NVR Logo
No ‘historic’ label for flood project
Officials eye plan to keep work moving in 2007
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Save and Share Share
Flood control officials announced disappointing news Tuesday, but they say they have found a silver lining for the nine year-old project.

Flood project officials said they failed in their recent effort to get federal officials to label the project one of national significance — a designation that would have loosened federal purse strings.
But a financial maneuver may free up money to keep construction going downtown and lay the groundwork for improvements along Napa Creek and the Napa River Oxbow.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers officials are looking over a proposed change in the agreement between their agency and the Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District the would allow the district to take money it is obligated to pay in yearly installments and advance it in a lump sum instead.
This would gather about $6.5 million for the 2007 construction season, allowing heavy equipment to remain in Napa and avoid having to break down the construction camp and burden taxpayers with the cost of rebuilding it again.

“Mobilization and demobilization, that’s a very costly endeavor and obviously it slows down your construction,” said Heather Stanton, local project manager.
The project has faced continual funding setbacks from the federal government, making a projected 2011 end date wishful thinking. Stanton said within six months the district — with the help of the Corps of Engineers — will come up with an updated schedule. That’s become something of a tradition with a project that was originally sold to Measure A voters in 1998 as something that would be finished by 2007.

But flood officials are doing everything in their own power to keep the project from falling further behind.

For example, if the flood district can advance the $6.5 million to keep construction going on downtown flood defenses along the river from the Hatt building to the First Street Bridge, that places the project in a more favorable position to use whatever federal money comes this year to handle engineering work for the Wine Train tracks and the Oxbow bypass channel.

More importantly for residents in the Napa Creek area, it also sets the flood project in a better position to use federal money to build flood defenses along that waterway.

One thing flood district officials want to make clear is the advance money is not a loan, Napa County Supervisor Bill Dodd said, but a tactic to keep the ball rolling.

“When you have to tear down construction sites and then build them back up again it costs a lot of money,” he said. “Ultimately, this was seen as a way to save the taxpayers money.”

In the meantime Stanton said the flood project’s environmental benefits still make it a candidate for national significance in the next fiscal year. There are nine projects of national significance, including the Florida Everglades and various harbors.

“We will keep pounding at it,” Stanton said. “We believe because this project embodies the future of what flood projects should be — that includes restoration — that it should jump over the hurdles.”
3 comment(s)

Napa local wrote on Jan 24, 2007 12:40 PM:

" I think the flood control project was a bad idea to begin with, with plenty of sad consequences for Napa, and I can't say I'm not glad they didn't get their "historic" label. "

That makes sense wrote on Jan 24, 2007 7:37 PM:

" "Napa local" is right. I feel the same way about guardrails, safety belts, and reinforced concrete. Who needs them? Besides, anyone can tell you it's fun to scrape mud out of your house now and then. "

Napa local wrote on Jan 24, 2007 11:43 PM:

" Don't build/live next to a river if you aren't prepared to deal with the consequences. The river will still flood despite how much we mess with it, as we witnessed last winter. Your uninspired use of sarcasm is really pathetic, take some lessons or something. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy