NVR Logo
Ex-teacher sentenced to two years for sex abuse of student
Jorge Covarrubias | Buy photos
Napa math instructor convicted of nine counts of abusing teen
Saturday, March 31, 2007
Save and Share Share
A former Napa High School teacher convicted of sexually abusing a teenager was sentenced on Thursday to two years in state prison.

At the sentencing, Jorge Covarrubias, 32, buried his head in hands, sighed and rubbed his face when Napa Superior Court Visiting Judge Michael Byrne denied probation and handed down the prison sentence.
Covarrubias was sentenced to two years in state prison for each of the nine offenses of which he was convicted. Byrne ruled each of the two-year sentences are to be served concurrently — at the same time — so the true sentence is two years.

Byrne also denied a prosecution request that Covarrubias be forced to register as a sex offender. The judge said two cases — one at the California Supreme Court — have raised the question of whether the crimes Covarrubias was convicted of — sexual abuse of a teen — mandate registration. He indicated he would not require registration unless or until the question is resolved by higher courts.
Covarrubias, a former math teacher at Napa High School, was convicted of sexually abusing the victim, who was also a student at Napa High, but not in Covarrubias’ math class.

The incidents took place between November 2003 and 2004, when the boy, now 18, was 15 years old. Covarrubias and boy met at Napa High School.
The boy and his father had a rocky relationship. The father went to the school and sought advice about his son from Covarrubias, who was also a school counselor. After visiting the victim and his father at their home, Covarrubias offered to let the boy live with him to “straighten him out.” The boy’s father agreed.

Character witnesses

Thursday’s sentencing began with Covarrubias’ supporters testifying about his good character.

Former co-workers, friends and his sister talked about Covarrubias’ contributions to the community and his passion for teaching. They said he was a positive role model for his students and young family members.

A male former student remembered Covarrubias as a “great teacher and great counselor” who always offered good advice.

Covarrubias smiled and nodded his head as his friends recounted their memories of him.

Covarrubias’ Defense attorney Kristine Burk of Southern California touted his achievements since he moved to Napa when he was 14.

“He learned English, graduated from Cal Poly as an engineer. He went on to become a teacher because he loves the job. He will never get his teaching credential back,” Burk said. “He has been responsible. He has been out of custody for 15 months and has showed up for every single court appearance.”

During the trial, the defense maintained the sex acts between Covarrubias and the boy were consensual.

“This is not a case of a sexual predator, a pedophile or violent sexual offenses. That is not this man. This was a private relationship. It did not take place at the school like so many of these cases do,” Burk said. “The victim was not a current student. My client did not have any power over him, like to give him special grades.”

‘Vulnerable’ victim

Deputy District Attorney Paul Gero told the court the victim could not be at the sentencing because he has been deported to Mexico.

Speaking in behalf of the teen, Gero read a written statement from the victim.

“I met (Covarrubias) at school and thought he was a nice guy. I thought he was someone I could trust. Now, I don’t feel normal. I question my sexuality. He betrayed me and I don’t know if I can ever trust anyone again.”

Gero said Covarrubias used his position of trust to lure the boy into the sexual relationship. He said the victim had a troubled life and Covarrubias took advantage of it. “His mother died. His father abandoned him (giving over custody of the boy to Covarrubias). His father had no money to take care of him. He threatened to send him back to Mexico. The boy was vulnerable.”

He also accused Covarrubias of not taking any responsibility for his actions.

“He showed up all of his court dates, that is what he is supposed to do. He didn’t flee to Mexico because that would be an admission of guilt,” Gero said.

Gero argued the sexual relationship between the defendant and the victim was anything but consensual.

“He told the defendant ‘no’ many times. The victim said he was thinking of suicide,” Gero said. “There was nothing enjoyable for the victim about the relationship. This is not a Romeo and Juliet statutory rape case.”

Gero urged Byrne to sentence Covarrubias to seven years, four months in prison.

Violation of trust

Byrne said he had “given a lot of thought to this case. I’ve been up since 4 this morning thinking about what I was going to do about this.”

Byrne said although he believed Covarrubias would do well on probation, he was going to deny probation based on the vulnerability of the victim and Covarrubias’ violation of his position of trust.

About 30 of Covarrubias’ family members and friends attended the sentencing, crying and sobbing upon hearing Byrne’s ruling. Two female family members broke down, wailing and gasping for breath as they were escorted from the courtroom by relatives. At the same time, court bailiffs handcuffed Covarrubias to take him away to the county jail for booking.

In the hallway outside the courtroom, the women collapsed on a bench, crying uncontrollably and trying to catch their breath as others fanned them. Others were also crying loudly as they comforted one another. “It’s just not fair. He’s innocent,” a woman cried out.

His sentencing was continued several times after a jury convicted Covarrubias in August. The last continuation was in February when Judge Byrne granted a continuance after Covarrubias fired his trial attorney and hired Burk. At that time Burk suggested she might file a motion for a new trial.

On Thursday, Burk told Byrne that after reviewing the transcripts and records on her client’s case, she found no merit to file the motion.

John Glaser, Napa Valley Unified School District superintendent, said Thursday afternoon, “The Covarrubias matter had been handled by law enforcement. We have not been actively involved in the case from the beginning. It is always unsettling to both parents and district when something like this happens. We do everything we can to ensure that this doesn’t happen.”

Glaser said Covarrubias is no longer employed with the school district.
15 comment(s)

Timmy wrote on Mar 30, 2007 6:33 AM:

" I think Covarrubias should be in prison for 15 to 30 years in jail for the actions what he did to the male student in his class that he did the actions to, I think he should owe the victim's family and the victim an apolige for what he did to their own relative, if I was Covarrubias for a example, I wouldn't do that, because 3 reasons, 1: It's not right to do it in public or alone with someone that you know or love, 2: you (like Covarrubias did) might do something stupid to yourself or the victim, or 3: Don't do that again "

Maria wrote on Mar 30, 2007 6:57 AM:

" I know that many off this young man's family are upset but I don't understand why they seem to be blaming others. If you have sex with a 15 year old, you are going to go to jail. From what little I can tell from this case, it looks like he received a light sentence. If those poor women wailing in the halls want to mad at somebody, maybe they should be scolding Jorge for making such bad and immoral choices. "

Liz wrote on Mar 30, 2007 8:06 AM:

" The law is the law, age of consent is 18 in the state of California. Any minor is not mentally able to understand the ramifications of having sex with an adult. Good job Paul Gero, thank-you for protecting our children. "

j wrote on Mar 30, 2007 8:42 AM:

" He got what he deserved, the boy was a minor and that's disgusting. What is wrong with our teachers? This happens all over the nation and it's horrible. Do these people think of how this will affect these kids when they get older? "

Accuracy is Important wrote on Mar 30, 2007 9:31 AM:

" This article gets so much wrong. The jury did not find this guy guilty of sex with a 15 year old. Basically, this was a statutory rape case and people get probation for that crime all the time. Overall the judge did the right thing and if someone's family member is escorted away in handcuffs it's reasonable to feel anguish -- regardless of what they did. "

Larry wrote on Mar 30, 2007 10:10 AM:

" Where was the background check in the first place? "

Tina - current mood=angry wrote on Mar 30, 2007 2:34 PM:

" I'm sending this along to Bill O'Reilly .... I know if this story catches his eye - we may see some action on this on a national level .. I think it's important that as a parent we each understand this doesn't always happen to someone elses kid - we need to stand up and make it heard and known that this is not a fit punishment for ruining a young persons perspective of the human spirit- and life in general. I think it's high time the punishment fits the crime ... this is an outrage. May God Bless this young man and his family and put a fire under the rear ends of those who make these pedophiles "rights" a higher priority than that of the innocent victims. Tina "

I Beg To Differ wrote on Mar 30, 2007 2:45 PM:

" To Accuracy is Important.. you state "the jury did not find this guy guilty of sex with a 15 year old". Why then are these words of his own attorney, "This is not the case of a sexual predator.. this was a private relationship...this did not take place at school" Obviously, even his defense is not denying the fact that these sexual acts did in fact take place. Regardless of when and where they took place, this is outrageous that a teacher would be involved in this manner with a student. "

Wondering wrote on Mar 30, 2007 3:25 PM:

" I too feel sorry for this man's family. And like others here, I'll admit that I haven't followed the case very closely....but given that, wouldn't two years seem like a victory given the circumstances??? Why all the drama? I guess I'm just a bit worried that we're slowly being over-taken by the curse of moral relativism where people can start to pick and choose which laws they want to follow. "

john wrote on Mar 30, 2007 4:28 PM:

" TWO years is no where REALISTIC,730x.85=620.5 days=1year 265 days. BE SERIOUS the man( a TEACHER) was convicted of NINE COUNTS of FELONY SEX CRIMES WITH A MINOR(A STUDENT) . What Did WENNEKER GET?? 3 years 6 months. Great message beimg sent out to CHILD MOLESTERS. "

watch out your children! wrote on Mar 30, 2007 9:12 PM:

" Teechers Evry Day Mostly Is Good Doing A Lot..Is Somtines A PERVERT! NOT GOOD! watch out your children! you never no whoo! 2 years this guy (good) but how many pedofile still teeching??? "

angry wrote on Apr 2, 2007 10:38 AM:

" i still think Mr Covarrubias is innocent "

I Beg To Differ wrote on Apr 2, 2007 2:09 PM:

" Angry... perhaps you should read the article again more carefully! His attorney states clearly that "this was a private relationship taking place outside of school". They are NOT denying him having sex with a student. Whether the student was a willing partipant or not, Covarrubias is the adult who should know better. How disgusting for him to want to have sex with a kid? Everyone out there who feels sorry for this teacher should have their heads examined. 2 years in prison is a JOKE! "

angry wrote on Apr 3, 2007 8:50 AM:

" i beg to differ...the articles in the news papers are not always true you should have been present in the courts and follow the story yourself to be well informed not just write with no knowledge "

I Beg To Differ wrote on Apr 4, 2007 12:51 AM:

" OK then... since I wasn't present in the courtroom, and I guess we can't count on the newspaper for the facts, I'll just have to rely on the jury of 12 competent people who did hear everything and did find enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict him of this crime. You can continue to live in denial. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy