NVR Logo
When sex offenders move to your town
Police and Megan’s Law help prepare neighbors
Monday, February 19, 2007
Save and Share Share
Napa County is home to 205 registered sex offenders. Of that number, 144 reside in the city of Napa.

While those figures might surprise some residents, local law enforcement agencies are doing their part to keep the public informed of the whereabouts of sex offenders they believe pose a danger to the public. Officers send letters to neighborhoods where registered offenders reside — the most recent letter went out last month.
In 1947, California became the first state to mandate that sex offenders register with police agencies, giving their current address and employment. In 1986, the law was applied to juveniles convicted of sex offenses. That information was made public record in the mid-1990s with the passage of Megan’s Law, allowing public access through the Internet to the name, address and convictions of sex offenders registered in a county.

The newer legislation gave law enforcement the authority to alert residents about any registered sex offender living in their neighborhoods who they deemed to be a danger, according to Napa Police Cmdr. Steve Potter.
“We have only distributed fliers two times this year, and it was on the same person because he relocated to another residence in Napa,” Potter said.

The latest flier was sent out in January by the Napa Police Department in conjunction with the county sheriff’s department. Although the offender is not classified as a sexually violent predator, authorities thought residents should be aware he was living in their north Napa neighborhood, Potter said.
“When making the decision to notify the citizens with a flier, we take into consideration the criminal history and if we believe they are a danger to the community,” Potter said. “If we come to the conclusion this is the case, we make a flier with the sex offender’s name, description, address and his or her registered sexual crimes and distribute it to the immediate neighbors.”

The flier also makes it very clear the person is not wanted by the law and has served his or her sentence as prescribed by law.

“We are not suggesting in any way that the public take any action against the registered sex offender. We just want them to be aware and take precautions to protect themselves and especially their children,” Potter said.

Public reactions

Potter said the public responds to the notifications with “mixed emotions.”

“Many people are upset to know a registered sex offender is living in their neighborhood. But on the other hand, they are grateful that we have given them that information so they can take measures to deal with it,” Potter said.

Potter said he cannot recall any local incidents where the public has taken matters into their own hands to deal with a registered sex offender living in their neighborhood.

Speaking of those who have been convicted, he said, “If they register as a sex offender and obey the laws, they have the right to live where they want.”

Sheriff’s Lt. Jean Donaldson said there are no sexually violent predators living in Napa County.

To be designated a sexually violent predator, according to state law, the offender is “a person who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense against two or more victims and who has a diagnosed mental disorder that makes the person a danger to the health and safety of others in that it is likely that he or she will engage in sexually violent criminal behavior.”

Sex crimes that require registration range from indecent exposure and certain child pornography charges to rape and other charges involving sexual violence.

Under the law, sex offenders when released from jail or prison are mandated to register with their local law enforcement within five days. They also must register when they change residence. They are also required to register annually within five working days of their birthday. Sex offenders who have no permanent address are considered transients and must register every 30 days. Those considered sexually violent predators must register every 90 days.

Law enforcement agencies are notified by California Department of Corrections or the local county jail when a sex offender is released into its jurisdiction.

“We monitor that information. If the person does not register as a sex offender within five days of their release, we go looking for them,” Potter said.

The sheriff’s department has one detective assigned to investigate sex crimes, in cooperation with the Napa police and county probation departments.

Donaldson said many of the registered sex offenders have committed crimes against their own family members. “So when they are released from jail or prison, the victims are aware of where they are living,” he said.

Last November California voters passed Jessica’s Law — Proposition 83. The legislation increased penalties for those convicted of sex offenses and changed the distance registered sex offenders must live from a school or park to 2,000 feet.

Prior law ruled sex offenders could not live within 1,329 feet of a park or school. High-risk sex offenders could not live within 2,600 feet of a school or park. The restriction only applied to the time the person was on parole or probation. Under Jessica’s Law, the restriction would apply to all the time they are required to register as a sex offender, which in most cases is for life.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton in Sacramento ruled Proposition 83 is not retroactive, meaning sex offenders required to register before Proposition 83 passed are exempt from carrying global positioning devices for the rest of their lives.

The ruling states that if a registered sex offender who has served his time is living in a home that is closer than 2,000 feet from a school or park, he or she does not have to move, said state Department of Justice spokesman Nathan Barankin.

“They will not be kicked out of their home. However, if that person changes residency, Proposition 83 applies,” he said.

Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein said the state attorney general’s office will most likely challenge Karlton’s ruling.




Megan’s Law

Megan’s Law allows the public to research the names and whereabouts of registered sex offenders in California. The Web site is www.meganslaw.ca.gov.

Protect your family

• Remember that in the vast majority of cases, children are molested by someone they know.

• Inform children that it is wrong for adults to engage children in sexual activity.

• Make an effort to know the people with whom your child is spending time.

• Teach your children about their bodies, give them the correct language to use when describing their private parts. Emphasize that those parts are private.

• Never leave children unattended in an automobile.

• Listen to your children. Pay attention if they tell you that they do not want to be with someone or go somewhere.

• Notice when someone shows children a great deal of attention or begins giving them gifts.

• Make an outing to a mall or a park a “teachable” experience in which your children can practice checking with you, using pay phones and finding adults who can help if they need assistance.
40 comment(s)

Neighbor wrote on Feb 19, 2007 11:01 AM:

" We live near Bob Hanna who was arrested for child pornography charges in December (see NR front page article 12/9/2006). His next court date is 2/28/2007, based on the outcome we may find ourselves living next to a Registered Sex Offender. Anyone know if we can file civil charges seeking damages from the lost value to our home? I doubt that we'd be able to sell our home without disclosng this information. Who on earth would by our home? No one wants to volunarily live next to a sex offender. The innocent children and the true victims, but this disgusting crime will create victims out of his neighbors and those trying to raise children around him. "

Karen B wrote on Feb 19, 2007 2:43 PM:

" An interesting article By MARSHA DORGAN Register Staff Writer regarding registered sex offenders. Perhaps, she could research and post web link information where people could search for registered sex offenders living in their neighborhood. This link could be posted under quick links of the Napa Valley Regiser,thus providing easy information access for another service to your community. Thank YOu "

ACF wrote on Feb 19, 2007 2:48 PM:

" All you people living in rural areas better get use to the fact that many sex offenders released from prison will be coming to live in your neighborhood. Because of Jessica's law these offenders will have no where else to go. As far as knowing where these people live, I think it would be better if people didn't know. That knowledge pomotes a false sense of security but also causes fear and anger toward people who are not a threat to begin with. The people who are really a serious threat will not be allowed to live in a family-packed envirornment. Instead they will be in hospitals, half-way houses, etc. Better re-think where you're going with all these notifications, restrictions and excessively punitive laws. "

Curious wrote on Feb 19, 2007 4:25 PM:

" This article says that there are 205 registered sex offenders in napa county. I went on Megan's law, and did a search under napa county, and only 121 are listed. Where are the other 84? "

Nancy wrote on Feb 19, 2007 4:31 PM:

" ACF you better rethink your way of thinking. "

curious wrote on Feb 19, 2007 6:39 PM:

" I was wondering if there was a FREE website that someone could use instead of Megan's law? After reading this article, I was interested to see who may be living near me, but when I went to www.meganslaw.com as suggested in this article, I was astonished to find that there was a fee to use this site. I feel that this type of site should be available free of charge. "

Marcello wrote on Feb 19, 2007 8:53 PM:

" If any person commits a crime he or she must pay, but once you have paid for this crime it's unconstitutional to continue to pay every time a new law passes. New law's should only apply to new crimes, not to old crimes that have been long paid for by a conviction or settelment of the judicial system of our country. "

rich wrote on Feb 19, 2007 9:19 PM:

" go to .....national sex offender registry and that might help you find the people that you're looking for "

Leah S wrote on Feb 19, 2007 11:31 PM:

" ACF, please continue to try to educate a very gullible public. You understand the unintended consequences of this law of banishment. Neighbor, no one wants to live next door to a drug dealer or a murderer either. We certainly don't want a drunk driver in our midst either. This is America and we were founded on the principles of the Constitution. We are not at liberty to decide who it shall protect or will not protect. If you want a selective society, move to another country. Maybe your property values will be better there. We are moving towards becoming Nazi Germany all over again. There are laws in place to protect society from the violent sexual predators. Put your hysteria to bed and move on to something that will actually benefit children. Jessica's Law will prove to be of no benefit and you or one of your family member's could be the next victim of this ill-convceived law. It only takes an accusation to get a conviction. A great many so-called sex offenders have not hurt anyone. "

Registration Is Worse Than Worthless wrote on Feb 20, 2007 9:09 AM:

" I think it's great when the property values of neighbors suffer because a Registered person lives next door. You people want these Registries and are so clueless that you think they help, so that's the least you deserve from them. They do much more damage than that but I don't have the time to even start. "

Tim P wrote on Feb 20, 2007 9:20 AM:

" I am a retired Police officer with over 25 years in the LE. I can tell you first hand these laws are getting more time then we should be giving them. The public is told that sex offenders are the ones who will repeat the crime. In fact the truth is that they are one of the lowest group of criminals to do a crime again. However with the way these laws are set up we are forceing them away from the help they need. Also forcing them to go into hiding because to the Sex Offender Registry. This is not good. Ask Iowa about the problems the 2000 foot law caused. ALSO GET THIS ONE; SEX CRIMES ARE COMMITTED BY SOMEONE WELL KNOWN TO THE VICTIME IN OVER 90% OF THE CASES. I feel real bad for the victims that never get over these bad crimes. But we as a free country should look more to getting these sex offenders help and make sure that money is spent on the victims support system. Do not spend it on trying to enforce some of these laws that are a joke on the public so those elected to office can get votes. The fact is that after arrest for a sex crime the criminal is only about 3.4% likely to do a sex crime again. Only those who are murders are less likely to do a crime again. Check the numbers both at the state level and the federal level. Check on the studys. Find out how Study C was not used right and the person who did the Study has noted that the goverment missused his study to show the US Supreme that Sex Offender Registrys should be ok'd by the court. This whole thing is out of line and we are on the brink of a Police State. "

Come on! wrote on Feb 20, 2007 12:01 PM:

" Yeah, let's just let the offenders live anonymously amongst us so we can invite them to block parties, into our homes and around our kids. The people who need protection are the children. These offenders are wired differently than the rest of us and there is no "cure" from this behavior. Some of these cyber-criminals will never touch a child, some will. It's such a small step for them to make and the consequences are too great. Also, keep in mind that these freaks are PAYING to view crimes done to ACTUAL children. These "humans" are just the lowest of the low. National registries are a good thing, locking these people up for a very long, long time is a good thing. "

Phil wrote on Feb 21, 2007 5:40 AM:

" To poster "Come on!": Your statements show you know nearly nothing about how child sexual abuse happens, who does it, why, where, or how to prevent it. Registries will do next to nothing to protect your children. If you do what you need to do to really (i.e. truly, actually, in reality) protect your children, you have no need at all for Registries. Registries are just a feel-good panacea designed to help people feel like "sex offenders" are being harassed and watched. They do nothing positive all the while causing society harm at a level that would shock anyone who understands it. Most people on this country's Registries are people who have completely legally paid for their mistakes and are doing nothing but living law abiding lives like anyone else. The Registries do nothing but harass and disenfranchise those people, their spouses, their children, and the rest of their families. But again, for those people on a Registry who do intend to commit a crime, the Registries do absolutely nothing to even slightly hinder them and in fact, they contribute to most of the major factors that have been correlated with sexual offending. The stupidity of it all is stunning. "

Proof wrote on Feb 23, 2007 6:40 AM:

" Phil and Tim P - I would like you to share any reputable studies that support your views. Your comments claim to be backed by factual data, but you have produced none. "

john wrote on Feb 23, 2007 8:55 AM:

" Napa county is complaining about 200 "chesters". Try the registry for Shasta county, almost the same numbers of "people" in the county,however the numbers of R.S.O's is amazing... quit complaining. there is nothing you can legally do about it..... WATCH YOUR CHILDREN". "

Answers for "Curious" wrote on Feb 23, 2007 9:35 AM:

" Answers for "Curious": I am the "detective" mentioned briefly in the above article and am assigned full time to track and monitor sex offenders for the sheriff' department. To answer your first question regarding the numbers discrepency: There are a number of sex offenders who, if they meet the qualifications specified by law, can have their names and addresses excluded from the public side to Megans Law. These offenders are still monitored and tracked by law enforcement and law enforcement can make public notifications in the interest of public safety. Secondly, the government web site to search for sex offenders in California is free (you've got the wrong address listed in your post). Go to http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/ It is a very user friendly site to browse and research and is completely free. Hope that helps. Todd "

Karen B wrote on Feb 23, 2007 4:47 PM:

" A community service that the Napa Valley Register could provide, is the convenient posting of the website for Registered Sex Offenders. Please post under Quick Links of the Napa Valley Register, the website link, http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/ Thank you, Karen B "

to ACF wrote on Feb 23, 2007 10:39 PM:

" Methinks thou doth protest too much. "

to Leah S wrote on Feb 23, 2007 10:59 PM:

" ...A great many so-called sex offenders have not hurt anyone? Not visibly,no but what they do is called soul murder. I can not feel sorry for anyone who has EVER preyed on children and I do not agree with any of these comments.Oh Yes, they do offend again retired police officer and frequently. They say themselves- it is a compulsion they can not control.I most certainly want to know who lives in my neighborhood.I could care less if you think I am uninformed or clueless my job is to protect my children.Megan's law wasn't passed for nothing. "

Sandra wrote on Feb 24, 2007 8:36 AM:

" To those who think its ok to live and let live concerning sex offenders who have done thier time. Are you aware that most pedophiles are never "Cured"? "

Shawna wrote on Feb 25, 2007 10:52 AM:

" It is our responsibility to protect our own kids. You can not trust in anyone other then yourself to do this. Always remember no one cares more about your son/daughter then you. We must teach our kids that there are creaps out there just waiting for some to let there guard down. "

Mark Miwords wrote on Feb 25, 2007 8:55 PM:

" It's tough to look out for your kid everywhere. I was fortunate enough to volunteer several days a week in my daughter's upvalley classroom. While I was never particularily fond of one of her teachers, I never had even the suspicion that he was molesting children in his classroom. He was very smooth about the whole thing. He would send me out into the hall to correct papers, and would "feel up" little boys on the couch while I was out of the room. I don't think the boys were physically harmed, but the mental harm his victims endured will last years. It can in no way be classified as "not being hurt" as Leah S. suggessted. The teacher is now out of jail and the last I checked, is living in Petaluma. There is no way to undo his acts, and the pervert should be censured from society until the day he dies. Megan's Law is just and the pervert should have a big red "P" (for pedofile, or pervert) painted on his forehead. "

JJ wrote on Feb 26, 2007 6:54 AM:

" go to Familywatchdog and you can see who lives in your neighborhood..It is scary. I think a Sex Offender shouldn't live anywhere near a school..At Least 10 blocks, but some I see are in a block and 1/2 radius. "

To Mark wrote on Feb 26, 2007 7:00 AM:

" You are so right, even the people we think we can trust don't always prove to be safe. Thanks for the truth from you story. I agree we can only try and protect our kids, because the people that do this kind of thing know how to be sligh. "

To protect your kids wrote on Feb 26, 2007 8:42 AM:

" Make them saavy. Sex offenders choose kids who don't know the facts of life, and who are polite, shy and timid. I recently read a book called"Speaking of Sex" and the nurse/sex educator who wrote it said that she had not (in 30 years) met a child who was molested who knew all the scientific names for body parts and what their natural functions were. Predators don't like it if a child can speak with an educated voice on the subject of sex. Why? My guess is that they make very credible witnesses. "

Dr. Gene wrote on Feb 26, 2007 8:44 AM:

" Actually, Megan's Law was passed for nothing. It is a huge panacea that has protected no one and caused nothing but trouble. It has diverted just a ridiculous, outrageous amount of resources and attention AWAY from actually reducing and preventing sexual offenses. And people who KNOW that don't even care much. Additionally, the Registries have caused various governments throughout America to act immorally (even criminally) against people who are on the Registries and their families. It's a sad statement about this country. You people who think the Registries are useful are misinformed. You are being lied to. The facts are MORE than crystal clear regarding this - the danger to your children is not some guy living across the street from you or next to their school. First and foremost, the danger is someone within your family. You can discover these facts from ANY reputable victim's advocacy group. Start with the NCMEC. I have raised all of my children without a single one being abused because I taught them what is right and wrong behavior from adults and the fact that ANYONE (most especially someone they know and trust) might try to take advantage of them. I did not use the Registries to point out the "bad" guys or people who might be "extra, extra, extra, extra" likely to try something. I never needed to do that because those people on the Registries were and are an insignificant danger to them. Does anyone remember who this person was? I don't remember. But, there was a highly regarded expert who was giving a presentation to a bunch of people about how to keep their children safe. A parent asked him what was the single most effective thing that she could do to protect her children from being sexually abused. The expert said, "Don't m0lest them. That is by far the single most effective thing." That is a fact that is undisputable. (BTW, this page wouldn't let me post the word "m0lest", that is why I spelled it with a 0 instead of an o.) "

Civil Rights? Human Rights wrote on Feb 26, 2007 1:29 PM:

" Where did these posters come from? If you hurt a child, in ANY fashion, especially abuse of ANY kind, you no longer have rights with respect to hiding the issue. I am sure, oh I am CERTAIN the dandy people who think the Sex Offender database is not warranted, have all experienceds abuse as a child? Or perhaps their own children? A close family member? I think not. You abuse a child, you should receive the harshest form of punishment allowed. We are not talking a 19 y.o. boy having consentual sex with a 15 y.o. girl, etc. we are talking grown adults, abusing and hurting children. Those need life in prison, not allowed back out. Get a clue people. "

Mark Miwords wrote on Feb 26, 2007 3:53 PM:

" "Civil Rights? Human Rights" Is correct. Those who abuse children should be incarerated forever. Just because a child is knowledgeable about body parts or what appropriate behavior is for an adult, doesn't make him safe. If you are in an abusive situation, CONTROL, either physically, mentally or emotionally is what the abuser uses to manipulate his/her victim. Once you're in an abusive situation, mentally, it's very tough to know which way to turn. Children have a harder time sorting this out, and shouldn't be expected to. "

Old Fashioned wrote on Feb 27, 2007 7:58 AM:

" After reading sex offender cases, most repeat the crime and there is no cure. It is a mental illness. They perceive situations differently than the mentally sane. If this is a mental issue, shouldn't they be in a mental institution? If after many surveys they all come to the same conculsion, then WHY are they letting them out? We should build more State Hospitals instead of closing them to house the mentally ill, not release them to live in our neighborhoods. Just for grins and giggles, let's say we relocate them next to California Mayor's, Congressman, Attorney's and just plain RICH in general. I'm sure things would change in a heartbeat. Effect the RICH and POWERFUL, and what do you know..... PROCEDURES AND LAWS GET CHANGED! Sad but true.... "

Napan wrote on Feb 27, 2007 3:58 PM:

" I think that since abuse of a child is such a vile crime, those who commit these crimes should be publicly shamed for it, regardless of whether or not authorities believe the are still dangerous. These crimes shouldn't be swept under the rug. "

Witch Hunter wrote on Feb 28, 2007 7:08 AM:

" Fellow Schadenfreuders: My good neighbors and I are trying to run a registered sex offender, his wife, children, and mother-in-law (I think) out of our neighborhood and into someone else's. Where can I get the best pitchforks, torches, and other tools (e.g. access to legislators) to get this done? We don't need any white sheets for this job because everyone is down with it. God's Will be done, Witch Hunter "

to Witch Hunter wrote on Feb 28, 2007 11:10 AM:

" You are incapable of making a sound arguement. So shall we accept your view as one that feels we should accept them or just look the other way? The victims we are discussing are children. We are talking about people who directly abuse children and those creeps that PAY to view videos of children screaming and crying as awful, hideous crimes are being committed against them. HOW DO YOU NOT GET THIS??? This is a sickness that cannot be cured. They are wired differently. This has been proven time and time again. You want to JUDGE people for not wanting to live around sick criminals who are likely to commit their crimes repeatedly?? Where did the rights of law abiding citizens go? Why do we not deserve the right to raise our children in peace and safely away from these predators? You will have NO good answer for that question because there just ISN'T one. "

Will H. wrote on Feb 28, 2007 12:12 PM:

" This reply is to "To Witch Hunter". With all due respect, what a bunch of nonsense! Just about everything you said is factually wrong. You are "thinking" from an emotional, rather than factual, rational basis. I hate these crimes as much as the next person but the experts on this subject are right. Registration is of extremely limited value and could very well be doing more harm than good. And the rest of the stuff, the residency restrictions and all that, will definitely do more harm than good. As a country, we need to develop an intelligent policy that actually does something useful to prevent these crimes. -------------------- The rights of law-abiding citizens aren't going anywhere. In fact, they are only getting stronger. Those people on the registries have been punished. The rights of law-abiding citizens have been protected. But after the people on the registries have repaid their legal debts to society, it is wrong to harass them and their families, especially in ways that harm society. And it is blatantly dishonest and immoral to single out sex offenders as a class of people who need to be registered and harassed when there are millions of other types of criminals who are certainly more dangerous to children. -------------------- That is one of the biggest problems that I have with the registries - it is a lie that they are for protecting children. If we are supposedly going to register people who are dangerous to children, let's really register people who are dangerous to children. No one will ever be more dangerous to children than their own parents. So let's start with the people who beat their children. There are thousands and thousands of people on this country's registries who have never touched or harmed a children. Yet, in my state we won't register people who have gone INSIDE an elementary school and slammed the claw end of a hammer into a random 10-year-old girl's head (The media reported: “She was hit so hard that the hammer's claw was imbedded in her skull and part of her brain had to be removed.”). We don't register people who have killed children while driving drunk or blown up houses with children in them by cooking meth. It's easy to protect children from sexual abuse. This other stuff, not so easy. So is that why we don't even bother? -------------------- Many experts have said that we don't have registries to protect children but rather because it helps us express our outrage and hatred of these crimes. I personally believe that and also think that is certainly true with respect to the residency restrictions. As a nation, we are not terribly concerned about stopping child abuse, sexual or otherwise. But we are outraged about sex crimes. "

Bottom Line wrote on Mar 1, 2007 8:23 AM:

" Everyone has the right to be informed of potential dangers in our neighborhoods. When those sex offenders made their choice and acted upon them, they gave up certain freedoms by doing so. "

concerned wrote on Mar 1, 2007 3:30 PM:

" Why is it that a person who was pled no constest to a sex offense of a minor, has not been registered as a sex offender?? How many other times has he done this and not been caught?? Is the law from 1947 not in effect anymore?? "

Angela Rossman wrote on Mar 2, 2007 8:51 AM:

" Bottom Line, we may have a "right" to be informed of potential dangers in our neighborhoods but our sex offender registries do nothing to help with that. Right off the top of my head I can think of a hundred different types of criminals who are more dangerous to MY children than 99+% of the people who are on the registries. I'm more concerned about a drunk driver living next door than a child m0lester. That person is more dangerous to my children than a m0lester. Besides, any person who is supposed to be registered that is going to m0lest children isn't going to worry about registering. Or he/she is simply going to go somewhere other than his/her neighborhood to do it. All you have to do it take a cursory look at how registration "works" and you will understand how easy that is. So, no thanks, I'm not going to commission the government to give me an incomplete list of some subset of some potential bad guys. I'm going to be a parent and pay attention to the relationships that my children have with ANY adults (registered or not). --------------------------------- new paragraph! --------------------------------- The real bottom line on the registries is that they aren't even close to worth the problems they cause (including increased sexual offenses), the effort they take, or the money they cost. I forget what the exact numbers and time frame were but these numbers are close - in the state where I live we recently passed some new, useless registry laws and laws attempting to banish registered people from populated areas (intended to drive them out of the state) and (as part of the debate over the law) the government estimated that the results from just those new laws only (not including all the existing stuff) would cost us over a billion dollars extra over the next ten years. That is not a typo, it is a billion *additional* dollars. None of that money is focused on actually reducing or attempting to prevent sexual offenses. There is almost NO money available for that (or for indigent children's health care, I will add). It is all focused on after-the-fact, retroactive punishment. As a mother and part of a family struggling to pay taxes, it all makes me sick. "

Kevin wrote on Mar 2, 2007 1:37 PM:

" Hard to imagine a mother that would not take the time to look at such a registry in order to protect her children. It doesn't take long. Then show your kids where the perverts live and warn them, in an age appropriate manner, what to do to protect themselves. How many times do we have to read the same sad story in the newspaper about a pedophile "nobody had any idea" living in a neighborhood and abusing the children. The registry is just a tool, use it for your children's sake. "

to angela wrote on Mar 4, 2007 4:13 PM:

" these are not "potential bad guys' as you state,these ARE bad guys evidenced by their arrest for child m0lestation. "

Angela Rossman wrote on Mar 5, 2007 5:57 AM:

" Kevin, the registries are a panacea. If parents do what they should to keep their children from being sexually abused then they have no "need" for registries. If parents do not do what they should, since the registries are not nearly enough (they absolutely, positively do not tell you who is the greatest risk to your children), they are putting their children at much, much greater risk. My children are not at risk of being sexually abused because I don't let them have relationships with random adults without my supervision. AND they are educated. AND, in spite of people who support the registries refusing to acknowledge facts, the greatest danger of children being sexually abused still lies with their father, followed closely by other family members. --------------------------------- new paragraph! --------------------------------- You will keep reading the same sad "nobody had any idea" story in the newspapers because nearly all sexual offenses are committed by people who are not registered. That's a fact that anyone can verify. That has not changed and will not change. --------------------------------- new paragraph! --------------------------------- Lastly, the registries are not a tool for protecting children. They may have started that way (as a decent, noble idea, I might add) but they have become exactly what the skeptics said of them from the beginning. They are abused by Americans who as a whole cannot use the information responsibly and rationally. The registries are a tool that are allowing the majority of us to violate the rights of a minority. They have been used to do some things I can hardly believe are happening in this country. Did you know that in some states in this country the governments are using the registries to approach families years after one of the family members has completed the terms of their legal sentence for a crime and they are inventing excuses (which are pretty well refuted by facts) to force those families from their homes? They are doing the same thing with people's jobs. And we stand to the side and applaud. I would barely believe it but we do have something of a history of violating people's rights. "

real facts wrote on Mar 5, 2007 1:06 PM:

" Here are some real facts according to Department of Justice and Department of Corrections studies... 1) 74% of sex offenses are perpetrated by people who have NO criminal record...... 2) 60% of sex offenses perpetrated by previously convicted criminals are by criminals who were convicted of OTHER crimes (and would therefore not be registered by these laws)..... 3) DoJ studies indicate that released sex offenders have a 5-6% re-conviction rate for sex offenses (rapists are closer to 7% and child molesters are closer to 3%) after five years..... 4) The first five years are height of re-convictions and it drops off dramatically after those first five years..... 5) Successful integration into society and positive friendships and stable employment are the strongest predictor of future "rehabilitated" sex offenders..... 6) Rejection, depression and ostracism are the strongest predictors of re-arrest for sex offenses..... .7) Sex offenses are often devastating to victims. However, research shows that between 30-90% (depending on which research you read) of victims do not show medium-long term psychological maladjustment or trauma...... 8) In a recent study, parents of abused kids describe the experience has "horriffic" in more than 80% of cases, where now-grown kids who were involved in the same cases described them as "horriffic" in just 5% of those. 10% of study participants whos parents described the experience as "horrific" described the experience as "neutral to positive" from their own viewpoint (there is far more worry about harm than there is actual harm) 9) the US Constitution prevents laws from being created where the punishment for the crime is substantially more severe than the outcome for the victim. In the case of murder or violent rape (child rape being especially so), the outcome is demonstrably severe. In nebulous cases of pseudo-consent like the recent teacher scandal, this is not so clear cut. 10) Abuse is an individual thing. Some people suffer horribly, others do not. Generalizing your shallow outrage due to shallow and inconsistent reporting in a daily newspaper is both irresponsible and reeks of knee-jerk politics over a reasoned approach public safety and law. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy