NVR Logo
A dream come true?
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Save and Share Share
There once was a man with a dream. Imagine if an assassin’s bullet hadn’t cut his life short.

The man, whose birthday we celebrate as a federal holiday next month, perhaps could have lived to see today. He could have lived to see that, in so many ways, we heeded his message.
Back in 1963 on the Washington Mall, he proclaimed his dream, “deeply rooted in the American dream.” He had a “dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.’”

And so here we are, facing the 2008 presidential election in which these are some of the names being floated: Barack Obama, a U.S. senator, who is black. Condoleezza Rice, the Secretary of State, who is a black woman. Hillary Clinton, who is a woman and dynastic. New Mexico governor Bill Richardson would add a Hispanic to the bill.
In other words, some color (pun intended) has been added to the presidential landscape.

They’re all in the mix with more traditional-looking possibilities — white guys. That’s what I call dream fulfillment.
Yet, we still have our hang-ups. Can America handle a woman president? A group called The White House Project exists on the assumption that women need a whole lotta affirmative action to ever make it to the West Wing. And that a woman should get there just because she’s a she.

That’s precisely the kind of attitude voters in Michigan rightly rejected this year when they voted for the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. MCRI amends the state’s constitution to outlaw “state entities from discriminating or granting preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.”

That’s what Martin Luther King Jr. was talking about. Michiganders know the dream. Americans know the dream.

Now there is the brand-new question “Can a Mormon be president?,” raised by pundits concerning the potential candidacy of outgoing Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. Will Evangelicals vote for someone they consider unChristian? Will Americans be freaked out by previously unpublicized customs and beliefs? There may be more Catholics around than Mormons, but didn’t we get over this kinda thing, say, four decades ago?

In other words: How about “May the best man or woman win”?

Or, to borrow a phrase or two: “When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, Free at last! free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

(Lopez is the editor of National Review Online.)
4 comment(s)

Kevin wrote on Dec 21, 2006 7:25 AM:

" America shouldn't elect the 'best man' (or woman)as President. We elect leaders, sometimes flawed men who who have the qualities that are needed at a specific time to accomplish what is best for the country. Think Truman and WWII. Jimmy Carter was arguably one of the smartest, most moral, compassionate Presidents we have ever had. He was also one of the worst Presidents we have ever had, unable to deal with the rampant 20% inflation, 15% interest rates, the OPEC oil embargo, Iran hostage crisis and personally responsible for financially ruining thousands of farmers by his agricultural boycott of Russia. "

yikes wrote on Dec 21, 2006 10:53 AM:

" Hilary, Condi, or Barrack... wow, whoever wins this one, we're in a lot of trouble "

Mark wrote on Dec 21, 2006 11:32 AM:

" I wouldn't hesitate to vote for the likes of a Walter Williams, or Jesse Lee Peterson, but not for Mr. Obama; He has no proven leadership record nor legistlative trail to tout at this time; plus, his childish reaction to the media comments about his ears prove he shouldn't be any where near the nuclear football; as for a lady candidate, we need the tough skin of a Hillary, but without her broom and massive baggage. If the democrats go ahead and put Obama on a ticket, it would be flagrant pandering. "

The slyest man? wrote on Dec 21, 2006 3:50 PM:

" Is that who you advocate Kevin? Why do you Trot out Truman, FDR, or JFK selectively to make your points when you wish to appeal to the distant past to shore up weak arguments? Why were only certain tools in the fight against communism acceptable? Only those your favorite heros would use? When some of the most conservative people in the U.S. were asked to make a sacrifice to aid in the defeat of this world wide evil they squealed like stuck pigs. Yet they would gladly sell grain to the U.S.S.R. and buy their tractors. What history do you select when you create your attacks? Communism was not single handedly defeated by Ronald Reagan, Bush or any single president but by the taxes of the majority of American working and middle class citizens paid, not the farmers of the mid west or well to do denizens of Wall Street. It will also be mainly working and middle class and the underclass taxes and lives that defeat the present threat not some silver spooned manikin pocketing his tax cut and avoidance of service. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy