NVR Logo
Concern rising over homeless problem in Napa
Napa Police chief worried prison crowding crisis could add to troubles
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Save and Share Share
Napa’s homeless problem continues to vex city officials, with Police Chief Rich Melton warning Tuesday the situation could get worse if the state cuts its prison population.

Either Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or a federal judge could decide within the next few months to ease prison overcrowding by releasing thousands of inmates early, Melton said.
“It appears imminent that something significant could happen,” said Melton, who worries that this could bring more crime to Napa. “You (will) start having a more violent population,” he said.

Recent high-profile crimes, including several robberies, a stabbing and a murder, have put Napa’s homeless population in the public eye. The city and social service agencies sponsored a forum last month on continuing problems associated with the city’s homeless people.
Police responded to more than 3,000 calls for service involving homeless people last year, up 20 percent from the year before, Melton said.

On Saturday, city employees and workers with other agencies mounted a day-long cleanup effort at homeless encampments along the river. They filled more than three Dumpsters worth of trash, Melton said.
Melton said the homeless problem, targeted for years by social service agencies and police, needs a fresh effort to find solutions.

“There needs to be some policy-level oversight on a regular basis of all the agencies that deal with it,” the chief said. No agency can do it alone, he said.

Charlene Horton, program director of the Napa Valley Shelter Project, said local cities and agencies launched a Homeless Policy Council last fall, but the effort lost momentum. “It needs to regroup,” she said.

A long-standing group, the Homeless Services Planning Council — The Continuum of Care, continues to meet regularly to coordinate services, she said.

Social service agencies are doing good work with the homeless population, Horton said, but the public’s perception is soured by the behaviors of a relatively small number of troublemakers.

These individuals, numbering just a few dozen, don’t want to turn their lives around, she said. Instead, they flaunt “streetwise” behaviors that antagonize neighbors, she said.

Within two months, the city expects to hold a public hearing on a new use permit for the Hope Resource Center on Fourth Street that serves the homeless.

Many nearby residents and businesses view the Hope center as a magnet for people with mental and drug problems who hang out all day in downtown Napa. The center is between the Salvation Army and First Presbyterian Church, where free meals are served daily.

The council was scheduled to approve $700,000 in federal Community Development Block Grants Tuesday for social service agencies, including $8,700 to repaint the interior of the Hope center.

Councilwoman Juliana Inman questioned this expenditure. What if the center’s use permit extension is denied? she said.

Rather than use federal money to paint the center, Inman suggested churches or community groups could do the job with volunteer help, assuming the center stays downtown.

Councilman Jim Krider said the homeless could do the work. “There are people in the community who have plenty of free time,” he said.

The council won’t make a final decision on how to spend the federal money until May.

Napa City Manager Mike Parness said hearings on the future of the Hope center should happen by June.

The center opened in the fall of 2001 to provide job search, social services and laundry and shower facilities during the day.

“The Hope center is really a critical component of adult homeless services,” Horton said. “If it didn’t exist, then what?”

The problems of some homeless people are so seemingly intractable that the situation can be “discouraging,” Horton said. “These people can be very challenging to work with. It can also be very rewarding when they do succeed.”

The issue of homelessness is significant enough that it should be discussed by the Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency, Councilman Mark van Gorder said. The agency recently expanded its membership and added a new mission as a forum for issues of countywide significance.

“I don’t believe it’s just a Napa problem,” Krider said.
27 comment(s)

PHWYLIE wrote on Apr 5, 2007 4:20 AM:

" If you build it, they will come. In droves. "

JJ wrote on Apr 5, 2007 6:55 AM:

" Since it seems the homeless are not going away, but they disturb the downtown area due to their shelter location. Would moving them to the outskirts of town help? "

Exasperated wrote on Apr 5, 2007 7:23 AM:

" Two ideas: 1) Care, Not Cash for Napa. Sure, help these people out, but don't give them handouts! 2) Move the Hope Center (and all other services) OUT OF DOWNTOWN!!! With all of the wonderful and exciting things going on downtown, increasing a 'magnet' place for them like the Hope Center is like a monkey wrench in the works. "

How many? wrote on Apr 5, 2007 8:22 AM:

" If we weren't protecting the rights of illegal aliens in this town maybe we could make a "small" dent in the population in our courts and jail. We don't need criminal imports to our town, I'm sure we have enough of our own to handle. "

Jerry wrote on Apr 5, 2007 9:36 AM:

" So what Ms. Inman is saying,is that the negative perception of the homeless situation, is based on the so called couple of dozen folks that don't want to turn their lives around. These people, most of them not from Napa, know the system, and work the system for every nickle they can get. No lines at the shelters here, and the word is getting out.Probably eat three or four times a day free in town, free medical, dental, and a clean place to stay. Get blasted all day, sober up in time to get into the shelter at night, and so on. I believe in helping folks that can and do want to better their lives, not setting up early retirement for these scumbags "

Dan wrote on Apr 5, 2007 9:43 AM:

" "DON'T GIVE THEM STUFF" NO fresh "effort" for a solution is needed. "DON'T GIVE THEM STUFF" and the majority will be gone in a week. I lived in San Francisco for 15 years and I experienced the homeless a great deal. S.F. "GIVES THEM STUFF" and the situation there is horrible. New York City once had a bad homeless problem until Mayor Guiliani stopped, well you the rest. My son and I recently walked form Battery Park to Central Park and not once were we harrassed by the homeless. I'm quite surprised that the city officials are "vexed" since the solution is so simple. I'll be attending the public hearing regarding a use permit for the Hope Resource Center. "

Jonnie wrote on Apr 5, 2007 9:59 AM:

" Has anyone ever thought that if we stopped giving away free meals and making it comfortable for homeless to just hangout all day, (taking no responsibility for themselves), that maybe they might go somewhere else? Hell let's help them in a different way. Here's an idea, let's take all of these Vine busses that noone rides, and give them all free rides to a city of their choice. Say like Oakland , or Seattle. "

napahillbilly wrote on Apr 5, 2007 11:38 AM:

" The crime in this town is NOT caused by the little tiny homeless population in Napa. The federal government for once has the right idea to fighting crime by strengthening enforcement against the Mexican gangs and the meth guys. The homeless people in Napa have it made. I have been one, I know. Derilicts and drug addicts used to go to the state hospital till they closed that and now the prisons closing will definitely cause problems as far as crime goes but don't blame it on the homeless. They're just trying to get some cigs or a bottle. They don't want no trouble. Meth guys and the gangs are your culprits! The chronic homeless are frequently mentally impaired or dememted and need to be housed accordingly. They are sick and we just choose to call them homeless because we refuse to deal with them on the level that they should be, in permanent care. These people are not rational enough to make the right decisions and it is up to society to make it for them. We get what we deserve and for the homeless just leave em alone if you can't help em and don't even blame them for all of your crime troubles. We as a society only have ourselves to blame. Come on. Who are you trying to kid anyhow? "

Why? wrote on Apr 5, 2007 12:15 PM:

" Why are WE paying $8700 to re paint the Hope Center? Pay for the paint and have those who will benefit from the center help re paint it. "

Rarely Agree! wrote on Apr 5, 2007 12:32 PM:

" Funny this time I agree with most of the posts here! We are all one paycheck away from being homeless. However sadly I too have found that those that are homeless do so by choice! Yes there is the mentality challenged. And those with substance abuse issues. Sadly we had one in my family too. Got moved from family to family! What helped? The "Tough Love" approach! She knew her last stop was with us! We showed her how to get a job. Permanent housing. Avenues to pursue to get help. Even got her abit cleaned up narcotics wise. But we told her it all came down to if She Wanted To Succeed! Honestly I think she had hoped that she would have a permanent home with us! At the age of 46, I don't think so! We gave her six months. In that time she succeeded till it was time for her to go! And without having to use force, she did! Is our concious clear? Yes because we knew we gave her the tools to succeed. She choose not to follow those steps taught to her! Sadly I agree with Napahillbilty. However we have the ones who felt that many should not be institutionalized and simply put into group homes. Works for some but not who need the regimentation of an institution. Should we go back to this system of care? Well we've seen the other product? What does that tell you? Homelessness should not be a crime issue. However trespassing. Sleeping in a dwelling without permission from the owner or agent of the property controlled. Or aggressively begging for money is a crime! There are food pantries one can get a meal. Maybe not a gourmet meal but it will fill your belly! Think again Napahillbilty, there are some issues that are criminal. May not be to you however as long as they are on the books, they are criminal! And no I too will not give just a few coins or a dollar to feed one's alcohol or drug problem. And no...I'm not obligated or have to care for the many homeless! I have enough issues with my own job and maintaining my own home as is! I have to work for a living! Not adopt every homeless person! We should take a lesson from NTC! It is hard in this economy to live day to day. Many make it. Many don't! Many must go with society's norms whether we like it or not! Maybe we should learn one thing...grow up and take responsibilty for yourself! "

Mason wrote on Apr 5, 2007 2:06 PM:

" Just remember to treat homeless people with respect and love as though you were meeting Jesus. "

irishrover94558 wrote on Apr 5, 2007 2:18 PM:

" I am one of those so-called homeless. I am transitionally homeless. I work every day. I stay at the shelter. I know the people who are the one pay check away. People there is no simple answer to this solution. But unfortunately that small percentage of people whom in the article "flaunt" their status do make it bad for the remainder of the homeless and struggling to make a better life for ourselves. Moving the Hpe Center out of downtown to another area of town just simply isn't practical. And to the readers who feel all of us need to be run out on a rail, let me remind you that the homeless person could be the well dressed individual riding alone on one of those busses going to work; shopping in your store; dining in your restaurant. You would not know that person was homeless because of the stereotypical description of someone. I attended and spoke at the forum. I was the only homeless person who bravely stood up and admitted I was to the crowd there. I reminded the several dozen or so individuals there of my plight. I do not condone what those who have trashed this town - whether they understand what they are doing or not - but to assume all homeless are scumbags, ought to be run out of town, and do not appreciate what we are working for, is simply a shame. We need these services to survive. And we do accept responsibility - those that care - for our actions. We may be the invisible homeless but we do exist admist the vines. "

Sandra wrote on Apr 5, 2007 2:25 PM:

" I agree with most of the posts. But I do feel terrible for those with mental illnesses. I work in the strip mall complex by Nob Hill. We have our own homeless guy. He is obviously mentally ill. So far he has been harmless, but the poor guy is a mess. He talks to invisible people all day long. In the winter I worry he will freeze at night, and in the summer I worry he will die from the heat since he won't remove any of the heavy clothes he has worn for 4 years. He smells so bad that you can't go near him. We have tried getting him help, but he refuses it. People like him should be institutionalized. Maybe with proper medication he could live a more normal life. But thanks to former Governor Reagan he can no longer be forced into getting care. We have dead beats taking advantage, and the people who really need help fall through the cracks. It is just so sad. "

PHYLIE wrote on Apr 5, 2007 2:26 PM:

" Again, if you build it, they will come. In droves. "

sad! wrote on Apr 5, 2007 2:38 PM:

" "The Hope center is really a critical component of adult homeless services,” Horton said. “If it didn’t exist, then what?” Then, these people would LEAVE NAPA! Is that really so vexing? It's not like these people would stick around and starve in Napa when they know any other bay area city will give them a handout. I don't hate people that have no place to live, so don't think these comments are directed in that way at all. It's just simple logic! I've seen less homeless people in NYC, honestly! "

napanative wrote on Apr 5, 2007 4:35 PM:

" Being homeless does not equate to being worthless. Some of the posts suggest moving the homeless out of town. Is that "out of sight, out of mind". Treat others how you wished to be treated. Not all of these people chose to end up on the streets seeking help. Sometimes, circumstances just happen. We should all have compassion and help these people. "

to napanative wrote on Apr 5, 2007 5:31 PM:

" so, tell what exactly the homeless hanging out all day downtown and under bridges adding to our community? True, they are not any less human than you or I but they are not adding anything positive to Napa! Of course one day my family or myself could end up broke without a place to live but you can be positive I would not spend my time waiting for handouts. We don't need to advertise that if you come to Napa you will get star treatment, complete with a newly painted place to sleep. Why don't they just spend the rest of the $700,000 painting underneath the bridges in Napa. There is nothing better to spend money on here! "

Stacy Marvelous wrote on Apr 5, 2007 5:44 PM:

" We have been warned by our police chief that we will soon start having a more violent population here in river city because of prison overcrowding and the need to release these violent predators on California's population. This is plain idiotic and irresponsible as far as our elected officials are concerned. The problem of prison overcrowding and the problem of homelessness can both be solved very easily by doing two things. One, raise our state sales tax by an amount that will pay for the building of more prisons to take care of the overcrowding for once and for all. Two, make homelessness a crime and fill those new prisons with them. This is a simple and humane solution that will make Napa a safe and happy place to live in again. "

joshua boles wrote on Apr 6, 2007 8:03 AM:

" you know post of the post about this has maid me sick i grow up around the homeless shelter my grandma has ben working there for 20 years trying to help them get there life back and every one of us and i say us cuz i am homeless right now to are just the same as anyone who ant homeless and everyone who thinks that helping is a wast of time and money i cant wait for the day that they to may need the help "

Exasperated wrote on Apr 6, 2007 12:15 PM:

" To Joshua: I think you may be misdirecting your anger. Many of the posts here aren't saying we shouldn't be helping the homeless. What we are saying is that the center should be located elsewhere and that we shouldn't have to pay to paint it. There is nothing mean-spirited about logic. Yes, we know there are homeless people who are trying to better themselves. Yes, we know that there are many of us who are just a few paychecks from being in the same situation. BUT...we are also saying that we're sick of handouts (paying $8700 to paint the Hope Center) and wary of the effect the many 'bad apples' of the group will have on downtown. There is nothing wrong with having the people who benefit from the center doing the work to paint it. Consider it a 'thank you' for the services you've recieved. There is nothing wrong with moving it out of downtown. Sorry to say it, but the area surrounding the Hope Center will not attract businesses and services that are in line with the ongoing improvement of downtown. "

to joshua wrote on Apr 8, 2007 8:07 PM:

" don't listen to that guy talking down to you. Your anger is directed right where it should be. "

checkyoursix wrote on Apr 10, 2007 12:13 PM:

" I'm just glad our city council is cutting funding for all departments. Less for parks means better environment for the homeless. Less for cops means better environment for the homeless. Think crime is bad now? Just wait. "

Local Yokel wrote on Apr 10, 2007 8:56 PM:

" Most of the homeless are that way because they prefer it to responsibility and self discipline. A lot of us enjoy a little slumming on the weekend, wearing sweats and not having a shave, but not all day or seven days a week. Free food and welfare checks keep them in smokes, drugs and alcohol and they do not care if they slum it under a bridge. Genuine bad luck cases should qualify for help but the bums should be run out of town. Vagrancy should be illegal as it was in times gone by and there was a lot less of it. Yup, tough love. "

Just a Thought wrote on Apr 10, 2007 10:27 PM:

" Instead of putting new condo development in on 1st street why not a homeless shelter? Instead of providing free room and board have the homeless work for their stay if they are not working elsewhere. Help cook meals, clean the shelter, do laundry for the shelter. If there is not enough work in or around the shelter they can work with the City of Napa on clean up or beautification projects around the county. Simple concept, no work no food or shelter. NO FREE RIDES! "

Undereducated. wrote on Apr 12, 2007 3:44 AM:

" One of the problems that has caused homelessness is the lack of education and the inability of some people to maintain a job with a below average skills. Basic reading and writing skills are necesary in today's society. Best of luck to Joshua being able to overcome that... "

BeenThere wrote on Apr 12, 2007 12:32 PM:

" While working I found myself under the Trancas St. bridge a couple years ago and what I saw was shocking. First of all, I had to clearly state my intentions to the individuals in that encampment. As far as they were concerned, I was trespassing and frankly, they were as uncomfortable with me as I was with them. There were three tents, two fire pits and lots of trash. I'm sure that trash was still there when the winter rains came along and washed it away. Along with these three tents and the accompanying camp paraphernalia, there were maybe 10 bicycles and some of them brand new and clearly expensive. Not something that anyone living in that situation could afford to BUY. These people, while you can't help but feel sorry for them, are sick, addicted, down on their luck, call it what you want, but along with whatever label you give it, you have to tag on THIEVES and it needs to stop. The police in Napa are well aware of these illegal encampments but ignore them. I can't have a fire pit on my own property, but these people are left alone to burn "whatever" and leave it to pollute our rivers? How can this be situation be justified by anyone in anyway? It's baffeling. Find a place for these people away from the downtown area. Feed them, treat their illness, give them a place to heal and/or get on their feet but keep them away from the rest of us law abiding, tax paying, hard working citizens who don't need or want the blite put right in front of our noses every day. And while your at it, move those "Day Laborers" out of the Home Depot parking lot. "

irishrover94558 wrote on Apr 12, 2007 12:52 PM:

" To many of you who have basically placed homelessness on the same level as crime, if you were in debt and this was several centuries ago, you too would be in prison. Humanity has good and bad sides. Unfortunately the vitriol commentary shown by several to this article is unfounded. The homeless person you see on the street is not the majority, yet they make all of us homeless or nearly homeless as criminal as the petty thief. The state has no choice. They will either by their own hand OR by a court order release these prisoners throughout the entire state. Every community, large and small, will have to deal with it. Secondly, the Newsome plan in Napa County, while plausible, does still have its "bugs" and may not work in every community. To ther writer that suggested a new shelter, the South Napa Shelter has these features. We cook and clean the shelter. The goal is both sustainable income and sustainable housing. Unfortunately no one has a good solid answer. But lets be mindful of the fact not every homeless person is the bum those you make us out to be. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy