The dangers of electropollution
By JOY CARLSON
It is an invisible danger that has no sound or smell but is creating chaos with all of our cells. In less than two decades, one third of the global village has embraced this new technology, spawning the multi-million dollar wireless communications industry. From cell phones to hot spots to entire wireless cities, rarely has a technology so rapidly and so profoundly transformed the world. The explosion of wireless technology has brought with it a totally new form of dangerous radiation called electropollution. Humanity is now exposed to more than 100 million times more radiation than just two decades ago.
The 100 trillion cells of the body communicate with each other by subtle low electromagnetic signals as well as through chemical reactions. Continuous exposure to electromagnetic radiation can drastically distort and disrupt these cellular communications pathways, resulting in abnormal cellular metabolism and eventually disease. Electropollution profoundly compromises the normal intercellular communication of the body. Cell function deteriorates, cell membranes harden, causing a shutdown of the cells. Now nutrients cannot get in and toxins cannot get out. Over time this leads to toxin and free radical buildup, genetic mutation, premature aging, illness and disease.
So picture this... it’s a typical morning in a Starbucks equipped with wireless Internet. You see three people involved in cell phone conversations, one sending a text message from a PDA and two surfing the Internet on laptops. Each device is transmitting to the antenna installed in the back of the store, which in turn is transmitting out. At each point the signal gets an electronic push from the device to get it going. This push, like a boat being accelerated through water, creates a wake called a near-field plume. This plume is sending out lots of radiation. Homes, wireless offices, schools, hospitals and most every workplace are now filled with cell phones, laptops, wireless networks, game stations, iPods. With the increasing world of wireless technology our world is now being blanketed with a dense fog of plumes and beams. As we work, learn, sleep and play in these environments and whether we personally use these gadgets or not, our cells are being bombarded and our cellular function is being compromised.
The most vulnerable are the children. Their cells are still growing and are filled with more fluid, thus the radiation can penetrate much faster into their cells. Disney got in the game big time recently with offers of family plans and a kid starter plans targeted to 8-to-12 year-olds. An 8-year-old child who gets a cell phone will by age 28 have used a cell phone for longer than anyone to date. Consider this: In 1970, one out of 10,000 children were diagnosed with autism. Last year, one in 166 children were diagnosed with autism. Many scientists and some doctors are now trying to get the word out that we are now starting to see genetic damage that is weakening our children’s cells, thus causing many more health challenges such as autism.
The health challenges coming from our continual exposure to electrical pollution is becoming a worldwide concern. In Europe in May, a movie is coming out showing the public about the health problems that are increasing every day with the increasing use of the electronic and wireless age, and will be here in the U.S. at the end of summer. The good news is science and medicine have experience with toxic exposure and have developed a “gold standard” for dealing with these types of problems called the public health paradigm. The paradigm always encompasses primary, secondary and tertiary interventions. Primary addresses the cause of the problem and is best accomplished by reducing or canceling out exposure. Secondary deals with the symptoms of the problem, of which the most significant is disrupted intercellular communication. Tertiary deals with stopping the problem and keeping the symptoms from coming back.
There will be a talk about this enormous problem that is affecting everyone on planet earth on Feb. 8 at the Elks Lodge at 7 p.m. Please join us and bring your questions.
(Carlson lives in Napa.)
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Hooray! wrote on Feb 6, 2007 7:06 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Feb 6, 2007 7:24 AM:
PHWYLIE wrote on Feb 6, 2007 8:45 AM:
Sandra wrote on Feb 6, 2007 8:49 AM:
come on wrote on Feb 6, 2007 9:02 AM:
Hooray! wrote on Feb 6, 2007 9:31 AM:
to serve man wrote on Feb 6, 2007 10:38 AM:
PHWYLIE wrote on Feb 6, 2007 11:08 AM:
stan wrote on Feb 6, 2007 5:21 PM:
upon further review... wrote on Feb 6, 2007 5:29 PM:
Don Hill wrote on Feb 6, 2007 6:09 PM:
mrakgraphics wrote on Feb 6, 2007 6:39 PM:
stan wrote on Feb 6, 2007 7:32 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Feb 6, 2007 9:43 PM:
stan wrote on Feb 7, 2007 6:25 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Feb 8, 2007 12:38 AM:
Rocco wrote on Feb 8, 2007 12:23 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Feb 8, 2007 2:31 PM:
Carolyn W C wrote on Feb 11, 2007 10:39 PM:
Lisa wrote on Feb 12, 2007 8:31 AM:
Patsy wrote on Feb 12, 2007 11:55 AM:
Autism wrote on Feb 12, 2007 5:26 PM:
autismvlog.com wrote on Feb 13, 2007 4:35 PM:
Heather wrote on Feb 18, 2007 12:45 PM:
Truthiness wrote on Mar 15, 2007 1:02 PM:
bioelectric wrote on Jun 23, 2009 1:29 PM:
I see an article able from truthiness about being tricked into a biopro presentation....I agree sales should be upfront and say - hey we'll give you some info, but gee we want to sell you too.
I'm getting off point, this is all just such a multi-faceted issue, with a lot of points of view. I am amazed by the people who continue to believe cell phones and technology is safe just because our government still says so. Gosh I'm just not willing to take that chance, how many times have we been told that about other things - only to be later told it's killing us. Here's some of the research I've done recently on the subject of how we're being affected. http://www.scribd.com/doc/15703516/Millions-Affected-by-the-Mysterious-Symptoms-of-a-Silent-Epidemic We can't all move to a mountain top - but we can do what we can to protect ourselves. Limit use of cell phones and other technology, get a product that Shields and strengthens your energy field (yes, yes, I know it all sounds crazy, but is it any crazier than the fact that invisible waves carry sounds and pictures and messages around the world - what's "junk science" today, frequently becomes standard knowledge within a decade. Personally I'm not going to take that chance and I'm not giving up my computer, wi-fi or cell phone. Carolyn "