NVR Logo
Arrests: Feb. 14
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Save and Share Share
• Antonio Damian Garcia was taken into custody Monday night after a woman he knows told police he had assaulted her, according to Napa police.

The woman also accused Garcia of producing a knife and threatening to slash her car tires, Napa Police Sgt. Don Honey said.
Garcia, 29, of Napa, was arrested on suspicion of domestic violence, brandishing a weapon, battery and violation of probation.

• Early Tuesday morning Michael Alan Austin was booked into the county jail for allegedly battering a teen and keeping her from leaving a residence in the 2200 block of Eva Street in Napa, Honey said.
The woman told police Austin punched her and pulled her hair, he said.

Austin, 52, was arrested on suspicion of false imprisonment and battery.
• Police responded to a Monday afternoon call of possible drug activity in the 1900 block of G Street, Honey said.

When they arrived they found Jose Victor Parra of Napa, who appeared to be under the influence of drugs, Honey said.

Officers searched Parra and found him to be in possession of suspected methamphetamine, he said.

Parra, 47, was arrested on suspicion of possession of a controlled substance and being under the influence.
12 comment(s)

Common Sense wrote on Feb 14, 2007 7:37 AM:

" How about publishing a police log? "

Meth Losers wrote on Feb 14, 2007 8:05 AM:

" Great to see another bust for METH, The sad fact for law abiding citizens is that Parra will more then likely spend a couple of days in jail, have his day in court only to be let out to walk the streets again and to use again.. In fact, he could get busted up to 3 times before he would see any real jail time. The Napa cops are doing thier job only to have the judges and district attorney let the public down by giving these meth losers to many chances. "

Yes, Publish a police log wrote on Feb 14, 2007 9:23 AM:

" The register already publishes a list of DUI convictions each month, why not a list for all convictions each month? "

Jail time wrote on Feb 14, 2007 10:45 AM:

" How sad is it that if you get into a fight in the streets of Napa, you get up to 3 years in jail, but when you get caught with drugs you only spend a couple of days, then your free to do it again? "

Jarvis wrote on Feb 14, 2007 11:26 AM:

" The drug court law enacted a few years ago probably has a lot to do with many chances given to drug abusers. Couple that with our ever overpopulated jails and prisons, and Napa PD's apparent disregard for the great social and financial impact of cranksters. How many times have you gone to a gas station or store and seen someone obviously under the influence in a cash handling position? A wink and a nod... "

jerry l wrote on Feb 14, 2007 1:29 PM:

" some cities publish a police log on a daily basis "

Clean and Sober wrote on Feb 14, 2007 1:54 PM:

" I am a recoverin Meth addict and a drunk. I know from experencie that if you go to jail high ir under the influence you dont just spend a couple of days. I got busted for being under the influence and I spent six months behind bars. I was only arrested once for being under the influence and I got six months. People don't know what it is like to be in jail high...it is the worse thing you could ever experience. I think people who use drugs after they have allready been in jail for the same thing are stupid people. I got arresated once for that and I never did it again. It takes more than Prop 36 to keep somebody clean. It takes Prop 36 and a live in drug treatment program. I think the the judges these days should make it a maditory thing for them to go to programs. The last program I was at saved my life from getting into more trouble or dying from an overdose. I am proud to say that I have almost 5 years clean and sober!!!! "

Meth Losers wrote on Feb 14, 2007 3:12 PM:

" Jarvis you are right, the drug laws are a joke, our prison system is a joke. Perhaps if the METH heads smoked METH in front of the judges house or our DA's house they would be put away, but the average citizen (who pays the judges and DA's salary) gets the reply, sorry we had to release the offender due to state law... Think about this...It cost more for a DUI (legal drug)(misdemeanor) then getting busted with METH (FELONY)????????????????/ "

Meth Losers wrote on Feb 14, 2007 3:15 PM:

" Clean and Sober, Way to go!!!!! the laws have changed since you were locked up....now you can get arrested 3 times before you get any real jail time.... Keep it up, you life is much better right???????????? "

Sovreign Dave wrote on Feb 14, 2007 3:53 PM:

" Hey Meth Losers, you hit the nail on the head with that last comment. The DUI laws are a scam on the public designed to reap HUGE profits from the "legal" drug they allow us to buy. So they make a pile of money from the population that they KNOW can afford to pay and has the most to lose if they try to challenge the system. It's broken bigtime and although the cops are frustrated with the revolving door, sometimes, THEY are part of the problem...case in point, DUI baby. They get big brownie points from MADD and the fees keep the state of california's administrative court system in the black. Insurance companies are in on it too. Drug addicts don't have the abil;ity to PAY cash for the crimes they commit so the system lets them go so they can incarcerate those who CAN pay. It's a joke. Want to start making a dent in the corrupt system that surrounds us? Stop paying income tax. It is voluntary anyway and when you file, you actually take a much greater chance of being convicted and going to jail than someone who does not file at all. It is on the irs.gov website for all to see. The moronic employees of government haven't a clue that law is for government, NOT people. Wake up now.... "

Guido wrote on Feb 14, 2007 6:53 PM:

" Pay attention please class! Repeat after me! Proposition 36. The fact that it is called PROPOSITION 36, should be a clue to you people that the TAXPAYERS that are paying the salary of the DA's, Judges, etc., are the same geniouses that thought drugs should be decriminalized (almost) by Prop 36. At least in drug court, the judge has the option to put someone in jail if they are not doing what they are supposed to. "

Jessica wrote on Feb 20, 2007 11:16 AM:

" My sister is a recovering Meth addict... Here is just 1 suggestion, Instead of throwing these drug addicts and alchoholics in jail... why dont you send them to a recovery program. Do you really think jail will help somebody whom is addicted? I dont. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy