetic of today as well, Wadsworth said.

The 1908 bridge qualified for the National Register as the first concrete and steel truss bridge in Napa County. Napa County Landmarks nominated the bridge for the National Register in an effort to save it.

Ultimately, the City Council concluded it would be too costly to try to retain the old bridge, which risks collapse in an earthquake and obstructs water in a major flood.

Eliminating this flood obstruction is necessary to make the Napa River flood control project work, officials said. The new bridge will be four feet higher than the old.

Because of greater height, the new span will require elevating the First Street approaches. This will mean retaining walls three to five feet tall in front of four houses at the southeast corner of First and Juarez Street.

These neighbors requested a green railing, saying it would be more compatible with their Victorian-era homes than a gray railing.

Gordon Huether, chair of the city of Napa Planning Commission, and Bernhard Krevet, president of Friends of the Napa River, complained Tuesday that the color had been switched from gray to green at the last moment without public notice.

This seemed like an “end run around the public process,” said Huether, who believes that gray better matched the bridge’s contemporary design.

The council was unanimous that the wishes of those living closest to the bridge should be respected. These families will bear the brunt of the project, Councilman Peter Mott said.

“Their homes are already seriously impacted,” Councilman Mark van Gorder said. “It seems the very least we can do is grant them the color they want to have.”

When construction starts, this summer or next, it will close First Street between McKinstry and Juarez streets for 18 months.

The bridge, which will be 151 feet long, is estimated to cost $8 million, with the Federal Highway Administration paying 88.5 percent of construction costs. The city will pay the remainder from gas tax revenues.

“We’re struggling to get the project built as quick as possible so construction costs don’t continue to go up,” Wadsworth said.

In 2004, the construction component was estimated to cost $5 million. Today’s estimate is $7 million.

The city slowed the project to bring the public more fully into the design process and do additional environmental studies. Several extremely modern designs were rejected because they would have cost $2 million more.
23 comment(s)

Napa Native wrote on Apr 5, 2007 12:25 AM:

" Man, all these new bridges suck. What exactly was wrong with the old ones? "

we the people of Napa wrote on Apr 5, 2007 12:47 AM:

" here we go again. I've had as much i can take. The City Council is wasting 8 millions dollars. We need to fire all of them. 'The 1908 bridge qualified for the National Register as the first concrete and steel truss bridge in Napa County. Napa County Landmarks nominated the bridge for the National Register in an effort to save it. Ultimately, the City Council concluded it would be too costly to try to retain the old bridge, which risks collapse in an earthquake and obstructs water in a major flood' Is the City Council telling us it would cost more then 8 million dollars? Do they really think we are that stupit? "

REPUBLICAN KID wrote on Apr 5, 2007 9:30 AM:

" Why do we need the new bridge right now? That area is below the river,At first and silverado tr. It will still flood regardless. Fix the creek first then take a look at this area. "

blg wrote on Apr 5, 2007 9:35 AM:

" Wouldnt it be nice to have nothing more to worry about than if someone changed the color of a bridge without a public hearing? "

Demo Cracy wrote on Apr 5, 2007 10:41 AM:

" I'm glad the color got changed to one the neighbors like. "Friends of the Napa River" is well named -- no friends of the humans nearby... Do you really thing the river cares about the color of the bridge? "

napahillbilly wrote on Apr 5, 2007 11:15 AM:

" Can't the city council find anything better to spend seven million on rather than a little tiny bridge. Only the tourists driving in on Silverado trail will use it probably. The bridge that is there is beaurtiful and historic and apparently just like our beautiful old downtown this will soon be just another fond memory. How about putting in something for the young people of this town. They got nothing! You would think all we are as a community are wine guzzling tourists who can't wait to go to Copia. Wake up from your nightmare Napa. I will tell you that although you think you are all high and mighty with your wine and tourists money you really need to pay attention to the people, the real people in this town, not just the tourists. We matter too and we liked the bridge just the way it was. All of ths garbage about the 'flood plan'. I have lived here fifty-three years and I ain't at the bottom of the river yet. Shame on your waste and you lies. "

Barry wrote on Apr 5, 2007 11:58 AM:

" To repeat what is in the story, almost 90 percent of this work will be paid by the federal government, funds set aside for highway and bridge work. Although many would agree that the existing bridge is attractive, it is not structurally sound. There are many places where the rebar is exposed as the concrete has deteriorated. And what was wrong with the old bridges is that they blocked high flood water flows. The new bridges are higher to allow all that water to flow beneath. "

wantmoreinfo wrote on Apr 5, 2007 12:30 PM:

" Why can't the Register include a picture of the proposed bridge? "

Happy wrote on Apr 5, 2007 3:09 PM:

" Everything has a life span and it sounds like the old one had done its duty well but is time to be replaced. I'm happy that thought is being given to design a new bridge that will be beautiful as well as functional. After all, this is our home and we all deserve to have it be clean, attractive as well as functional. If you don't like the direction that is being taken, join one of the committees and help work on the project. "

Sick n Tired wrote on Apr 5, 2007 5:41 PM:

" That's it. Enough, I've had enough. I'm leaving. Napa used to be a nice place to live and work. I used to enjoy living here. Now it takes 15-20 min to cross town instead of 5-10. Oh, and thank you for all the new signal lights installed the past few years. Now I get to look forward to another bridge project and more congestion on our streets. Hey, while your at it, why not start working on the new 1st street bridge over Hwy 29? Goodbye Napa. I've had enough of your traffic congestion, road construction, bridge replacements and yes, your illegal alien problem. Good luck, hope you survive. "

Vince wrote on Apr 5, 2007 8:00 PM:

" Napa and Napa County has some of the oldest bridges in California. The people of Napa need to fight and preserve these. I urge the Napa Landmark to rally the people. If we can save the Opera House why can't we save the bridges. Our heritage is being lost!! "

Debbie wrote on Apr 6, 2007 8:39 AM:

" It seems funny that you would complain about this bridge (and the others that came before)and then likely be the first ones to complain about the lack of action on building new bridges that contributes to the next big flood in the area. Anyone remember the pictures of the cinedome in Jan 2005? It's unfortunate we have to give up some nice old bridges, and spend alot of money doing it. However, the repeated floods cost us on a regular basis, so a choice must get made. I continue to support the flood control, I just wish the state and feds would hold up their end of the deal (wishful thinking) "

Les wrote on Apr 6, 2007 9:17 PM:

" During the last downtown flood was caused by Napa Creek jumping its banks and flooded everything to the river. The Ox Bow and First Street bridge weren't impacted. Wrong priorities for Flood Control... "

Napan wrote on Apr 7, 2007 7:58 AM:

" The reconstruction of the bridge makes sense to me, but the extravagance of the illuminated glass does not make sense. If we lowered the cost of the bridge a bit, perhaps some of the streets in Napa could be repaired. It's rediculous. Patchwork everywhere that wears away with each storm. Please, please put some money into repaving the streets in the city of Napa. "

Hello? wrote on Apr 7, 2007 12:09 PM:

" To Napa Native, Where were you in 1986, 1995, 1997, and 2005 when the heart of Napa was underwater and national level disasters were proclaimed by Presidents Reagan, Clinton and Bush? These bridges are being replaced because more than 2/3 of the citizens of Napa voted for a 1/2 cent sales tax that has since been leveraged to secure tens of millions of state and federal funds. This was an astute move on the part of visionary leaders in Napa! It will be a beautiful day when this comprehensive and environmentally sensitive project is completed and Napans can no longer face a significant flooding threat. "

REPUBLICAN KID wrote on Apr 7, 2007 2:24 PM:

" The area will still flood even with out a bridge there in 1862 long before the bridge the area at 3rd st and juares st was 7 feet under water "

Bye wrote on Apr 7, 2007 6:12 PM:

" Dear Sick and Tired, Good bye. We will not miss you and your griping. Why don't you move to a place like Walnut Creek or some other hole that caters entirely to people who can't get out of their cars. I'm sure the traffic is great there. We'll walk, thanks. Oh, you can walk across Napa in a half hour, easy. "

Napa Native wrote on Apr 8, 2007 2:16 AM:

" In response to "Hello?": Yes of course I was there during those years. The serious floods started happening when they stopped dredging the river. This whole flood control project is a complete sham and an utter waste of money, and if you can't see that, I feel sorry for you. It is the probably the worst thing that's every happened to Napa. Hundreds of millions of dollars wasted, pointless destruction, irreplaceable landmarks destroyed, and the river will continue to flood just as it did in the beginning of last year. "

our town? wrote on Apr 9, 2007 9:55 AM:

" All or most of the constuction going on around the napa river is meant to pacify out side investors and convince then to build here, develop here and many of those pushing city hall on all of these proposals are profiting from the sale of the properties that would normally be considered flood prone we pay they play we lose they gain "

Barry wrote on Apr 9, 2007 2:44 PM:

" The comments of "Les" and "Napa Native" are factually incorrect. The flood of 12/31/05 occurred on Napa Creek and other tributaries AND on the Napa River. I'm sure the many people flooded east of Soscol would be surprised to learn that the "Oxbow and First Street Bridge weren't impacted." It is also incorrect that "serious floods started happening when they stopped dredging the river." Dredging of the river below Third Street is done on about 8-10 years intervals, and it is due for dredging now. In regard to replacing the First Street Bridge, it is part of the larger plan for Flood Control, in which all of the improvements, working together, will provide flood protection. Today we have only a portion of the Project built. Yet to come are the Oxbow bypass channel and all of the floodwalls. "

Kevin wrote on Apr 12, 2007 7:29 AM:

" You can dredge and channel all you want, but during heavy rains when Conn Dam is overflowing, there is a high tide and the wind is out of the south the river is still going to flood! "

mominapa wrote on Apr 12, 2007 9:54 AM:

" The flooding started when the tourists and celebrities began buying up the land and putting their vineyards on the sides of the hills. Elementary school is where I learned about soil errosion, mudslides and flooding. Pretty simple, but when the celebs send out their party invitations they give directions according to which vineyard they own on the side of a prominent hill which used to contain stately Redwood trees. Quit hiding behind money, Napa City Council, and find something affordable, fun and creative for our children to do. How about an art show for artists under 18 where they can sell their artwork, make a little money for themselves and some recognition in the community or begin a Junior Arts Council or a recreation department that is not a total joke. "

Native Napan wrote on Apr 12, 2007 12:17 PM:

" Thany you, mominapa! This flood control thing is elitist nonsense. Vineyards have had a tremendously negative impact on the local environs in recent years. I have great respect for many of the old-time vintners and grape-growers, but these celebrity types and trashy yuppies who buy vineyards and wineries as status symbols make me absolutely sick. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy