NVR Logo
Local woman advocates against death penalty
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Save and Share Share
Janis Gay never met her grandfather. The St. Helena woman, however, has devoted a great deal of her life to a man she never knew.

Gay said her grandfather was hanged in Folsom Prison for murder when Gay’s mother was 9. Gay didn’t learn about her grandfather’s fate until she was 21. “There never was any conversation about it before that,” she said.
The knowledge that he was executed spurned Gay’s interest in the death penalty, leading to her co-chairing the Wine Country Chapter of Death Penalty Focus.

Death Penalty Focus is a nationwide organization that seeks to abolish the death penalty. Its president is actor Mike Farrell, who is most famous for starring as B.J. Hunnicutt in the legendary television sitcom “M*A*S*H.”
The Napa County chapter of Death Penalty Focus was formed about 18 months ago and has close to 30 members.

“Death Penalty Focus is dedicated to ending the death penalty in California through educating the public,” Gay said. “Education is our main focus.”
The death penalty has been the focus of intense debate in the last 30 years. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down death penalty laws in some states where it felt the legal process was not fair, and many states then took precautionary steps before reinstating a law that many believe is an important punishment for the most heinous crimes.

In 1986, Californians made a rare decision to oust a sitting California Supreme Court Justice, Rose Bird, in large part because the Bird court threw out several death sentences.

Questions have arisen about whether certain forms of execution, including lethal injection now commonly in use, are “cruel and unusual” punishment barred by the U.S. Constitution.

Gay said politics influences in decisions about capital punishment.

“The death penalty gets more attention during an election year,” she said.” Also the input from the elected district attorneys throughout the state has a great effect on the death penalty. In California in order to end the death penalty the citizens have to vote on it.”

She also said she believes race and economics play a role.

“Right now, Latinos are the No. 1 race facing the death penalty. And the poverty issue has a great impact. If you are poor and can’t afford a high-powered super attorney, you are at a much higher risk of being sentenced to death.”

The living and the dead

Although Gay was a young adult when she found out about her grandfather, she didn’t really become engaged with the subject until she reached her 40s.

“I was constantly thinking about him and especially how he died. I started really looking into the issue. I went to a conference in Sacramento, which really got me thinking about what happened to my grandfather and the effect it had on my mother and our extended family. My mother had to deal with the image of her father hanging from the end of rope,” Gay said. “The family had to deal with exile. I have many aunts, uncles and other extended family I have never met. It shatters families. I am still angry at him for what he did. I am working hard on forgiving him for what he did to our entire family.”

Gay does not believe the death penalty is a deterrent for those who commit murder.

“People who kill don’t think about the consequences of the death penalty or life in prison. Our group also does not see the death penalty as a way to honor the victims. It only creates more violence,” she said.

When a person is sentenced to death row, the pain the victims’ families have gone through during the court process doesn’t stop there.

“It actually begins all over again with the prolonged series of appeals. The family is left in limbo and is facing many, many years of court appeals, hearings and more hearings. It takes close to 20 years to execute an death row inmate. Some of the victims’ family members may not live long enough to see the execution,” Gay said.

Gay believes life in prison without the possibility of parole — the sentence recently given to Napa double-murderer Eric Copple — gives the victims’ families closure.

“Once they go to prison, it’s over. The family is released to mourn, grieve, be with their families and get on with their lives,” she said. “The death penalty just perpetuates more chaos.”

Dick Wollack is a co-chair for the Wine Country Chapter of Death Penalty Focus and served on the organization’s national board for about four years.

“I started studying the death penalty when I was in the eighth grade. I was stunned by the illogical saying as a society we don’t kill people and then the state executes people in retaliation for the crimes they have committed,” Wollack said. “I have no compassion for murderers and vile people who commit crimes, but I believe if we eliminate the death penalty it would set a moral compass.”

Wollack believes the death penalty sends the message that California condones violence. He also points out that the death penalty is far more costly to the state than housing a prisoner for life.

“There is the cost of the two trials — one to prove guilt and the next to argue for the death penalty. Then there is the huge cost of the appeals process, which can take decades,” he said.

Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein does not see the death penalty as a black-and-white issue.

“I have a lot of respect for both sides of the issue,” Lieberstein said. “However I think the death penalty is appropriate is some situations.

“This is personal emotional decision for all of those involved when it comes to seeking the death penalty. It should be the most difficult decision a prosecutor has to make because it’s the ultimate sanction our criminal justice system and the people of California have.”

Right now there is a moratorium on the death penalty in California, as a federal judge has ruled the state’s lethal injection process is flawed. More than 600 prisoners are on Death Row in California.

“This has put a strain on a lot of people, especially the families of the victims whose murderer is on death row,” said Lieberstein. “Families have to go through a lot when dealing with a death sentence. There are countless hearings and the governor is the only one who has the power to grant a stay of execution at the very last moment. That’s not fair to the families of the victims and the defendant. Everyone is entitled to closure.”
10 comment(s)

pay the bill wrote on Mar 18, 2007 9:27 AM:

" You should front the cash for housing these trash. Get real. Death does teach better morals it removes the trash fromthe earth. Thinning of the black sheep so tp speak. "

June wrote on Mar 18, 2007 10:36 AM:

" Dear madam, Murder victims get the death penalty!....Since your stance is based on your beliefs...Would it be possible for you to believe that the victims can too get some sympathy...or better yet be warned in advance of their impending demise...so they can get a high powered lawyer to defend them in advance...sound stupid?...so do you. "

EXNAPAN wrote on Mar 18, 2007 12:36 PM:

" People that kill and mame are monsters.You put them in prison and they still prey on the weak and are still monsters.How about the people that want to do away with the death penalty start paying for the feeding and housing of said monsters.look up the cost of housing a monster for just one year,then multiply that by 30 or 40 times.It's no wonder California is bankrupt.In my state we are nice to monsters.We let them choose how they are going to die.Injection or hanging.Lets not forget that sometime down the road some bleeding heart might get said monsters paroled to do evil once again. XXXXXX "

Marla wrote on Mar 18, 2007 2:58 PM:

" Imagine a woman opposing the death penalty...Is it a choice? What about the defenseless babies who are murdered by abortion...shouldn't these babies have a lawyer to protect their rights? it a choice? "

john wrote on Mar 18, 2007 4:27 PM:

" pay the bill, I would not even support the death penalty in your pathetic ill informed case. Before you espouse an opinion you ought to ask yourself one question? Is this sentence intelligent and necessary. THEN CHECK YOUR TYPING/SPELLING. "

Get Real wrote on Mar 18, 2007 5:57 PM:

" One thing is settled when the death penalty is used, that person will never kill again. When they are locked up for life, they do not contribute to society. They cost all of us 50,000 a year to keep them under lock and key. That money could be put to far better use. Like helping to feed or educate a victim's child. Oh, by the way I've worked in our prison system, so you can't sweet talk me! "

Huh? wrote on Mar 18, 2007 9:03 PM:

" After the extensive appeals process is finally exhausted and the murderer actually gets put to death 20 years after the crime, it ends up costing the state more than it would to put the criminal in prison for life. So, your financial argument for killing murderers doesn't really make much sense. "

The Accountant wrote on Mar 18, 2007 9:04 PM:

" At the trial level, death penalty cases are estimated to generate roughly $470,000 inadditional costs to the prosecution and defense over the cost of trying the same case as an aggravated murder without the death penalty and costs of $47,000 to $70,000 for court personnel. On direct appeal, the cost of appellate defense averages $100,000 more in death penalty cases, than in non-death penalty murder cases. "

Me Like wrote on Mar 18, 2007 9:06 PM:

" No. No. I like EXNAPAN's point of view. I think the poor, disabled and elderly are also a burden on our state. We should just execute them too. You know, to save money. That's all that matters, right, the money. "

EXNAPAN wrote on Mar 19, 2007 7:55 PM:

" Here where I live we had a child molester that killed 2 ten year old boys.He was caught.Went to trial.Admitted his crime.Was found guilty and was put to death by hanging.All of this took less than 2 years.That's justice. XXXXXX "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy