NVR Logo
Taxpayers neglecting to claim phone tax refund, IRS says
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Save and Share Share
WASHINGTON — More than a third of early tax return filers are not requesting the one-time telephone tax refund entitling them to at least $30, the Internal Revenue Service said Wednesday.

The IRS notice about mistakes in requesting the refund came a week after the tax agency sent out a warning that it would take action against taxpayers and tax preparers who improperly claim large refunds from the discontinued tax.
The government last August stopped collecting the long-distance excise tax, and has authorized a refund of tax collected on service billed during the period from March 2003 to July 2006.

Those claiming a standard refund amount, which needs no documentation, will receive $30 to $60, based on the number of exemptions they claim. People making claims on the actual amount paid over the 41-month period need not send records to the IRS, but should have documents to back up their claims in case the IRS has questions.
The agency said that in addition to more than one-third of early filers using Forms 1040, 1040A and others not requesting the refund, lower income people using Form 1040EZ-T are failing to show a refund amount on Line 1a.

Others it said, are requesting refunds based on the entire amount of their phone bills, rather than the 3 percent tax on long-distance and bundled service, or requesting amounts in the hundreds or thousands of dollars.
It advised taxpayers to file electronically because electronic-filing software flags often-overlooked tax breaks. The agency also reminded taxpayers that the break does not apply to the total phone bill or taxes paid on local-only service. Taxpayers are urged to stay away from tax preparers claiming they can get hundreds of dollars or more back.

Most taxpayers can claim the one-time refund on federal excise taxes for long-distance telephone service — whether for landline, cell phone or Voice over Internet Protocol. The government stopped collecting the tax after July 2006 after businesses repeatedly fought the tax and won.
No comments posted.
Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy